FROM-THE- LIBRARY-OF
TRINITYCOLLEGETORONTO
PRESENTED
nev. Canon F.H. Mason
APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
APOSTOLIC
CHRISTIANITY
NOTES AND INFERENCES MAINLY
BASED ON S. PAUL'S EPISTLES
TO THE CORINTHIANS
BY
H. HENSLEY HENSON, B.D
FELLOW OF ALL SOULS* COLLEGE, OXFORD
INCUMBENT OF S. MARY'S HOSPITAL, 1LFORD
CHAPLAIN TO THE LORD BISHOP OF S. ALBAN's
RURAL DEAN OF SOUTH BARKING
METHUEN & CO.
36 ESSEX STREET, STRAND
LONDON
1898
JUN
fe?
1968
TO
ARTHUR L. STRIDE, ESQ., J.P.
THIS VOLUME IS INSCRIBED
IN TOKEN
OF SINCERE RESPECT AND AFFECTION
AND IN REMEMBRANCE OF MANY
PERSONAL KINDNESSES
PREFACE
charm of Apostolic Christianity is unique,
-1 and its importance supreme. Partly, it may
not be questioned, the natural but irrational dis
position to exalt the past at the expense of the
present explains the lofty estimate of the earliest
Church which most modern Christians have formed,
and an actual study of the extant memorials of the
first century will, to this extent, chasten and modify
that estimate. Chiefly, however, the interest of
thoughtful men in the first beginnings of the Divine
Society arises from a just conviction of the solemn
importance of the subject. It is felt on all hands
that the Christianity of history, and especially the
Christianity of contemporary history, is a very dif
ferent thing from the Christianity of the Apostles :
there is an uncomfortable suspicion in many minds
that the proportions of the Faith have been deranged,
that the intrinsically greater things have fallen into
the background, and the intrinsically lesser things
have usurped their prominence. The Church, the
Ministry, the Sacraments, the Creeds — these have, in
many minds, seemed to crowd out of view more
ultimate and august realities ; and so powerful is
the vague, almost unconscious, resentment of the
human conscience, that a wide and ever-widening
breach has silently discovered itself between religious
viii APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
men and organized religion. On all hands it is
observable that Christian men are quietly with
drawing themselves from all formal religious
observances. They neither attend public worship
nor receive the Blessed Sacrament, nor outwardly
concern themselves with religious affairs. It would
be a grave error to suppose that these people are in
any definite way opposed to Christianity. Most of
them have a real respect and admiration for Jesus
Christ, and a vague but confident belief that if only
religion were what He intended it to be, if only the
Church were again what it was in the Apostles'
times, they would eagerly profess themselves
disciples. During the years that I have lived in
East London and " London over the Border " I have
often heard vehement denunciations of the Church,
of the clergy, of the Sacraments, and of the Bible,
but I can only recall a single instance in which the
stream of invective was directed against the Founder
of Christianity, and then it provoked very manifest
repugnance. Largely, it must be admitted, this
attitude is reflected and, by an inevitable reaction,
stimulated by the so-called religious romance of the
day. Scarcely anybody reads the New Testament :
the current notions about the Gospel and the
Apostolic age are largely based on the productions
of Marie Corelli, Mr. Hall Caine, and writers of
that type. Religious sentiment and emotion are
developed by a thousand devices, while the prevail
ing conception of contemporary Christianity is often
a strange and various product of ignorance, prejudice,
and delusion. Yet I cannot escape the conviction
PREFACE ix
that there is a more legitimate foundation for the
deliberate and sustained alienation of so vast a
multitude than mere sentiment on the one hand
and mere mistake on the other.
The causes of this quiet repudiation of definite
external religious observance are not altogether
obscure. Probably few realize the gravity of the
fact that, through the rapid growth of the cities, the
main stream of the national life is now running, with
an ever increasing volume, in urban channels. Life
in a great city affects powerfully and distinctively
the development of character. I am far, indeed,
from suggesting that the urban influence is necessarily
or even generally bad ; but I am very sure that in
certain directions that influence is hostile to religion.
The passion for amusement pathetically testifies to
the deep weariness of routine, which the city-worker
chained from day to day to his office-stool, or penned
behind his counter, feels so acutely. Even the
religiously-minded men feel this revulsion against
restraint : the mass, consciously or unconsciously, are
swept along by it. The services of Religion are
found too long and too dull. Only on the condition
that they become "bright," "popular," above all,
short, will they be attended. The result is disastrous
on the public worship and on the preaching. I am
convinced that an unconscious effort to match the
tastes of the giddy and emotional urban folk, far
more than any real religious conviction or any innate
bent towards anarchy, lies at the root of the ritual
eccentricity which now distresses many sober-minded
Churchmen, and perplexes the Bishops. It is melan-
A 2
x APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
choly to observe that Religion, which should grapple
with and bring under discipline that frivolity which
is the inevitable effect of urban life, rather aspires
to conciliate and use it.
The Decline of the Pulpit is not less serious.
Here, no doubt, special causes have contributed.
The Oxford Movement was very largely a reaction
against the arid and tyrannous Evangelicalism
which oppressed the national conscience at the
beginning of this century. As the Pulpit had
been unduly magnified by the earlier movement,
so it was unduly minimized in the later. More
over, the Tractarians widened the area of clerical
interests. Church History was no longer eschewed,
though its study was severely conditioned by eccle
siastical presuppositions. Ritualism opened a new
and delightful world to the weaker members of the
Anglo-Catholic party. The Sermon was habitually
depreciated. It was made to symbolize human self-
assertion as against Divine Grace : it stood' for
"Protestantism" as against the "Catholic Church."
It is still the fashion in '''High Church" circles to
affect a great contempt for preaching : and commonly
the Sermon in " advanced " Churches faithfully re
flects the humble theory which may be supposed
to have governed its composition. It may be held
for certain that an excessive care for religious cere
mony is incompatible with a high standard of
preaching. The human mind cannot with impunity
multiply its interests. A close and affectionate
study of Ritual will leave little margin of time or
mental power for those critical, historical, and theo-
PREFACE xi
logical studies which are the indispensable conditions
of serviceable preaching to modern congregations.
A worthier obstacle to the Pulpit has been the
immense increase of parochial duties. Whether this
increase is wholly satisfactory may be doubted :
whether the time and energy bestowed on the raising
of money for a thousand objects, in the organizing
of amusements, not always of the highest kind, could
not be better employed, may well be questioned :
yet, at least, it must be conceded that the motives
which have led to that distracting multiplicity of
parochial engagements, which threatens to make
pastoral charge wholly incompatible with intellectual
self-respect, are high and unselfish motives. Here
I refer to the subject merely in its bearings on the
lamentable Decline of the Pulpit, to which I have
adverted. Of late years there has been a consider
able increase of " Home Missions." Almost every
parish of any size is subjected every few years to
the Ordeal of a " Mission." The enormous demand
for preachers has induced many of the more earnest
and eloquent clergy to cultivate an emotional and
declamatory type of preaching, which, though im
mediately effective and generally popular, is not free
from very obvious and considerable perils. I think
there are signs that the standard of Pulpit perform
ance has been appreciably lowered by the develop
ment of " Mission preaching." Finally, the Sermon
may have suffered by the competition of the religious
newspaper and the religious book, though it may
be doubted whether the readers of such are not
generally the most assiduous auditors of Sermons.
xii APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
Personally I think the influence of the press has
been indirect. The best work is now rarely put into
Sermons : it is reserved for publication. This is a
natural, but a highly undesirable practice.
It has often occurred to me that there is a con
nection between the facts just stated and the grave
difficulty which is now felt in obtaining suitable
candidates for the Christian Ministry. No doubt
the serious decline in clerical incomes has influenced
parents in choosing careers for their sons ; but there
is compensation in the thought that poverty, though
it may hinder some from entering Holy Orders,
will purify the motives of many who, with the full
knowledge of the distresses that await them, yet
put their hand to the plough of the Divine Service.
A more serious loss is inflicted on the Church when
young men of intellectual gifts and high character
turn away from Ordination because, under existing
circumstances, they cannot hope for an adequate
sphere for the exercise of their best powers.. As
matters stand now a musical voice is a better
recommendation than academic distinction, a know
ledge of athletics and theatricals outweighs habits
of intellectual industry, and a solemn sense of the
awfulness of religion. If indeed it be the case that
the Church has no use for the higher gifts of mind
and character, then it is nothing astonishing that
her Ministry has little attraction for the gifted and
devout. The higher the standard of Ministerial Duty
the more attractive will the Ministerial Life be
found : but no thoughtful and earnest man can
readily accept a career, of which the principal tasks
will be purely mechanical.
PREFACE xiii
However this may be, the broad fact now stares
the clergyman in the face that his principal instru
ment of teaching is breaking in his hands ; the
Pulpit seems to be discredited in the general mind,
it is certainly ignored in the general practice.
Therefore since teaching has always been and must
remain the chiefest function of the Christian Ministry,
the clergyman is driven to adopt various expedients
by which to recover some opportunities for fulfilling
his duty. Informal lectures, books written in a
sufficiently popular style to secure the interest of
average men, private conferences of one sort or
another — these and similar methods are resorted
to as substitutes for the Sermon.
These pages represent one modest attempt to
bring before laymen in their homes subjects which
had been better treated in Sermons, but which, since
they will neither listen to Sermons nor read them,
must be treated otherwise or not at all.
Urban life not only stimulates a passion for
amusement, it also directly ministers to the cynical,
sceptical disposition, which, not less than frivolity,
obstructs the way of Religion. English people of
the middle and lower classes, so far as I have
observed, are not as a general rule well disposed
towards definite infidelity ; but they seem to be
falling into a vague unbelief, which does not care
enough about spiritual things to positively contradict,
but which tacitly rejects the teachings of the Gospel.
There is a widely-extended distrust of the good faith
of the clergy in matters of Religion. It is thought
that language is used in the pulpit which does not
xiv APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
correspond with any actual convictions. The de
structive aspects of Biblical criticism are becoming
generally known, and something like contempt is
not rarely expressed at the unrelaxed hold on the
least defensible views which the clergy, in too many
cases, display. With this contempt it is difficult not
to feel a measure of sympathy. The timidity of the
clergy scarcely respects the boundaries of Christian
principle when it insists on ignoring the conclusions
of Biblical Science. The manly attitude of S. Paul
condemns such nervous dishonesty : — " Therefore
seeing we have this Ministry, even as we obtained
mercy, we faint not ; but we have renounced the
hidden things of shame, not walking in craftiness,
nor handling the Word of God deceitfully; but
by the manifestation of the truth commending
ourselves to every man's conscience in the sight
of God."*
The most urgent necessity of the present juncture
seems to be the recovery of public confidence in- the
clergy. As one step, and a considerable one towards
that end, I have urged, as well by example as by
precept, the general adoption of the Revised Version
in the public services of the Church. Without deny
ing or minimizing the faults of that Version, I submit
as an absolutely incontrovertible proposition, that for
all the purposes which a Version of the Bible exists
to serve, it is the best Version in existence. To go
on using an inferior Version, when a superior is
accessible, is not in my deliberate judgment to be
reconciled with pastoral integrity. I need say no
* 2 Cor. iv. r, 2.
PREFACE xv
more to explain my use of the Revised Version in
this volume.
Urban life, it must be added, tends always towards
sensuality. In the first century this was certainly
the case ; by many melancholy and scandalous
tokens we know that in this respect the nineteenth
century can claim no exemption from the same
burden. Personally I am convinced that the most
formidable obstacle to Christianity at this moment
is the wasting and furtive viciousness which, in many
forms, corrupts our city population. Drunkenness
is a lesser evil than sensuality ; it is neither so
degrading to the character, nor so deadening to the
soul. Weizacker speaks of " the gigantic war which
Christendom in general, and Paul in particular, had
to wage with immorality." The same formula might
be employed to express the duty of the modern
Church. Unhappily it does not express the actual
procedure of the Church as a whole.
Frivolity, cynical scepticism, sensuality — these
notes of urban life are always recognizable. Two
millenniums of Christianity have not altered the
inveterate characteristics of great cities. Apostolic
Christianity — as Professor Ramsay has reminded us —
was almost exclusively urban. Hence the study at
every point suggests parallels to contemporary ex
perience, and it is literally true to say that the least
archaic period of ecclesiastical history is the most
remote.
The Apostolic Age has been of late years made
known to us by the labours of many brilliant and
indefatigable students, The effect of their work is
xvi APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
a new revelation. The first beginnings of Christianity
are now understood, as they have never been under
stood before. The conflict of the critics over the
documents has incidentally brought together a mass
of information about the first century, which enables
the English student at the end of the nineteenth
century to appreciate the standpoints and sympathize
with the difficulties of the Christians of Jerusalem
and Corinth, to whom the Apostles preached.
Unhappily the rank and file of English Churchmen
are still suspicious and fearful of the new knowledge.
They read their New Testament, or neglect to read
it, with the paramount conviction that it is all a
solemn and blessed miracle, which has no real con
nection with actual, normal human experience. To
such I respectfully address this volume. The history
of its origin is briefly this. I read the Corinthian
Epistles with classes of men both in Barking and
in Ilford, and found it serviceable to put together
into separate addresses the leading subjects dealt
with by the Apostle. These were found helpful,
and I was urged by many, both laymen and clergy
(to whom my notes were submitted), to bring the
whole into connected form and publish it. This
account of the origin of this book will, perhaps,
go some way towards explaining some sufficiently
obvious faults of arrangement and style.
This volume, it is hardly necessary to explain,
is not addressed to scholars, nor does it attempt
an exact or continuous interpretation of the Corin
thian Epistles, on which, nevertheless, it may be
called in some sense a commentary. I have through-
PREFACE xvil
out endeavoured to be honest and clear, not greatly
regarding a certain looseness of arrangement if only
the broad outlines of the subject could be plainly
marked. I have not scrupled to draw practical
inferences ; and though I have tried not to read into
the first century the ideas of the nineteenth, yet I
have everywhere assumed the continuity of eccle
siastical life.
I fear that repetition has not been as successfully
avoided as I could wish. Partly this arises from the
circumstance that the first four chapters were
originally composed as a thesis independently of the
rest of the book, which, as I have said, was in the
first instance designed for public delivery. This also
may explain a certain difference of style.
References have only been given when it seemed
to me desirable to indicate to the reader either the
authority for an opinion which might seem novel,
or the direction in which fuller information might
be obtained. I have given the Greek text of quota
tions from the New Testament wherever it seemed
to me that anything turned upon an exact rendering
of the original. Histories of the Apostolic Age
abound, and there are numerous commentaries on
the Epistles to the Corinthians. Many of these I
have used.
It will be manifest on every page how much I owe
to the works of Re*nan, Weizacker, Godet, Ramsay,
Hort, and Bishop Lightfoot. Perhaps I may be
permitted to make special mention of two authors —
the one a great preacher of the fourth century, the
other a great preacher of the nineteenth — S. Chry-
xviii APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
sostom and F. W. Robertson. Both have taught
me much; both considered the Corinthian Epistles
of S. Paul from the standpoint of men set to teach
civilized people under urban conditions ; and both,
therefore, enter into the Apostle's mind more deeply
than more learned exegetes.
If this little book shall induce in anyone a desire
to know something more about the great subject
of which it treats, my labour will not have been
thrown away. To me it has been a labour of love,
from which I rise with the conviction that in the
Apostolic Age the latest Christian century must
find its guidance. In reverting to first principles the
Church must recover that Christian allegiance which
she has now so largely forfeited. We are haunted
and burdened by the idiosyncrasies of the later
history. We are slaves to the fourth century, or
to the Ages of Faith, or to the Reformation, or
to the Zeitgeist of our own generation. Hence our
impossible demands, our obdurate divisions, Our
desperate rivalries. Behind all that long apostasy
we call Church History is the Age of the Apostles,
when the mind of the Spirit was reflected in the
life of the Society with a fidelity which has never
since been witnessed. There we may discover the
original principles of Christianity, return to which
is the supreme spiritual necessity of our time.
CONTENTS
PART I.
THE APOSTOLIC ECCLESIA, OR LOCAL CHURCH
PAGE
I. INFLUENCE OF THE SYNAGOGUE ON THE ORGANIZATION
OF THE ECCLESIA . . ... 3
II. LIMITS TO AUTONOMY OF THE LOCAL ECCLESIA . 7
III. DISCIPLINE OF THE RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLIES . . 16
IV. MORAL DISCIPLINE OF THE LOCAL ECCLESIA . . 34
PART II.
PRELIMINARY DATA
CHAP.
I. THE EPISTLES OF S. PAUL . . 41
II. THE FOUNDING OF THE CHURCH IN CORINTH . . 54
III. THE LETTER FROM CORINTH 66
PART III.
DOCTRINE AND THE SACRAMENTS
I. THE HISTORIC CHRIST . . 81
II. THE RESURRECTION . . ... 94
III. THE CORINTHIAN HERETICS . . . . 107
IV. THE APOSTOLIC CREED . . . . 120
V. BAPTISM . . . ... 134
VI. THE HOLY COMMUNION . . . 150
xx APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
PART IV.
ORGANIZATION AND PRACTICE
CHAP. PAGK
I. THE CHURCH . . • *73
II. THE MINISTRY . . . 187
III. PUBLIC WORSHIP . • 201
IV. THE GIFT op TONGUES • • 214
V. MIRACLES . . . 227
VI. THE CHRISTIAN PROPHETS . . • 239
VII. WOMEN IN THE CHURCH . . 252
VIII. APOSTOLIC FINANCE . . . 266
IX. CONCLUSIONS . . ... 282
APPENDICES
I. S. PAUL'S TEACHING IN CORINTH . . 297
II. APOSTOLIC SUCCESSION . . . 3°°
III. CONFESSION . . . 306
IV. CELIBACY . . ... 312
TWO DISCOURSES
I. THE ADMINISTRATION OF HOLY BAPTISM IN LARGE
URBAN PARISHES . . ... 319
II. THE SOCIAL INFLUENCE OF CHRISTIANITY . . 336
PART I.
THE APOSTOLIC ECCLESIA
OR LOCAL CHURCH
I. INFLUENCE OF THE SYNAGOGUE ON THE ORGANIZATION
OF THE ECCLESIA
II. LIMITS TO THE AUTONOMY OF THE LOCAL ECCLESIA
III. DISCIPLINE OF THE RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLIES
IV. INTERNAL DISCIPLINE OF THE LOCAL ECCLESIA
B
THE APOSTOLIC ECCLESIA
OR LOCAL CHURCH
I. INFLUENCE OF THE SYNAGOGUE ON THE
ECCLESIA.
Church of Christ received from the Divine
-L Founder no rigid and detailed constitution.
Neither the faith, nor the government, nor the
discipline of the Christian society were defined in
advance. The Apostles, to whom the task of
founding the Church was given, were assured the
presence of the guiding ''Spirit of Truth," and sent
out into the world to learn by experiment and failure
the right methods of organization. The conditions
under which they went about their work were difficult
and various. In Palestine they acted under the over
mastering influence of ancestral Judaism : when the
Gospel had spread beyond the limits of Palestine it
advanced still on Jewish lines. The synagogues of
the Hellenistic Diaspora became the first preaching
centres of the Christian Faith in Gentile lands, and
the earliest models of Church organization. More
over, the fact that without exception the Apostles
were Jews, and particularly that the most active
missionary of them all, Paul of Tarsus, was a
Rabbinist of distinction, tended to strengthen the
3
4 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
influence of the old system upon the development
of the new. The Christian Church was literally the
off-spring of the synagogue. In Jerusalem we learn
from the Epistle of S. James* that the name "syna
gogue" was actually applied to the Christian assembly.
Probably this was customary throughout the Jewish
congregations. The record of the Acts suggests that
the Apostles hoped and even expected to win over to
Christianity entire synagogues. They were frankly
admitted as co - religionists by the synagogue
authorities, and allowed in the ordinary course of
the worship to advocate the Messianic claims of
Jesus Christ. Thus S. Luke records of Paul and
his company that at Antioch, in Pisidia, " they went
into the synagogue on the Sabbath, and sat down.
And after the reading of the law and the prophets
the rulers of tJie synagogue sent unto them, saying,
Brethren, if ye have any word of exhortation for
the people, say on."\ The synagogue was, indeed,
the common starting-point of evangelistic , work.
At Iconium, at Thessalonica, at Bercea, at Corinth,
at Ephesus we read that S. Paul began his
preaching of the Gospel in the local synagogue.
The authorities were extremely long - suffering ; in
no case does it appear that the Apostle was refused
permission to preach, or promptly ejected after
the nature of his preaching had become evident.
Even at Thessalonica, J where the Jews showed
themselves very hostile, we read that the Chris
tian preaching was tolerated for three successive
* S. James ii. 2. f Acts xiii. 14, 15.
± Acts xvii. 2.
THE APOSTOLIC ECCLESIA 5
Sabbaths. At Corinth* the narrative suggests that
a considerable time elapsed before the violent breach
with the synagogue, and at Ephesusf it is on record
that S. Paul continued his preaching in the syna
gogue for no less than three months. It would be
no extravagant assumption that in many instances
the Apostles succeeded in carrying with them the
entire synagogue, which passed without difficulty
from Judaism to Christianity.! But where this was
not so, and the Christian synagogue came into
existence as a Schismatic congregation, it is certain
that the general system of the parent synagogue
would be maintained in the separated body.§ At
Corinth and at Ephesus the transition was abrupt
and violent. S. Paul made his final departure from
the Corinthian synagogue with every demonstration
of anger. The violence of the Jews was met by an
outburst of righteous resentment. " When they
opposed themselves and blasphemed he shook out his
raiment, and said unto them, Your blood be on your
own heads : I am clean : from henceforth I will go
unto the Gentiles" This indignant language was
immediately followed by decisive action. The
Apostle organized a Christian synagogue in the
house of a Corinthian proselyte who dwelt hard by
the synagogue of the Jews. The real meaning of
his conduct was evident when Crispus, the ruler of
the synagogue (6 apxi(njvaywyo<i)y professed himself
a believer, and joined the new society. Much the
same course was followed at Ephesus : there the
* Acts xviii. 4. f Acts xix. 8.
£ v. B. L. HATCH, p. 60. § B. L. HATCH, p. 60 62.
6 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
schoolroom of Tyrannus served to shelter the new
Christian community which organized itself as a
rival synagogue outside the limits of Israel. These
conspicuous examples were undoubtedly typical of
the common procedure. Everywhere outside the
Jewish synagogue was formed a rival, organized on
the same lines and preserving unaltered the same
aspect. The influx of Gentile converts must have
quickly affected the organization of these Christian
synagogues. New conditions of existence involved
new problems, and the solution of those problems
necessitated extensive modification of the original
Jewish model. The history of the Church in Corinth
enables us to follow the course of development. The
conditions under which that Church took shape were
thoroughly representative. Originating in a secession
from the Jewish synagogue, it rapidly attracted the
Gentiles, until it became predominantly non-Jewish.
The society to which the Pauline Epistles are
addressed is clearly composed mostly of converts
from heathenism. Apostolic discipline represents a
compromise between the tradition of the Jewish
synagogue and the needs of the Gentile disciples.
The compromise was gradually reached, for the
needs to which it was adapted only revealed them
selves gradually, but throughout this was its character
— an adaptation of the original Hebrew system to
the changed circumstances and wider functions of a
Christian Ecclesia.
THE APOSTOLIC ECCLESIA
II. LIMITS TO AUTONOMY OF THE ECCLESIA.
The original Christian Ecclesia, as it is pictured
in the Corinthian Epistles, was by no means destitute
of the machinery of government. Whether there
existed a ministry in the traditional Christian sense
may be fairly questioned. The idea of a free republic
rather than that of a society governed by an ordained
ministry is suggested by the Apostle's language : yet
this freedom was neither absolute nor unrestricted.
Large, indeed, were the powers of the Corinthian
Ecclesia, but they were subjected to four important
authorities. These must be carefully considered.
I. Laws of Christ.
The supreme and ultimate authority was the
commandment of Christ. It is certain that at the
time when the Corinthian Epistles were written
(probably in A.D. 57) the Evangelic tradition had
not been committed to writing. The oral Gospel,
agreeing, we may believe, in the main with the can
onical narratives, varied considerably in detail. Yet
wherever it could be adduced, the Authority of the
Divine Founder was final. Thus in the discussion on
the right of the Christian ministry to maintenance by
the Church. S. Paul, after advancing arguments
drawn from the practice of the older Apostles, from
the analogy of common life, from the practice of
contemporary Judaism, reaches the climax of his
reasoning in the words, "Even so did the Lord ordain
8 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
that they which proclaim the Gospel should live of the
Gospeir *
Whether we understand these words as a free
rendering of Christ's language addressed to the
Twelve, according to the first Synoptic, f to the
Seventy according to the third,J or as a separate
" logion " which has no place in the Canonical
Gospels, it makes no matter. The Apostle evi
dently adduces the authority of our Lord as closing
the question. Similarly, when dealing with the
difficult subject of domestic ties, which had been
submitted to his judgment by the Corinthians, S.
Paul sharply distinguishes his own authority from
that of Christ. " Unto the married I give charge, yea
not /, but the Lord, . . . but to the rest say 7, not the
Lord"§ At that early stage, when the memory of
the Life of the Founder was yet fresh in Christian
minds, the authority of Christ, the Lord, as He was
emphatically styled, was conceived as immediate
as well as final. Discipleship resolved itself into
the frank and affectionate recognition of that
supreme and operative Lordship. While the tra
dition of the Founder was recent and powerful, the
lesser authority of the Christian society played but
little part in the history ; but manifestly, as the
years passed, that tradition tended to grow weaker,
and as it waned the ecclesiastical power, properly so
called, continuously waxed.
* i Cor. ix. 14. t S. Matt. x. 10.
J S. Luke x. 7, 8. § I Cor. vii. 10-12.
THE APOSTOLIC ECCLESIA 9
2. Mosaic Law and Old Testament.
S. Paul certainly regarded the Christian Ecclesia
to be subject to the Jewish law so far as it dealt with
morals. He assumes among his converts a complete
acceptance of the Jewish Scriptures. His quotations
from the Old Testament presuppose in his readers a
familiarity with the sacred writings. Undoubtedly
the Greek Version of the Canon was generally known
throughout the sphere of the synagogue, and its
acceptance was naturally transferred from the syna
gogue to the society, which found in the synagogue
its origin and its model. Examples of an appeal to
the Scripture are numerous in the Corinthian Epistles.
Fornication is condemned by a reference to the Book
of Genesis. " The twain, saith he, shall become one
flesh"* The Mosaic rule, " Thou shalt not muzzle
the ox when he treadeth out the corn" is applied to
the case of the Christian minister claiming mainte
nance from the Ecclesia which he serves.! The
history of Israel supplies precedents of warning or
encouragement. Indeed, the Apostle ascribes to the
Corinthian Church the character of sacred distinc
tion which belonged to the chosen people. To his
thinking the Ecclesia succeeded to the position
which the synagogue had forfeited.! The ex
periences of ancient Israel are the heritage of the
spiritual Israel of Christian believers. " For I would
not, brethren, have you ignorant, how that our fathers
* I Cor. vi. 16 = Genesis ii. 24. f i Cor. ix. 9.
t cf. Gal. vi. 16, where S. Paul calls the Church "the Israel of
God."
io APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
were all under the cloud, and passed through the sea.
. . . Now these things were our examples . . . now these
things happened unto them by way of example : and
they were written for our admonition, upon whom
the ends of the ages are come"* The silence of
women in the religious assemblies is based on the
Mosaic law, by which we must understand the Rab
binic tradition in which S. Paul had been trained.
" Let the women keep silence in the churches : for it is
not permitted tmto them to speak ; but let them be in
subjection, as also saith the law!' f
These direct references to the Jewish law by no
means adequately express the extent of the restric
tion on Christian liberty involved in the Apostle's
assumption that the Church was the true successor
of the synagogue, and as such subject to the moral
rules, not only of Scripture but also of the established
Rabbinic tradition.
3. Apostolic Authority.
Moreover, the Church was subject to the Apostolic
Authority, and in S. Paul's hands that authority
was neither narrow in range nor feeble in exercise.
It is evident that the Apostle claimed for himself
over the Churches which he founded an authority
supreme within the limits of his apostolic com
mission, divine in essence, independent, therefore,
of external control, and unaffected by human judg
ment, which could be exercised either in person,
or by letter, or by a duly accredited envoy. S. Paul
* I Cor. x. i, 6, II. t i Cor. xiv. 34.
THE APOSTOLIC ECCLESIA 11
dwells much on his own authority, and resents,
almost passionately, the attacks upon it, which were
both frequent and vigorous.
He planted the Church [eyo> e<f>vrev<Ta, in. 6] ; in so
doing he was indeed a fellow-worker with God.
[Qeov yap eV/xei/ crvvepyol, Hi. 9.] He is the wise
master-builder [<ro<£o? apxtrcKrcov, in. 10], who has
laid the one foundation [Oe/meXiov] on which all the
rest must build, either well or ill. He repudiates
human judgment as indifferent, and indeed irrelevant,
in the case of one who holds a Divine Commission
to be the servant of Christ and steward of the
mysteries of God. [ovrws rj/mas Xoyife<r0a> avOpwTros, to?
VTrrjperas XpiarTOv KOI oiKov6fj.ov<s jmvtTTtjplcov Qeov, iv. I.]
This, indeed, might be said of all Christian ministers,
but he was the spiritual father of the Corinthians,
and as such could claim over them an unique
authority. He addressed them not merely as a tutor
[Trcu^aycoyoY], but as the father who " in Christ Jesus
had begotten them through the Gospel" (iv. 14, 15.)
This authority he would exert in gentleness, but
if necessary with severity, [ri OeXere ; ev pd/SSco
e\6o) TT/OO? v/ma<? ; // ev ayaTnj 7rvev/J.ctTi re TrpcwTrjTOS ;
iv. 21.] His relation of Founder authorized him
to claim from the Corinthians a provision for his
maintenance [^ OVK eyofj.ev e^ovcriav (frayetv Kal
TTietv, ix. 4], but this right he had not exercised,
preferring not to associate his preaching with any
personal claims, however legitimate, (ix. 15-17.)
The " traditions " [Trapadoa-ei?] which he had delivered
to the Corinthians were binding upon them. (xi. 2.)
In case of doubt as to their application the reference
12 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
lay to him, and from his decision there was no
appeal. He was the channel through which the
Evangelic History had reached them, and he neces
sarily determined its practical bearings. He speaks
by way of command rather than of exhortation or
advice, and though he is careful to separate his
personal opinion from his inspired decision, it does
not appear that he would tolerate any disregard
of the less authoritative utterance. In the second
epistle, which has much the appearance of a personal
"Apologia," S. Paul dwells at length* on his position
towards the Churches of his own foundation. He
evidently considers himself exclusively charged with
their spiritual oversight, and pathetically declares
that besides his normal sufferings at the hands of
persecutors and opponents, "there is that which
presseth upon me daily, anxiety for all the Churches" t
As the Churches grew more numerous, and
were scattered over a wider area, the Apostle
found himself compelled to exercise his episcopal
functions by means of messengers and of letters.
To this necessity the Church owes those incom
parable compositions, the Epistles of S. Paul, which,
originally called forth by special emergencies, were
made the vehicles of eternal truth, and rapidly
secured among Christians the supreme position
which they merited, and which in the next century
caused them to take rank as inspired Scripture.
M, Renan has pointed out that the idea of utilizing
epistles t as instruments of government was not
* Especially 2 Cor. x. 7-16. t 2 Cor. xi. 28.
J R£NAN, S. Paul, p. 228.
THE APOSTOLIC ECCLESIA. 13
original, but borrowed, in common with so much else,
from the practice of the synagogue. In S. Paul's
hands, however, the Epistle became, as we have said,
not merely a means of ruling congregations, but also
of teaching religion. Finally, in the administration
of discipline within the local Churches S. Paul held
himself to be supreme. He issued his sentence from
a distance, and determined both the character and
the duration of punishment. But to this point we
shall recur at a later stage of our inquiry.
4. General Custom of Ecclesia.
The local Churches were self-governing, but not
independent. The general custom of the Christian
society was held to be binding on particular con
gregations. This recognition of the unity of the
Church was seriously threatened at Corinth, where
tendencies to ecclesiastical individualism were un
usually strong. The behaviour of women in the
religious assemblies was a case in point. It appears
that some of the Corinthian women ventured to
appear unveiled in the congregation, and actually
usurped a share in the conduct of service. S. Paul's
Rabbinic training rendered such licence particularly
abhorrent to him ; his good sense warned him that
the gravest offence, possibly leading to a rupture
of Communion, would be given to the Churches
of Judaea. Moreover, he had but too good reason
for suspecting the moral effect of such perilous
liberty upon the Corinthian community. He con
demns the conduct of the women as an unwarrantable
14 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
departure from the general practice of the Christian
society. He concludes the discussion about veiling
with this brusque observation : " But if any man
seemeth to be contentious [<f>i\6v€iKO$], we have no such
custom [aruwjOetav], neither the Churches of God" *
and he closes his prohibition of the public prophesy
ing of the women still more peremptorily. " What ?
was it from you that the Word of God went forth ?
or came it unto you alone ? " t The Apostolic Church
[ was assuredly not "congregational" in the modern
sense, any more than it was " presbyterian " or
"episcopal " : the notion of an external unityj
superior to local particularism and restraining it,]
Jdid certainly exist ; and in the autocracy of the
[Apostles over the Churches which they planted was
the principle of the later episcopal regime. In face
of the evidence of the Acts and the Pastoral Epistles
kt seems difficult to deny that the notion of trans
mitting ministerial authority by a formal act_of
prdination was established in the earliest Church.
[From these premisses the conclusion of episcopacy
kvould seem to be as logically irresistible as it has
been historically evident.
Official Ministry. Thus the local Churches in
the Apostolic period were held together in a loose,
but not ineffective union. The task of maintaining
order within those little communities must have
devolved upon officials. The synagogue, upon which
the Christian Ecclesia was modelled, had its duly
ordained officials ; it is barely conceivable that these
could have been dispensed with in the new societies.
* I Cor. xi. 16. t I Cor. xiv. 36.
THE APOSTOLIC ECCLESIA 15
It is not, indeed, necessary to assume that in those
early days there existed the sharply defined " orders "
of a later age, but that some ministry existed, how
soever designated or regarded, seems to be proved
by the Pauline Epistles. Possibly, as Weizacker
suggests, the earliest converts became the first
ministers.* In their houses would the little con
gregation of converts ordinarily come together, and
their claim to the submission of their brethren would
be largely based on the substantial services which
they rendered to the common cause.
It must, however, be conceded that the regular
ordained ministry was, in Apostolic times, dwarfed
by the exceptional ministries which then principally
engaged the attention of the Church. The diffusion
of extraordinary gifts rendered the maintenance of
order extremely difficult. At Corinth it is probable
that the circumstances were exceptional, but every
where in the Apostolic age the " deacon," the
" presbyter," and the " episcopos " count for little
beside the " apostle," the " prophet," the " speaker
in a tongue." It is remarkable that neither when
rebuking the disorders which disgraced the Agape,
and even the Eucharist, nor when regulating the
procedure of the normal religious assemblies at
Corinth, does S. Paul address himself to those who,
on the hypothesis that an ordained ministry existed
in that Church, must have been primarily responsible
for the disorders and the natural agents of reform
ation.
* Vide Apostolic Age, vol. ii. p. 320; cf. also HORT, Christian
Ecclesia, p. 117.
16 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
III. DISCIPLINE OF THE RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLIES,
i. Domestic.
The religious assemblies were either domestic
or public. To the former none but the baptized
had access; the latter appear to have been open to
the entrance of the heathen [a-jna-roij I Cor. xiv. 22],
and perhaps were designed with a view to their
conversion. The domestic assemblies were the
Agapae or Love-feasts, and the Lord's Supper.* At
this early time these were united, the Agape forming
a preliminary to the more solemn rite.t Later,
probably as a consequence of the persecutions, the
Agape was wholly discontinued, and the Holy
Communion transferred to the early morning. This
arrangement, originating under the pressure of
calamity, speedily commended itself as convenient,
and from the second century until the nineteenth
the practice of celebrating the Holy Eucharist in
the evening has been abandoned.
That grave disorders had made their appearance
in the Corinthian Church is evident from S. Paul's
letter. The Corinthians carried over into their
Agapae the licentious and ostentatious habits of their
prae-Christian life. The Apostle's indignant language
conveys a melancholy picture of excess and anti
social arrogance. The Corinthians, when they came
together for the Agape, drew apart in cliques, severed
from one another by doctrinal differences or by variant
customs. The mutual dislike and suspicion of these
* S. Jude 12. t S. Peter xi. 13.
THE APOSTOLIC ECCLESIA 17
factions destroyed the harmony and threatened the
unity of the Ecclesia. More scandalous, however,
was the ostentatious gluttony of the wealthier
members, and the evident hunger of the poorer.
It would seem that at Corinth everyone brought
with him not — as was the later and more creditable
practice — a contribution to the common provision, but
his own supper. The rich ate to excess, the poor had
little or nothing ; and when in due course the Agape
was succeeded by the Mysteries of the Eucharist the
awful profanity of drunken communicants might be
observed. " When therefore ye assemble yourselves
together \ it is not possible to eat the Lord's Supper :
[KvpictKov SeiTrvov <f>ayeiv] for in your eating each one
taketh before other his own supper : and one is hungry
and another is drunken. What ? have ye not houses
to eat and to drink in ? or despise ye the Church of
God [;/ TJ;? eK\\r]cria$ TOU Oeov Ka.Ta<f)pov€iT€\ and put
them to shame that have not ? " After rehearsing the
history of the Institution of the Eucharist, and
pointing out in terms of the greatest solemnity the
guiltiness of the Corinthians, the Apostle concludes,
" Wherefore, my brethren, when ye come together to eat,
wait one for another. If any man is hungry let him
eat at home : that your coming together be not unto
judgment" [u/a IJLYJ el? Kpt/ma crvvepxivOe, 1 Cor. xi.
20, 21 ; 33, 34.]
2. Public.
Quite distinct from the Agape and the Lord's
Supper, which followed it, was the public service of
the Church. The former were domestic and social,
C
i8 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
the latter was public and didactic. It may safely be
asserted that the ordinary service of the synagogue
provided the model upon which the public service of
the Ecclesia was formed. The reading of the Old
Testament, probably in the Septuagint Version, and
in fixed portions or lessons, the recitation and singing
of the Psalms, the offering of prayer, and preaching
were common to both. Very early the practice was
introduced of reading the Apostolic Epistles, and,
when the Evangelic tradition had been committed to
writing, the Gospel narratives,* S. Paul instructs the
Colossians not only to read in the public assembly
of the Church the Epistle which he had addressed
to them, but to forward it to the Church of the Lao-
diceans for similar public reading, and to receive in
exchange the Epistle from Laodicea.t The arrange
ment of the congregation customary in the Jewish
was reproduced in the Christian synagogue. In both
women were present, and joined in the singing and
the " Amen " ; but in neither were they permitted to
appear unveiled, or to take any prominent share in
the service. It appears that the men prayed un
covered, according to the general custom of the
Greeks. The practice of veiling the head in token
of reverence and penitence, which certainly prevailed
among the later Jews, did not perhaps obtain in
the Apostolic age4 Possibly there was a formal
allocation of seats to the " unbelievers " who attended
these assemblies, such as was customary in the next
century.
These arrangements, borrowed from the syna-
* S. Mark xiii. 14. f Col. iv. 16. £ I Cor. xiv. 16.
THE APOSTOLIC ECCLESIA 19
gogue, were necessarily modified by the conditions
under which the Christian Ecclesia existed. On the
one hand, the extraordinary diffusion of xaPicrfJLaTa'
on the other hand, the rapid expansion of the society
by the admission of converts from heathenism, neces
sarily affected the constitution and order of the
Ecclesia. The fourteenth chapter of the first Cor
inthian Epistles throws a strong light on the subject,
and must, therefore, receive the close attention of the
student of Apostolic Christianity.
S. Paul evidently combats an exaggerated estimate
of the socially valueless x<*Pl°'V'a> described by the
ambiguous expression, speaking yAoW# or yXaWai?.
He contrasts it very disadvantageously with the
XapKr/jLct of 7rpo<f»]T6ia. The basis of his judgment
is the assumption that the measure of worth is the
power to edify. " He that speaketh in a tongue edifieth
himself, but he that prophesieth edifieth the Church.
Now I would have you all speak with tongues, but
rather that ye should prophesy : and greater is he that
prophesieth than he tJiat speaketh with tongues, except he
interpret, that the Church may receive edifying" (1/^.4,5).
Here it may be noticed that the Apostle evidently
contemplates the very widest diffusion of xa/o/o-/xara.
There is no suggestion of an official ministry, charged
with the conduct of " Divine Service." S. Paul as
sumes the possibility, and even the desirableness of
an arrangement by which, without confusion, every
member (no doubt, every adult male member) of
the Ecclesia should lead the public devotions. He
rebukes the disorderly exercise of the xap'i(TlJ-a'ra:
he does not deprecate all exercise. " What is it.
20 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
then, brethren ? When ye come together, each one hath
a psalm, hath a teaching, hath a revelation, hath a
tongue, hath an interpretation" There was no agree
ment beforehand as to the nature and order of the
religious exercises, nor yet any settled principle by
which the exercise of the xapi(TlULaTa might be
directed and restrained. The Ecclesia tended to
present to view a scandalous spectacle of disorder
and competitive display. The Apostle lays down
the broad principle, "Let all things be done to
edifying',' and proceeds to apply the rules of the
synagogue to remedy the confusions of the Church.
The Rabbins required that the reading and interpret
ing of the Scripture should be orderly, the ministers
succeeding one another in due rotation.* So in the
Ecclesia. " If any man speaketh in a tongue, let it be
by two, or at the most three, and that in turn : and
let one interpret : but if there be no interpreter, let him
keep silence in the Church : and let him speak to
himself and to God. And let the prophets Speak by
two or three, and let the others discern. [SictKpiveraxrav.]
But if a revelation be made to another sitting by, let
the first keep silence? It would seem that the
prophets formed a distinct class, and sate together
in the assembly. But they were not officials. The
prophetic inspiration might come upon any member
of the Ecclesia, and its character was "discerned" or
recognized by infallible tokens. Once admitted into
the category of the prophets, the position seems to
have been permanently retained. S. Paul refused to
allow the strength of the prophetic impulse to be
* LlGHTFOOT, Works, xii. 542.
THE APOSTOLIC ECCLESIA 21
pleaded as an excuse for breaking up the order of the
worship. Disorder could not be justified : it involved
an insult to the Author of all order. " For ye all can
prophesy one by one, that all may learn, and all may be
comforted : and the spirits of the prophets are subject to
the prophets, for God is not a God of confusion, but of
peace: as in all the Churches of the Saints"* The
Apostle takes for granted that his counsels, con
ceived in the interests of order, will be affirmed by
the genuine prophets. He boldly proposes such
affirmation as a test of genuineness. " If any man
thinketh himself to be a prophet, or spiritual, let
him take knowledge of the things which I write
unto you, that they are the commandment of the
Lord'' (y. 37.) The ideal which he offers to the
Corinthians unites the highest appreciation of the
XapKTfjLara with the keenest jealousy of disorder-
" Wherefore, my brethren, desire earnestly to pro
phesy, and forbid not to speak with tongues. But
let all things be done decently and in order" [Trcu/ra
(5e evcrxilu-ovGi)? KOI Kara TOL^IV yivea-Oco.]
The necessity of thus laying stress on the im
portance of order was evident from another point
of view. The heathen were wont to attend the
meetings of the Ecclesia, and the impressions they
received determined their permanent attitude towards
Christianity. There was much suspicion of the new
religion among them, and the malignant jealousy
of the Jews was at all times eager to minister to that
suspicion the stimulus and direction of malicious
suggestion. It was clearly important to vigilantly
* xiv. 31-33.
22 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
guard against discreditable appearances, which, in
the existing state of opinion, could hardly fail to
receive the worst possible construction. S. Paul is
fully awake to this danger, and warns the Corinthians
against it. He describes the case of a simple heathen,
drawn by curiosity to visit the Christian Assembly.
He is startled by the confused and meaningless
clamour of the " unknown tongue," which in the
extravagance of unrestrained enthusiasm is poured
forth at once from many persons. His astonishment
is quickly replaced by disgust, and he leaves the
meeting convinced that Christians are the victims
of insanity. Against this melancholy picture the
Apostle sets the case of a man who has found
himself encountered by the solemn, spirit-searching
utterances of the prophets, as in due order they
succeeded one another in speaking to men "edifica
tion, and comfort, and consolation'' He feels irre
sistibly that he is in a divine presence ; his conscience
is stirred, his fears are waked, and he lends a willing
and respectful audience to the Gospel. " If therefore
the whole Church be gathered together, and all speak
with tongues, and there come in men unlearned or
unbelieving [iSiurrat r\ cn^crroi], will they not say that
ye are mad ? But if all prophesy, and there come in
one unbelieving or unlearned, he is reproved [eXeyxeraf]
by all, he is judged [avaKplverai] by all: the secrets of
his heart are made manifest : and so he will fall down
on his face and worship God, declaring that God is
among you indeed"*
* xiv. 23-25.
THE APOSTOLIC ECCLESIA 23
3. Moral Discipline.
The close contact with the heathen in the
necessary intercourse of urban life forced into
prominence the organization of an effective moral
discipline. The paramount character of Apostolic
Christianity in a great heathen city was that of
revolt against the established morality. The
ancients were sufficiently familiar with novelties in
doctrine to regard with equanimity the addition
of one more religious theory to the many already
in existence.* The variety of rites and ceremonies
was so great that if the Christian observances had
been far more novel than they actually were, they
would hardly, of themselves, have occasioned much
alarm, or provoked much opposition, but the case
was different in the region of practical morality.
The Christians there stood out in sharp contrast
to the rest of society, they were committed to a
position of arrogant isolation, they seemed plainly
guilty of anti-social conspiracy. The very violence
of the rupture with society necessitated by disciple-
ship rendered the maintenance of moral discipline
at once the most arduous and the most important
function of the Christian Ecclesia. The Corinthian
Epistles reveal the gravity of the perils which
threatened the morality of the infant Church, and
the means by which the Church endeavoured to
guard her purity.
* Cf. the scene at Athens. Acts xvii. 16 fol.
24 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
CASE OF THE INCESTUOUS CORINTHIAN.
A gross scandal at Corinth had been brought
to the Apostle's knowledge, and his directions for
dealing with it enable us to learn the nature of the
discipline then established.* The case is thus
described by S. Paul. "// is actually reported that
there is fornication \Tropveid\ among you, and such
fornication as is not even among the Gentiles, that one
of you hath his father s wife. And ye are puffed up,
and did not rather mourn, that he that hath done this
deed might be taken away from among you. For I
verily, being absent in body but present in spirit, have
already, as though I were present, judged him that
hath so wrought this thing in the name of our Lord
Jesus, ye being gathered together, and my spirit, with
the power of our Lord Jesus to deliver such a one unto
Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit
may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus" Here we
may separately consider: (i) the offence; (2) the
procedure ; (3) the sentence.
I. Offence.
The offence of the incestuous Corinthian was not
directly an ecclesiastical offence. It was a breach
of the moral law involving scandal, and, therefore,
came within the jurisdiction of the Ecclesia. The
predominant character of Apostolic Christianity being
moral, gross breaches of morality involved a negation
of discipleship. S. Paul enumerates the offences which
* i Cor. v. 1-5.
THE APOSTOLIC ECCLESIA 25
were of this fatal character. How far it is possible to
extract from his language anything of the nature of a
formal classification of sins may well be doubted. It
appears that objection had been taken to his ruling in
a letter, which is no longer extant, as impracticable.
In justifying his decision, which had been misunder
stood, the Apostle seizes the opportunity for develop
ing his moral teaching. " / wrote unto you in my epistle
to have no company 'cvith fornicators ; not altogether
with the fornicators of this world, or with the covetous
and extortioners, or with idolaters : for tJien must ye
needs go out of the world: But now I write unto you
not to keep company, if any man that is named a
brother [eaV -n? a£eA$>o? oVo/uafo'/ueyo?] be a fornicator
or covetous [TrXeoi/e/cr/;?], or an idolater
, or a reviler [XolSopos], or a drunkard
, or an extortioner [a/o7ra£], with such a one
no, not to eat. For what have I to do with judging
them that are without [TOU? e'fco] ? Do not ye judge
them that are zvithin [rot'? ecrw], whereas them that
are without God judgeth ? Put aiuay [egdpare] the
wicked man from among yourselves'.'* This language
is explicit. S. Paul, distinctly repudiating the notion
of passing judgment on non-Christians, enumerates
six offences as involving loss of communion, and, as a
consequence of loss of communion, cessation of social
intercourse. These offences are: I, fornication; 2,
covetousness ; 3, idolatry ; 4, reviling ; 5, drunkenness ;
6, extortion.
A little further on in the Epistle he repeats in a
more rhetorical shape his enumeration of offences
* i Cor. v. 9-13.
26 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
fatal to Christian fellowship.* To the six sins already
mentioned he adds four: adultery, effeminacy, sodomy,
theft. These, however, would seem to be really in
cluded in the shorter enumeration. Thus the more
general Tropvot would seem to include the particular
variety /U.OLXO{, and less obviously the darker types of
sensuality. " Thieves " might be included in " ex
tortioners." The Apostle names the varieties of
sensuality in an ascending scale of gravity. Forni
cation was in the actual experience of the Corinthians
aggravated by religious connections, and became
idolatry. It might involve also a grave social offence
as adultery ; nay, lust had yet darker developments
— it passed into those offences which the usage of
Christendom abhors as " unnatural." Clearly the
immediate needs of the Corinthian Ecclesia are the
governing influences in these Corinthian catalogues.
Crimes of violence are altogether omitted ; crimes of
sensuality are elaborately enumerated.
In the Epistle to the Galatians S. Paulf sets down
a long list of fifteen " works of the flesh," but the
passage is obviously rhetorical, and need not be
further considered.
2. Procedure.
The disciplinary procedure is sufficiently indicated
in the passage quoted above. The whole Ecclesia
was specially convened, and the guilty member
set forward in the midst. A solemn invocation of
Christ, conceived as actually present, for the Apostolic
* i Cor. vi. 9, 10. t v. 19.
THE APOSTOLIC ECCLESIA 27
Church literally believed the promise in the Gospel,*
introduced the formal treatment of the case. Probably
the commandment of the absent Apostle was read
aloud in order that the greatest possible authority
might attach to the action of the Church, and the
sentence was pronounced in his name. The formula
of excommunication may be recognized in S. Paul's
Epistle. The offender was delivered unto Satan for
the destruction of the flesh, that the spirit might be
saved in the day of the Lord Jesus. t
Assuming with most authorities that the sequel to
the case of the incestuous Corinthian is to be found
in the second Epistle,^ we can learn that unanimity
was not necessary in order to pass sentence of ex
communication. A majority sufficed. § This, indeed,
was the case in this instance. S. Paul's severity did
not commend itself to all the members of the Corin
thian Ecclesia. His decision was resisted by a
minority, but the sentence of the majority was
accepted as final. The offender, declared excom
municate, manifested every token of genuine repent
ance. Indeed, his sorrow was so extreme as to
threaten despair. So the Apostle intervened in the
* S. Matt, xviii. 20.
t 2 Cor. ii. 5-1 1.
J Weizacker (Apostolic Christianity, vol. i. pp. 349-353) argues that
the connection between the excommunication in the first Epistle and
the absolution in the second is untenable. But his reasoning is weakened
by an obvious desire to magnify the opposition to S. Paul's Apostolic
authority in Corinth. The matter is not of importance so far as the
argument in the text is concerned.
§ Godet repudiates the notion of a formal sentence by vote of the
Ecclesia as absurd; but his reasons are not convincing. (Cor. i.
228-9.)
28 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
interest of mercy. In the second Epistle he urges the
penitent's restoration, and undertakes to ratify the
action of the Corinthians in rescinding the excom
munication. We may conclude that the restoration
of the offender* was not less public, solemn, and formal
than his expulsion.
3. Sentence.
What ought to be understood by the apostolic
formula of excommunication ? M. Renan under
stands the language of S. Paul in the Corinthian
Epistle quite literally. " II ne faut pas en douter :
c'est une condamnation a mort que Paul prononce."t
There is much to be said for this view. The case of
Ananias and Sapphira, recorded in the Acts, may be
adduced in support of it, nevertheless it cannot be
accepted without modification.
Under the circumstances of the Apostolic Church
mere exclusion from the Christian society was a
very serious matter. The sentence extended not
only to the religious assemblies from which the ex
communicate was banished, but also to the friendly
and almost indispensable intercourse of society.
Christianity drew the line very sharply between the
Church and Pagan society : to be excluded from
the Church was to be an outcast from all men.
* Probably the penitent was restored to communion by the laying on
of hands. The exhortation in I Tim. v. 22, " Lay hands hastily on no
one," may be, with large probability, referred to " the act of blessing
by which penitents were received back into the communion of the
faithful." It is so understood by Dr. Hort (Christian Ecclcsia,
p. 214) and by Bishop Ellicott (Pastoral Epistles, p. 83, 5th ed. ).
t S. Paul, p. 392.
THE APOSTOLIC ECCLESIA 29
The excommunicate Christian was the object of
general abhorrence. The terrors of superstition
were added to his actual misery. He had been
publicly " delivered to Satan for the destruction of the
flesh" The terrible formula was no merely con
ventional phrase, of which the meaning had been
quietly worn away by familiarity.* It was a new
formula, expressing at once the Christian belief in
the power of evil, and the apostolic authority in the
spiritual sphere. Thrust outside the protected area
of the Church, the excommunicate lay exposed to
every spiritual adversary. Even S. Paul held the
prevailing doctrine that the heathen deities were
demons, (i Cor. x. 20.) We may be sure that the
Corinthian converts held it far more strongly. What
must have been the mental and spiritual anguish of
the wretch thus abandoned to the vengeance of the
idol-demons, whom he had deserted in order to join
that Church which now disowns him? It is not
difficult to believe that, as a matter of fact, excom
munication was often followed by disease and death.
The consequences which followed the desecration of
the Eucharist at Corinth would follow expulsion from
the Church. "For this cause many among you are
weak and sickly \ and not a few sleep >."t The "destruc
tion of the flesh" would bear a terribly literal mean
ing ; and the connection between excommunication
and physical disaster, once established in the general
mind by some striking examples, would tend to
justify itself by means of the fears it provoked.
* LlGHTFOOT, VOL xii. p. 475.
t I Cor. xi. 30.
30 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
It has been hitherto assumed without hesitation
that the delivery unto Satan and excommunication
were identical, but this identity has by no means
been generally maintained, and we must therefore
not pass away from the subject without giving some
reasons for our position.
M. Godet insists, with great positiveness, on dis
tinguishing between excommunication, which was an
act of the local Ecclesia, and this sentence of delivery
to Satan, which was exclusively an Apostolic act.
The latter might or might not be added to the
former, and it alone carried with it a physical
penalty. The Corinthians, indeed, by prayer might
have obtained at God's hand the destruction of the
excommunicate,* and they were blameworthy in not
doing so ; but what their prayers might have effected
the authority of the Apostle could inflict. " La seule
difference entre ce chatiment qu'a de"cre"t6 1'apotre et
celui que les Corinthiens auraient dti rdclamer d'en
haut, c'est que T^glise s'en serait remise a Dieu pour
le mode d'e"xe"cution, tandis que Paul, en vertu de sa
position spirituelle supe"rieure a celle de I'e'glise, se
permet de determiner le moyen dont le Seigneur se
servira, car il connait la pens£e du Seigneur."f (ii. 16.)
Weizacker, on the other hand, takes for granted
that excommunication involved (according to the
belief of the Apostle) the dreadful physical conse
quences implied by " delivery unto Satan." " Exclu
sion from the Church was not, however, all that was
involved. Paul associated with that the idea derived
• I Cor. v. 2, atpeiv, equal to destroy, according to M. Godet.
t GODET, Corinthiens^ vol. i. p. 232.
THE APOSTOLIC ECCLESIA 31
from the old institution of the ban, that the excom
municated person would necessarily die. He would
be given over bodily to Satan for destruction, and
the sentence of the Church thereby only effected
what he himself effected who took part unworthily
in the Lord's Supper, and who was in consequence
punished with sickness and death."*
It is not disputed that the Church borrowed from
the synagogue the procedure of excommunication.
That procedure involved a graduation of penalties.
Lightfoot has described the disciplinary system of
the Jews in his " exercitations " on the Corinthian
Epistle.f We learn that excommunication was in
three stages of advancing severity, (i) Simple ex
communication, which was called Niddui, in which
there was not absolute cursing, and which lasted
thirty days. During that time the excommunicate
might make his submission and receive absolution.
(2) Excommunication with a curse, Shammatha,
which involved the publication of the offence in the
synagogue, and also lasted thirty days. (3) Anathema,
which was the final sentence. " And this is much
more heavy than either Niddui or Shammatha. For
in this is both excommunication, and cursing, and
the forbidding the use of any men, unless in those
things only which belong to the sustaining of life.
And they anathematize not, but when a man hath
hardened himself against the bench once and again."
Lightfoot himself concludes that "delivery unto
Satan" was not excommunication, but "a miracu-
* WEIZACKER, Apostolic Age, vol. ii. p. 379, Eng. Trans,
t LIGHTFOOT, Works, vol. xii. p. 466, fol. London, 1823.
32 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
lous action, namely, of the real delivery of this
(incestuous) person into the hands and power of
Satan, to be scourged by him, and tormented by
him with diseases, tortures, and afTrightments." We
should rather conclude that the more dreadful conse
quences of Christian excommunication did but reflect
the superiority of the Church over the synagogue ;
the graduated system of Jewish discipline was adopted
by the Church, and in the Church necessarily received
a more mysterious and dreadful character. In the
case of the incestuous Corinthian, the Ecclesia had
not even taken the first step in the disciplinary
process. S. Paul, to mark at once his horror of
the crime and his indignation at the laxity which
condoned it, insists upon the final sentence of
Anathema, i.e.t delivery unto Satan for the destruc
tion of the flesh. His language appears to convey
this. The exceptional circumstance of his absence
from Corinth is not to interfere with the formality
of the proceedings. The Ecclesia is to meet, and
his sentence, conveyed beforehand in the Epistle, is
to be considered precisely equivalent to a declaration
from him actually present.
That there was a graduated system of discipline
in the Apostolic Church is evident from several
passages in the Epistles. The passages in the
Epistle to the Thessalonians and the Galatians are
of especial value in illustrating the language of the
Corinthian Epistles. Excommunication of the
milder, preliminary type is suggested by 2 Thessa
lonians iii. 14 : "And if any man obeyeth not our word
by this epistle, note that man, that ye have no company
THE APOSTOLIC ECCLESIA 33
with him to the end that he may be ashamed. And
yet count him not as an enemy, but admonish him as
a brother!' The extremest possible condemnation
is suggested by the language in Galatians i. 8, 9 :
"But though we, or an angel from heaven, sJiould
preach unto you any gospel other than that which we
preached unto you, let him be anathema. As we have
said before, so say I now again, if any man preacheth
unto you any gospel other than that which ye received,
let him be anathema'.' In the Epistle to Titus * we
find the following very specific injunction : "A man
that is heretical after a first and second admonition
refuse: knowing that such a one is perverted, and
sinneth, being self-condemned" This injunction seems
to be directly suggested by the words of our Saviour,
which must be regarded as the charter of the
Church's discipline, and which may possibly have
been committed to writing at the time when the
Pastoral Epistles were written. It is, indeed, true
that our Lord contemplated " offences against the
brethren," while S. Paul treats of heresy (which
his excommunication of Hymenaeus and Alexander
compels us to understand in the technical sense),
but the transference of the discipline from the sphere
of conduct to that of opinion would present no
difficulty to one who held S. Paul's view as to the
nature and claims of the doctrine he preached. The
Dominical injunctions in S. Matthew xviii. 15-17 run
as follows : "And if thy brother sin against thee, go,
show him his fault between thee and him alone : if
he hear thee thou hast gained thy brother. But if he
* iii. 10, ii.
D
34 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
hear thee not, take with thee one or two more, that at
the mouth of two witnesses or three every word may
be established. And if he refuse to hear them, tell
it unto the Church, and if he refuse to hear the Church
also, let him be unto thee as the Gentile and the
publican'1 The elaborated discipline of the later
Church followed the lines here laid down.
Finally, the Apostolic conception on the one hand
of the organized powers of evil, and on the other
of the Church, appears to require the association
of spiritual abandonment with the fact of exclusion
from the Christian Society. A passage from the
Colossian Epistle will sufficiently illustrate this. The
Apostle exhorts to thankfulness for the inestimable
gift of the Gospel. " Giving thanks unto the Father,
who made us meet to be partakers of the inheritance
of the saints in light : who delivered us out of the
power of darkness and translated us into the kingdom
of the Son of His love" The Church was a protected
sphere, an asylum of safety in a demon-ridden world,
over which Satan wielded empire. To be thrust out
from the Church was to be exposed without defence
to the assaults of Satan.
ARBITRATION IN THE ECCLESIA TO REPLACE
LAWSUITS.
Interposed between the discussion of the Corinthian
scandal and a fervid denunciation of impurity is
a paragraph dealing with the subject of lawsuits.
The disgraceful inactivity of the Ecclesia in the
matter of the incestuous communicant indicated a
THE APOSTOLIC ECCLESIA 35
singular inability to grasp the full greatness of its
own position. The same fact lay at the root of
the practice, which had reached discreditable pro
portions, of carrying disputes between Christians
before heathen tribunals. The members of the
Church in Corinth were mostly drawn from the
humbler ranks of a Greek commercial community.
They belonged to the race and to the class in which
petty disputes about property have the greatest
importance and evoke the keenest interest. This
litigiousness was bad in itself as tending to strengthen
a hard, grasping disposition, directly opposed to the
spirit of Christian fraternity. It was scandalous in
effect, as leading to a public exhibition before the
heathen of the domestic bickerings of the disciples
of Christ. It was distinctly perilous as bringing
Christians into close contact with the heathen life,
out of which Christianity had drawn them, and as
establishing in their minds a mean estimate of the
authority of the Ecclesia. The language of S. Paul
reveals a very keen perception of all these mischiefs.
He lays particular stress on the implied insult to the
Ecclesia, and the evident breach of fraternity. The
analogy of the synagogue is plainly paramount in
his mind. The Jews, under the tolerant sway of the
Roman Empire, were permitted to retain their own
judicial institutions, and among these were reckoned
the synagogues. It is not uninteresting that at
Corinth the judicial independence of the Jewish
community in reference to certain classes of questions
had been publicly asserted by a Roman proconsul.*
* Acts xviii. 15.
36 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
The Christian Ecclesia in Corinth owed its origin
to a rupture within the Jewish synagogue,* and
bore the aspect, and, probably, advanced the claims
of a rival synagogue. The Roman Government at
this early period drew no distinction between Jew
and Christian. The privileges of the synagogue
might be appropriated by the Church. This, in
effect, is what the Apostle aimed at. From his
standpoint the Jewish synagogue in rejecting the
Gospel had fallen into apostasy and forfeited its
claim to be regarded as a synagogue. To that
claim the Christian synagogue was rightful heir.
Lightfoot thinks that S. Paul's language directly
contemplates the judicial arrangements of the
synagogue, and the antecedent probabilities point
in that direction. In every synagogue there were
three tribunals, known respectively as the Bench
of Three, composed of duly ordained elders, the
"Authorized" or " Mumchin," whose members com
monly held this office by some special patent from
the Sanhedrim, and " the Bench not Authorized,"
of which the members were elected by the litigants.
The first of these courts dealt with ordinary suits,
the second confined itself to ritual matters, and the
third had the range and the limitations of a board
of arbitrators. It is to this last, according to
Lightfoot, that S. Paul refers in the Epistle. "To
this very ordinary bench among the Jews the apostle
seems to have respect in this place, and to prescribe
it to the Corinthians for a means of ending their
differences, which was easy, common, and void of
* Ibid. 5-8.
THE APOSTOLIC ECCLESIA 37
cost and charges. The Bench of Mumchin one
may not unfitly call TOVS avOevrrj/mevovs, such as were
deputed by authority : this Bench consisting of ...
those that were not Mumchin, he calls egovOevtj/mevovs,
not 'vile' or 'contemptible/ but such as were 'not
authorized.' He exhorteth, therefore, that if at any
time suits arise among them, concerning pecuniary
or other matters, they by no means run to heathen
courts, but rather choose some private men among
themselves, as judges and arbitrators in such
matters." * This may well have been in the
Apostle's mind, but it is obscured by the indignation
which shapes his actual language. "Dare [roX/ma]
any of you> having a matter against his neighbour,
go to law before the unrighteous^ and not before t/ie
saints ? or know ye not that the saints shall judge
the world? and if the world is judged by you, are
ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters [KpiTtjplcov
e\axi<TTwv] ? Know ye not that we shall judge angels ?
how much more things that pertain to tJiis life
[/SiarriKa] ? if then ye have to judge things pertaining
to this life [ft tunica KpiTtjpia], set tJiem to judge who
are of no account in the ChurcJi. [TOW e^ovOevti/mevovg
ev Tf €KK\rj<Tia TOUTOVS KaOifcre.] I say this to move
yoti to shame. Is it so that there cannot be found
among you one wise man, who shall be able to decide
between his brethren^ but brother goeth to law with
brother •, and that before unbelievers? Nay, already
it is altogether a defect in you [o\w? //rr^yua V/JLIV]
that ye have lawsuits [/cp//xara] one with another.
Why not rather take wrong? why not rather be
* Works t xii. pp. 484, 485.
38 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
defrauded? Nay, but ye yourselves do wrong, and
defraud, and that your brethren''
Whether or not this language is to be understood
as actually instituting a tribunal in the Ecclesia for
the adjudication of suits between Christians, certain
it is that it became the authority upon which such
institution justified itself in the next century. The
change of attitude towards Christianity which
speedily took place on the part of the Empire, and
led to the settled policy of persecution, destroyed the
protection which had resulted from identification
with Judaism, and rendered all Church organization
hazardous and difficult Less and less must dis
cipline have been a matter of fixed rules and courts,
more and more must it have taken the character
of moral influence. As the theory of the Church
developed, the practical effect of Church censures
increased. Tertullian's well-known description of
Christian worship may be adduced. The discipline
was not the less effective for being purely moral : its
sanctions were found in the convictions of the com
munity. " Nam et judicatur magno cum pondere,
ut apud certos de dei conspectu, summumque futuri
judicii praejudicium est, si quis ita deliquerit, ut a
communicatione orationis et conventus et omnis
sancti commercii relegetur."*
* Apol. 39.
PART II.
PRELIMINARY DATA
CHAPTER I.
THE EPISTLES OF S. PAUL
THE Epistles of S. Paul form the principal
authority upon which the student of Apostolic
Christianity must build his theory ; and we must,
therefore, begin our present inquiry by briefly
describing the nature and importance of those
primary documents, with two of which we shall be
in this volume mainly concerned. The exceptional
character of the Apostle's writings was recognized
from the first. An example is found in the second
Corinthian Epistle. " His letters, they say, are
weighty and strong ; but his bodily presence is
weak, and his speech of no account."
These words are the judgment of hostile contem
poraries upon S. Paul. How far they may express
a real contrast between the personal insignificance
and the literary ability of the Apostle we can hardly
now appreciate. Probably they have the measure of
truthfulness which belongs to malicious but successful
caricature. S. Paul was not physically imposing,*
* The Acts of Paul and Thekla (a second century document) con
tains a description of the Apostle which, in Prof. Ramsay's opinion,
"seems to embody a very early tradition." It is not nattering.
Onesiphorus goes out to meet S. Paul. "And he saw Paul coming,
a man small in size, with meeting eyebrows, with a rather large nose,
41
42 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
nor did his speech possess the characteristics of the
most generally approved eloquence. So far his
adversaries may be allowed to have the advantage
of him. But even they were compelled to admit
that "his letters were weighty and strong'' [fiapeiai,
K. iayvpai.] Their reluctant admission inadequately
represents the high estimate of these writings,
which has from the earliest times obtained among
Christians.
The importance of these Epistles is by no means
sufficiently indicated by the fact that they form not
less than one-fourth of the New Testament. They
include the earliest of existing Christian documents :
the whole series were written between the years 52
and 67 of our era. They have been subjected to
the rigorous examination of keen and learned, and
not always friendly criticism for many years, and we
may certainly say that the general result has been to
confirm the traditional theory of their authorship.
" I must needs believe that all the Epistles of S. Paul
which have come down to us as his are genuine."
This is the deliberate conclusion of a very learned
and acute scholar, Professor Sanday, and if any object
that he is a Christian, I will content myself with
replying, first, that his Christianity never, as far as
I know, interferes with the honest exercise of his
critical faculty ; and next, that his favourable opinion
of the Pauline Epistles is shared by all competent
bald-headed, bow-legged, strongly built, full of grace, for at times
he looked like a man, and at times he had the face of an angel."
Conybeare and Howson have put together the traditional conception
of S. Paul's appearance. — Vide Life and Epistles, chap, vii., end.
THE EPISTLES OF S. PAUL 43
critics with regard to four, by most with regard to
seven, and by many with regard to ten out of the
thirteen ascribed to the Apostle in the Canon. The
Pastoral Epistles* are admittedly the most disputed
and the most disputable members of the series, but
Professor Ramsay's t recent and most interesting
discoveries of the actual relations which existed
between the Roman State and the Apostolic Church
have gone far to strengthen their position. It may
be useful to have before us the list of undisputed and
practically undisputed Epistles. Undisputed are the
Epistle to the Romans, the two to the Corinthians,
and that to the Galatians ; practically undisputed are
the First Epistle to the Thessalonians, the Epistle to
the Philippians, and that to Philemon. The rest are
disputed, but not very successfully. We may be
content with the position of most English critical
scholars that no real case has been made out against
any of them.* In the present state of opinion the
• " There are features of the Pastoral Epistles which legitimately
provoke suspicion. To the best of my belief, however, they are genuine,
and that not merely in parts : the theory of large early interpolations
does not work out at all well in detail." — \\QKI , Judaistic Christianity,
p. 130-
f Vide Church in the Roman Empire, pp. 245-251. " Incidentally
we may here note that the tone of the Pastoral Epistles in this respect
(persecution) is consistent only with an early date. It is difficult for the
historian of the Empire to admit that they were composed after that
development of the Imperial policy towards the Christians which
occurred . . . under the Flavian Emperors."
% Wcizacker admits Romans, I, 2 Corinthians, Galatians, I Thess.,
Philippians, i.e., six epistles, is doubtful about Colossians and Philemon,
and rejects the three Pastoral Ep., 2 Thess., and Ephesians.— Vide
Ap. A%c, p. 218.
Harnack admits all the Epistles except Ephesians, which he marks
44 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
private Christian appears to have good reason for
accepting with confidence the traditional theory of
the Church.
These thirteen letters (for the Epistle to the
Hebrews, which is sometimes reckoned as a fourteenth
Pauline letter, is agreed on all hands to be the work
of an unknown writer of the Apostolic age), includ
ing the oldest Christian documents, have formed and
must always form the starting point, and the founda
tion of whatever knowledge we can obtain as to the
beginnings of Christianity. They are the principal,
because the primary witnesses to the truth of those
facts of the life of Christ, and of that presentment
of the character of Christ, which together form the
basis of the Christian Religion. The four Gospels
are alike anonymous and undated ; the letters of
S. Paul, of which the date is well known, and the
authority cannot be denied, form a most valuable test
by which to appraise the historical worth of those
sacred narratives. We shall see, in the course of
our inquiry, how far the Epistles to the Corinthians
confirm the statements of the evangelists. Again,
all Christians are agreed in deferring to the authority
of the Apostles. The most ignorant member of the
smallest and youngest sect appeals to that tribunal
not less than the most cultivated member of the
most venerable Church. The Creed of Christendom
as doubtful, and the Pastorals. He thinks that the latter were based
on genuine Epistles of S. Paul. His chronology is remarkable. He
places S. Paul's conversion in the same year as the Crucifixion, A. D. 30,
and his death in A.D. 64. — Vide die Chronologic der alt lit.y p. 233, fol.
Leipzig, 1897.
THE EPISTLES OF S. PAUL 45
lays emphasis upon the " Apostolic " character of the
Catholic Church. It cannot then be a matter of
indifference to us what the Apostles actually taught
and ordered in the Churches which they founded.
And we shall not well learn this from the lips of
controversialists, or the assertions of partisans. We
must not pile together texts, and so wring from the
New Testament some kind of assent to the doctrines
we already have decided to maintain. We must
rather let the Epistles tell their own tale, and bear
their own witness in their own way.
The practice of writing doctrinal Epistles may
have been suggested to S. Paul by "the so-called
Epistles of Jeremiah and Baruch and the Epistles
at the beginning of 2 Maccabees.* The Old
Testament contains at least one specimen of such
compositions in the letter sent by the prophet
Jeremiah to the exiles in Babylon. t Probably the
practice grew out of the necessities of experience.
The rapid success which followed the missionary
labours of the great Apostle had scattered little
Christian communities over a great part of the
Roman Empire. How were the new converts to
be spiritually governed except by means of letters?
S. Paul himself says that he was burdened with
"anxiety for all the churches"\ That anxiety found
* SANDAY, Bampton Lectures, p. 335, note.
t Vide R£NAN, S. Paul, p. 228. "La correspondance entre
synagogues existait deja dans le judaisme ; 1'envoye charge de porter
les lettres etait meme un dignitaire attitre des synagogues." This
whole chapter gives a most interesting view of the circumstances under
which the Apostle wrote, and the actual conditions of the Churches
to which he wrote. % 2 Cor. xi. 28.
46 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
expression in the Epistles. From the circumstances
of their origin these documents derive both loss and
gain. On the one hand, they often deal with questions
which were at the time of urgent importance, but
which have long ceased to be so. Thus in the
Corinthian letters great space is taken up with two
discussions, on the eating meat sacrificed to idols, and
on the due exercise of miraculous gifts, neither of
which have any direct reference to modern needs*
although it must be allowed by all that the Apostle
so handles these subjects as to provide principles
of Christian conduct, which can never be wholly
without relevance to Christian needs. Directly, how
ever, these questions do not any longer concern us,
and it is difficult to induce the careless reader to
interest himself in them. Doubtless we have in this
circumstance the explanation of the fact that some
of S. Paul's letters — how many we do not know, but
certainly several — have perished. One such letter is
referred to in the first Corinthian Epistle. "I wrote
unto you in my epistle" (v. 9), says S. Paul, but we
cannot refer to the passage for the Epistle no longer
survives. In the closing verses of the Epistle to
the Colossians we perhaps have another lost letter
mentioned. " When this epistle hath been read among
you, cause that it be also read in the church of the
Laodiceans ; and that ye also read the epistle from
Laodicea"* The Epistle to Laodicea, however, has
perished, unless the supposition be correct that it
is to be identified with the Epistle to the Ephesians.
There is an expression in the second Epistle to the
* Col. iv. 16.
THE EPISTLES OF S. PAUL 47
Thessalonians which seems to indicate that several
letters had preceded that Epistle, which is probably
the earliest in date of all the existing letters save its
predecessor to the same Church. " The salutation of
me, Paul, with mine own hand, which is the token in
every epistle : so I write!'*
"Every epistle" seems to indicate certainly more
than one. The emphasis laid on the Apostle's
autographf appears also to show that the practice
of forging letters was included among the weapons
of his adversaries. Earlier in the same Epistle S.
Paul exhorts the Thessalonians not to "be troubled
either by spirit, or by ivord, or by epistle as from us"
We may take for granted that the lost letters dealt
with matters of temporary though urgent importance,
and so speedily fell out of use among Christians, and
then, in the troublous days of persecution, perished
altogether. We may admit that the study of the
surviving Epistles is hindered by the aspect of
obsoleteness, which in some places they present.
The gain, however, predominates over the loss.
We owe to the practical exigencies out of which they
came that practical tone, that sound insight into the
actual conditions of temporal existence, that faithful
portraiture of primitive Christianity which charac-
* 2 Thess. iii. 17.
f R£NAN, S. Paul, p. 233. " Pour eviter les fraudes nombreuses
auxquelles donnaient lieu les passions du temps, 1'autorite de 1'apotre
et les conditions materielles de 1'epistolographie antique, Paul avail
coutume d'envoyer aux Eglises un specimen de son ecriture, qui etait
facilement reconnaissable ; apres quoi, il lui suffisait, selon un usage
alors general, de mettre a la fin de ses lettres quelques mots de sa main
pour en garantir 1'authenticite,"
48 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
terize these writings, and add so greatly to their
interest and value. We may say with confidence
that S. Paul was not unconscious of the importance
of his Epistles. That he intended them for public
use is evident from such passages as that which
I have already quoted from the Colossian letter, and
from the solemn adjuration which is added at the
end of the First Epistle to the Thessalonians. "/
adjure you by the Lord that this epistle be read unto
all the brethren" (v. 27.) He clearly believed him
self to be writing with the assistance of the Holy
Spirit. He knew himself to be inspired. This is
evident from the careful distinction he draws between
his own unassisted judgment, and the judgment to
which he was led by the Spirit. The seventh
chapter of the first Corinthian Epistle provides some
very suggestive examples of such distinction. The
different expressions employed by the Apostle
deserve careful notice. " This I say by way of per
mission, not of commandment" (v. 6.) " Unto the
married I give charge, yea not I, but the Lord"
(v. 10.) " And so ordain I in all the churches" (v. 17.)
" Now concerning virgins I have no commandment
of the Lord: but I give my judgment, as one that
hath obtained mercy of the Lord to be faithful. I
think therefore that this is good by reason of the
present distress" (vv. 25, 26.) " She is happier if she
abide as she is, after my judgment : and I think that
J also have the Spirit of God" (v. 40.)
Such careful language does manifestly annihilate
theories of verbal inspiration ; but it does not less
manifestly claim for the Apostle's language when
not thus guarded a special authority.
THE EPISTLES OF S. PAUL 49
" Paul declares that he does not teach of himself,
and that he is but the organ of Him who has con
fided his mission to him. This is what he means
to say when at the head of some of his letters he calls
himself 'Apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God.'
He puts his writing under the guarantee of Him who
intrusted him with it."*
Largely, indeed, these Epistles are polemical,
concerned with the calumnies of bitter personal
antagonists, and the false teachings of dangerous
heretics. The language faithfully reflects the vehe
mence of the writer's fear, or indignation, or joy,
or affection. We know that S. Paul was wont to
dictate his letters. Where, contrary to custom, he
writes with his own hand he calls attention to the
fact. " See with how large letters I have written
unto you with mine own hand" he writes to the
Galatians. Similarly, in the little epistle to Philemon,
we find : " / Paul write it with mine own hand, I
ivill repay it" But, in this instance, there was an
obvious motive for emphasizing the personal liability
for the debt of Onesimus which the Apostle under
took. In one instance the amanuensis interpolates
his own name. " / Tertius, who write the epistle,
salute you in the Lord"\ is almost abruptly intro
duced into the salutations with which the Apostle
concludes the Epistle to the Romans.
Two results may be attributed to this practice of
dictation. On the one hand, much would depend on
the ability of the amanuensis to take down fully and
accurately the utterances of S. Paul. " One might
* GODET, Intro, to N. T., p. 123. f Rom. xvi. 22.
E
50 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
take down the Apostle's words verbatim ; then we
should get a vivid, broken, natural style like that of
Romans and First and Second Corinthians. Another
might not succeed in getting down the exact words ;
and then when he came to work up his notes into
a fair copy the structure of the sentences would be
his own, and it might naturally seem more laboured."
It has been plausibly suggested that the habit of
the amanuensis may explain those differences in the
" cast and structure of the sentences " which are
apparent in the later Epistles, and have done
yeoman's service to the cause of destructive criticism
in the hands of the Germans. On the other hand,
as has been already hinted, speech is a much more
facile instrument of expression than writing. The
astonishing irregularity which marks the glowing
eloquence of the Apostle is easily explicable if the
language be regarded as the unrestrained outpouring
of his thoughts as they rushed to his lips clothed
in the words which first presented themselves to his
mind. There is precisely the aspect which we might
expect to find in a speech, but which surprises us
in an essay.
The Epistles were carried to their destination by
disciples in whom S. Paul had confidence. Some
times the messenger is mentioned and specially
commended to the Church. "/ commend unto you
Phoebe our sister" occurs in the Epistle to the
Romans.* Probably she was intrusted with that
letter. "All my affairs shall Tychicus make known
unto you> the beloved brother and faithful minister
* xvi. I.
THE EPISTLES OF S. PAUL 51
in the Lord : whom I have sent unto you for this
very purpose, that ye may know our estate, and that
he may comfort your hearts : together with Onesimus
the faithful and beloved brother that is one of you"*
We may conclude that Tychicus was the bearer of
the Epistle to Colossae ; we know that Onesimus
carried a private letter to Philemon, the master
from whom he had in former days run away under
discreditable circumstances.
We must remember that communications were
easy within the Roman Empire. Railways and
telegraphs were indeed unknown ; but roads were
excellent, and there was a regular and efficient
system of posts. It is probable that in the matter
of material civilization the Roman Empire of S.
Paul's day has not found its equal until the present
century.!
Finally, we must remember the necessary limita
tions of the witness which Epistles, prompted by
practical emergencies, and often directed to con
ditions of life and thought which were transitory,
and have in fact long since passed away, can yield
to the great subject of Christianity. If we expect
to find in S. Paul's Letters a methodical and detailed
exposition of the Christian Creed, we shall certainly
be disappointed. The Epistle to the Romans most
nearly corresponds to our idea of a theological
treatise, and even in that instance the corres
pondence is not very close. Still less shall we
find in these letters a complete system of Church
polity. If we look to discover in them the model
* Col. iv. 7-9. f GIBBON, Decline an.i l-'a /, chap. ii.
52 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
of any existing ecclesiastical system, we shall
certainly find them contradict our expectations.
S. Paul was writing to Christian people, and he
takes for granted their acquaintance with and belief
of the Christian Faith. What the Christian Faith
involves in the matter of articles of belief it is not
hard to discover by legitimate inference from the
Letters ; but it is nowhere expressly stated, except,
indeed, with reference to certain fundamental truths,
upon which the Apostle is led to insist by the
necessities of polemical argument. So with regard
to Church government. We may infer with more
or less probability what the system was, but it is
nowhere formally declared. The Church at that
early period was taking shape, and the agents
which influenced the final result were neither few
nor simple. Certain elements existed which were
derived from the ultimate authority of our Lord ;
certain principles were accepted which derived their
origin from no inferior source; there was an .intense
conviction of the presence and guiding action within
the Christian Society of the Holy Ghost ; there
existed in S. Paul a singularly rich, strong, original
character : in his converts a wealth of material,
almost infinitely diverse in quality, and subjected
to the formative influence of the most various forces.
The Epistles reveal the process of settlement,
of definition, of development which created the
Catholic Church of Christian History. The source
and character of the process are thus described by
the great Apostle in a passage from the Epistle,
which will form the principal authority in our present
inquiry : —
THE EPISTLES OF S. PAUL 53
"Now there are diversities of gifts, but the same
Spirit. And there are diversities of ministrations,
and the same Lord. And there are diversities of
workings, but the same God who worketh all things
in all. But to each one is given the manifestation
of the Spirit to profit withal. For to one is given
through the Spirit the word of wisdom ; and to
another the word of knowledge according to the same
Spirit ; to another faith in the same Spirit ; and
to another gifts of healings in the one Spirit ; and to
another workings of miracles ; and to another pro
phecy ; and to another discernings of spirits ; to another
divers kinds of tongues ; and to another the interpreta
tion of tongues : but all these worketh the one and the
same Spirit, dividing to each one severally even as He
will!'* We may add that among the numerous
results of that Divine Energy working in the
Christian Society none bear their origin more plainly
impressed on them, none have exercised a wider
and more beneficent influence in succeeding ages,
none have more fully secured the ratifying accept
ance of the general Christian conscience than these
letters of S. Paul, which even the enemies of
Christianity must acknowledge to be " weighty and
strong" and which Christian students in every age,
and never more confidently than in this, have believed
to be inspired.
* i Cor. xii. 4-1 1.
CHAPTER II.
THE FOUNDING OF THE CHURCH IN
CORINTH
IT needs but to glance at the map to see at once
that the city of Corinth must have been one
of the most important of the ancient world.* It
"stood on the high road between Rome and the
east, and was therefore one of the greatest centres
of influence in the Roman world." With its two
ports — Lechaeum on the west, and Cenchreae on
the east — Corinth was a meeting place of merchants,
wealthy with the exchange and commerce of nations,
luxurious with the lavish luxury of wealth, profligate
with the shamelessness of luxury. Its importance,
both political and commercial, was long standing.
It provoked the envy of monarchs and the more
malignant jealousy of mercantile rivals. The greatest
disaster of Corinthian history had its origin in " mer-
* GROTE, History of Greece, vol. ii. p. 224. " Corinth in ancient
times served as an entrepot for the trade between Italy and Asia
Minor, goods being unshipped at Lechceum, the port on the Corinthian
Gulf, and carried by land across to Kenchrese, the port on the
Saronic ; indeed, even the merchant vessels themselves when not
very large were conveyed across by the same route." For a descrip
tion of the remains of the ancient city see Diet, of the Bible, art.
"Corinth." Stanley has a picturesque account of the outward aspect
of the city in S. Paul's age : v. Corinthians ', p. 5.
54
THE CHURCH IN CORINTH 55
cantile selfishness," which was strong enough to
overcome in the Roman mind that admiration for
all things Greek, which generally influenced the
attitude of the Republic towards the communities
of Hellas.* In the year 146 B.C. the Consul
Mummius had besieged and taken Corinth. The
sack of the city was memorable both for its ruthless
character, and for the considerable effect produced
by the transference to Rome of the numerous art-
treasures of the greatest centre of Greek life. " The
town was stripped of everything of value, and the
works of art, pictures, statues, and ornaments of
every description were collected for transport to
Italy. Much, however, was spoilt by the greedy
and ignorant soldiers, and Polybius — who had lately
returned from a similar spectacle at Carthage — saw
some of the finest pictures thrown on the ground
and used as dice-boards. . . . Corinth was then
dismantled and burnt, and remained a mere village
until its restoration in 46 by Caesar." f The sack
of Corinth had taken place about two centuries
before the arrival of S. Paul, but the memory of
disasters lingers long, and we know that there existed
in the restored city some relics — temples or other
public buildings — which had escaped both the fierce
ness of the flames and the violence of the plunderers,
surviving to perpetuate the tradition of the great
overthrow from which they had emerged. We have
* MOMMSEN, Provinces of tht Roman Empire, vol. i. p. 257. •' In
the treatment of Corinth mercantile selfishness had, after an ill-
omened fashion, shown itself more powerful than all Philhellenism."
t SHUCKBURGH, Hist, of Rome, p. 525.
56 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
a parallel in our own history. Rather more than
two centuries have elapsed since the Great Fire of
London in Charles II. 's reign ; but the memory of
that immense conflagration is still green among us.
We may detect a reference to the sack of Corinth
in S. Paul's description of that fire of the Divine
Judgment, which will consume everything that is
not precious and solid. " But if any man buildeth on
the foundation gold, silver, costly stones, wood, hay,
stubble ; each man's work sJiall be made manifest : for
tJie day shall declare it, because it is revealed in fire ;
and the fire itself shall prove each man's work of ivhat
sort it is."*
For a century Corinth remained in desolation, and
then a new era in its history began, when "the
greatest of all Romans and of all Philhellenes, the
dictator Caesar," made " the atonement for the sack
of Corinth" by re-founding the city as a Roman
colony. This was in the year 46 B.C. S. Paul came
to the new city in the year 52 A.D. In this • com
paratively short period of 98 years the growth of
Corinth had been extremely rapid. " The Greek
merchants, who had fled on the Roman conquest to
Delos and the neighbouring coasts, returned to their
former home. The Jews settled themselves in a
place most convenient both for the business of com
merce and for communication with Jerusalem. Thus,
when S. Paul arrived at Corinth after his sojourn at
Athens, he found himself in the midst of a numerous
population of Greeks and Jews. They were probably
far more numerous than the Romans, though the city
* I Cor. !ii. 12, 13.
THE CHURCH IN CORINTH 57
had the constitution of a colony, and was the metro
polis of a province."* Corinth, moreover, was associ
ated with the famous Isthmian games, which every
second year attracted a vast concourse of Greeks.
It seems probable that, during his residence in the
city, the Apostle actually was present during the
games:f it is certain that he was both interested in
them and familiar with the rules under which they
were carried on. Many allusions to athletics may be
found in his Epistles. It will suffice to quote one
from the First Epistle to the Corinthians. He com
pares the Christian to an athlete contending in the
foot-races which were the favourite contests of the
ancient Greeks. " Kncnv ye not that they which run
in a race run all, but one receive th the prize ? Even so
run that ye may attain. And every man that striveth
in the games is temperate in all things. Now they do
it to receive a corruptible crown ; but we an incor
ruptible. I therefore so run, as not uncertainly ; so
fight I, as not beating the air ; but I buffet my body,
and bring it into bondage: lest by any means, after
that I have preached to others, I myself should be
rejected? \ The visitor to the site of ancient Corinth
will be able to trace the remains of the Posidonium
or sanctuary of Neptune, the scene of the Isthmian
games. " The exact site of the temple is doubtful,
and the objects of interest, which Pausanias describes
as seen by him within the enclosure, have vanished ;
* CONYBEARE and HOWSON, xii.
t " It may be confidently concluded that he was there at one of the
festivals. (Ibid. c. xx.)
% I Cor. ix. 24-27.
58 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
but to the south are the remains of the stadium,
where the foot-races were run ; to the east are those
of the theatre, which was probably the scene of the
pugilistic contests ; and abundant on the shore are
the small green pine trees, which gave the fading
wreath to the victors in the games."* Religiously
Corinth enjoyed an evil prominence as the centre of
" the abandoned and unclean worship of Aphrodite,
to whose temple more than a thousand priestesses
of loose character were attached." This circum
stance may explain the anxious and reiterated
emphasis on the duty of purity which marks the
Epistles to Corinth, and the constant association in
S. Paul's thought of idolatry with sensuality.
The record of the founding of the Christian Church
in Corinth is contained in the i8th chapter of the
Book of the Acts. "After these things (i.e., the visit
to Athens and disputation there with the philosophers)
he departed from A thcns and came to Corinth. A nd he
found a certain Jew named Aquila, a man of Pontus
by race, lately come from Italy, with his wife Priscilla>
because Claudius had commanded all the Jews to depart
from Rome? We may notice the reference to Imperial
history. The Roman historian Suetonius, who, though
writing at a later date, probably reproduces the words
of a contemporary document, states that this edict of
Claudius was occasioned by disturbances at Rome led
by one Chrestus, by whom we must understand the
leader of the Chrestians or Christians, whom the ill-
informed Romans supposed to be still living. The
narrative proceeds: — "And he came unto them; and
• Diet, of the Bible, art. "Corinth."
THE CHURCH IN CORINTH 59
because he was of the same trade, he abode with them,
and they wrought; for by their trade they were tent-
makers." We have here an interesting indication of
the strict Rabbinic influences under which S. Paul had
been brought up. The Rabbis strongly insisted that
every boy ought to be taught a trade. " He that
teacheth not his son a trade, doth the same as if he
taught him to be a thief" is a saying of Rabbi Judah.
We may learn from the Epistles how great store the
Apostle set by the independence which his ability to
earn his own living secured to him. He made the
Gospel without charge to his converts. He took
advantage of no man. " Ye yourselves know" he said
to the Ephesian presbyters, " that these hands minis
tered unto my necessities, and to them that were with
me"* Following his custom in every city where the
Jews were numerous, S. Paul first addressed himself
to the authorities of the synagogue. Doubtless the
scene in Pisidian Antioch was repeated in Corinth.
"After the reading of the law and the prophets the
rulers of the synagogue sent unto them, saying, Brethren^
if ye have any word of exhortation for the people, say
on"\ The Apostle at first met with considerable
success. The earlier stages of his preaching con
tained little that would offend the prejudices of his
hearers, while his fervent loyalty to the spiritual
destiny of Israel, his profound knowledge of the
Scriptures, and his earnest eloquence would go far to
conciliate the most suspicious. A change, however,
happened when he passed on to the central element
of his message. " But when Silas and Timothy came
* Acts xx. 34. f Ibid. xiii. 15.
6o APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
down from Macedonia, Paul was constrained by the
Word (cn/i/6/x€To ra> Ao'yo>), testifying to the Jews that
Jesus was the Christ'' It is not easy to connect the
arrival of S. Paul's companions with his increased
energy in preaching. It has been suggested that
they brought a supply of money, and so enabled the
Apostle to leave tent-making and give himself up
wholly to his preaching. It is certainly true that the
Philippians did minister to S. Paul's necessities, for he
gratefully acknowledges their bounty in his Epistle to
them (iv. 15); but it seems difficult to reconcile this
sense with the structure of the passage in the Acts.
We may learn from S. Paul's own account of his
preaching at Corinth that it presented marked
features. "And I, brethren" so he writes to the
Corinthians, " wJten I came unto you, came not with
excellency of speech or of wisdom, proclaiming to you the
mystery of God. For I determined not to know any
thing among you, save Jesus Christ, and Him crucified.
A nd I was with you in weakness, and in fear, and in
much trembling. And my speech and my preaching
were not in persuasive words of wisdom, but in demon
stration of the Spirit and of power : that your faith
should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in ttie power
ofGod."(\\. 1-5.)
Perhaps the Apostle looked back with half-regret
ful feelings on his disputation at Athens, when he
had laid aside the manner of an apostle in order to
contend in the character of a sophist with the
sophists of the Athenian schools. " It would
appear," observes Professor Ramsay, " that Paul was
disappointed and perhaps disillusioned by his ex-
THE CHURCH IN CORINTH 61
perience in Athens."* Certainly his insistence on
the crucifixion of the Messiah would be as offensive
to the Jews as it was ridiculous to the philosophers.
We are not surprised to learn that opposition mani
fested itself, and soon took a violent form. The
Apostle was little disposed to conciliate or com
promise with the Jews. "And when they opposed
themselves, and blasphemed, he shook out his raiment,
and said unto them, Your blood be upon your own
heads ; I am clean : from henceforth I will go unto
the Gentiles. And he departed thence, and went into
the house of a certain man named Titus Justus, one
that worshipped God, whose house joined Jiard to the
synagogue. And Crispus, the ruler of the synagogue,
believed in the Lord with all his house ; and many of
the Corinthians hearing believed, and were baptized"
The open breach with the synagogue must have
taken place sooner or later, wherever the Gospel
was preached in the synagogue ; here in Corinth
the process was carried through by the Apostle him
self. The house of the converted proselyte became
the first independent Christian Church ; for the first
time the connection with the venerable system of
Judaism was repudiated ; Christianity stood out in
its true character as a new religion. This important
event took place amid circumstances of great dis
turbance and difficulty, which, however, eventually
turned out to the furtherance of the Christian cause.
S. Paul had clearly gauged the critical character of
his action, and braced himself for conflict. He was
inwardly strengthened by renewed assurance of the
* S. Paul, tht Traveller and the Roman Citizen, p. 252.
62 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
Divine Protection. " And the Lord said unto Paid in
tJie night by a vision, Be not afraid, but speak, and hold
not thy peace : for I am with t/iee, and no man shall
set on thce to harm thee : for I have much people in this
city. And Jie dwelt there a year and six months, teacli-
ing the Word of God among tliem" We can imagine
how bitter were the feelings with which the Jews
regarded the seceders from the synagogue. Corinth
had easy communication by sea with Palestine. We
may be sure that the malignant enemies of S. Paul at
Jerusalem exerted their influence to stimulate and
organize the opposition against him in Corinth. An
opportunity for action was provided by the arrival in
the city of a new proconsul of Achaia. " But when
Gallio was proconsul of Achaia, the Jews with one
accord rose up against Paul, and brought him before
the judgment seat, saying, This man persuadeth men
to worship God contrary to the law. But when Paul
was about to open his mouth, Gallio snid unto the Jews,
If indeed it were a matter of wrong or of wicked
villany, 0 ye Jews, reason would that I sJiould bear
with you : but if they are questions about words and
names and your own law, look to it yourselves ; I am
not minded to be a judge of these matters"
" It is clear," observes Professor Ramsay, " that
Gallio's short speech represents the conclusion of a
series of inquiries, for the accusation, as it is quoted,
does not refer to words or names, but only to the
law. But it is reasonable to suppose that the Jews
put their accusation at first in a serious light, with
a view to some serious penalty being inflicted ; and
Gallio, on probing their allegations, reduced the
THE CHURCH IN CORINTH 63
matter to its true dimensions as a question that
concerned only the self-administering community of
'the Nation of the Jews in Corinth.'"* The
governor's action gave great satisfaction to the
Greeks of Corinth, with whom the Jews were
probably extremely unpopular. A demonstration
of public feeling was made in the very presence of
the proconsul. "They all" (*>., the Greeks) "laid
hold on Sosthenes, the ruler of the synagogue^ and beat
him before the judgment seat." Even this violence did
not disturb the placid mind of Gallio. He "cared
for none of these things'' Shortly afterwards Paul
himself left Corinth, and sailed for Syria. It is
curious that precisely at this time, when his relations
with the Jews were so strained, and when he had
himself conducted an open secession from their
synagogue, we should read of his performing a
ritual act required by Jewish law. He shaved his
head in Cenchreae ; for he had a vow. Perhaps he
was already preparing for his encounter with the
intensely Judaistic Church of Jerusalem, in which he
knew himself to be the object of general suspicion,
and not a little positive hostility. He was acting on
that conciliatory principle which he had laid aside
in the conflict with the Corinthian Jews, but which
marked his conduct at Jerusalem. " / am become all
things to all men, that I may by all means save some,"
is his own account of himself. The episode before
the proconsul's judgment seat illustrates the neutral
attitude which, in the earliest period of Church
History, was maintained by the Roman Government
* S. Paul, pp. 258-9.
64 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
towards Christianity. At the same moment the
sharpest contrast was presented between the fanati
cal hatred of the Jews and the impartial justice of
the Empire. The impression made by the contrast
on S. Paul's mind is reflected in the Epistles to the
Thessalonians, which were written during his resi
dence in Corinth. In no other of his letters does
the Apostle write with such bitterness of his own
nation. u Ye also suffered the same things of your
own countrymen even as they " (i.e., the Christians of
Judaea) "did of the Jews ; who both killed the Lord
Jesus and the prophets, and drave out us, and please not
God, and are contrary to all men; forbidding us to
speak to tJte Gentiles that they may be saved ; to Jill
up their sins alway : but the wrath is come upon
them to the uttermost'.' * This is the language of
deep indignation. S. Paul has clearly come to the
decision that there is no hope of working through
the Jews or with them. His separation of the
disciples, and organization of an independent con
gregation in the house of Titus Justus, was but the
expression in act of the sentiments he expressed in
the Epistles to Thessalonians. On the other hand,
he gained a new estimate of the spiritual value of
the mighty organization of the Empire which had
rescued him from his adversaries and authorized the
existence of the Church. We may truly say that
" the residence at Corinth was an epoch in Paul's
life." His view of the Roman Government as the
providential agent for enabling the preaching of the
Gospel is ambiguously expressed in the second
* i Thess. ii. 14-16.
THE CHURCH IN CORINTH 65
Thessalonian letter, in which he speaks of the re
straining force which at present checks the " mystery
of lawlessness" and the removal of which will be the
signal for the great catastrophe of the second Advent*
In the Epistles to the Galatians and Romans his
language is definite and clear : — " The powers that be
are ordained of God" f
We gather from the Epistles to the Corinthians
that the Church in Corinth was mainly composed
of Gentiles. The name of " Sosthenes our brother "
is associated with the Apostle's in the opening verse
of the first Epistle ; and it is natural to conjecture
that he may be identical with the ruler of the
synagogue, whom the rabble beat before Gallio's
judgment seat ; but there is nothing beyond the
identity of names to show that so conspicuous a
success had been vouchsafed to the Church. The
general drift of the Epistles prohibits the notion
that any large proportion of the Corinthian Christians
were Jews ; yet the numerous references to Scripture
and to the system of Judaism make it certain that
knowledge of both was general in the Church.
Probably Titus Justus, whose name sufficiently
indicates that he belonged to the Italian colony,
and who is expressly described as a proselyte, was
representative of many. The core of the Church
in Corinth, as in most of the great cities of the
Empire, was found in the Greek proselytes, who
possessed the Scriptures, and attended the worship
of the synagogues of the Dispersion.
* 3 Thess, ii. 7. f Rom. xiii. I.
CHAPTER III.
THE LETTER FROM CORINTH
A^TER his acquittal before the tribunal of
Gallio, or to speak more exactly, his escape
from trial through the imperturbable neutrality of
the proconsul, S. Paul yet tarried many days in
Corinth ;* then, solemnly bidding farewell to the
Church, he started on a leisurely journey to Syria
by way of Ephesus. While he was visiting Csesarea,
and making a general visitation of the Churches
which he had founded, there came to Ephesus a
learned and eloquent Alexandrian Jew, named Apollos.
Ignorant of the Gospel history, "knowing only the
baptism of John!' Apollos " was mighty in the
Scriptures" and his reasonings were entirely favour
able, so far as they went, to Christianity.
Happily Priscilla and Aquila (who had left Corinth
in S. Paul's company) had remained at Ephesus
when the Apostle went forward to Caesarea, and
from them Apollos learned " the way of God more
carefully!' He professed himself a Christian, and
in that character was formally commended by the
Ephesian brethren to the kindly reception of the
Corinthian Church. His influence at Corinth rapidly
* Acts xviii. 18.
66
THE LETTER FROM CORINTH 67
extended ; especially in controversy with the parent
synagogue his labours were rewarded by great
success, "for he powerfully confuted the Jews, and
that publicly ', showing by the Scriptures that Jesus was
the Christ? While he was thus active at Corinth
S. Paul had returned to Ephesus and entered on
a lengthened ministry there, which, though marked
by many crises of danger, resulted not only in the
firm foundation of the Church in Ephesus itself, but
also in the wide extension of Christian influence
in the province of Asia. Shortly after S. Paul's
settlement in the city ominous reports reached him
from Corinth. The servants of Chloe brought
tidings of divisions among the Christians, divisions
which were only the more offensive since they
sheltered themselves under the authority of justly
venerated names. Apollos arrived from Corinth,
and his tidings were in the main confirmatory of
these reports. Especially, he had to tell of grave
departures from the law of Christian purity. The
heathen laxity in which the Corinthians had grown
up, and by which they were surrounded, was assert
ing itself most manifestly among the baptized.
S. Paul wrote a short Epistle on the subject of
purity; this Epistle is referred to in the first of the
canonical writings, but has not survived.
Hearing further reports he determined to visit
Macedonia and Achaia on his journey to Jerusalem,
where his presence was required in the matter of the
general collection for the poverty-stricken Christians
of Judaea, which he had agreed to make among the
Gentile converts, and which he designed to serve
68 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
as an assertion of unity. With this plan in view
he sent on in advance two of his most trusted
disciples — Timothy and Erastus — with instructions
to organize the collection against his own arrival,
and to rectify the disorders at Corinth.* In the
interval, however, there arrived in Ephesus a depu
tation from the Corinthians, composed of three
members — Stephanas and Fortunatus and Achaicusf
— and charged with a letter from the Church. To
this Corinthian letter S. Paul made answer in the
First Epistle to the Corinthians, and we are able
to discover from the latter the outline of the
contents of the former.
The Corinthians appealed to S. Paul for direction
on five matters of practical importance. The answers
of the Apostle are marked by a tone of authority,
which makes it evident that he regarded himself as
the supreme ruler of his converts in spiritual matters.
I. The first and, from some points of view, the
most important question in the letter had reference to
the subject of marriage. It is discussed and answered
in the seventh chapter of our Epistle. The actual
inquiry had reference to celibacy. Was it a legiti
mate state? Under what limitations and for what
reasons was it to be commended? It is not very obvious
to the modern reader why such an inquiry should have
been made ; but a little reflection, and a study of
S. Paul's reply, make it evident that the subject was
* Acts xix. 21, 22.
t I Cor. xvi. 17, "And I rejoice at the coming of Stephanas and
Fortunatus and Achaicus." It will be observed that the names are
obviously Gentile.
THE LETTER FROM CORINTH 69
both urgent and difficult. The relations of husband
and wife within the married state were rendered
extremely complicated by the advent of Christianity.
How far did the heathen husband's authority extend
over the Christian wife? How far was the heathen
wife to be considered subject to the Christian hus
band ? Did the marriage hold good when one of
the parties became Christian ? What was the posi
tion of the children ? Might new marriages between
Christians and heathen be rightfully contracted ?
How was the Christian doctrine of the spiritual
equality of the sexes to be reconciled with the
subordination of wife to husband in the married
state ? What about divorce ? The question of the
Corinthians was neither simple nor unimportant : it
dealt with real difficulties : and it is not too much to
say that the highest interests of society were at stake
in S. Paul's treatment of it. Moreover, in ancient
as in modern times, though far more powerfully,
there has worked in devout minds that ascetic
principle, which assuredly true in itself, does easily
lend itself, and has constantly lent itself to the most
disastrous errors. Was the single state religiously
preferable to the married ? That, S. Paul answers,
must be determined by considerations of expediency.*
His own opinion was that in view of the approaching
Advent of Christ, an event which would be preceded
by great catastrophes, and in view of the claims of
the religious life, it was better to remain single : but
* Cf. Eph. v. 22-33. This passage cuts up by the roots the idea that
S. Paul believed in the superiority of the single life in itself. His own
example sufficiently proves that he regarded it as superior in some
circumstances and for some work.
70 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
he refused to advance beyond that position. That
there was any inherent spiritual superiority in the
unmarried state he would not allow. The false
asceticism which degraded marriage found in S. Paul
the most uncompromising antagonist. Unmarried *
himself, it is yet to him that we owe that sublime
doctrine of marriage which makes it the symbol of
the highest and holiest fellowship, which consecrates
it as inherently spiritual, and associates it for ever
with the very centre of Christian discipleship.
II. The second question dealt with a practical
matter of great urgency. S. Paul answers it in the
eighth and tenth chapters of the Epistle. Ap
parently there were three inquiries : —
1. Was it permissible to buy and eat the meat
publicly offered for sale in the market-place, although
it was known that according to custom the sellers
had offered it to idols ?
S. Paul replies in the affirmative. " Whatsoever is
sold in the shambles, eat, asking no question for con
science sake : for the earth is the Lord's, and the fulness
thereof." *
2. Was it permissible for a Christian to join with
his neighbours in the feasts, which were held in the
heathen temples, and formed, perhaps, the principal
social gatherings ?
It seems probable that S. Paul has preserved the
actual language of the Corinthian letter. " Now
concerning things sacrificed to idols : we know that we
all have knowledge : we know that no idol is anything
in t!ic wurld> that ' all things are lawful' " These
* x. 25, 26.
THE LETTER FROM CORINTH 71
phrases were perhaps much on the lips of the
Corinthians, especially of those who called them
selves the "strong" members, and regarded with
ample disdain their more scrupulous brethren. S.
Paul returns to the Corinthian question a twofold
negative. Under existing circumstances their liberty
to feast in heathen temples would hurt the con
sciences of many, and so break the supreme law
of charity. "It may be true, as you say, that ' meat
will not commend us to God ' : that ' neither if we eat
not are we the worse : nor, if we eat, are we the better ' :
but your point of view is wrong : you treat the
subject purely in its selfish aspects." " Take heed
lest this liberty of yours become a stumbling-block to
the weak. For if a man see thce which hast know
ledge sitting at meat in an idol's temple, will not his
conscience, if he is weak, be emboldened to eat t kings
sacrificed to idols ? For through thy knowledge he that
is weak perisheth, the brother for ivhose sake Christ
died. And thus, sinning against the brethren, and
wounding their conscience when it is weak, ye sin
against Christ" How the petty ritual point grows
in S. Paul's hands into a nobler thing, is transformed
until the whole issue is lifted out of the controversial
atmosphere of Corinth and judged at the foot of the
Cross ! On the other hand, the Apostle condemns
the practice of attending idolatrous feasts as involv
ing positive disloyalty to our Lord. * He apparently
* Cf. I Cor. x. 19-21, with I Cor. viii. 4. Godet reconciles these
apparently contradictory statements thus: — "Jupiter, Apollon, Venus
assurement ne sont pas des etres reels : mais Satan est quelque chose.
D'arriere toute cette fantasmagorie mythologique se cachent des puis-
I
72 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
believed the heathen gods to be demons — a belief
which was general in the early Church, and there
fore any participation in the heathen worships was
a homage of Satan, and apostasy from Christ.
" What say I then ? that a thing sacrificed to idols is
anything, or that an idol is anything ? But 1 say, that
the things which the Gentiles sacrifice, they sacrifice to
devils, and not to God : and I would not that ye should
have communion with devils"
3. Finally, might a Christian accept a private
invitation to dinner in the house of a heathen friend,
although the meat set on the table would probably
have been " offered to idols " ?
Yes, replies S. Paul, he may go, but if his attention
is directly called to the idolatrous character of the
meat, so as to raise the question of religious principle,
he must decline to partake of the meat. " If one of
them that believe not biddeth you to a feast, and ye are
disposed to go : ivhatsoever is set before you, eat, asking
110 question for conscience sake. But if any man say
unto you, This hath been offered in sacrifice, eat not,
for his sake that showed it, and for conscience sake."
(x. 27-28.) Such is S. Paul's treatment of this
question, which for so many ages has ceased to
be urgent in the Christian Church, save where the
Corinthian conditions are reproduced among the
newly-founded Churches in heathen lands. For
missionaries the subject has a direct and living
sances malfaisantes, qui, sans etre des divinites, n'en sont pas moins
tres-reelles, tres-actives, et qui sont parvenues & fasciner 1'imagination
humaine et a detourner sur des etres de fantaisie le sentiment religieux
des nations pai'ennes : de la les cultes idolatres, cultes addresses a ces
puissances diaboliques et non pas a Dieu." — Corinthicns, ii. p. 106.
THE LETTER FROM CORINTH 73
interest, and even for other Christians, the members
of an ancient Christian Church, the Apostle's teach
ing has a real value. I have sometimes reflected that
under changed forms the inquiries of the Corinthians
in the matter of idolatry still need answer. Many
devout disciples are distressed in conscience by the
apparent necessity under which they are placed to
accept and in a measure support an order of social
life which they are convinced is poisoned with
injustice. They are fearful of incurring guilt by
maintaining a system which involves the practice
known as sweating, and in their anxiety they are
sometimes prepared to attempt very perilous
economic and moral experiments. I suggest that
the Pauline principles might apply. " Whatsoever
is sold in the shops, buy, asking no question for
conscience sake. . . . But if any man say unto
you, These goods are manufactured under disgraceful
conditions, the work-people are oppressed and the
materials are adulterated or inferior, buy not, for his
sake that showed it, and for conscience sake."
III. The Corinthian letter raised another question,
which again, at first, strikes us as rather trivial, but
which, on investigation, is found to be of real im
portance. How ought women to behave in the
religious assemblies ? Were they to be veiled ?
Might they take part in the conduct of worship?
We must remember that Christianity effected a great
change in the position of women. It was by no
means easy to determine the practical application of
that equality in Christ on which all Christians were
agreed. Moreover, there were considerable perils
74 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
involved in any sudden extension of liberty to
persons who were quite unaccustomed to its
possession. In the profligate atmosphere of ancient
Corinth these perils were obvious and grave. We
shall have to return in a later chapter to the question
of the conduct of public worship in the Corinthian
Church, and I do not propose to anticipate here the
discussion which will more properly be undertaken
there. It will suffice to state that the Apostle insisted
with some show of indignation that in the public
assemblies the Christian women should be veiled,
and that they should take no part in the actual
conduct of the devotions. "Let the women keep
silence in the churches : for it is not permitted unto
tJiem to speak ; but let them be in subjection, as also
saith the law:'*
IV. The Corinthian Church was richly endowed
with spiritual gifts, but the sense of order was frail,
and the temper of responsibility inadequate. The
public assemblies became scenes of confusion, almost
of conflict. The need of some regulations wherewith
to check anarchic tendencies and to ensure a more
edifying conduct of the common devotions was
apparent. It is sufficiently evident that the Corinthian
letter included a request that the Apostle would deal
with the subject. The discussion of spiritual gifts
forms the climax of the Epistle. The beautiful
description of the Church under the metaphor of
the natural body has passed into the very texture
of Christian thought ; the appended hymn on the
glories of charity or love has taken its place in
Christian literature as the unequalled unity of
* i Cor. xiv. 34.
THE LETTER FROM CORINTH 75
inspired thought and graceful though glowing
language.* We owe both to the anarchy of the
Corinthian assemblies. The fourteenth chapter con
tains the Apostle's actual rulings ; incidentally it
enables us to gain view of the Apostolic Church
in real life. We refrain from commenting on it
here, because we shall have to deal with the whole
subject in a later chapter. In putting forward the
principles which ought to control the exercise of
spiritual gifts, S. Paul makes a significant appeal to
those members of the Corinthian Church who
claimed to be most richly endowed with these graces.
"If any man thinketJi himself to be a prophet, or
spiritual, let him take knowledge of the things which
I write unto you> that they are the commandment of
the Lord" (v. 37.)
V. The Corinthian letter appears to have made
reference to u the collection for the saints " which S.
Paul had pledged himself to organize throughout
the Churches which he founded. In the Epistle to
the Galatians the Apostle for polemical reasons is
led to give an account of the circumstances under
which he had done this. He is defending the cause
of Christian liberty against the Judaizing fanatics
who sought to impose on the Gentile Churches the
yoke of the Mosaic law, and he narrates the history
of his relations with the " chief est apostles" "James
and Cephas and John, they who ivere reputed to be
* KENAN'S enthusiastic description of this thirteenth chapter is
worth quoting: — " Emporte par un souffle vraiment prophe'tique au'
dela des idees melees des aberrations qu'il vient d'exposer, Paul e'crit
alors cette pa^e admirable, la settle de toute la litterature, Chrdtienne qui
puisse etre compares aux discours de Jesus." — S. Paul, p. 408.
76 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
pillars" These unquestioned leaders of the Church
had not insisted on the imposition of the Jewish law.
On the contrary, " when tJiey perceived the grace that
was given unto " S. Paul they had readily consented
to an arrangement by which, while they themselves
undertook the conversion of the Jews, he should
"go unto the Gentiles" one condition only they had
insisted upon, and that S. Paul was more than
willing to fulfil, " only they would that we should
remember the poor ; which very thing I was also
zealous to do" It is very evident that the success of
this collection was earnestly desired by S. Paul.*
It would cut the ground from under the feet of those
who persistently accused him of disloyalty to the
Mother Church of Jerusalem, and it would bring
home to his Gentile converts the reality of their
communion with their Jewish brethren. Yet he was
clearly anxious as to the reception which his efforts
would obtain at Jerusalem. He requests the prayers
of the Roman Christians on his behalf, .and his
words convey the impression that he had misgivings
as to the future. " Now I beseech you, brethren, by our
Lord Jesus Christ, and by the love of the Spirit, that
ye strive together with me in your prayers to God
for me ; that I may be delivered from them that are
disobedient in Judcea, and that my ministration which
I have for Jerusalem may be acceptable to the saints ;
that I may come unto you in joy through the will of
God, ajid together with you find rest" t That S. Paul's
misgivings were justified by the event is manifest
from the narrative in the Acts of his visit to
* FiifeHORT, Romans and Ephesians, pp. 40-44. f Rom. xv. 30-31.
THE LETTER FROM CORINTH 77
Jerusalem, a visit which led to his arrival in Rome
as a state prisoner.
We conclude, then, that the collection was regarded
both by S. Paul and by the Corinthians as a matter
of considerable importance. They inquire by what
methods the money is to be collected and for
warded, and this is the Apostle's answer: "Now
concerning tlie collection for the saints, as I gave order
to the churches of Galatia, so also do ye. Upon the
first day of tlie week let each one of you lay by him in
store, as he may prosper, tJiat no collections be made
when I come. And when 1 arrive, whomsoever ye shall
approve by letters, tJiem will I send to carry your
bounty unto Jerusalem : and if it be meet for me to
go also, they shall go with me."* We learn from the
second Epistle that the Corinthians were not so
zealous in this matter as S. Paul had expected them
to be. No less than two chapters — the eighth and the
ninth — are devoted to the subject, and the embarrassed
tone of the Apostle is very apparent. He courteously
dwells on the liberality of the Corinthians, but he re
minds them that " he that soweth sparingly shall reap
also sparingly^' and that " God loveth a cheerful giver''
S. Paul's answer to the Corinthian inquiry con
tains the earliest reference to the observance of
the "first day of the week'.' We learn from the
record of the Acts that the Christians of the
Apostolic age were accustomed to receive the Holy
Communion on that day. At Troas it is related that
" upon the first day of the week, when we were gathered
together to break bread, Paul discoursed with them,
78 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
intending to depart on the morrow : and prolonged his
speech until midnight"* It does not indeed appear
that S. Paul intended the Corinthians to make their
weekly contributions at the religious service, his
language seems rather to suggest that each one
should set aside his alms at home, and bring the
total to the common fund on the Apostle's arrival ;
but this in no way detracts from the significance of
the reference. The "first day of the week" is
mentioned as a matter of course ; that was the
obvious day which would suggest itself to every
Christian mind when any matter connected with
religion was in question. The explanation of this
prominence, at once unquestioned and complete,
points to the supreme event which was associated
in Christian thought with the first day of the week.
That event — the resurrection of Christ — stamped a
character of greatness and iov upon the dav. and en
dowed it with the name which has continued in use
foroug-hout the history of the Church, and remains
the favourite name in the usage of disciples among
themselves, — "the Lord's Day." Incidentally it is
worth noticing that the Apostle provides a very
remarkable piece of collateral evidence for the
historic truth of that Article of the Creed, which
perhaps may be described as the foundation of all
the rest, " On the third day He rose again'1
* Acts xx. 7.
PART III.
DOCTRINE
AND THE SACRAMENTS
CHAPTER I.
THE HISTORIC CHRIST
THE Corinthian Epistles were written before the
canonical Gospels ; they may represent, therefore,
an earlier stage of the tradition about our Lord. By
carefully studying them we shall be able to discover
what was the original account of Jesus Christ, which
was circulated in the Church. If they confirm the
history as it is presented in the four Gospels, we
certainly have added, and that in no slight measure,
to the strength of the reasons which justify our
acceptance of that history. Manifestly the inquiry
which we have in hand touches the very centre of our
religion. Everything depends on the validity of our
belief that the Founder of our religion was, what the
Creed asserts that He was, the Son of God ; that
being thus of divine origin and essence, He yet was
very man ; that His death on the cross was no mere
martyrdom glorious with the barren majesty of un
equalled fortitude, but an event, powerful for our
salvation ; that His resurrection was no fair dream
of ardent friendship, unable to reconcile itself to the
extinction of the hopes which had grown round His
person, but a fact able to bear the weight of Christian
faith. The truth of Christianity stands or falls with
G 81
82 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
the truth of Christ's history. In the four Gospels we
have a record of our Lord's life on earth, which for
eighteen centuries has been accepted as a true record.
This century, however, has brought that record under
the scrutiny of a vigilant and rigorous criticism.
Attention has been directed to the discrepancies in
detail between the synoptic evangelists, to the remark
able difference between the history as presented by
those writers and the history as presented by the
author of the fourth Gospel. The discrepancies, even
when the harmonists have tried their hardest, are
real ; the difference between the first three Gospels
and the fourth is manifest to every student. Yet, in
spite of these, I do not think any impartial person
will deny that there is left upon the student's mind an
impression at once distinct and absolutely unique.
The personality of Jesus looks out upon us from the
Gospels, commanding, inscrutable, severe, vet beyond
all parallel winning, tender, and pathetic. That
personality constitutes the abiding charm . of tho.se
writings. It is the secret of the power of Christianity.
It is the magnet of souls, drawing out to itself the in
voluntary homage of the good, the pure, the just in
every age and in every land. The question proposes
itself and presses for answer. Is the impression left
on us by the Gospels a just one? Is the personality
of Christ, presented in those writings, a creation of
pious fancy, or is it a transcript from actual ex
perience ? In a word, are the Gospels in the main
true ? The inquiry which we have now in hand will
help us towards the answer. If we can show that the
Gospels do certainly present the earliest form of
THE HISTORIC CHRIST 83
Christ's history, that, whatever else may be said about
the picture of our Lord which they contain, this at
least must be conceded, that it is the original picture,
the first, the oldest ; that in the Gospels we have no
later growth, no developed tradition, but in its
essential features the same version of the life of
Jesus as that which on the morrow of His death was
accepted by the converts to Christianity — then, I
submit, that we shall have advanced a long way
towards the affirmative answer to the momentous
questions we have proposed. Supposing, then, for
the sake of our argument, that we had no other
documents from which to form our conception of the
history of Christ than these Epistles to the Corin
thians, what should we know about that history?
Or, to state the same thing in other words, what
account of Christ did S. Paul give to the Corin
thians ?
Let me remind you that both the Corinthian letters
were written in the year 57. that S. Paul had been at
that his knowledge of Christ's history must have been
acquired at the time of his conversing and fbaf,
therefore, the version of that history which these
Epistles assume must have been current within the
first eight or ten years after our Lord's crucifixion.*
It cannot, I think, be reasonably disputed that
whether we learn much, or whether we learn little
from these writings about our Lord's life on earth,
what we learn is certainly the original version of the
history. We turn now to the Epistles themselves.
* This is probably an under-statement of the facts.
84 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
The most casual reader must be impressed by the
prominence of Christ in these Corinthian letters.
Unless my counting is at fault our Lord is mentioned
by name sixty-nine times in the first Epistle, fifty-
six times in the second. There are, besides,
numerous references to Him more or less direct.
He is referred to under two names, "Jesus" and
"Christ" ; often both names are combined, "Jesus
Christ" or " Christ Jesus" The title which is
most commonly assigned to Him is "Lord"; except
in quotations from the Old Testament, it would
seem that wherever "the Lord" is mentioned, Christ
is referred to. In one place he is emphatically
described as the "one Lord" of Christians; and in
another the recognition of His Lordship is referred
to as the test of discipleship. The contrasted for
mulas in the following passage would seem to have
been actually current in Corinth. The one, perhaps,
was the battle-cry of the synagogue ; the other, the
rejoinder of the Church. " I give you to understand,
that no man speaking in the Spirit of God saith, Jesus
is anathema ; and no man can say, Jesus is Lord, but
in the Holy Spirit."*
Two events in Christ's History are specifically
dwelt upon — His Crucifixion and His Resurrection.
" We preach Christ crucified, unto Jews a stumbling-
block, and unto Greeks foolishness."^ S. Paul is fully
conscious of the unpopularity of the fact upon which
he constantly insists. " / determined not to know
anything among you, save Jesus Christ, and Him
crucified" \ This fact emerges again and again in the
* i Cor. xii. 3. f Ibid. i. 23. J Ibid. ii. 2.
THE HISTORIC CHRIST £5
Apostle's thought. Does he urge the necessity of
purity, and the jealous exclusion from Christian
society of all that endangers purity? It is the
death of Christ which supplies the basis of his
appeal. " Purge out the old leaven, that ye may be
a new lamp, even as ye are unleavened. For our
passover also Jiath been sacrificed, even Christ" " Ye
are not your own ; for ye were bought with a price :
glorify God therefore in your body" *
Does he seek an argument which shall bring home
to the "strong" members of the Corinthian Church
the real meaning of that proud insistence on their
liberty to which they clung? He finds it in the Death
of Christ. " Through thy knowledge he tliat is weak
perisheth, the brother for whose sake Christ died"\
Does he seek an explanation of that affliction which
shadows his apostolate? It is here that he finds
it. The Apostles are "always bearing about in the
body the dying of Jesus, that the life also of Jesus
may be manifested in our body"\ Will he confess
the motive of his passion for souls? It is still
the Cross. "For the love of Christ constraineth us;
because we thus judge, that One died for all, there
fore all died ; and He died for all, that they which
live should no longer live unto themselves, but unto
Him who for their sakes died and rose a gain "^ Do
the Corinthians require an explanation of the con
trast between his lofty insistence on obedience, and
his harassed, feeble personality? He will yet point
them to the paradox of Christ's Passion. " Seeing
* Ibid. v. 7, 8; vi. 19, 20. t Ibid. viii. II.
t 2 Cor. iv. 10. § Ibid. v. 14-15.
86 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
that ye seek a proof of Christ that speaketh in me :
who to youward is not weak, but is powerful in you :
for He was crucified through weakness^ yet He liveth
through tlie power of God'' *
Now this insistence on the fact of the Crucifixion
would be inexplicable if it stood alone ; but is not
so much explicable as obvious when it is combined
with the fact of the Resurrection. Regarded in the
light of the triumph of Easter, the tragedy of Good
Friday receives an interpretation which invests it
with resistless attractiveness. " Wherefore we hence
forth know no man offer the flesh ; even though we
have known Christ after the flesh, yet now we know
Him so no morc"\ The Crucifixion is no longer
merely or mainly the central Infamy of human
history ; it is a Pageant of Divine Love ; it is the
stepping forth into the vexed life of the Race of
the Divine Helpfulness. " God was in Christ recon
ciling the world unto Himself, not reckoning unto
them their trespasses, and having committed unto us
the word of reconciliation ." + The Resurrection is
affirmed with a solemnity and caution not inade
quate to its crucial importance. The Apostle does
not hesitate to stake on it the truth of Christianity.
" If Christ hath not been raised, your faith is vain ;
ye are yet in your sins"§ The testimonies collected
together in the fifteenth chapter of the First Epistle
are too important to be cursorily noticed here ; we
must consider them separately in the next chapter.
The Institution of the Eucharist is related in the
* 2 Cor. xiii. 3. t Ibid. v. 16.
"$. Ibid. v. 19. § I Cor. xv. 14.
THE HISTORIC CHRIST 87
eleventh chapter, and so close is the parallel with
S. Luke's Gospel that it leaves us in little doubt
as to the source from which the Evangelist drew
some of his materials. The form of the account
as it stands in the Epistle suggests that in liturgical
use it had already established itself. Reserving to
a later stage in our inquiry the discussion of this
subject, we may here pause to notice that the
Apostle follows exactly on the lines of the Gospels
in giving so great prominence to the closing scenes
of our Lord's life.
We learn that Christ was a Teacher, whose
authority, indeed, is final in the Church. Twice,
at least, S. Paul quotes the very words of Christ,
and it is interesting to note that while in both
instances the words are fairly representative of His
teaching, in neither do the canonical Gospels contain
the actual words attributed to our Lord. In treating
of marriage the Apostle lays down this rule on the
authority of Christ : — " That the wife depart not from
her husband, and that the husband leave not his wife!'
Again, in arguing the right of the clergy to the sup
port of their flocks, he adduces as the final considera
tion this precept of Christ that " they which proclaim
the gospel should live of the gospel'' It is worth
noticing that in the farewell speech to the Ephesian
presbyters attributed to S. Paul in the Acts, there is
another saying of Christ quoted which also is not
found in our Gospels. He bade the presbyters
" remember the words of the Lord Jesus, how He
Himself said, It is more blessed to give than to
receive" (xx. 35.)
88 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
We learn incidentally that Christ had "brethren"
and "apostles" of whom twelve occupied a position of
exceptional importance. One of these is mentioned
by name, apparently as holding a certain recognized
pre-eminence amongst them — Cephas. We also learn
that one of Christ's brethren bore the name "James"
11 Have we no right to lead about a wife that is a
believer, even as the rest of the apostles, and the
brethren of the Lord, and Cephas?" It is evident
that all these were well-known persons, whose
authority no Christian would dream of disputing.
In the testimonies of the Resurrection we find the
following: — "He appeared to Cephas; then to the
twelve . . . then He appeared to James ; then to all
the apostles"} In the second Epistle we are able to
discover that within the apostolic college there was
recognized a certain gradation of authority. Some
were regarded as superior to the rest, if not in
position yet certainly in influence. "/ reckon that
I am not a whit beJiind the very chief est apostles" \
We learn from the Epistle to the Galatians, which,
you will remember, was written about the same time
as the Corinthian Epistles, and is, like them, of un
disputed authority, that these " chief est apostles " were
"James and Cephas and John?
Moreover we have in these Epistles no obscure
indications as to the character of the Historic Christ.
It is assumed that the Corinthians are familiar with
His self-abnegation. " Ye know the grace of our Lord
Jesus Christ, that, though He was rich, yet for your
sakes He became poor, that ye through His poverty
* I Cor. ix. 5. f Ibid. xv. 5, 7. % 2 Cor. xi. 5.
THE HISTORIC CHRIST 89
might become rich"* It is evident that the Christ of
history was, in worldly circumstances, a poor man.
His character was as notorious as his poverty. "/
Paul myself intreat you by the meekness and gentleness
of Christ" \ says the Apostle.
So far we have been concerned mainly with state
ments of fact, and I do not think anyone will deny
that the agreement between the Gospels and these
Epistles is, so far as it goes, complete. The Gospels
confirm and explain the allusions in the letters, and
are in the process themselves confirmed and explained.
Now we may turn to the position assigned to Christ
in these Epistles, and inquire how far it matches with
the declarations about Himself which in the Gospels
are attributed to our Lord. Here we should expect
a large measure of variation ; for here the idiosyn
crasy of the Apostle would be free to assert itself.
We shall find, however, that even here the witness of
the Epistles to the Gospels is decisively favourable.
We notice that great emphasis is laid by S. Paul on
the Divine Sonship of Christ. God is described as
the Father of Jesus Christ ; the description seems to
carry with it a version of the Divine character.
" The God and Father of the Lord Jesus, He ivho is
blessed for evermore, knoiveth that I lie not" + So
Christ is called " the image of God" in whose ''face "
men may perceive " the light of the knowledge of the
glory of God"% Would it be possible to find a better
comment on these expressions than these words from
the fourth Gospel : — " No man hath seen God at any
* Ibid. viii. 9. f Ibid. x. I.
% 2 Cor. xi. ji. § 2 Cor iv. 4-6.
90 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
time ; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of
the Father, He hatJi declared Him''* Christ is pre
sented in the Corinthian Epistles as a Divine Being,
the object of Christian worship. The first Epistle is
addressed not only to the "saints" at Corinth, but
also to "all that call upon the name of our Lord
Jesus Christ in every place? To have the " mind of
Christ" is to "know the mind of" God.f His name
is united with that of God the Father in the Bene
dictions with which the second Epistle opens and
concludes. S. Paul prayed to Him in tribulation
and was strengthened. He is the Judge of the
world before Whose Tribunal all men must be made
manifest. \ In His "day" the spirit of the sinner
who has done penance for his sin shall be saved. §
He is the "one foundation" of discipleship.|] He is
the model which Christians must imitate. U He
governs the Church with sovereign authority, allot
ting to every man his place, determining for every
office its functions. He is the Head of the mystical
Body into which Baptism admits, and in which the
Holy Eucharist sustains men.** His grace is ineffably
great ; His dignity is supreme. Unworthily to receive
the Holy Communion is to be "guilty of the body and
the blood of the Lord? Yet while so awful He is ever
near at hand in watchful mercy. He will arrange
the journeyings of S. Paul as well as afflict with
fearful penalties the unrepenting sinners. No quota
tions can adequately express the intense conviction
* S. John i. 18. t I Cor. ii. 16. % 2 Cor. v. IO.
§ i Cor. v. 5. 0 MM- »'• If
** Ibid. xii.
THE HISTORIC CHRIST 91
of Christ's nearness which penetrates these Epistles.
S. Paul naturally turns to Him for guidance, comfort,
and strength. Nay, the astounding mystery is
declared as a matter so surely established in the
Christian consciousness as to be the very common
place of discipleship that Christ inhabits the Christian.
" Know ye not as to your own selves, that Jesus Christ
is in you? unless indeed ye be reprobate"*
The numerous references to the Holy Spirit are
not less impressive, and they also tend in the same
direction. The doctrine of the Blessed Trinity, no
where formally defined, everywhere underlies S.
Paul's language, and the Epistles conclude with a
formula which is definitely Trinitarian. " The grace
of the Lord Jesus Christ, and the love of God, and
the Communion of the Holy Ghost, be with you all"
Now compare this version of Christ (if I may be
permitted the expression) with the version presented
in the four Gospels. Can it be truthfully said
that there is any substantial discrepancy between
them ? Is it not rather manifest that the agreement
is remarkably close ? Christ, as He is described in
the Gospels, did claim to be the Son of the Father,
the Light and Life of men, the Judge of the World,
the King of the Kingdom, the Founder of the
Church, the Model of Disciples. And you will not
fail to notice that the parallel is particularly close
with the Fourth Gospel. Whatever may be said—
and I admit that much may be said — as to the form
and language of that Gospel, I cannot question, with
the Epistles of S. Paul before me, that the substance
* 2 Cor. xiii. 5.
92 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
is genuinely evangelic. We are led to the conclusion
that the original version of Christ's life, the version
that within eight years of His Death was set before
the converted Pharisee, from whose extant writings
we may still learn it, was essentially the same as that
which for so many centuries has been the Baptismal
Confession of Christendom, which has long been
known in the Church as the Apostles' Creed. If
the evidence cannot prove the truth of the Creed,
it certainly can prove its original character, and in an
historical question to get the original version of the
facts is to get all the assurance of truth you are able
to get from historical inquiry.
At the very beginning of Christian History the
inquirer encounters the Problem of Jesus. The
paradox which amazes, perhaps also offends him,
is there already, before tradition has been swelled
by myth and fable. He must find some other ex
planation of the Divine element in Christ's history
than the obvious one of legendary expansion.
Legend takes time to grow ; myth does not spring
up in a night ; fable echoes faith, but cannot create
it. The war of the critics over the documents
cannot touch the facts of the Life of Christ. They
are certified, so far as they can be certified, by
the independent authority of the Pauline Epistles.
Profoundly diverse in so many things, in this the
nineteenth century finds itself at agreement with
the first. The one changeless element in Christian
History is the Person of Tesus. From It all grace
proceeds ; to It all problems come for solution.
It reconciles the contradictions of experience, and
THE HISTORIC CHRIST 93
creates unity of faith out of the chaos of opinions.
For the Person of Jesus is both Divine and Human,
since in Its indissoluble Oneness meet the perfect
Nature of God, and the perfect nature of man.
Yes, amid the shifting sands of speculation, here
is the Rock. The Historic Christ, Who loved the
society of little children, and felt no shame to be
the Comrade of the strayed and exiled ones of the
earth, Whose fierce anger rushed forth in anathema
upon hypocrisy, and pride of place, and selfishness
of class, Whose stainless purity shamed into silence
His embittered foes, Who wrestled in strong prayer
beneath the olives of Gethsemane and prayed for
His murderers in the Hour of His Agony, the Cross
of Whose Passion is clothed with Eternal Glory — the
Historic Christ remains when the last word of
criticism has been spoken, the Alpha and Omega
of Christian Faith, the only sure Foundation of
Human Hope.
CHAPTER II.
THE RESURRECTION
M REN AN has observed that the Resurrection
• was of all the Christian dogmas the most
repugnant to the Greek mind. We owe to the fact
this memorable fifteenth chapter of the first Corinthian
Epistle, perhaps the most important chapter in the
Bible. It is evident that there were persons in
Corinth who stumbled at this doctrine. "How say
some among you that there is no resurrection of the
dead?" asks S. Paul. The objectors do not seem
to have questioned Christ's Resurrection ; to do that
would have been to stultify their position as
Christians, but they denied the general Resurrection
which — as the Apostle urged with unanswerable
force — was really involved in the fact of 'Christ's
rising. They may be compared with those heretics —
Hymenaus and Philetus — whose ''profane babblings "
are censured in the second Pastoral Epistle, and
who are described as "men who concerning the truth
have erred, saying that the resurrection is past
already"* Among the Jews the Christian doctrine
created no difficulties. The belief in resurrection
and immortality was no new thing. " Within the
Old Testament period, and even within Old
Testament literature the gloom of Sheol begins
to lighten, while between the Maccabean age and
* 2 Tim. ii. 17, 18.
94
THE RESURRECTION 95
the birth of Christ the ' larger hope ' had become
a permanent dogma of Judaism."* The doctrines
of the immortality of the soul and the resurrection
of the body were firmly held by the Pharisees, and
their influence was generally supreme within the
sphere of Judaism. Gibbon does not overstate the
fact when he says that "the immortality of the
soul became the prevailing sentiment of the
synagogue under the reign of the Asmonean
princes and pontiffs." The narrative of the Acts
illustrates the different attitude of Jews and Greeks
towards the message of the Resurrection. S. Paul
could count on the sympathy of the Pharisees when
he urged this doctrine. On one occasion he availed
himself of that sympathy in order to avert a judicial
condemnation. " When Paul perceived that the one
part (of the Sanhedrim) ivere Sadducees, and the other
Pharisees, he cried out in the council, Brethren, I am a
Pharisee, a son of Pharisees ; touching the hope and
resurrection of the dead I am called in question" \ The
result of this appeal abundantly justified the Apostle's
expectation. The assembly was divided, and the
" scribes of the Pharisees part" openly espoused his
cause. On the other hand, the Greeks received the
announcement of Christ's Resurrection with con
temptuous incredulity. Of the Athenians we read
that " when they heard of the resurrection of the dead,
some mocked" \ The prominence given to the Resur
rection in the preaching of S. Paul is apparent on
the face of the history of the Acts. The Athenian
philosophers, indeed, supposed that the " Restir-
* MONTKFIORE, H. L., p. 455. f Acts xxui. 6. $ Ibid. xvii. 32.
96 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
rection " was the name of a separate Deity. " Certain
of the Epicurean and Stoic philosophers encountered
him. And some said, What would this babbler say?
other some, He seemcth to be a settcr-forth of strange
gods : because (adds the historian) he preached Jesus
and the resurrection''* Festus, also, was impressed
with the Resurrection as the principal subject of S.
Paul's teaching. He described his apostolic prisoner
to King Agrippa as one who was not accused of any
evil things, but whose enemies " had certain questions
against him of their own religion, and of one Jesus, who
was dead, whom Paul affirmed to be alive."}
The case was not different with the older Apostles.
They, indeed, were the original eye-witnesses, and
their incommunicable function was to declare the
fact of Christ's Resurrection. " We are witnesses','
said S. Peter to Cornelius and his friends, " of all
things ivhich He did both in the country of the Jews
and in Jerusalem ; whom also they slew, hanging Him
on a tree. Him God raised up the third day, and gave
Him to be made manifest, not to all the people, but unto
witnesses that were chosen before of God, even to us,
who did eat and drink with Him after He rose from
the dead" I It is important to notice the emphasis
laid on the testimony of the Apostles. The record
of the Gospels represents the followers of Christ
as entirely destitute of any expectation that He
would rise from the dead. Some of them were
actually bearing in their hands the spices with which
they designed to bury His Body, when they were
encountered by tidings of the empty sepulchre and
* Acts xvii. 18. f Ibid. xxv. 18, 19. $ Ibid. x. 39-41.
THE RESURRECTION 97
the vision of angels. The obstinate incredulity of
S. Thomas refused belief to all testimony save that
of his own senses. We may be sure that the Apostles
were not more sceptical than the other disciples, nor
disciples than the unbelieving Jews. From the first
the belief in Christ's Resurrection was advanced on
evidence which was considered to be irresistible, and
was, in fact, generally accepted as such. S. Paul
sets down in his Epistle to the Corinthians a list
of testimonies which had been delivered to him soon
after his conversion, and which he strengthens by the
addition of his own personal testimony. He is care
ful to disclaim any originality for this summary of the
Gospel. " / delivered unto you first of all that which
also I received." The expressions are identical with
those adopted by the Apostle when treating of the
Eucharist. " / received (Trape\a/3oi>) of the Lord that
which also I delivered (-TrapeSiaKa) unto you'' (xi. 23.)
The kindred substantive to the verb here rendered
to " deliver to" anyone is used by S. Paul in the
second Thessalonian Epistle, where it is represented
in English by the famous word " tradition," i.e., some
thing delivered to somebody. " So then, brethren,
stand fast, and hold the traditions (7rapaS6a-ei$) which
ye were taught, whether by word or by epistle of ours''*
Now S. Paul expressly says in the Galatian Epistle
that he did not make the acquaintance of the older
Apostles until some time had elapsed after his con
version. " After three years I went up to Jerusalem to
visit Cephas, and tarried with him fifteen days. But
other of the Apostles saw I none, save James, the Lord's
* 2 Thess. ii. 1$.
H
98 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
brother!' (i. 19.) It is significant that in the list of
testimonies the only names mentioned are those of
Cephas and James. This coincidence corresponds
with the probabilities of the case in assigning the
origin of this " tradition " which S. Paul delivered
to the Corinthians to his visit to Jerusalem three
years after his conversion. This visit may be
reasonably ascribed to the year 38 of our era, that
is, precisely eight years after the Crucifixion of our
Lord. In Jerusalem, then, the scene of the alleged
fact, where, if the statement were false, overwhelming
evidence must have been at hand to demonstrate
its falseness by the very men who had companied
with Christ during His life, and had been panic-
stricken by His Death — within eight years of the
supposed occurrence, S. Paul received the following
statement : — " That Christ died for our sins according
to the Scriptures ; and that He was buried ; and that
He hath been raised on the third day according to the
Scriptures ; and that He appeared to Cephas ; then to
tht twelve ; then He appeared to above 500 brethren
at once ; then He appeared to James ; tJien to all the
Apostles" S. Paul, in rehearsing this " tradition,"
inserts a comment and makes an addition. Of the
500 brethren, he says, " the greater part remain until
now, but some are fallen asleep" Is it extravagant
to infer from these words that S. Paul had known
many of these brethren, and learned from their own
lips the glorious Fact of which they had been specta
tors ? He adds to the list his own testimony. "And
last of all) as unto one born out of due time. He appeared
to me aiso" That vision of the Risen Lord wa3
THE RESURRECTION 99
supremely important to S. Paul. Not only had it
been the cause of his conversion, but it was the basis
of his Apostolic authority. He could meet the
insulting questions of his judaistic opponents with
confidence. "Am I not free ? am I not an Apostle?
have I not seen Jesus our Lord?" It does not fall
within the purpose of this inquiry to examine the
evidences of the Resurrection ; it is sufficient to
show that in the Apostolic Church the fact of the
Resurrection was presented to men as claiming their
belief reasonably. It was matter of legitimate
questioning ; it challenged inquiry ; it required
proof; it possessed — so the Apostles maintained
and so the Church believed — overwhelming proof.
It may be permitted to remark that— apart from
the refusal to allow any evidence as adequate to
prove the Resurrection — the evidences which satisfied
S. Paul remain to-day unshaken by centuries of
questioning and criticism.
But what were the Corinthians taught about Christ's
Resurrection ? What was the understanding of the
Fact which obtained in the Apostolic Church ? The
fifteenth chapter, which opens with the traditional
testimonies to the fact, proceeds to expound the
doctrine of the Resurrection. "But now hath Christ
been raised from the dead, the first-fruits of them that
are asleep. For since by man came death, by man came
also the resurrection of the dead. For as in A dam all
die, so also in Christ shall all be made alive. But each
in his own order ; Christ the first-fruits ; then they
that are Christ's at His coming'' Our Lord is the
true representative of the race in its spiritual, as
ioo APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
Adam in its natural capacity. In His case the law
is first operative, which shall in due course be
operative in all His brethren. The Resurrection
is not so much miraculous as natural ; the working
of the law, which is ultimately to work universally.
S. Paul proceeds to argue the moral necessity of the
Resurrection. The practice of baptizing for the dead
assumed the life beyond the grave, in which the
sacrament, thus vicariously received, could prove its
efficacious virtue. "Else what shall they do which are
baptized for the dead? If the dead are not raised at
all, why are they then baptized for the dead?" Con
siderable doubt has been expressed as to the meaning
of this " baptism for the dead." The difficulty hardly
so much arises from any obscurity in S. Paul's
language as from an unwillingness on the part of
students to admit the existence in Apostolic times,
and, apparently, under Apostolic auspices, of a
practice which seems plainly superstitious. We do
not share that unwillingness, and, therefore, do not
perceive the difficulty. M. Renan, perhaps, goes
too far in his explanation of the Corinthian usage.
"The faithful," he says, " called to mind their excellent
ancestors, who had died without having known the
truth which saves. A touching practice — baptism for
the dead — was the consequence of this feeling. They
believed that in being baptized for those of their
ancestors, who had not received the sacred water,
they conferred on them the merits of the sacrament ;
thus they allowed themselves to hope that they would
not be parted from those whom they had loved."
We cannot think that the practice had so wide an
THE RESURRECTION 101
application. Rather we should suppose that it was
limited to the case of those who being desirous of
baptism were cut off by death before they could
receive the Sacrament. This view is confirmed by
the testimony of S. Chrysostom, who relates, not
without expressions of contempt, the custom of
certain Christians. "After a catechumen was dead
they hid a living man under the bed of the deceased,
then coming to the dead man they spoke to him
and asked him whether he would receive baptism,
and he making no answer the other replied in
his stead, and so they baptized the living for the
dead." The reason of their action is stated by
Epiphanius. They feared " lest in the resurrection
the dead should be punished for want of baptism."
While we may agree with Dean Stanley in regarding
this " baptism for the dead " as a " curious relic of
primitive superstition," we shall maintain that the
idea underlying the practice was a true one. S. Paul
only appeals to the custom as an indication of the
necessary assumption of the Resurrection which the
Corinthians were making. He goes on to urge the
kindred witness of all hardship borne for the sake
of righteousness, nay, of all effort after righteous
ness. " Why do we also stand in jeopardy every hour ?
I protest by that glorying inyoti, brethren, which I have
in Christ Jesus our Lord, I die daily. If, after the
manner of men, I fought with beasts at Ephesus, what
doth it profit me ? If the dead are not raised, let us
eat and drink, for to-morrow we die." Loyalty to
righteousness is an act of faith in that life beyond
the grave, in which righteousness shall be seen to be
102 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
victorious. Here in this strange world, where the
wicked flourish as the bay tree and the heroes of
self-sacrifice sink unregarded into their graves, the
servant of Righteousness must " endure as seeing Him,
Who is invisible"
But a host of objections were urged, are still urged,
in the name of reason, of physical science. "But
someone will say, How are the dead raised? And
with what manner of body do they come ? " There are
many in these days who object to the doctrine of the
Resurrection its incompatibility with what are con
veniently called the " laws of nature." S. Paul, as
Christ had done before him,* points to the significant
analogy of nature. " Thou foolish one, that wJiich thou
thyself sowest is not quickened, except it die ; and that
which thou soivest, thou sowest not the body that shall
be, but a bare grain, it may chance of wheat, or of some
other kind ; but God give th it a body even as it pleased
Him, and to each seed a body of its own. . . . So also
is the resurrection of the dead. It is sown in corrup
tion ; it is raised in incorruption ; it is sown in
dishonour ; it is raised in glory ; it is sown in weak
ness ; it is raised in power ; it is sown a natural body ;
it is raised a spiritual body"
* Cf. ARCHBISHOP TEMPLE'S Bampton Lectures, pp. 196-7 (London,
1884). "It is quite possible that our Lord's Resurrection may be
found hereafter to be no miracle at all in the scientific sense. It fore
shadows and begins the general Resurrection ; when that general
Resurrection comes we may find that it is, after all, the natural issue
of physical laws always at work. . . . We may find that even in the
language of strict science " He was the first-fruits of them that slept,"
and that His Resurrection was not a miracle, but the first instance of
the working of a law till the last day quite unknown, but on that last
day operative on all that ever lived."
THE RESURRECTION 103
The idea of " a spiritual body " takes the doctrine
of the Resurrection out of the category of the
physical, and relieves it from all objections which
proceed on the materialist supposition. The best
comment on the phrase is provided by the Evangelic
accounts of Christ's Resurrection. Evidently the
Body of the Risen Saviour was an enfranchized,
glorious Body ; no longer was It subject to the
limiting conditions of terrestrial existence. It over
passed all physical impediments, coming and going
in perfect obedience to the Will of Christ, recogniz
able as Christ's and yet different, so that only by an
effort of awakened attention could the likeness be
perceived. Read the last chapter of S. Luke's
Gospel in connection with this fifteenth chapter of
the Corinthian Epistle : remember that S. Luke
probably drew from his great master, S. Paul, much
of his knowledge of the Evangelic History, that the
account of Christ's Risen Body may be regarded as
correspondent with S. Paul's conception of the facts,
and, therefore, as providing the basis of his doctrine
of the spiritual body. You recall the experience of
the two disciples with whom our Lord conversed on
the way to Emmaus. "// came to pass, when He had
sat down with them to meat, He took the bread and
blessed it, and brake, and gave to them. A nd their eyes
were opened, and they knew Him, and He vanished out
of their sight"* Our Lord Himself was the Author
of the Pauline doctrine, when — as S. Matthew relates
— He rebuked the coarse carnal notions of the
Sadducees. "Jesus ansivered and said unto them, Ye
* S. Luke xxiv. 30.
104 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
do err, not knowing the Scriptures, nor the power of
God. For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor
are given in marriage, but are as angels in heaven''*
Such is the argument of the Apostle. " Now this
I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the
kingdom of God ; neither doth corruption inherit
incorruption'' In the silence of death the subtle
alchemy of God shall work the great transformation ;
the carnal, perishable element shall be purged away,
and the emancipated spiritual element alone survive.
So death shall not be the final disappointment of
Christian Hope, as the Corinthians, misled by their
expectation of an immediate Advent of Christ, had
been disposed to think, but a stage of preparation for
the ultimate state of blessedness. '''Behold, I tell you
a mystery'' cries the Apostle, kindling with his sub
lime theme : " We shall not all sleep, but we shall
all be changed, in a moment, in the twinkling of an
eye, at the last trump ; for the trumpet shall sound,
and the dead shall be raised incorruptible, and we shall
be changed'' Yes ; the great transformation out of
the material into the spiritual is the essential thing ;
whether by death or by some unknown process apart
from death. " We shall be changed. For this cor
ruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal
must put on immortality. But when this corruptible
shall have put on incorruption, and this mortal shall
have put on immortality, then shall come to pass the
saying that is written, Death is swallowed up in
victory. 0 death, where is thy victory ? 0 death,
ivhere is thy sting ? The sting of death is sin ;
* S. Matt. xxii. 29, 30.
THE RESURRECTION 105
and the power of sin is the law ; but thanks be to God,
which giveth us the victory through our Lord Jesus
Christ" S. Paul catches up into his impassioned
speech the famous utterances of the prophets.
Isaiah* had described the bliss of that great
deliverance when the Lord God should have
"swallowed up death for ever" ; and Hoseaf at a
still remoter period had spoken even more wonder
fully. "/ will ransom them from the power of the
grave ; I will redeem them from death ; O death,
where are thy plagues ? O grave, where is thy
destruction ?" The prophets were stirred by the
thought of great national deliverances ; the Apostle
borrows their language to express a nobler victory.
The faith in the Resurrection, firmly built on the
conviction that Christ had actually risen from the
dead, was the source of that high courage which
marked the primitive Christians, and was so splen
didly conspicuous in the life of S. Paul. A new
grandeur attached to life in the world when it was
set free from servitude to physical conditions. " We
know that if the earthly house of our tabernacle be
dissolved, we have a building from God, a house not
made with hands, eternal in the heavens" \ The
humblest duties acquired a certain sanctity in
view of the assurance of immortality. Among the
Gentile converts there was, at first, a tendency to
turn aside from the common tasks of life in order
to reflect without distraction on the approaching
glories of the Day of Christ. This tendency was,
indeed, contrary to the mind of the Apostle, by
* Isaiah xxv. 8. t Hosea xiii. 14. £ 2 Cor. v. I,
io6 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
whom — in the Epistle to the Thessalonians — it was
severely rebuked. Few things are more impressive
than the calm, practical counsel with which S. Paul
concludes the famous chapter we have been con
sidering. He passes from his ecstasy of praise to
the plain duties of the hour. " Wherefore, my beloved
brethren, be ye stedfast, unmoveable, always abound
ing in the work of the Lord, forasmuch as ye know
that your labour is not vain in the Lord" Have
not those strong, simple words sounded to many,
standing beside the open grave into which has just
been lowered the mortal remains of their best
beloved, as a true message of God, restraining the
bitterness of grief, hallowing the stroke of calamity,
proclaiming the everlasting greatness of duty in the
very face of Death? Otherwise considered, human
labour — all the vain strivings of men, their splendid
ambition, their sublime aspirations, are perishing
and worthless ; but from the empty tomb in the
counsellor's garden streams on all honest wprk a
new and nobler light. Henceforth all honest work
is transacted " in the Lord!' and believers know
(even as the tears fall for dear ones gone) " that
their labour is not in vain in the Lord"
CHAPTER III.
THE CORINTHIAN HERETICS
r I ""HE Revisers have made use of two words to
A render into English the Greek cupeans. It is a
"heresy" or a "faction." Thus in I Cor. xi. 19 the
first is placed in the text, the last in the margin
as an alternative rendering. " For there must be
also heresies [margin, factions] among you, that they
which are approved may be made manifest among
you."
Perhaps " faction " does best render the sense
of the Greek word, although in this passage the
distinction is so clearly drawn between " divisions " or
" schisms " and " heresies " or "factions" as to compel
us to understand something more than the mere
breach of unity. S. Paul seems to argue back from
the external divisions to graver differences which they
expressed. " For, first of all, when ye come together
in the church, I hear that divisions exist among you;
and I partly believe it. For there must also be heresies
among you'' It will be worth while to notice the
New Testament usage of this word which here is
rendered "heresy" or "faction" Literally the word
simply means "choosing"; then it is applied to the
thing chosen, and so is used to describe opinions
which men adopt with no better authority than their
107
1 08 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
own preference. Thus in the so-called second
Epistle of S. Peter we read of "false teachers, who
shall privily bring in destructive heresies" or (as the
margin reads) " sects of perdition," by which we
understand private opinions of their own tending
towards perdition. This is nearly the later ecclesi
astical sense of heresy ; more commonly in the
New Testament the word is used to signify any body
of men holding a particular opinion. Thus we read
in the Acts of " the cu/oecr*?, or sect of the Sadducees? *
and of " the cupecri?, or sect of the Pharisees" t S.
Paul, in his defence before King Agrippa, said that
" after the straitest sect (cupecri?) of the Jews' religion
he hady before his conversion, lived a Pharisee" \
Tertullus, the orator, when opening his case against
S. Paul before the governor Felix, described him
" a ringleader of the sect (cupecri?) of the Nazarenes" §
and the Apostle, when answering for himself, took
up the expression. " But this I confess unto thee, that
after the Way which they call a sect (cupeo-is) so serve I
the God of our fathers"^ Finally, the Roman Jews
when, in response to S. Paul's invitation, they visited
him in prison, applied the word to the Christian
community, "as concerning this sect (cupevis), it is
known to us that everywhere it is spoken against? *&
It is, I think, evident that the notion of doctrinal
peculiarity is always present in this usage. The
external separation which marked off Sadducees,
Pharisees, or Christians, had its root in a divergence
of belief. In short, heresy stands for private opinion
* Acts v. 17. f Ibid. xv. 5. % Ibid, xxvi. 5.
$ Ibid. xxiv. 5. || Ibid. xxiv. 14. H Ibidt xxviii. 22.
THE CORINTHIAN HERETICS 109
in the sphere of religious doctrine. M. Godet's
comment on I Cor. xi. 19 seems to bring out clearly
the drift of the Apostle's thought :—
" To the simple divisions which arise from personal
preferences or antipathies Paul foresees that there
will succeed deep severances of another kind, based
on various conceptions of Christian truth. He
believes what he has been told about the first,
because he expects the last. There will arise among
them false doctrines, heresies, in the sense which the
Greek word has taken in later ecclesiastical language,
and there will result from thence divergences far more
serious than actual divisions. Divisions (o-x^/xara)
are like mere rents in a piece of cloth ; but heresies
(cupeveis) are rents which tear off a fragment and
destroy the unity of the piece." In the Epistle to
the Galatians S. Paul includes "heresies" in the long
list of " the works of the flesh" and, perhaps, we may
infer from its place in the catalogue, the special
gravity which attached to it in the Apostle's mind —
" enmities, strife, jealousies, wraths, factions, divisions,
heresies"
That " heresy " in the doctrinal sense was present
in the Corinthian Church is evident from the
Epistles. S. Paul exhorts to agreement in the open
ing chapter of his first Epistle to the Corinthians
in terms which point to disunion in matters of faith,
as well as in sentiment and conduct " Now I beseech
you, brethren, through the name of our Lord Jesus
Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that
there be no divisions (crx/oTiara) among you : but that
ye be perfected together in the same mind and in the
no APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
same judgment." Later in the Epistle S. Paul sets
himself to oppose one particular heresy, which had
reference to the fundamental doctrine of the Resur
rection. "Now if Christ is preached that He hath
been raised from the dead, how say some among- you
that there is no resurrection of the dead ? " * What
the precise teaching of the Corinthian heretics was
it is not quite easy to gather. That they admitted
the fact of Christ's Resurrection is the impression
most naturally conveyed by the Apostle's language.
He appears to make that universally accepted fact
the basis of his argument. However, the evident
anxiety with which S. Paul presses the reality of
Christ's Resurrection, and the care with which he
enumerates the historic evidences for the fact, may
show that unbelief had extended itself even to this
central doctrine. In the second Pastoral Epistle there
is reference made to the heretics, " Hymenceus and
Philetus, men who concerning the truth have erred,
saying that the resurrection is past already, and
overthrow the faith of some!' The essence of this
heresy was probably that false view of the body
as the enemy of the soul, which marked the early
Ascetics. The Resurrection of the body was a
prospect entirely irreconcilable with their philosophy.
The destruction of the body from their point of view
was the enfranchisement of the soul, and death, as
involving such destruction, not so much to be
abhorred as desired. " Death and resurrection were
terms which had with these false teachers only a
spiritual meaning and application ; * they allegorized
* i Cor, xv, 13,
THE CORINTHIAN HERETICS in
away the doctrine, and turned all into figure and
metaphor.'"* They understood by "resurrection"
only that spiritual quickening which belonged to
discipleship ; in this sense they taught that " the
resurrection was past already''
In the second Epistle S. Paul speaks with almost
passionate earnestness about the false teachers, who
were assaulting the faith of the Corinthians. "But
I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve
in his craftiness, your minds should be corrupted from
the simplicity and the purity that is toward Christ.
For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom
we did not preach, or if ye receive a different spirit,
which ye did not receive, or a different gospel, which
ye did not accept, ye do well to bear with him"\ The
Apostle speaks ironically. The ready welcome ex
tended by the Corinthians to these heretics moved
his scorn, even while it alarmed his affection. It
was a painful revelation of religious levity in his
converts that they should find so little difficulty in
abandoning the truth which they had received from
the Apostle, and that, moreover, at the instigation of
persons who had no title whatever to their audience.
That in the very lifetime of the Apostles heretics
should have made their appearance may well astonish
those who have been accustomed to think of the
Apostolic age as a golden time, when faith was
inviolate and unity unbroken. The manner in which
heresy was rebuked in the first age is eminently
worthy our notice. S. Paul applies a two-fold test
* BISHOP ELLICOTT, Epistles to Timothy and Titiis, p. 134.
t 2 Cor. xi. 3,
ii2 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
to the doctrines which came before him for judgment.
The one, we may call, the historical test ; the other,
the moral test. He appealed to the facts of the
Evangelic Tradition, which formed the basis of
Christianity. Opinions which could not be recon
ciled with those facts must necessarily be rejected
as incompatible with discipleship. You will observe
that the Apostle regards himself as the faithful
steward, charged loyally to transmit the treasure
of Divine truth. He does not claim an original
authority ; it is his function to carry to others the
message he has himself received. " / received of the
Lord that which also I delivered unto you " is the
formula with which he introduces his account of
the Institution of the Eucharist. "/ delivered unto
you, first of all, that which also I received" is the
phrase with which he prefaces what may almost
be called a solemn creed or profession of belief.
S. Paul disclaims that speculative " wisdom " which
the Corinthians admired. Christ had sent him not
to play the philosopher, but the Apostle, and it
was not for him to mitigate the harshness or explain
away the difficulties of the Divine Gospel. " Christ
sent me not to baptize, but to preach the Gospel ; not
in wisdom of words, lest the cross of Christ should
be made void''* Experience made clear at once the
disadvantages and the power of that unyielding
Message. Jews and Greeks alike were disappointed
and repelled, yet from both it drew to itself those
who found it " life from the dead!' " Seeing that
Jews ask for signs, and Greeks seek after wisdom :
* I Cor, i. 17.
THE CORINTHIAN HERETICS 113
but we preach Christ crucified, unto Jews a stumbling-
block, and unto Gentiles foolishness ; but tinto them
that are called, both Jews and Greeks, Christ the
power of God, and the wisdom of God" * Eloquence
and philosophy were almost impertinent when a
Divine Message was in question. The Gospel could
not need such auxiliaries. They might easily ob
struct its grace. So, for himself, S. Paul renounced
them, and set before his mind as an ideal the
absolute honesty which should distinguish a loyal
ambassador. " / determined not to know anything
among you, save Jesus Christ, and Him crucified.
And I ivas with you in weakness, and in fear, and
in much trembling. And my speech and my preaching
were not in persuasive words of wisdom, but in
demonstration of the Spirit and of power : that your
faith should not stand in the wisdom of men, but in
the power of God""\ Sincerity, straight-dealing are
the qualities which he emphasizes as properly
characteristic of a Christian Minister's work. " We
have renounced the hidden things of shame, not
walking in craftiness, nor handling the Word of God
deceitfully, but by the manifestation of the truth
commending ourselves to every man's conscience in
the sight of God? \
Necessarily, as time passed, fidelity in the Christian
took the shape of orthodoxy. For the guidance and
help of the new converts the foundation facts of the
Evangelic Tradition were expressed in a formula
of belief, a creed in fact. We have already had
* i Cor. i. 22-23. t Ibid. ii. 2-4. J 2 Cor. iv. 2.
I
H4 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
occasion to notice that in the Pastoral Epistles,
written at the close of S. Paul's career, there are
frequent references to " the faith" by which evidently
is understood a concrete body of doctrine. Heretics
are described as those that "fall away from the
faith ";* it is the mark of the "good minister of Jesus
Christ " that he is " nourished in the words of the
faith" t The very mark of the presumptuous
wrangler is departure from the Christian tradition.
" If any man teacheth a different doctrine, and con-
senteth not to sound words, even the words of our
Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is
according to godliness, he is puffed up, knowing
nothing, etc." { It is the duty of the Christian
Minister to "fight the good fight of the faith" \ In
the second Pastoral Epistle we find mention of a
"pattern of sound words" which S. Timothy is
exhorted to hold fast. || It would be true to say
that S. Paul tested religious opinions by the funda
mental beliefs of Christians, the articles of the Creed.
His second test was moral. Did the new opinions
make for righteousness, or was their tendency in
the opposite direction ? It goes a long way to
justify the extreme indignation which S. Paul
manifests against the heretical teachers, that for the
most part their heresies had a very evil effect on
conduct. Thus that false asceticism which despised
the body and denied the Resurrection easily passed
into a profligacy, which better matched the habits
of paganism than the precepts of the Gospel. The
ardent champions of " Christian liberty " were but
* i Tim. iv. i. t Ibid. v. 6. $ Ibid. vi. 3. § Ibid. v. 12.
|| 2 Tim. i. 13.
THE CORINTHIAN HERETICS 115
too often found to be as contemptuous of moral
restraints as of ritual distinctions. The zealots for
Mosaic ceremonial were commonly found to be
strangely indifferent to evangelic righteousness.
S. Paul — it is manifest from every line of the
Epistles — was a zealot for righteousness. Disciple-
ship in his mind was synonymous with the conflict
against sin. He ever speaks of baptism, the decisive
act which introduced men into the Church and
declared them disciples of Christ, as involving a
crisis of moral change, which the subsequent Christian
life attested and revealed. " Are ye ignorant that all
we who were baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized
into His death ? We were buried therefore with Him
through baptism into death : that like as Christ was
raised from the dead through the glory of the Father,
so we also might walk in newness of life!1* The
association of right faith and righteous conduct was
as natural in S. Paul's mind as that of heresy and
vicious living, and commonly experience justified
it. This must be remembered when we read the
stern counsel given to S. Titus : " A man that is
heretical after a first and second admonition refuse ;
knowing that such a one is perverted, and sinneth,
being self- condemned" \ For, if we direct our gaze
upon Christian history, we cannot avoid the im
pression that, while the Apostle's severity has been
vastly increased towards "heretics" the Apostle's
tests of heresy have been almost wholly neglected.
Again and again the Church of Christ has oppressed
and even caused to be slain as heretics men who
had been driven into revolt by her own portentous
* Romans vi. 3. f Titus iii. 10.
ii6 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
departures both from primitive faith and from
essential righteousness. One of the most awful
scenes in history is that presented by the con
demnation, betrayal, and execution of John Huss
by authority of the most numerous council of
ecclesiastics ever assembled in Christendom. Huss
— I borrow the words of the present Bishop of
London— was "stirred only by his desire for greater
holiness in the Church." His own life was pure ; *
his teachings were mostly based on the Scriptures ;
his personal influence was always good ; yet he was
murdered by the assembled chiefs of Christendom,
the very men who — such is the irony of history —
had been engaged in deposing a Pope for monstrous
crimes.t The action of the Council of Constance
represents in an extreme and astounding form the
general attitude of the Church towards "heresy"
through the greater part of her history. Is it any
wonder that there should have been provoked in
men's minds so powerful a reaction, that now little
if any sense of the peril and sinfulness of "heresy"
survives among us ? The grotesque extravagances
* " Of pure and austere life, his countenance bore the traces of con
stant self-denial, and his loftiness of purpose lent force to his words."
(p. 314.) '* His letters show us neither a fanalic nor a passionate party
leader, but a man of childlike spirit, whose one desire was to discharge
faithfully his pastoral duties, and do all things as in the sight of God,
and not of man." — History of Papacy , vol. i. p. 330.
t To fully state the irony of history it is necessary to add that the
cardinal doctrine enunciated at Constance, which was, indeed, the
assumption of the Council's action, viz., the superiority of a General
Council to a Pope, is now by the Vatican Council declared to be
heresy. It is permissible to think that in due course the same fate
will overtake the foolish and arrogant dogma of " Papal Infallibility."
The, instability of dogma is one of the plainest and most consolatory
lessons of history.
THE CORINTHIAN HERETICS 117
which arise and flourish in the religious sphere,
provoking the contemptuous ridicule of unbelievers
and the grief of all thoughtful Christians, must be
regarded as the direct outcome of the abuse of
authority, which for so many ages was normal in
Christendom. Discipleship to Jesus Christ does
involve belief in a divinely - revealed doctrine, to
disbelieve which is spiritually perilous, and may be
spiritually sinful. But the essence of heresy is
wilfulness, the deliberate choice of error in face of
a clear perception of the truth ; and there may be
— we know there is — much formal heresy which
has no wilfulness in it. Concerning such we cannot
rightly speak of guilt, we can only speak of spiritual
loss. Yet for ourselves we should be wise to adopt
a severer standard than that which we apply to
others. We are far more responsible for our
opinions than we choose to remember. Unhappily
it has become a common practice for men to speak
about their opinions as matters which stand outside
all laws. Yet there are laws of right thinking, to
disregard which is to stand self-condemned of folly.
The laws of language, of mathematics, of logic —
these cannot be set at naught by a rational thinker
under pain of exclusion from the intercourse of sane
men. Analogous to this~is"^the*case in the sphere
of religion. Christians are men who believe that
Christ's revelation of truth constitutes a law of right
thinking about religion, which cannot be set aside
without grievous loss. Christians are men whose
consciences have ratified and made response to
Christ's claim : and departure from His teaching
ii8 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
must in this case involve a certain infidelity to
conscience. Nor does even this state the whole
truth. It is no real excuse for a man who thinks
unreasonably that he never cared to understand
the laws which govern thought. We say, and
rightly, that it is every man's duty to understand
and obey those laws. Mere indolence or mere
wilfulness are not accepted as an excuse for folly.
So also in the religious sphere. Heresy may, and
generally does, result as much from ignorance as
from wilfulness ; but ignorance itself has an origin.
and that, for most of us. is our own lazy indifference
to truth. Surely we are responsible for the religious
errors into which we fall, because we are too idle
to learn or too vain to obey. S. Paul's admonition
to the Thessalonians is not superfluous for the
modern Church : " Prove all things ; hold fast that
which is good?* And this "proving" or "testing"
to which the Apostle exhorts his converts — and
which, we may add, was never more needed than
in this age and land of unchecked liberty of thought
and speech — can only lead to right results if it be
pursued by right methods. Still the touchstone
of heresy must be S. Paul's two-fold test. Does it
correspond with the fundamental facts of the
faith? Doesnakefbrrigiteousness?
us
tn
Nor do I think thaotnTiassorinentnereis
any real force in the common excuse that the
fundamental facts of Christianity are not apparent
to all students of the Scripture, or equally con
ceived by all professed Christians. For most men
the Creed, which has for more than fifteen centuries
officially expressed the essential elements of Christian
* i Thess. v. 21.
THE CORINTHIAN HERETICS 119
belief, will be sufficiently authoritative. Few will
be disposed to ask for a better statement of the
faith than that to which they were solemnly pledged
in baptism. The manifold and subtle heresy of
the present time may serve to sift the Church, as
formerly among the Corinthians the " heresies "
made manifest those that were approved. Men
show the metal of their character under trial.
Christians show the quality of their discipleship in
times of doubt and difficulty. " Watch ye, stand
fast in the faith^ quit you like men, be strong. Let
all that ye do be done in love''* That is the
counsel with which S. Paul concludes the first
Corinthian Epistle. Heresy in their midst is to
make the Corinthians more vigilant, more loyal,'
more resolute. They are to guard the sacred
deposit of revealed truth against the assault of
error, but let them remember that even that high
warfare is not exempt from the danger that belongs
to all warfare. The combatant may be hurried by
the ardour of conflict into breaches of that supreme
and ultimate law of Christ — the law of Love —
apart from obedience to which even loyalty to
truth shrivels into fanaticism, and vigilance against
error hardens into a rigid refusal to consider any
thing which is unfamiliar or unpalatable. But
still " let love be without hypocrisy" Let no man
plead charity as an excuse for disloyalty to the
truth. Be honest as well as charitable, faithful as
well as courteous ; true as well as liberal ; and thus
" speaking truth in love " be ready to " contend^
earnestly for the faith which was once for all
delivered to the saints "\
* i Cor. xvi. i }, 14. f Jude iii.
CHAPTER IV.
THE APOSTOLIC CREED
THE famous Creeds of Christendom do not
belong to the earliest ages of Christian History;
this, indeed, is what we might expect, since, for the
most part, those Creeds represent the self-defensive
action of the Church rendered necessary by the
assaults of error. Definition of belief must be
subsequent to belief; and, perhaps, marks the decline
of the fresh ardour of conviction. Definition belongs
to the calmer, colder period of reflection, of examina
tion, of deliberation. So it may not be doubted that
the intensity of belief is greatest when creeds are
shortest ; and length of creeds is a safe index to
the decay of faith. In our Prayer-book we have
three Creeds, and the latest is the longest. The
Athanasian Creed, as it is called, belongs obviously
to a time of religious controversy, when the creed
was more a subject of desperate disputing than of
devout conviction. Long, however, as is the
Athanasian Creed, it is a small thing beside the
doctrinal confessions of the sixteenth century, the
Creed of Pius IV., or the Confession of Augsburg,
or our own Thirty-nine Articles. But these lengthy
formulas faithfully reflect the aspect of an age which,
1 20
THE APOSTOLIC CREED 121
beyond all ages, was distracted by religious question
ing. In the earliest times of the Church, then, we
shall not look to find long and elaborate Creeds, nor,
indeed, any fixed and generally authoritative written
Creeds at all ; but we shall expect to find what may
be called rudimentary Creeds, crystallisation of
Christian conviction on certain subjects, real though
undefined terms of Christian fellowship.
We must, on the threshold of our inquiry, try to
realize the convictions which the Christian Mission
aries found ready to hand in their converts. The
Religion of Christ arose in the midst of Judaism ;
it was, and it professed to be, the true development
of Judaism ; and it built itself on the foundation
of Jewish belief. Now Judaism was a national and
exclusive system, and the very_ characteristic of
Christianity is universality. So far the old religion
and the new were directly opposed ; but the oppo
sition was more manifest in the region of theory
than of fact. Judaism, at the time of the beginning
of Christianity, had acquired by a variety of circum
stances a cosmopolitan character. The Diaspora, or
Dispersion, was spread abroad in all lands. The
translation of the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek had
introduced the history and theology of Israel to the
multitudes of the Greek-speaking population ; the
synagogue system had easily lent itself to the
purposes of a propaganda, and myriads of prose
lytes gathered round the Chosen People. While the
Hebrews of Palestine laboured to draw ever more
decisively the dividing-line between Israel and the
world, the Hellenists, Greek-speaking Jews of the
122 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
Dispersion, whose principal centre was the renowned
Greek colony, Alexandria, had admitted into their
religion wider ideas, and established relations of a
friendly character with their Greek neighbours. "That
non - Palestinian Judaism," it has been remarked,
" formed the bridge between the Jewish Church and
the Roman Empire, together with its culture. The
Gospel passed into the world chiefly by this bridge."
We know that the Apostles found everywhere in the
synagogues their first preaching centres, and in the
heathen proselytes who frequented the synagogues
their earliest converts. It has even been questioned
/whether S. Paul ever counted among his converts
any who had not gained from the synagogue a
knowledge of the Jewish Scriptures. Certainly his
Epistles, with their frequent reference to the system
and sacred writings of the Jews, make it evident that
such knowledge was very widely possessed. The
Apostolic Creed, then, included the beliefs of
Judaism. The unity and holiness of Gpd, the
vocation of Israel, the authority of the Moral Law,
the inspiration of the Old Testament — these were
taken for granted by the first Christian preachers.
They formed the foundation upon which to erect
the fabric of distinctively Christian conviction. We
advance to inquire what was the distinctively
Christian message? If we study the New Testa
ment we shall be at no loss for the answer. The
expressions employed in the Acts to describe the
Apostolic preaching convey a clear notion of its
character. " They taught the people, and proclaimed in
Jesus the resurrection from the dead'' * " Every day,
* iv. 2.
THE APOSTOLIC CREED 123
in the temple and at home, they ceased not to teach
and to preach Jesus as the Christ? * " Philip went
down to the city of Samaria, and proclaimed unto
them the Christ" t " Straightway in the synagogues
he proclaimed Jesus that He is the Son of God? \
S. Paul, addressing the Ephesian presbyters on the
sea-shore of Miletus, summed up his own preaching
in these terms. " / shrank not from declaring unto
you anything that was profitable, and teaching you
publicly, and from house to house, testifying both to
Jews and to Greeks repentance toward God and faith
toward our Lord Jesus Christ' '§ And with this we
may compare the same Apostle's declaration before
King Agrippa. " Having therefore obtained the help
that is from God, I stand unto this day testifying both
to small and great, saying nothing but what the
prophets and Moses did say should come ; how that
the Christ must suffer, and how that He first by the
resurrection of the dead should proclaim light both to
the people and to the G entiles? \ From these and
many similar passages we conclude that the central..
Christian message was that Christ, the promised
Messiah, had come, died on the Cross for the sins
of .men, had risen gloriously, and would speedily
return to judge the world._ The crucial question of
discipleship was whether this view of Christ would
be accepted or not.
There are two narratives of conversion in the
Book of the Acts, which set out very clearly
the actual manner in which the great issue was
presented to men. The first is in the eighth
chapter, and records the conversion of the Ethiopian
* v. 42. f viii. 5. J ix. 20. § xx. 20, 21. || xxvi. 22, 23.
124 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
eunuch. It is worth while to recall the episode.
As the evangelist approached the pious traveller
he heard him reading aloud to himself the 53rd
chapter of Isaiah, and immediately volunteered his
help as an expositor of the sacred and mysterious
text. "Philip opened his mouth, and beginning from
this scripture, preached unto him Jesus. And as they
went on the way, they came unto a certain water; and
the eunuch saith, Behold here is water ; what doth
hinder me to be baptized?" You will observe in
passing that S. Philip had evidently represented
Baptism as the necessary act of professing disciple-
ship. Here there has been interpolated into the text
a passage of considerable importance, of which the
antiquity is certainly great, and which may be fairly
considered to represent the practice of the Apostolic
age. It forms part of the text in the Authorised
Version, but has been relegated to the margin in
the more accurate Revised Version.* "And Philip
said, If thou believest with all thy heart, thou mayest.
And he answered and said, I believe that Jesus Christ
is the Son of God" The eunuch's profession fairly
represents the Apostolic Creed.
* Dean Alford's note on the interpolation is the following: — "The
insertion appears to have been made to suit the formularies of the
baptismal liturgies, it being considered strange that the eunuch should
have been baptized without some such confession. It appears to have
been one of those remarkable additions to the text of the Acts common in
D. (Codex Bezce), which is here deficient, and its cognates: few of which,
however, have found their way into the received text. This was made
very early, as Irenneus has it. The manuscripts which contain it vary
exceedingly : another strong mark of spuriousness in a disputed
passage." Professor Ramsay has an interesting discussion of the
problem presented by Codex Bezae in The Church in the Roman
Empire, pp. 151-168. He concludes that "the revision can hardly
be dated later than A.D. 150-160."
THE APOSTOLIC CREED 125
The other history is in the sixteenth chapter, and
relates the conversion of the Philippian jailor. The
circumstances of that conversion were unusual ; amid
the excitement and terror doubtless words were
not very carefully weighed ; it is, however, precisely
in such spontaneous utterances that men discover
their real convictions. "Sirs, what must I do to be
saved?" cried the jailor, kneeling before his prisoners.
"And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus, and thou
shalt be saved, thou and thy house. And they spake
the word of the Lord unto him, with all that were
in his house. A nd he took them the same hour of the
night, and washed their stripes ; and was baptized, he
and all his, immediately!' Here we get again the
same Apostolic Creed. " I believe on the Lord
Jesus." We may compare with these narratives
from the Acts the testimony of the Corinthian
Epistles. S. Paul seems to be appealing to the
notorious belief of Christians when he writes : "For
though there are that are called gods, whether in
heaven or on earth; as there are gods many, and
lords many : yet to us there is one God, the Father,
of Whom are all things, and we unto Him ; and
one Lord, Jesus Christ, through Whom are all
things, and we through Him."* Here the Apostolic
Creed is gathered into two Articles. " I believe
in one God the Father, and in one Lord, Jesus
Christ" We have in another passage a still shorter
formula. " Wherefore I give you to understand that
. ... no man can say, Jesus is Lord, but in the Holy
Spirit? \ " This solemn protestation," observes
* viii. 5-7. t xii. 3.
126 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
Harnack, " shows that he who acknowledged Jesus as
/the Lord, and accordingly believed in the resurrection
of Jesus, was regarded as a full-born Christian." We
may compare a passage from the second Epistle.
"For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus as
Lord, and ourselves as your servants for Jesus' sake!'*
The great argument about the Resurrection in I Cor.
xv. is prefaced by a careful and detailed statement
of Christian belief. It is at once the longest and
most significant declaration of faith which the Epistles
contain. The solemnity with which it is introduced
may, perhaps, indicate a settled and recognized form.
" Now I make known unto you, brethren, the gospel
which I preached unto you, which also ye received,
wherein also ye stand, by which also ye are saved ;
I make known, I say, in what words I preached it
unto you, if ye hold it fast, except ye believed in vain.
For I delivered unto you first of all that which
also I received, how that Christ died for our sins
according to the Scriptures; and that He was
buried ; and that He hath been raised on the third
day according to the Scriptures? We conclude,
then, that the Apostolic Creed, the specifically
Christian doctrine, which was added to the belief
about God, inherited from the Jews, was the con
fession of Jesus Christ as Lord, including in that
title the fact of His Resurrection from the dead.
The rapid extension of Christianity would speedily
compel the Apostles to make some provision for the
teaching of their numerous converts. The simple
acknowledgment of the Lordship of Jesus might,
* iv. 5.
THE APOSTOLIC CREED 127
indeed, suffice for admission into the Christian society,
but some completer statement of the truth would be
required to provide, in the absence of the Apostles, a
groundwork for Christian teaching and a barrier
against error. We may infer from the language
of S. Paul's Epistles that such a statement had
even at that early stage been put forward. There
are three passages in the Epistle to the Romans
(which is nearly coincident in date with the Corinthian
Letters) to which I will call your attention. In the
sixth chapter the Apostle blesses God for the conver
sion of the Romans. "But thanks be to God" he
writes, "that, whereas ye were servants of sin, ye
became obedient from the heart to that form of
teaching whereunto ye were delivered" The "form "
or "pattern " (TUTTO?) of teaching seems to mean
an authoritative statement of Christian doctrine.
We may conjecture that since no Apostle had yet
visited Rome, such a statement would be almost
indispensable for the Church in that city. In the
tenth chapter we find a passage, which certainly
seems to indicate a formal profession of belief as
inseparable from Christian discipleship. "The word
is nigh thee" says S. Paul, " in thy mouth, and in thy
heart ; that is the word of faith, which we preach ;
because if thou shalt confess with thy mouth Jesus
as Lord, and shalt believe in thy heart that God raised
Him from the dead, thou shalt be saved ; for with the
heart man believeth unto righteousness ; and with the
mouth confession is made unto salvation'' Among
the closing exhortations of the Epistle the Apostle
includes an urgent warning against certain disorderly
128 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
brethren, who disturbed the peace of the Church.
" Now I beseech you, brethren, mark them which are
causing the divisions and occasions of stumbling,
contrary to the doctrine which ye learned ; and turn
away from them'.' A common profession of faith in
the terms of an authorized statement would power
fully assert and protect the unity of the Church ,
and nothing could more plainly reveal the spirit of
division than the refusal to accept the established
formula. So we find S. Paul, in rebuking the incipient
schisms of Corinth, lays emphasis on this matter.
" Now I beseech you, brethren, through the name
of our Lord Jesus Christ^ that ye all speak the same
thing, and that there be no divisions among you ;
but that ye be perfected together in the same mind and
in the same judgment'' S. Paul, indeed, directly
claims Divine authority for the language by which
he had expressed the verities of revelation. " Which
things also we speak, not in words which man's wisdom
teacheth, but which the Spirit teacheth : comparing
spiritual things with spiritual',' or as perhaps the
original may better be rendered, " interpreting spiritual
things in spiritual terms''* " Christianity," observes
M. Re"nan, " not finding in the ancient languages
&. Kdl XaXoOyuej', OVK (v 5ida.KTO?s dvOpwjrivrjs crowds \oyois, dXX' £v
ITvei'/iaros, TTvev/j-ariKOis Tr^eu/iart/fa ffvyKpivovres, 'combining
the spiritual with the spiritual* i.e., applying spiritual methods to
explain spiritual truths. . . . This is the proper meaning of vvyKpLvfiv,
' to combine,' as 5ta/cptVetv is ' to separate.' SiryKpfretJ', it is true, some
times gets the sense of 'compare,' as in 2 Cor. x. 12; but it does
not suit context here, whether explained, as by Chrysostom and others,
of comparing the types of the Old Testament with the tidings of the
New, or more generally." — BP. LIGHTFOOT, Notes on Epp. cf S. Paul,
p. 1 80.
THE APOSTOLIC CREED 129
an instrument adapted to its needs, has broken them
up."* It is certainly true that Christianity has
created for itself a new vocabulary, of which, indeed,
the words are old, but the rich spiritual sense is
wholly new.
The necessity for Creeds, in the modern sense of
the term, would become apparent when Apostles were
withdrawn from the Church. We possess in the
Pastoral Epistles what may be called counsels for
governing the Church when the Apostles have dis
appeared. S. Paul, in those Epistles, appears to
contemplate the future, and, as far as he can, to
arrange for its requirements. It is, then, natural that
he should directly refer to a fixed form of belief. He
calls it " the faith" or " the mystery of the faith" or
" the sound doctrine" or " the deposit" or " the pattern
of sound words I' or " the faithful ivord which is accord
ing to the teaching!' or " the mystery of godliness''
He seems to quote it when he bids S. Timothy
" Remember Jesus Christ, risen from the dead, of the
seed of David, according to my gospel"] " Without
controversy" he cries, "great is the mystery of godli
ness ; He Who was manifested in the flesh, justified
in the spirit, seen of angels, preached among the nations,
believed on in the world, received up in glory. "I And
again, " There is one God, one Mediator also between
God and man, Himself man, Christ Jesus, Who gave
Himself a ransom for <?//."§ This Creed is the touch
stone of heresy and the test of orthodoxy; it is to
* " Le christianisme, ne trouvant pas dans les langues anciennes un
instrument approprie a ses besoins, les a brisees."
t 2 Tim. ii. 8. % I Tim. iii. 16. § Ibid. ii. 5.
K
130 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
be held fast, and fought for by the faithful Christian.
Timothy is to carefully transmit it to the succeeding
age. " The things which thou hast heard from me
among many witnesses, the same commit thou to faith
ful men, who shall be able to teach others also'' * This
Apostolic Creed seems to have substantially coincided
with the formula which for sixteen centuries has been
the Baptismal Confession of Christendom, which we
rehearse in our public worship, and know by the not
unsuitable name of "the Apostles' Creed." It is the
oldest and the simplest of the Creeds.
It would surely be a mistake to limit the belief of
the Apostolic Church to the few articles which (as we
have shown) formed its creed. We have but to read
these Corinthian Epistles to perceive how rich was
the faith of the first believers. "Of Him are ye in
Christ Jesus, Who was made unto us wisdom from
God, and righteousness and sanctification and redemp
tion? \ All theology is grandly summarized in that
one verse. But the aim of the Apostolic Creed was
not to state the whole faith, but its essence. That
essence is still, as at the first, discipleship to a living
Teacher. " Jesus is Lord." " The essence of the
matter," observes Harnock, " is a personal life which
awakens life around it as the fire of one torch kindles
another."}
It may be that in these later ages of the Church,
when the faith of the Christian is set forth in many
and lengthy doctrinal formulas, and has been "de-
* 2 Tim. ii. 2. f I Cor. i. 30.
J History of Dogma, vol. i. p. 71. (Theol. Trans. Lib.: Williams
and Norgate.)
THE APOSTOLIC CREED 131
veloped" into an elaborate and coherent theology,
that its original essence has, in a measure, been
buried and forgotten. Christianity has been regarded
as pre-eminently a matter of orthodox profession ; it
has ceased to be primarily what it is essentially,
discipleship to a living Lord, perhaps _we ^may fined
here that most significant combination, which surely
.is not the least remarkable sign of the times,— on the
one hand, ardent admiration of Jesus Christ, on the
other, avowed hostility to current Christianity. There
is an intuitive perception in many minds that for
modern Christians the faith of Jesus has undergone
a transformation not for the better, but for the worse.
The living Lord has retired into the background of
Christian thought, and His place in the affections of
those who own His Lordship has been filled by
theology, or the Church, or even the Church policy.
If this be so, and in so far as it is so, we have, indeed,
grave and urgent cause for self-examination and
searching of heart. We have need to return to the
Apostolic Creed, to bring ourselves, it may be for
the first time, into the presence of Jesus, to submit
ourselves frankly to the influence of His Personality,
to own Him from our hearts to be what we have so
often asserted with our lips, our Lord, in a word, to be
dimples.
This shall be our orthodoxy, our standard of fellow
ship, even S. Paul's. " If any man lovcth not the Lord,
let him be anathema''* In the light of this discipleship
the Creeds, the Church, the Sacraments, the Preach
ing, the Discipline of Christianity will take their
* I Cor. xvi. 22,
132 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
right place ; real, precious, even necessary to disciple-
ship, but empty, valueless, even harmful apart from
discipleship. The old order will be re-asserted in
our experience. First we shall be disciples, then
brethren and members. The positive laws of ordered
religion will be obeyed in the loving spirit of true
discipleship. Self-suppression will no longer be the
arduous achievement of discipline, but the eager
sacrifice of love. The Blessed Sacrament will take
its supreme place in our spiritual life when we realize
that therein we are brought into the closest fellowship
with Tesus. The grace of that Adorable Eucharist
will flow forth into our lives, enriching them with
tender consolations and sublime hopes. Failure and
disappointment, inexorable hardships of undeserved
obloquy, the silent gnawing of unappeasable desire,
the unuttered sorrows of defeated purpose — all the
mysterious shadows which lie darkly on life, defraud
ing it of sunshine, and driving the chill of despair
into the hearts of men — all these passing into His
Presence, seen in relation to His Person, borne for
His sake, shall underpass a strange and blessed
transfigurement. Instead of their former repulsive
aspect they shall acquire a new character, a new use,
becoming so many mystic links binding our ex
periences into His, and us to Him. So the Enigma
of Christian Heroism shall be renewed in the
humblest disciple's life, and the great language of
the Apostle express a normal and common con
viction. " We are pressed on every side, yet not
straitened: perplexed yet not unto despair: pursued,
yet not forsaken ; smitten down, yet not destroyed;
THE APOSTOLIC CREED 133
always bearing about in the body the dying of Jesus ',
that the life also of Jesus may be manifested in our
bodyr*
Nor is it only in the activities of life that the
power of this discipleship shall be proved. When the
last crisis comes upon us, and by manifold tokens
we know ourselves to be passing into the " valley of
the shadow of death," when we are alone in the
drear naked solitude of the last hour, — in that time
of rigorous testing, when all that is earthly, all that is
merely human, all that is not real, shall fall from our
side, — not even then shall the Apostolic Creed have
lost its virtue. Jesus shall fill our failing vision.
Jesus shall meet us on the eternal shore. It is the
same Sun which shrouds in splendour the dying day,
and lightens in the East the waxing glory of the
dawn.
* 2 Cor. iv. 8-10.
CHAPTER V.
BAPTISM.
THE subject of this chapter bears a character
which must be described as contentious ; among
English-speaking Christians it has been made the
occasion of extensive and obdurate separation. It
does not, however, correspond with the character of
this volume to discuss it from a contentious stand
point, or in a contentious spirit Our primary object
is not to justify or to condemn any modern doctrines
or usages, but to discover what was the real aspect of
Apostolic Christianity. When by honest and fearless
examination of the evidences we have obtained a
definite conception of the original belief and order of
the Church of Christ, we shall be in a better position
to decide upon the validity of modern versions of that
belief and order. Our discussion may conveniently
fall into three parts. In the first, we shall discuss the
practice and method of Holy Baptism; in the second,
the prerequisites of the Sacrament ; in the third, its
grace. Our chief authority throughout must be the
New Testament, and, according to our general plan,
we shall particularly consider the witness of the
Corinthian Epistles.
I. We found occasion to observe with reference to
the Apostolic Creed that it included the fundamental
134
BAPTISM 135
beliefs of Judaism ; much the same might be said
with respect to the usages of the Apostolic Church.
Our Blessed Lord adopted ceremonies which were
familiar and generally significant not only among the
Jews, though undoubtedly among them in special
measure, but even among the heathen. The idea of
religious purification as symbolized, and in some
sense realized by the "washing of water" was rooted
in Jewish and Gentile religion. Christ took up the
well-known usage of Baptism, and filled it with
deeper significance. He created the Sacrament out
of existing religious material. If it be allowed — and
certainly the position seems extremely probable —
that as early as the beginning of the first century
of our era the Jews were wont to baptize proselytes,
then we have an extremely close parallel to the
Christian rite actually established in contemporary
Judaism. How close is the parallel will be manifest
from the following account of the Jewish Baptism :—
" It was indeed a great thing when, in the words of
Maimonides, a stranger sought shelter under the
wings of the Shekinah, and the change of condition
which he underwent was regarded as complete. The
waters of Baptism were to him in very truth, though
in a far different from the Christian sense, the ' bath
of regeneration.' As he stepped out of these waters
he was considered as ' born anew,' in the language of
the Rabbis, as if he were ' a little child just born,' as
' a child of one day.' But this new birth was not
' a birth from above ' in the sense of moral or spiritual
renovation, but only as implying a new relationship
to God, to Israel, and to his own past, present, and
i36 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
future. It was expressly enjoined that all the
difficulties of his new citizenship should first be set
before him, and if, after that, he took upon himself
the yoke of the law, he should be told how all those
sorrows and persecutions were intended to convey
a greater blessing, and all those commandments to
redound to greater merit. More especially was he to
regard himself as a new man in reference to his past.
Country, home, habits, friends, and relations were all
changed. The past, with all that had belonged to it,
was past, and he was a new man — the old, with its
defilements, was buried in the waters of Baptism."*
On the assumption that Baptism with this signifi
cance was familiarly known to the numerous Gentiles
who as "proselytes of the gate," or as "proselytes
of righteousness," or "proselytes of the covenant,"
had been drawn into a relationship, more or less
intimate, with the Jewish system, and reminding
ourselves that the converts to Christianity were in
Apostolic times mainly drawn from these proselytes,
we can understand how easily and naturally the
new Christian Sacrament would commend itself to
the hearers of the Gospel. The Ethiopian eunuch's
question to S. Philip — " What doth hinder me to be
baptized?" — would occur to most of those who were
impressed with the truth of the Christian message.
Moreover, in direct relation to the mission of our
Lord stood the mission of S. John the Baptist,
whose familiar appellation points to the most con
spicuous feature of his ministry. The Evangelists
relate that S. John described his Baptism as the
* EDERSHEiM,y<?.s7<.r, the Messiah^ App. xii. vol. ii. p. 746.
BAPTISM 137
prophetic type of a Baptism shortly to be inaugurated
of more mysterious character and diviner virtue. " /
indeed baptize you with water unto repentance : but
He that cometh after me is mightier than /, whose
shoes I am not worthy to bear : He shall baptize you
with the Holy Ghost and with fire? * Several of
Christ's apostles, many of His personal disciples,
were drawn from the number of the Baptist's
followers, and this fact also leads us to conclude
that the Christian Sacrament at its first introduction
did not wear a novel appearance, but harmonized
with the customs and expectations of the disciples.
We learn from the history of the Acts that from
the very beginning the practice of baptizing converts
was followed ; and indeed we cannot doubt, in face
of the evidence, that it was invariably followed.
Moreover, it seems evident that almost, if not quite
universally, the method of Baptism was that which
is known as total immersion. That was the Jewish
method ; that also was the method of S. John ;
that is the method suggested by every reference
to Christian Baptism which the New Testament
contains. The impressive imagery of the Sacrament,
on which S. Paul dwells in several of his epistles,
appears to require it. Nor do I attribute very
much weight to the common and, at first sight,
weighty arguments based on the practical im
possibility of immersing 3000 persons in Jerusalem,
a city by no means well supplied with water, or
on the similar difficulty in the case of the Philippian
jailor. It is hardly clear how the narrative in the
* S. Matt. iii. u.
138 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
Acts ought to be understood ; and the difficulties of
a literal understanding appear to me more formid
able the more I consider the narrative ; moreover
it is by no means true that the water supply of
Jerusalem was so meagre as to negative a numerous
baptism by immersion. In the jailor's case the
assumed difficulty in the way of immersion does
not appear to exist. There was a river at Philippi,
on the bank of which, apparently, the Jewish
residents were wont to meet for prayer. The
Apostle had already baptized Lydia and her house
hold, doubtless in the river ; it is by no means
improbable that the jailor, who seems from his
appeal to his Christian prisoners to have had some
notion of the new religion, was acquainted with
the circumstance of the purple-seller's conversion.
S. Paul would naturally suggest to the convert a
visit to the river-bank for the purpose of his Baptism ;
and since the jailor is expressly said to have given
liberty to the Apostle and his companion, there -seems
no reason why the Baptism should not have been
easily performed. But while I thus insist that there
is no evidence in the New Testament of any other
method of Baptism than that of total immersion,
I do not for one moment believe that the Apostles
would have condemned another method under
special circumstances. I believe the Apostolic
administration of the Sacrament is very fairly
represented by the rules in the Teaching of the
Twelve Apostles, as it is called, a little manual
discovered a few years ago, and apparently with
good reason supposed to have been written about
BAPTISM 139
the close of the Apostolic age,* and at one time
read in the public assemblies of the faithful as an
Apostolic document. We conclude this part of our
discussion by reading the rules there laid down :—
" But concerning Baptism baptize thus : Having
said beforehand all these things (i.e., the moral
teachings which fill the preceding part of the
treatise), baptize ye in the name of the Father,
and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, in living
water." t
Probably at first Baptism was "into the name of
the Lord Jestts" as is stated in the account of the
Baptism of the twelve disciples of S. John the
Baptist, whom S. Paul baptized at Ephesus.
" Living water " is, of course, running water ; all
the earliest representations in art of Holy Baptism
represent the baptized as standing in a stream up
to the knees or even the middle, and the baptizer
standing on the bank, apparently intending to
* "Eusebius puts the Didache last among the ecclesiastical but
uncanonical and spurious books (ev TO?? vodois), and in the same
category with ' The Acts of Paul,' ' The Shepherd of Hermas,' ' The
Apocalypse of Peter,' 'The Epistle of Barnabas,' i.e., with writings
which were publicly used in some churches, but which he himself as
an historian with good reason did not find sufficiently authenticated
and intrinsically important enough to entitle them to a place among
the ' Homologumena,' or even among the seven ' Antilegomena,'
which are now parts of the New Testament canon." (ScHAFF,
The Oldest Church Manual^ p. 116.) This writer "assigns the
Didache with some confidence to the closing years of the first century,
say, between A.D. 90 and 100." This seems to be Bishop Lightfoot's
opinion also. See Apostolic Fathers^ vol. i. p. 390, note I. [Harnack,
however, places the Didache later, I3i-c. 160. Die Chronologie der
Altch. Lift., p. 438.]
t vii. i.
140 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
plunge or dip him in the water. The manual
proceeds : —
" But if thou hast not living (or running) water,
baptize in other water ; and if thou canst not in
cold, then in warm. But if thou have not either,
pour water thrice upon the head in the name of the
Father, and the Son, and the Holy Ghost." *
This is the earliest recognition of the sufficiency of
the method, now generally prevailing in the Church,
of " affusion " or " pouring." As far as I know the
method of "sprinkling" has no authority, either
ancient or modern. The rules conclude with the
following : — " But before the Baptism let him that
baptizeth and him that is baptized fast, and any
others who can ; but thou shalt bid him that is
baptized fast one or two days before."t
II. We proceed to inquire what were the pre
requisites of Baptism in the Apostolic age? They
are summed up in the two words, repentance and
faith. The record of the earliest Baptism no- doubt
reflects the normal process of the Sacrament. The
spoken message struck home to the consciences of
the hearers ; they appealed for guidance to the
Christian Preacher ; in every case the same demand
was made upon them. Repent and be baptized.
"Let all the house of Israel know assuredly, that God
hath made Him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus,
Whom ye crucified" \ There was the Gospel in a
sentence : the very core and pith of the message.
" Now when they heard this, they were pricked in their
heart, and said unto Peter and the rest of the Apostles,
* Ibid. 2, 3. t Ibid. 4. j Acts ii. 36.
BAPTISM 141
Brethren, what shall we do ? A nd Peter said unto
them, Repent ye, and be baptized, every one of you,
in the Name of Jesus Christ unto the remission of
sins ; and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.
. . . They then that received his word were baptized"
The question will probably arise, Were infants
baptized in the Apostles' times? The question is
not wholly easy to answer. That the children of
Christians were believed to inherit a measure of
religious advantage cannot be questioned. Even
one Christian parent sufficed to convey a sacred
character to the children. So S. Paul writes to the
Corinthians, "For the unbelieving husband is sanctified
in the wife, and the unbelieving wife sanctified in the
brother : else were your children unclean ; but noiv are
they holy''* Accordingly we find that S. Paul
accounts children to be members of the Church ; they
are included in the exhortations which he addresses
to the Christians of Ephesus and Colossae. "Children,
* I Cor. vii. 14. iiyiaffTOit yap 6 dvrjp 6 <S7ri<rros tv rrj yvvoAKi, KO.I
Tjyiao-Tai i) yvvT] TJ <S7rt<rroj tv ry d5c\0y* tird &pa TCL -riKva. vpuv
dKdOaprd 6m, vvv 5£ &yid tarw. Godet discusses this passage at
some length, and insists that the reference is to Infant Baptism.
(Corinthiens, i. p. 312-318.) Ep. Lightfoot is neutral, though clearly
in sympathy with a baptismal reference. "The passage is not to
be pressed on either side ; no inference can be drawn here against
the practice of Infant Baptism. On the contrary, the expression
tells rather in its favour. Certainly it enunciates the principle which
leads to Infant Baptism, viz., that the child of Christian parents
shall be treated as a Christian." (Notes on Epp. of S. Paul, p. 226.) It
is worth noting that S. Chrysostom does not seem to understand
any reference to Baptism. Robertson, of Brighton, writes charac
teristically : v. Lecture XV. on the Epp. to the Corinthians. The
bearing of the passage on the modern practice of indiscriminate
baptizing of infants is important. See the Discourse on this subject
appended to this volume.
142 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
obey your parents in the Lord'' "Children, obey your
parents in all things, for this is well-pleasing in the
Lord'' Fathers are exhorted to " nurture them in the
chastening and admonition of the Lord'' In the
Pastoral Epistles the emphasis laid on the right
conduct of the bishop's or deacon's family points
in the same direction. Thus the bishop or presbyter
must be " one that ruletJi well his own house, having
his children in subjection with all gravity ; (but if a
man knoiveth not how to rule his own house, how
shall he take care of the church of God?")* S. Paul
almost suggests that the family should be organized
as a little model of the larger family of the Church.f
S. Titus is admonished to "appoint elders in every
city"% men whose qualifications include the possession
of a Christian family. "If any man is blameless, the
husband of one wife having children that believe,
who are not accused of riot or unruly!' It seems
impossible to avoid the conclusion that the children
of Christian parents were regarded as naturally
entitled to receive Baptism, and did, as a matter of
fact, ordinarily receive the Sacrament. This con
clusion is strengthened by the undoubted fact that
Baptism was regarded as the parallel in the new
Covenant of circumcision in the Old ; that, accord
ingly, it served all the purposes of circumcision, while
it completely superseded it, being transcendently
superior in grace and dignity. "In whom" (i.e., in
Christ), writes S. Paul to the Colossians, "ye were
* 1 Tim. iii. 4-5.
t Cf. S. Chrysostom's expression, "a house is a little church," T] OIK la
ybp'EKK\f]<Tia tarl fj.iKpd. Horn. XX. in Eph. (Gaume vol. xi. p. 173.)
; Titus i. 5.
BAPTISM 143
also circumcised with a circumcision not made with
hands, in the putting off of the body of the flesh \
in the circumcision of Christ ; having been buried
with Him in Baptism"*
The beautiful passage in which Irenaeus describes
the method and virtue of Christ's Incarnation seems
to assume the Baptism of children.! " For He came
to save all through Himself; all, I mean, who through
Him are born anew unto God, infants, and little
children, and boys, and youths, and elders. Accord
ingly He came through every age, with infants
becoming an infant, hallowing infants ; among little
children a little child, hallowing those of that very
age, at the same time making Himself to them an
example of dutifulness and righteousness, and sub
jection ; among young men a young man, becoming
an example to young men, and hallowing them
to the Lord. So also an elder among elders, that
He might be a perfect Teacher in all things, not
only as regards the setting forth of the Truth, but
also as regards age, at the same time hallowing also
the elders, becoming likewise an example to them.
Lastly, He came also even unto death, that He might
be the first begotten from the dead, Himself holding
the primacy in all things, the Author of life, before
all things, and having precedence of all things."
I think, therefore, that the evidence justifies the
consistent belief and practice of the Church in the
matter of baptizing infants. For the most part,
however, the Church, in Apostolic times, was com-
* ii. u, 12.
t DR. HORT'S translation in Ante-Nicene Fathers^ p. 72.
144 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
posed of men and women who had been converted
in adult life, and who were baptized as adults. We
have already considered what was the nature of the
profession of belief which they were required to
make ; what their repentance was, I need not say,
every penitent will understand it ; yet it is requisite to
point out that it seems to have been expressed in
Apostolic times by a public confession of sin. The
scene at Ephesus was typical. "Many that had
believed came, confessing and declaring their deeds"*
But, indeed, in the New Testament repentance and
audible, detailed confession seem inseparable.
III. Finally, we turn to consider the Apostolic
doctrine of Holy Baptism. What did the first
Christians believe to be the effect of the simple
and familiar ceremony by which they were publicly
and formally constituted disciples of Jesus Christ?'
In the very brief time at my disposal I can do no
more than indicate the merest outlines of their belief.
Holy Baptism was believed to change the spiritual
status of the baptized. He henceforward stood
towards Almighty God in a new relationship. It
was no excessive use of language to describe the
change as a passing out of death into life. "And
you did He quicken" is S. Paul's phrase to the
Ephesians, "when ye were dead through your
trespasses and sins."] The baptized person was by
his Baptism wonderfully and most really associated
with the Death and Resurrection of Jesus. This,
indeed, was the manifest teaching of the external
ceremony : the disappearance under the water
* Acts xix. 1 8. t Eph. ii. I.
BAPTISM 145
pictured burial ; the reappearance pictured the life
from the grave. "Are ye ignorant" writes S. Paul
to the Romans, " that all we who were baptized into
Christ Jesus were baptized into His Death? We
were buried therefore with Him through Baptism into
death: that like as Christ was raised from the dead
through the glory of the Father, so we also might
walk in newness of life"' * From this union of the
baptized with Christ two consequences flowed. On
the one hand, it cancelled the sins of the past ; on
the other hand, it imparted a principle of Divine
Life to the baptized. The water of Baptism was
the means by which the Blood of Jesus was applied
to the penitent and believing sinner. So S. Paul,
warning the Corinthians against sin, reminds them
in these impressive words of their Baptism. " Ye
were washed, ye were sanctified, ye were justified in
the Name of the Lord Jesus Christ, and in the Spirit
of our God'' \ This grace of Baptism was, indeed,
* vi. 3-4.
t I Cor. vi. II. dXXo, aTreXotfcrcurfle, dXXa TTyidadrjTe, dXX' tdiKaiuOrjTe
£v T$ 6v6fJ.a.Ti TOU Kvpfou 'ITJCTOU XpiaroO ccaJ tv ry Ilve^/itm rou Oeou
TJ/J.UV. Godet understands here a reference to the full baptismal
formula. (S. Matthew xxviii. 19.) In confirmation of this view he
adduces Acts xix. 1-6, where S. Paul's question, " Into what then
were ye baptized?" seems to involve an accustomed mention of the
Holy Ghost in Baptism. The common expression, " to baptize into
the name of Jesus," "est une forme abregee pour designer le bapteme
chretien en general." He further adduces the fact that the Trinitarian
formula is found in the Didache. [vide Corinthiens, i. pp. 275-6.] On
the other hand, the evidence of early Church history is not favourable
to this view : " After the third century the formula of Baptism was
the name of the Trinity, and Baptism otherwise performed was declared
invalid. But in the early Church, as also in the Apostolic age, there
is evidence that the baptismal formula of the name of Jesus only was
not unusual." — ALLEN, Christian Institutions, p. 403,
L
146 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
the most prominent of all. To sin-burdened men
the remission of sins was of all spiritual boons the
most precious. The exhortation of Ananias to the
penitent Saul at Damascus was the most welcome
message conceivable. "And now why tarriest thou?
arise and be baptized, and wash away thy sins, calling
on His Name"* But vast as is this boon of remission,
it were but a transitory, nay, an illusory possession,
if it added no securities for future forgiveness. No
doubt the theory of discipleship supposed a life of
holiness following upon the death to sin in Baptism ;
and very awful language was employed to describe
the guilt and peril of sin in the baptized. The
probable interpretation of the terrible passage in
the Epistle to the Hebrews understands the "en
lightenment " which may not be renewed of Baptism.
"For as touching those who were once enlightened and
tasted of the heavenly gift, and were made partakers
of the Holy Ghost, and tasted the good word of God,
and the powers of the age to come, and then fill away,
it is impossible to renew them again unto repentance ;
seeing they crucify to themselves tJie Son of God afresh,
and put Him to an open shamed t The exact sense
of this fatal " falling away " is hard to determine ;
but the whole tone of the Epistles precludes the
notion that it is identical with sin as such. The
Corinthian Epistles are conspicuously full of warn
ings against sin, even gross sin, yet they are addressed
to "saints," that is, baptized Christians. The "one
Baptism for the remission of sins " carried its blessed
virtue not alone to the past, but also to all the life
* Acts xxii. 16. t Heb. vi. 4-5.
BAPTISM 147
of the baptized. For it placed him within the
sphere of forgiveness ; it made him member of the
Divine Society which has received from Jesus Christ
the "power of the Keys." So to repentance the
promise of renewed forgiveness is ever sure. "Godly
sorrow worketh repentance unto salvation" writes
S. Paul, "<? repentance which bringeth no regret" ;*
and S. John speaks very plainly : " If we say that
we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is
not in us. If we confess our sins, He is faithful and
righteous to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from
all unrighteousness "\ And with these teachings of
Apostles accords the word spoken by Jesus Christ
in the Upper Room, and always understood by the
Church of Baptism. " He that is bathed needeth not
save to wash his feet, but is clean every whit" + Within
the Church men are ever within reach of forgiveness.
No sins are too gross, no rebellion is too obdurate
and protracted to defeat the virtue of Christ's
Atonement, so only the sinner truly repent, and
make honest confession, and renounce his sin.
" The Blood of Jesus His Son cleanseth us from all
sin."
Baptism introduces into the sphere of the Holy
Ghost — it is the "laver of regeneration ';§ — in it men
are "born of water and tJie Spirit '."|| Hence it is
the basis of Christian equality. All secular distinc
tions lose their meaning in the new Life therein
conferred. Within the family of God all by title
of their common origin are equal. "For ye are all
* 2 Cor. vii. 10. f i John i. 8-9. % S. John xiii. 10.
§ Titus iii. 5. || S. John iii. 5.
148 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
Sons of God, through faith in Christ Jesus? writes
S. Paul to the Galatians, and he immediately adds
an explanation. "For as many of you as were
baptized into Christ did put on Christ. There can
be neither Jew nor Greek, there can be neither bond
nor free, there can be no male or female, for ye are all
one man in Christ Jesus"* Baptism being thus the
basis of Christian equality is also the basis of
Christian fellowship, the principle of Church unity.
"For in one Spirit ivere we all baptized into one
body, whether Jeivs or Greeks, whether bond or free;
and were all made to drink of one Spirit? t Christians
are one because they live by virtue of the same life-
giving inspiration ; they are all inhabited by the same
Spirit. " Know ye not" — is the earnest phrase of the
Apostle — "Know ye not that your body is a temple of
the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have from
God? "I
We may read in the wonderful eighth chapter of
the Roman Epistle what an Apostle considered the
meaning of the Baptismal Gift of the Holy Ghost.
"If any man hath not the Spirit of Christ, Jte is
none of His. . . . But if the Spirit of Him which
raised up Jesus from the dead dwelleth in you, He
that raised up Christ Jesus from the dead shall
quicken also your mortal bodies through His Spirit
that dwelleth in you"
S. Peter's famous parallel between the water of
Baptism and the water which floated the Ark of
Salvation expresses the general doctrine of the
New Testament. Then, in the traditional Deluge,
* Gal. iii. 26-28. t I Cor. xii. 13. % Ibid. vi. 19.
BAPTISM 149
the saving agent was water; so it is still: "After
a true likeness (water) doth now save you , even Baptism,
not the putting away of the filth of the flesh, but the
interrogation of a good conscience toward God, tlirougJi
the resurrection of Jesus Christ"* The humble and
familiar agent carries to the penitent and believing
soul the saving power of Christ's Risen Life. The
simple Sacrament at once tries faith and helps it ;
by its simplicity confounding natural wisdom, and
altogether disappointing human pride ; by its Divine
Authority consoling the misgivings of the lowly, and
firing the heart of the disciple with the passion of
conviction. In Baptism man is nothing; God is
everything. " When the kindness of God our Saviour
and His love toward man appeared, not by works done
in righteousness, which we did ourselves, but according
to His mercy He saved us, through the washing of
regeneration and renewing of the Holy Ghost which He
poured out upon us richly \ through Jesus Christ ?\
* I Peter iii. 21. f Titus iii. 4-5.
CHAPTER VI.
THE HOLY COMMUNION
WE may repudiate at once all intention of em
barking on the large and important subject
of Eucharistic controversy. Not one chapter, but
a bulky volume would be necessary, I do not say, to
do justice to that subject, but even to present it
in any tolerable shape. Moreover, such a discussion
hardly belongs to our present inquiry. We are seek
ing to gain a true conception of Apostolic Christianity,
and our principal authority is S. Paul, who, in the
Epistles to Corinth, has given us a picture, drawn
by a master's hand, of an Apostolic Church. We
shall divide our discussion into two parts : * in the
first, we shall discuss the administration of the Holy
Communion ; in the second, the doctrine held by the
Corinthians as to the Sacrament.
But first let me repeat a warning. We must not
look for detailed and thorough teaching about the
Holy Eucharist in the Epistles before us. We
showed above that the conditions under which these
writings took shape preclude the notion of systematic
instruction. S. Paul deals with practical matters,
which were urgent, which were causing scandal,
which threatened worse scandal. In so far as the
Holy Sacrament was concerned in the disorders
150
THE HOLY COMMUNION 151
the Apostle deals with it, but no farther. As a
matter of fact the Corinthian disorders did affect,
and that very closely, their treatment of the
Eucharist, and, therefore, the Epistle designed to
correct them is rich beyond all other New Testament
writings, save the fourth Gospel, in sacramental teach
ing. But we must be careful to appreciate justly
the language used : and, in order to do so, we must
endeavour to place ourselves in the position of the
Corinthians, and to understand the Apostle's words
from their standpoint. We shall return to this point
presently.
We observe that the Sacrament was evidently the
central act of Christian worship. It superseded the
sacrifices and sacrificial meals of the heathen ; it was
to the Jewish Christian all and more than all that his
Passover had been. It had been instituted by the
Lord Himself in direct connexion with His own
Redemptive Death. We cannot fail to recognize
the close agreement which all this presents between
the Epistles and the Evangelic narratives. We
have already alluded to the evidential importance
of this agreement ; here we content ourselves with
merely pointing to it.
The fullest account of the administration of the
Holy Communion is contained in the eleventh
chapter. The Apostle, having ordered that in the
religious assemblies the women should be veiled,
continues : " But in giving you this charge, I praise
you not, that ye come together not for the better but
for the worse. For, first of all, when ye come together
in the church [i.e., in religious assembly], / hear that
152 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
divisions exist among you ; and I partly believe it.
For there must be also heresies [or factions] among
yoUy that they which are approved may be made
manifest among you!' S. Paul has had occasion
earlier in the Epistle to denounce the factions of
Corinth ; he is now about to deal with their most
scandalous exhibition. " When therefore ye assemble
yourselves together, it is not possible to eat the Lord's
Supper: for in your eating each one taketh before
other his own supper ; and one is hungry and another
is drunken. What ? have ye not houses to eat and to
drink in ? or despise ye the Church of God, and put
them to shame that have not ? What shall I say to
you ? sJiall I praise you in this ? I praise you not"
We may remark that in this passage S. Paul goes
some way towards using the word "Church," eKK\t]<rla,
in the familiar modern sense of a consecrated build
ing. We know that in Apostolic times there were
no churches ; but the faithful assembled in one
another's houses.
There can be no doubt that the Lord's Supper
was preceded by the common meal, or Agape,
and that the shocking abuses denounced by S.
Paul belonged primarily to the latter. The associa
tion seems to have continued far into the sub-
Apostolic age. The name "Eucharist" seems to
have extended both to the Agape and to the
Lord's Supper. At the very beginning of the second
century we have the authority of Pliny's letter to
the Emperor Trajan for saying that the two rites
were separated. The language of the letter is not
free from ambiguity ; but on the whole it may be
THE HOLY COMMUNION 153
most reasonably understood as a description of the
Holy Communion in the early morning. Pliny is
reporting what he had discovered about the Chris
tians in Bithynia, and this is what he says : —
" They maintained that the amount of their fault
or error was this, that it was their habit on a fixed
day to assemble before daylight and sing by turns
a hymn to Christ as a god; and that they bound
themselves with an oath (sacminento) not for any
crime, but not to commit theft or robbery or adultery,
not to break their word, and not to deny a deposit
when demanded. After this was done their custom
was to depart and meet together again to take
food ; and even this (they said) they had given up
doing after the issue of my edict, by which in
accordance with your commands I had forbidden
the existence of clubs."*
It is possible that Trajan's edict suppressing the
clubs, which for the time destroyed the Agapae,
may have actually brought about the separation of
the Lord's Supper from the common meal. This
may be doubted. One thing, however, is certain :
* Professor Ramsay ( The Church in the Roman Empire] discusses
Pliny's Report and Trajan's Rescript. " Among the strict regulations
about societies, the Roman Government expressly allowed to all people
the right of meeting for purely religious purposes. The morning
meeting of the Christians was religious ; but the evening meeting was
social, including a common meal, and therefore constituted the
Christian community a sodalitas. The Christians abandoned the illegal
meeting, but continued the legal one. The fact is one of the utmost
consequence. It shows that the Christian communities were quite
alive to the necessity of acting according to the law, and of using the
forms of the law to screen themselves as far as was consistent with
their principles." (p. 219.) Bishop Lightfoot, however, thinks that
the Agape was still united with the Eucharist when Ignatius wrote
154 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
the language of S. Paul in censure of the Corinthian
excesses necessitated the formal severance, after a
longer or shorter interval, of the social feast from
the religious Communion. The character of those
excesses more than justified the Apostle's severity.
They not only destroyed the character of the Agape,
but they defamed the more awful mystery which
followed the Agape.
" The abuses which he (S. Paul) reproved and
sought to abolish were of two kinds," observes
Weizacker. " First, the congregation divided into
groups, the rich having their meals prepared without
reference to the others, and the poor requiring to
wait. Thus the difference in means and style of
living could not but wound, while the meal of the
wealthier degenerated into sensuality. In con
sequence of this, again, the Lord's Supper itself,
the commemoration, was neglected, if not altogether
given up. The feeling for it was lost, the order
thrown into confusion, the very formula had to be
insisted upon by Paul." The Apostle introduces
that formula with great solemnity ; as it stands in
nis Epistles, i.e., A.D. 100-118. "In the Apostolic age the Eucharist
formed part of the Agape. The original form of the Lord's Supper,
as it was first instituted by Christ, was thus in a manner kept up.
This appears from I Corinthians xi. 17 sq. (compare Acts xx. 7), from
which passage we infer that the Celebration of the Eucharist came, as
it naturally would, at a late stage in the entertainment. In the
Doctr. Apost., 10, this early practice is still observed. In after times,
however, the Agape was held at a separate time from the Eucharist.
Had this change taken place before Ignatius wrote? I think not."
The Bishop describes as "precarious " the inference drawn from
Pliny's letter by Professor Ramsay and others. ( Vide Apostolic
Fathers, Part II. vol. ii. p. 313-4.) For the subsequent history of
the Agape see note at end of chapter.
THE HOLY COMMUNION 155
the text of the Epistle it forms the oldest account
we possess of the Institution of the Eucharist.
"For I received [7rape\a/3ov] of the Lord that
which also I delivered [TrapeSooKo] unto you, how that
the Lord Jesus in the night in which He was be
trayed took bread ; and when He had given thanks ',
He brake it, and said, This is My Body, which is
for you ; this do in remembrance of Me [e*V TY\V e^v
ai/a/xi/iya-ai/]. In like manner also the Cup, after Supper,
saying, This Cup is the new Covenant in My Blood ;
this do as oft as ye drink it, in remembrance of
Me" That was the Formula of Consecration used
at Corinth, and doubtless everywhere in Apostolic
times ; it was not written down ; the New Testament
as yet did not exist, and the Liturgies were yet
unknown ; but it had become customary ; it had
taken a definite shape ; it was an incipient " Canon
of the Mass." The slight differences which are
noticeable between the four accounts of the Institu
tion, extremely interesting and suggestive in them
selves, do but serve to bring into prominence the
practical identity of formula used by the Apostolic
Church in the Holy Communion. S. Paul adds a
comment, which might well arrest the most reckless
of the offending Corinthians. "For as often as ye eat
this bread, and drink the Cup, ye proclaim the Lords
Death till He come. Wherefore whosoever shall eat
the bread and drink tJie cup of the Lord unworthily,
shall be guilty of the Body and the Blood of the Lord.
But let a man prove himself, and so let him eat of the
bread, and drink of the Cup. For he that eateth and
drinketJi, eateth and drinketh judgment [/c/o/^ta] unto
156 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
himself, if he discern not the body!* S. Paul does
not scruple to ascribe the sickness and mortality
then prevalent among the Corinthians to their sins
against the Sacrament. "For this cause many among
you are weak and sickly, and not a few sleep?
It seems sufficiently evident that all the members of
the Church received the Eucharist. We may be sure
that others were not only not permitted to receive, but
were not even permitted to be present. In course of
time the dismissal of the non-communicants became
a recognized feature of the Liturgy; and, curiously
enough, it has provided the name by which in the
Latin Church the Sacrament has been for many
centuries commonly called. As is well known, the
word " Mass " is only a corruption of missa, or missio,
the dismissal, which formerly took place at a fixed
point in the service. Some such procedure must
have existed even in the Apostolic Church, for it
is evident from the fourteenth chapter of the Epistle
before us that the Christian assemblies were acces
sible even to unbelievers, who certainly could not
have witnessed the "breaking of bread." S. Justin
Martyr, in his account of the Celebration, says : —
" And this Food is called by us Eucharist, and it is
not lawful for any man to partake of it, but he who
believes our teaching to be true, and has been
washed with the washing which is for the forgiveness
of sins and unto a new birth, and is so living as
Christ commanded. For not as common bread and
common drink do we receive these ; but like as Jesus
Christ our Saviour being made flesh through the
Word of God had both flesh and blood for our
THE HOLY COMMUNION 157
salvation, so also were we taught that the food
for which thanks are given by the prayer of His
word, and from which our blood and flesh by con
version are nourished, is both flesh and blood of that
Jesus who was made flesh."*
We may be sure that the Holy Communion was
commonly administered on the Lord's day, that is,
among the Jewish Christians on the Sabbath evening,
which would be considered the beginning of the
Lord's day. Such, probably, was the case at Troas,
where we read that " upon the first day of the week,
when we (i.e., S. Luke and the Apostle's company)
were gathered together to break bread, Paul discoursed"
at such length, as to prolong the assembly until day-
break.f Thus the celebration was originally a night-
service ; and, after the Agape had been definitely
separated from it, the service took place in the early
morning. It has been well observed J that this
arrangement was almost a necessity of the case
in a society numbering many slaves among its
members, who would, of course, have to work on
Sunday as well as on other days. " The Sacrament
of the Eucharist," observes Tertullian, " though it
was commanded by the Lord at meal-time and to all,
we take in assemblies before daybreak, and from the
hand of no others except our Presidents." The
older practice of evening communion lingered in
* Apologia, i. 66. S. Justin proceeds to describe the method of
Christian worship.
t Acts xx. 7, 8, ii.
JBy Bishop WORDSWORTH, The Holy Communion, p. 59. I have
drawn much from this valuable book, where the references are
collected.
158 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
the remoter districts, as for instance in Egypt, as
late as the fifth century; but generally from the close
of the first century the custom of the Church has
been to celebrate the Holy Eucharist in the morning,
and to insist upon fasting as a condition of reception.
It is greatly to be deplored that in recent years a
certain number of English clergymen — not, I think,
a large number, and, I believe, a diminishing number
— have permitted themselves to violate the settled
custom of the Church through eighteen centuries,
by celebrating the Holy Communion in the evening,
and encouraging the practice of non-fasting Com
munion. It is not in my opinion a subject for
discussion. It comes within the class of those
matters which must be and ought to be settled
by the general conduct of the Church. I answer the
objector in S. Paul's words. " If any man seemeth
to be contentiotis, we have no such custom, neither the
Churches of God"* We may conclude this part of
our discussion by reading the rules of the little
treatise known as The leaching of the Twelve
Apostles, which does probably present a very faithful
picture of Apostolic Christianity. It is deserving of
notice that here, as in S. Justin's description and in
Pliny's Letter, there is an inseparable connection
between conduct and Holy Communion.
" And on the Lord's own day gather yourselves
together and break bread and give thanks, first
confessing your transgressions, that your sacrifice
may be pure. And let no man, having his dispute
with his fellow, join your assembly until they have
been reconciled, that your sacrifice may not be
I Cor. xi. 1 6.
THE HOLY COMMUNION 159
defiled ; for this sacrifice it is that was spoken of
by the Lord. In every place and at every time offer
Me a pure sacrifice ; for I am a great King, saith
the Lord) and My Name is wonderful among the
nations!'*
We pass on now to gather in very brief outline the
Sacramental Teaching of these Corinthian Epistles.
What did S. Paul teach his converts as to the grace
and dignity of the Holy Eucharist ? " If we compare
I Cor. x. 17 and xi. 27," says Weizacker, "then it is
clear that by the body Paul alternately understands
the Church and Jesus Himself, applying it to the
former, doubtless, by means of the interpretation
of the simile of the bread, as a unity composed of
many grains of corn. xii. 27 furnishes the connecting
link between the two applications : the Church is one
body, but tJie body of Christ Himself." It is necessary
to consider these three passages more carefully.
In the tenth chapter S. Paul is warning the
Corinthians against idolatry. They were disposed
to minimize the significance of their presence at
the idolatrous feasts, and partaking of sacrificial
meats. " What difference can the idols make ? "
they said, "we know idols are really mere shams.
Why should we hold aloof from the society of our
neighbours, because they are so stupid as to think
the feasts and the meats in some sense sacred to the
idols ? " S. Paul's method of arguing is this. He
points the Corinthians to the Sacrament. What that
Sacrament means to you Christians, he says, that
the Idol-feasts mean to your neighbours, and will be
* Chap. xiv.
160 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
understood to mean to you also. The heathen ex
pressed their religious unity with one another, and
with their gods by those sacrificial feasts. To partake
at the idol table was to publicly unite oneself to the
body of devotees, and to make oneself by solemn
symbolic act partaker of the idol's life. Therefore,
such partaking involved nothing less than the
negation of discipleship. It stultified the Christian
position. " I speak as to wise men ; judge ye what
I say. The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not
a communion [KOIVMVIO] of (i.e., participation in) the
Blood of Christ? The bread which we break, is it
not a communion [KOLVMVLO] of the body of Christ?
seeing that we, who are many, are one bread, one
body ; for we all partake of the one bread. . . . Ye
cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils ;
ye cannot partake of the table of the Lord, and of the
table of devils!' We may compare the expressions
in the Eucharistic petition contained in The Teaching.
" As this broken bread was scattered upon the
mountains and gathered together became one, so
let Thy Church be gathered together from the ends
of the earth into Thy kingdom, for Thine is the glory
and the power through Jesus Christ for ever."
The Holy Communion was not only the external
sign by which the disciples of Christ might be
recognized, but it conveyed the Divine Life by
which the individual disciples were united by a living
bond with Jesus Christ. It sustained the mystic
union with the Lord which Holy Baptism had
created. So necessarily the idea of the mystical
Body, the Church, passed into the idea of Christ
THE HOLY COMMUNION 161
Himself as, through the Sacrament, bestowing His
own life-giving Presence. Christians became one
Body because they received one Divine Life.
The consecrated Elements were seen to possess a
more awful character. They conveyed the very Life
of the Lord ; they were spiritually His Body and
His Blood. Therefore the gross irreverence of the
Corinthians had a more heinous guilt ; it involved
the ignoring, perhaps the scorning of the Lord
Himself. "For as often as ye eat this bread, and drink
the cup, ye proclaim the Lords Death till He come.
Wherefore whosoever shall eat the bread or drink
the cup of the Lord unworthily [ovafi'a*] shall be guilty
of the body and the blood of the Lord'1* We
* S. Chrysostom interprets "unworthy receiving" in two ways.
I. Generally, of that hard, shameless temper which permits in the
communicant open breaches of the Christian law, and especially
(cf. v. 22) contempt of the poor. "These things let us also listen
to, all of us, as many as in this place approach with the poor to
this Holy Table, but when we go out, do not seem even to have
seen them, but are both drunken, and pass heedlessly by the hungry ;
the very things whereof the Corinthians were then accused. And
when is this done? say you. At all times, indeed, but especially
at the festivals, where, above all times, it ought not so to be. Is
it not so, that at such times, immediately after the Communion,
drunkenness succeeds, and contempt of the poor?" (Horn. XXVII.
c. 5 in i Cor. ) 2. More exactly, of a gross forgetfulness of the inherent
dignity of the Sacrament. "Not discerning the Lord's Body, i.e.,
not examining well, not bearing in mind as he ought, the greatness
of the things set before him ; not estimating the dignity [6yKov] of the
gift. For if thou shouldest accurately learn who it is that lies before
thee [rt's TTOT^ ivrw 6 irpoKdnevos] and who He is that gives Himself,
and to whom, thou wouldest need no other argument, but this is enough
for thee to use all diligence, unless thou art wholly abandoned."
(Horn. XXVIII. i, in I Cor.) I have appended to this chapter S.
Chrysostom's excellent observations on the custom of communicating
at festivals. His words are as necessary for English Churchmen in
the nineteenth century as for Antiochenes in the fourth.
M
1 62 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
learn from the context the nature of such unworthy
eating and drinking, and S. Paul states it plainly in the
next verse. It is the undiscerning, undiscriminating
reception of the Sacrament, the reception which
makes no difference between those hallowed Ele
ments and common food, which sees nothing
more in them than the lowly creatures of bread
and wine they are, and continue to be, which has
no reverence because it has no faith. "For he that
eateth and drinketh eateth and drinketh judgment
unto himself, if he discern not the Body."* This
blindness to the spiritual dignity attaching to the
Sacrament was, in essence, the very fault of the Jews,
who murdered the Prince of Life. They were so
gross of understanding, so carnal-minded, that when
the Spiritual King stood before them they could — in
the phrase of the prophet — see no comeliness in him to
move their desire. So we can recognize the real
identity of disposition between those who despise
Christ present in the Sacrament, and those who
despised Him before the tribunal of Pilate. Both
were in the awful language of S. Paul, "guilty of
the Body and the Blood of the Lord?\
6 yap (ffdlwv Kal irlvuv Kpl/ja eai'ry foOlet Kal irtvei /J.TJ
t It is indeed far from my intention to suggest that a devout and
edifying reception of the Holy Communion must involve the acceptance
of a specific theory of the Mode of Christ's Presence in the Sacrament.
I hold firmly that the precise contrary is true. But, apart from such
specific theories, the disciple cannot escape from (i) Christ's clear com
mandment ; (2) His emphatic teaching in S. John vi., xiii., xvi., which,
whatever other reference it may possess, cannot be supposed to have
no reference to the Sacrament ; (3) The positive law and unbroken
tradition of the Christian Society. Under all the circumstances —
THE HOLY COMMUNION 163
The Apostle's language in this Epistle compels us
to give a directly Sacramental application to S. John's
record of our Lord's great discourse at Capernaum ;
and we are thus permitted to borrow from the
Evangelist the "catalogue of those spiritual
privileges " belonging to Holy Communion, to which
S. Paul but indirectly refers. "It contains," says
Waterland, " i. A title to a happy resurrection; for
such as spiritually feed on Christ, Christ will ' raise
up at the last day' 2. A title to eternal life ; for our
Lord expressly says, ' Whoso eateth My Flesh, and
drinketh My Blood, hath eternal life! 3. A mystical
union with Christ in His Whole Person ; or, more
particularly, a presential union with Him in His
Divine Nature. 'He that eateth My flesh, etc., divelleth
in Me, and I in him' 4. In these are implied
(though not directly expressed by our Lord in that
discourse) remission of sins, and sanctification of the
Holy Spirit"*
But no summary can do justice to Christ's teaching
on that memorable occasion. Let any thoughtful and
unprejudiced man read the sixth chapter of S. John's
Gospel from the first verse to the last, let him remem
ber that the primary, though not exclusive reference
of Christ's words was to the Holy Communion, let
him read the language of S. Paul to the Corinthians,
always supposing a knowledge of the facts — it seems impossible to
reconcile a contemptuous attitude towards Holy Communion with
any real conviction of Christ's Lordship. But when all is said the
human heart is inscrutable, and while we may, and, I think, ought to
grasp for ourselves the solemn significance of neglecting or despising
the Sacrament, we had best refrain from sentence on others.
*,p. 192-
1 64 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
and on the authority of these distinct yet comple
mentary testimonies let him determine the Sacra
mental belief of the Apostolic Church. He will
hardly fail to conclude that the first disciples held a
doctrine of the Eucharist which in point of loftiness
and solemnity has never since been surpassed in the
Church.* " Now ye are the Body of Christ" writes S.
Paul, " and severally members thereof "\ The statement
at once explains, and is explained by, the words
already quoted. " The Bread which we break, is it not
a communion of t/ie Body of Christ ? seeing that we,
who are many, are one bread, one body : for we all
partake of the one bread'' Plainly, then, the Apostolic
Church considered the regular receiving of Holy
Communion necessary for the maintenance of Church
membership, necessary for the maintenance of living
connection with the Source of all Grace, our Lord
Himself. We cannot doubt that S. Paul would have
regarded neglect of Holy Communion as involving
the cutting off from the soul of the Divine Life,
which Christ gives in the Sacrament. Christ's own
words are thus explained, words spoken at the very
time when He instituted the Holy Eucharist. "As
the branch cannot bear fruit of itself, except it abide
in the Vine ; so neither can ye, except ye abide in Me.
I am the Vine ; ye are the branches ; he that abideth
in Me, and I in him, the same beareth much fruit ; for
apart from Me ye can do nothing. If a man abide not
in Me, he is cast forth as a branch, and is withered ;
and they gather them, and cast them into the fire, and
* v/teis 5^ 6rre crw/xa XpicroO KCU
f I Cor. xii. 27.
THE HOLY COMMUNION 165
they are burned" * Far be it from me to limit the
application of Christ's words. They bear profounder
sense than attaches to any one application, however
true ; but I cannot see my way to doubt that they
describe, and were designed to describe, the relation
into which Christ enters with the faithful disciple
in the Blessed Sacrament, and the most solemn
and terrible results involved in the interruption,
through deliberate neglect of the Blessed Sacrament,
of that relation. I cannot see my way to doubt that
the regular and devout receiving of Holy Communion
is the natural, and, so far as we know, the only
ordinary mode by which the Christian can remain
within the unity of Christ's Mystical Body.
NOTE.— S. Chrysostom, Horn. XXVIII. i in i Cor.
After some preliminary remarks about S. Paul's habit of
turning aside from his main argument in order to follow up
some side issue, he continues : — " Now the same thing he
hath also done here ; in that having once found occasion
to remind them of the Mysteries, he judged it necessary to
proceed with that subject. For indeed it was no ordinary
one. Wherefore also he discoursed very awfully concerning
it, providing for that which is the sum of all good things,
viz., their approaching those Mysteries with a pure con
science. Whence neither was he content with the things
said before alone, but adds these also, saying, But let a man
examine himself, which also he saith in the second Epistle :
prove yourselves, examine yourselves ; not as we do now>
approaching because of the season rather than from any
earnestness of mind. For we do not consider how we may
* S. John xv. 4-6.
1 66 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
approach prepared, with the ills that were within us purged
out, and full of compunction, but how we may come at
festivals^ and whenever all do so. But not thus did Paul
bid us come; he knoweth only one season of access and
communion, the purity of a man's conscience. Since if
even that kind of banquet which the senses take cognizance
of cannot be partaken of by us, when feverish and full of
bad humours, without risk of perishing ; much more is
it unlawful for us to touch this Table with profane lusts,
which are more grievous than fevers. Now when I say
profane lusts I mean both the desires of the body, and
of money, and of anger, and of malice, and, in a word,
all thaf are profane. And it becomes him that approacheth,
first, to empty himself of all these things, and so to touch
that pure sacrifice [0wtas]. And neither^ if indolently
disposed and reluctantly ', ought he to be compelled to approach
by reason of the festival ; nor, on the other hand, if penitent
and prepared, should any one prevent him because it is not a
festival. For a festival is the shewing forth of good works,
and reverence of soul, and exactness of conversation. And
if thou hast these things thou mayest at all times keep
festival, and at all times approach. Wherefore he saith,
But let each man examine himself, and then let him
approach. And he bids not one examine another, but a
man himself, making the tribunal not a public one, and
the conviction without a witness."
The last sentence is of special interest as showing how
far the Church of the fourth century stood from the modern
rule, which makes confession to the priest the necessary
preliminary to reception of the Sacrament. It is very
unfortunate that the great Church Festivals synchronize
with the popular holidays. The special temptations of
a "Bank Holiday" prove too much for the fragile virtue
of many communicants. The most miserable days in the
THE HOLY COMMUNION 167
year for the priest of a large parish are Boxing Day, Easter
Monday, and Whit-Monday. The zeal for religious
statistics operates as a strong pressure on careless Christians
to communicate on the Festivals, and thus directly ministers
to deplorable profanation.
THE AGAPE
It may fairly be doubted whether, in the Apostolic age,
the term " Agape " was employed to describe the common
meal of the Ecclesia. The term is certainly absent from the
Pauline Epistles, and from the Acts. It would seem barely
possible for S. Paul to write the famous chapter, i Cor. xiii.,
on dydTn] without reference to the technical meaning of the
word, if at that time such existed. In Jude 1 2 and 2 Peter
ii. 13, the Agape is mentioned, but in neither case is the
reading undisputed. In both cases — assuming that R.V.
has the right text — abuses of the gravest kind are denounced.
"These are they that are hidden rocks in your love-feasts
when they feast with you, shepherds that without fear feed
themselves"* "Men that count it pleasure to revel in the
daytime, spots and blemishes, revelling in their love-feasts
while they feast with you'' t
Evidently the Agape was used as an instrument for self-
indulgence by persons in authority, "shepherds." This
marks a later stage of Church life than that described in
the Corinthian Epistles, and is naturally connected with
the curious regulation in the Didache, which requires that
the Prophet shall not partake of the feast which he orders.
" And no Prophet that orders a table in the spirit eats of it
[himself] unless he is a false prophet."J
The history of the Agape may be conveniently sum
marized as follows : —
i. In Apostolic and in sub-Apostolic times it was
* Jude 12. t 2 Peter ii. 13. % xi. 9.
1 68 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
united with the Eucharist proper, to which it formed the
normal preliminary.
2. Under pressure of persecution it was generally aban
doned as provocative to the authorities of the Empire.
3. In the third century it was generally separated from
the Eucharistic Celebration, and tended to become either a
mere entertainment, or a distribution of provisions to the
poor.
4. In the fourth century its secular character was indicated
and emphasized by exclusion from the Churches. It
generally connected itself with the rapidly developing cult
of the martyrs.
5. It quickly became disreputable, was discountenanced
by the Church, and fell into desuetude.
" The name, indeed, still lingered as given to the annual
dedication feasts of Churches at Rome in the sixth century,
and the practice left traces of itself, in the bread, blest as
distinct from consecrated, which under the title of Eulogia
was distributed in Churches, or taken from them to absent
members of the congregation, (2) in the practice, prohibited
by the Apostolic canons, and by the Council in Trullo, of
bringing to the Altar honey, milk, grapes, poultry, joints of
meat, that the priest might bless them there before they
were eaten at a common table. The grapes appear, indeed,
to have been actually distributed with the ayia, or conse
crated elements, while the joints of meat are mentioned as
a special enormity of the Armenian Church. (3) Traces of
the Agape are to be found, lastly, in the practice which
prevailed in Egypt, from the neighbourhood of Alexandria
to the Thebaid in the fifth century, of meeting on the
evening of Saturday for a common meal, generally full and
varied in its materials, after which those who were present
partook of the ' mysteries.' (Diet, of Christian Antiquities,
Art. 'Agapse,' where the facts are put together and
THE HOLY COMMUNION 169
references given.) Among the attempts to restore the
system of primitive Christianity which marked the
Methodist movement so distinctly and honourably must
be counted the revival of 'Love-feasts.' For this John
Wesley himself was responsible. 'In order,' he says, 'to
increase in them a grateful sense of all God's mercies,
I desire that, one evening in a quarter, all the men
in band ; on a second, all the women would meet ; and
on a third, both men and women together, that we might
together " eat bread," as the ancient Christians did, " with
gladness and singleness of heart." At these Love-feasts
(so we termed them, retaining the name, as well as the
thing, which was in use from the beginning) our food is
only a little plain cake and water. But we seldom return
from them without being fed, not only with " the meat
which perisheth," but with " that which endureth to ever
lasting life." Subsequently the Love-feasts were not con
fined to the bands, but open to the whole Society.' "
OVERTON,/. Wesley, p. 129.
PART IV.
ORGANIZATION AND PRACTICE
CHAPTER I.
THE CHURCH
THE original character of the Corinthian Church
was that of a secession from the Corinthian
synagogue. It is, indeed, certain that as a general
rule the Christian religion followed the Jewish
Dispersion, and the synagogue was the forerunner
of the Church. This fact had important effect on
the organization of the new community, as we shall
have occasion to show when we come to treat of the
Christian Ministry, Discipline, and Worship. Here
we must attempt a double task. On the one hand,
we have to form some idea of the Apostolic Church
as it actually was, not as it has been represented
by the grateful fancy or the more deliberate purpose
of later generations. On the other hand, we must
learn the doctrine about the Church which was taught
by the Apostles.
That Christianity should be organized in a society
was almost inevitable. Apart altogether from theo
logical considerations, this result might have arisen
from the circumstances amid which the religion of
Christ began its course in the world. It has been
often remarked that the first century of our era was
174 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
marked by a general and powerful tendency towards
association.
" There were then, as now," writes Dr. Hatch,
"associations for almost innumerable purposes in
almost all parts of the empire. There were trade
guilds and dramatic guilds ; there were athletic clubs
and burial clubs, and dining clubs ; there were friendly
societies, and literary societies, and financial societies;
if we omit those special products of our own time,
natural science and social science, there was scarcely
an object for which men combine now for which
they did not combine then."* Thus it was the most
natural thing in the world for the converts to
Christianity to form an association. They had the
models of such association ready to hand in the
familiar institutions of society, and those models
were closely followed. To the outside observer the
Christian communities appeared to belong to the
general type of associations, and, as a matter of
fact, they were so regarded by the Roman Govern
ment when they first attracted its notice.
The basis of association was discipleship to Jesus
Christ, crucified and risen. S. Paul has made it very
clear that in his preaching the central element was
the personal Lord. This was the gospel, that Christ
the Messiah had come in fulfilment of the Old Testa
ment prophecy, that His Death on the Cross had
reconciled man to God, by making Atonement for
the World's sin, that He was reigning at the Right
Hand of God in the Power of the Resurrection, that
He would shortly return to judge the world. The
* HATCH, B. Lt p. 26.
THE CHURCH 175
Jews were arrested by the proclamation of Christ
as the Messiah. The Apostolic preaching consisted
primarily in the proof, out of the Old Testament
Scriptures, of that fundamental position. The account
in the Acts of the proceedings at Thessalonica is
doubtless representative. "Paul, as his custom was,
went in unto them [the Jews], and for three sabbath
days reasoned with them from the scriptures, opening
and alleging, that it behoved the Christ to suffer, and to
rise again from the dead ; and that this Jesus, Whom,
said he, I proclaim unto you, is the Christ'' * The
Gentiles rather fastened on the doctrines of Atone
ment and Judgment certain and near at hand. We
gather from the Acts that S. Paul was wont to dwell
most on these parts of his message when he found
himself face to face with Gentiles. He called to
repentance ; he announced the Judge. He attacked
idolatry and the foul immorality which idolatry
fostered, and even necessitated. His appeal was
direct to the conscience of his hearers. Take, for
example, the conclusion of his sermon at Athens.
" The times of ignorance, therefore, God overlooked ; but
now He commandeth men that they should all every-
where repent : inasmuch as He hath appointed a day
in the which He will judge the world in righteousness
by the Man Whom He hath ordained ; whereof He
hath given assurance unto all men, in that He hath
raised Him from the dead" t The well-known
description of the Apostle's preaching before the
governor Felix is probably true of his general
method. "He reasoned of righteousness and temper-
* Acts xvii. 2. t Ibid. xvii. 30, 31.
176 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
ance, and the judgment to come" Where, then, the
Jews formed the majority of the Church the prevail
ing temper remained intensely Jewish. Righteous
ness was the noble heritage of Israel ; discipleship
did not involve a moral transformation. The religious
and moral system in which the Jews had grown up
received the doctrine of Christ's Messiahship, and the
Evangelic tradition of His Life and Teaching, but
the addition did not seem to necessitate any breach
with the past. But where, as in Corinth, the Church
was predominantly Gentile the case was otherwise.
Christ the Saviour, Christ the Pattern, Christ the
Grace-giver, Christ the Judge — in every character He
faced the guilty conscience. He demanded the
violent, immediate, and complete renunciation of the
sinful habits of life. He upheld the winning Model
of the New Life ; He threatened with inexorable
punishment the old sins. Discipleship among the
Gentiles was emphatically an affair of the con
science. It involved a sharp conversion, which cleft
life asunder, repudiating the past, transforming the
present. The converts from heathenism were literally
*' an elect race," a " holy nation," * called out from
a world, perishing in its rottenness, into the new life
of purity and love. This was the immense signifi
cance of their Baptism, which formally and publicly
marked the great transition. So S. Paul addresses
the Corinthians in anxious warning, setting in contrast
* Dr. Hort reminds us that the common explanation of the famous
word Ecclesia, as meaning the "called-out " people, cannot be main
tained. The idea itself, however, is thoroughly true and apostolic.
— Vide HORT, Christian Eccksia, p. 5'
THE CHURCH 177
their past iniquities and their present profession. "Be
not deceived : neither fornicators, nor idolaters •, nor
adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves
with men, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor
revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of
God. And stich were some of you : but ye were washed,
but ye were sanctified, but ye were justified in the name
of the Lord Jesus Christ, and in the spirit of our God" *
Thus the Church was a society organized on the
basis of the belief in Christ as Saviour, Model, Lord,
Judge, in opposition to the prevailing wickedness of
society. Its missionary method was a frank, straight
appeal to the Conscience. Now the prevailing
wickedness of the Imperial Society of that age
may be grouped under the two heads of uncleanness
and cruelty. The Church, then, was an association
for the maintenance of purity and chanty. This
twofold character is indicated by the two names
commonly used to describe the members of the
Church. They are "saints" and "brethren." This
twofold character expressed itself in the necessarily
Catholic basis of membership. Discipleship being
an affair of the conscience appealed to men as such,
apart altogether from all conventional distinctions.
S. Paul, writing to the Romans, dwells much on the
universal relevancy of the Gospel of Redemption.
The Church did, indeed, like the net in the parable,
gather of every kind ; yet mostly, as perhaps was
natural, she draw her members from the humbler
ranks of society. This was notably the case at
Corinth, as S. Paul reminded the Corinthians.
* i Cor. vi. 9.
N
i;8 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
"For behold your calling, brethren, how that not
many wise after the flesh, not many mighty, not
many noble, are called!' * Doubtless many were
slaves. The Apostle directly addresses himself to
such, deprecating the not unnatural idea that disciple-
ship was incompatible with their servile condition.
" Wast thou called being a bondservant ? care not for
it : but if thou canst become free, use it rather. For
he that was called in the Lord, being a bondservant, is
the Lord* s freedman : likewise he that was called, being
free, is Christ's bondservant. Ye were bought with
a price ; become not bondservants of men. Brethren,
let each man, wherein he was called, therein abide with
God1.' t M. Re"nan reminds us that the servile class
of the Roman Empire included many of the more
intelligent and educated people. "The servile con
dition," he says, " included persons who were culti
vated, contented, virtuous, well-informed, well brought-
up. The highest teachings of morality came from
slaves : Epictetus passed in servitude a great part of
his life. The Stoics, the sages said, as S. Paul to the
slave — ' Remain where you are : do not think of
enfranchisement.' We must not judge the popular
classes in the Greek towns by our populations —
sullen, brutal, coarse, incapable of understanding.
That element of fineness, delicacy, polish, which we
perceive in the relations of the first Christians is the
tradition of Greek refinement. The humble artisans
of Ephesus, whom S. Paul salutes with so much
cordiality, were certainly sweet persons, of touching
probity, set off by excellent manners and by that
* i Cor. i. 26. f Ibid. vii. 21-24.
THE CHURCH 179
peculiar charm which there is in the courtesy of
simple folks. Their serenity of mind, their content,
were a perpetual sermon. ' See how they love one
another,' was the remark of the heathen, astonished
by this innocent and tranquil aspect, by this profound
and attractive cheerfulness. Next to the preaching of
Jesus this is the Divine Achievement of Christianity :
this is its second miracle — a miracle, verily drawn
from the living forces of humanity, and all that is
best and holiest in humanity."* We may allow
something for the characteristic style of the eloquent
Frenchman, and something for his standpoint, but
surely he does not overstate the fact. Perhaps our
first impression as we read these Corinthian Epistles
is one of disappointment. Those bitter partisan
rivalries, that terrible profligacy, that discreditable
anarchy, that frightful misconduct at the holiest time,
at once amaze and repel us. We expected better
things of the Church which listened to the living
voices of the Apostles, in which the memory of the
Son of God was yet recent In our disappointment
we may readily be unjust to these first believers,
unjust to Christianity. We have before us the
picture of the Church's scandals ; but we forget the
state of society amid which the Church existed.
Think what it meant for Corinth, for the world, that
in an age which delighted in the brutal butcheries
of the Amphitheatre, in a place where the central
shrine of the popular Religion was nothing better
than a vast brothel,! there should yet exist and
* R£NAN, S. Paul, pp. 436, 437. Paris, 1869.
f " L'affluence des marins attir.'s par ks deux ports avail fait de
1 8o APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
spread a society of which the purpose was the
making possible for men the life of brotherly love
and personal purity. Read the thirteenth chapter
of the first Corinthian Letter, that sweet Hymn of
Charity which stirs within us infinite yearnings and
tender hopes, and think what it meant for Corinth
and the world, that in the foul, cruel, pagan city
companies of men and women had been drawn
together into a fellowship so real, so divine, that
there was nothing exaggerated or unreal in address
ing to them those glowing words. When the
"hard, pagan world" of imperial Rome was at
the height of its blood-stained magnificence, is it
not a portent indeed that in " upper rooms," in
the cavernous catacombs of the dead, in the waste
places, on the mountains, human ears should receive,
and human lips rehearse such words as these? "Love
suffer eth long and is kind ; love envieth not ; love
vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up, doth not behave
itself unseemly, seeketh not its own, is not provoked,
taketh not account of evil, rejoiceth not in unrighteous
ness, but rejoiceth with the truth, beareth all things,
believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all
things!' This at least may be said for the Church
of the first days, that its practice was not wholly
unworthy of such words. Can as much be said for
the Church of any later age?
We said that the Church wore the aspect of those
Corinthe le dernier sanctuaire du culte de la Venus Pande*mos, reste
des anciens etablissements ph^niciens. Le grand temple de Venus
avait plus de mille courtisanes sacrees : la ville entiere etait comme un
vaste mauvais lieu, ou de nombreux etrangers, des marins surtout,
v6naient follement depenser leurs richesses." — Ibid., p. 214.
THE CHURCH 181
associations, which were the most conspicuous feature
of the social life of the Roman Empire. Its purpose
was, indeed, vastly superior, its spirit fraternal, but
its general organization was remarkably similar. It
might be an easy matter for the more unspiritual
Christians to think of the Church much as their
heathen neighbours thought about it — it was just
one more religious association in Corinth. S. Paul
intervenes with his doctrine of the Body of Christ.
He compels the Corinthians to regard their associa
tion as not only superior to all other associations,
but as a thing wholly apart, belonging to an order
of its own, with claims and graces unparalleled
elsewhere. His teachings about the Church are
scattered over the Epistles, but they are summed up
in the twelfth chapter. The Apostle begins by
tracing every genuine profession of discipleship to
the Holy Spirit. " Wherefore I give you to under
stand, that no man speaking in the Spirit of God
saithy Jesus is anathema ; and no man can say, Jesus
is Lord, but in the Holy Spirit'' And so with those
"spiritual gifts" which the Corinthians so greatly
admired, and so extensively abused, their Author
was the Holy Spirit. From this fact it followed
that the distribution of those gifts was not capri
cious, nor yet determined by individual merit, but
expressed the purpose of the Holy Spirit, and was
designed to serve the general edification, The
Corinthians were treating their several gifts as
private possessions ; S. Paul teaches them to rather
regard them as Divine trusts. " To each one is given
the manifestation of the Spirit to profit withal" The
1 82 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
gifts are various, indicating by their variety that
none are sufficient standing alone, but all are de
signed to assist and complement one another : their
value lies in their due correlation, their virtue de
pends on their co-exercise. "All these worketh the
one and the same Spirit, dividing to each one severally
even as He will" In fact, Christians are not so
many separate individuals, but severally members of
an inspired society. S. Paul describes the Church
under the metaphor of the human body.* " For as
the body is one, and hath many members, and all the
members of the body, being many, are one body ; so
also is Christ. For in one Spirit were we all baptized
into one body, whether Jews or Greeks, whether bond
or free ; and were all made to drink of one Spirit?
" Think," he says, " what is involved in that common
gift of the Spirit in Holy Baptism. You stand on
a basis of equality ; and yet this equality co-exists
with an almost infinite diversity of function. You
are severally placed by the Divine Architect as
' living stones ' in His Spiritual temple. You depend
on one another ; you cannot dispense with one
another ; you cannot transfer to any other your own
function. You may not despise one another." " For
the body is not one member, but many. If the foot
shall say, Because I am not the hand, I am not of the
body ; it is not therefore not of the body. And if the
ear shall say, Because I am not the eye, I am not of
the body : it is not therefore not of the body. If the
* This metaphor was not original. The Stoics especially were wont
to employ it ; but nowhere is it used with such range and power as in
this Epistle.
THE CHURCH 183
whole body were an eye, where were the hearing? if
the whole were hearing, where were the smelling?
But now hath God set the members each of them in
the body, even as it pleased Him'' After his fashion
the Apostle is led away by his metaphor ; he draws
out fresh lessons for the rebuke of the loveless
anarchy of Corinth, for the eternal guidance of dis
ciples. " It is, you see, absurd to draw distinctions
between the members, calling this one honourable
and that one uncomely. All are necessary : and all
are so closely bound together that their fortunes are
the same." "And whether one member suffer eth, all
the members suffer with it ; or one member is honoured,
all the members rejoice with it" Then comes the
direct application of the metaphor. " Now ye are the
body of Christ, and severally members thereof. And
God hath set some in the church, first apostles, secondly
prophets, thirdly teachers, then miracles, then gifts of
healings, helps, governments, divers kinds of tongues.
Are all apostles? are all prophets? are all teachers?
are all workers of miracles ? have all gifts of heal
ings ? do all speak with tongues ? do all interpret ?
But desire earnestly the greater gifts. And a still
more excellent way shew I unto you." That " more
excellent way" is the way of love, which forms the
subject of the thirteenth chapter.
It is evident that S. Paul's notion of the Church
was very exalted. Breach of unity was to his think
ing grievous sin : it contradicted the very fundamental
conditions of discipleship. So he treated the divi
sions among the Corinthians as very serious matters.
' Now I beseech you, brethren, through the name of our
1 84 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and
that there be no divisions among you ; but that ye be
perfected together in the same mind and in the same
judgment" The Apostle would have had small
patience with the popular modern notion that every
disciple is free to follow his own private choice in
the matter of public worship. Such individualism
was, in the judgment of S. Paul, " sin against the
brethren? In like manner the conduct of every
member was of direct interest to the whole Church.
The Corinthians forgot this when they treated with
indulgence that incestuous Christian, whose crime
shocked even the heathen. "Know ye not that a
little leaven leaveneth the whole lump ? Purge out the
old leaven, that ye may be a new lump, even as ye are
leavened. . . . Put away the wicked man from among
yourselves? The litigiousness of the Corinthians
was so particularly blameworthy because it argued
contempt for the "Body of Christ? "Is it so" —
demands the indignant Apostle — " that there cannot
be found among you one wise man, who shall be able to
decide between his brethren, but brother goeth to law
with brother, and that before unbelievers ? " It is the
sacred character of the Christian society that makes
so guilty that reckless exercise of liberty which hurts
the consciences of the weaker brethren. Liberty
must be conditioned by expediency, regulated by
charity, if it is not to degenerate into guilty license.
"All things are lawful; but all things are not ex
pedient. All things are lawful ; but all things edify
not. Let no man seek his own, but each his neighbour's
good? The same considerations must determine the
THE CHURCH 185
relations between Corinthian Christians and the rest
of the Church. Large as is the liberty of the local
church, it may not be so extended as to break the
unity of the whole Christian fellowship. "If any
man seemeth to be contentious^ we have no such custom^
neither the churches of God!' " God is not a God of
confusion^ but of peace ; as in all the churches of the
saints" " What ? was it from you that the word of
God went forth ? or came it unto you alone ? "
Clearly S. Paul's authority cannot be pleaded in
justification of the congregational theory of the
Church.* He represses the notion of such inde
pendence with a peremptory decisiveness that admits
of no misunderstanding. The " Body of Christ " can
never be narrowed down to the limits of a congrega
tion, or even, we may add, in deference to later
Christian experience, of a denomination. It must
never be thought of as anything less than " the
whole company of faithful people dispersed through-
* It seems impossible to reconcile the Church theory of the Pauline
Epistles with such a theory as the following, which was propounded
in 1658 by a representative body of independents in " a declaration of
the faith and order owned and practised in the congregational churches
in England": — "That every particular society of visible professors
agreeing to walk together in the faith and order of the gospel is a
complete church, and has full power within itself to elect and ordain
all church officers, to exclude all offenders, and to do all other acts
relating to the edification and well-being of the Church."
"They disallow the power of all stated synods, presbyteries, con
vocations, and assemblies of divines, over particular churches ; but
admit that in cases of difficulty, or difference relating to doctrine or
order, churches may meet together by their messengers in synods or
councils, to consider and give advice, but without exercising any juris
diction." (NEAL's History of Puritans ; vol. ii. p. 692. London, 1837.)
These declarations reflect very plainly the influence of contemporary
politics.
1 86 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
out the whole world." Nor did S. Paul consider this
wide fellowship to be merely matter of phrase or
sentiment. He insisted that the fraternity of be
lievers must express itself in action. During the
Famine in Palestine, when the Jewish Christians
were reduced to great want, he exerted himself with
much energy to obtain liberal contributions from the
members of the Gentile churches.
CHAPTER II.
THE MINISTRY
SPAUL was in exceptional degree the victim of
• calumny and misrepresentation. His character
was defamed ; his teaching contradicted ; his Apos
tolic authority questioned ; his success belittled ; even
his physical appearance ridiculed. It is astonishing
what bitter malignity he provoked. The personal
fortunes of the Apostle are reflected in his Epistles.
We can detect the note of ceaseless conflict through
out them. They constantly tend to become apologies
for the writer. One result of this circumstance is to
secure for the Christian ministry a very large place
in the Pauline Epistles. The Apostle, driven by his
opponents to justify his actions and the large
authority he claimed over the churches he had
planted, is led to write at length of the Apos
tolic Office in particular and of the ministerial
office in general. In the last years of his life
he was forced, by the rude pressure of persecu
tion, to consider the contingency of his own
withdrawal from the government of the churches.
He was thus led to write the three Pastoral Epistles,
in which he directly and formally treats of the
187
i88 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
pastoral office. Indeed, those Epistles might not
inaptly be called the Apostle's Manual for Bishops.
It is noteworthy that in the Apostolic age the
Christian ministry was still largely undeveloped.
It was latent in the Apostolate. Ecclesiastical terms
were not definitely fixed ; they reflected, in the
looseness of their application, the bewilderment of
the time. The Church was taking shape. In the
process many factors were operative ; but the
supreme principle which governed their operation
was that which was enshrined in the name "Apostle,"
and which the Apostolic ministry most conspicuously
asserted — the principle of Divine Mission.* For the
rest, the actual form which the Christian ministry
ultimately assumed was very obviously determined
by secular conditions. The names, presbyter, epis-
kopos or bishop, deacon, were familiar in current
experience. The infant Church naturally modelled
itself on the organization out of which, in a sense,
it grew — the synagogue, or the Greek Club. It
adopted for its own purposes the institutions and
the very names of Judaism or paganism ; but it
brought everything under the control of the supreme
Apostolic idea. Here, as it seems to me, is the
mistake of those industrious and learned students
• S. Paul assumes that the Christian preacher stands in the position
of the prophet of Hebrew History ; mission is essential to the prophetic
character. So in Romans x. 14, 15 the Apostle writes, "How shall
they hear without a preacher? and how shall they preach except they be
sent?" A generation after S. Paul the Church believed that the
"sending" of the Apostolic ministry was solemnly effected by the
Risen Christ on Easter Evening. (See S. John xx. 21-23.) Most
Christians will need no better assurance of this fact of Divine Mission
than the record of the fourth Gospel.
THE MINISTRY 189
who endeavour to provide a merely Jewish or merely
heathen origin for the Christian ministry. They
are very successful in showing the reproduction
within the Christian Church of the established
institutions and officials of the older systems, but
they forget the dominant doctrine which determined
the character of the ministry — the doctrine of a
Divine Mission.
In the Corinthian Epistles we observe S. Paul
directly dealing with a disposition on the one hand
to magnify the power of religious teachers ; on the
other hand, to degrade their character. The Cor
inthians were inclined to constitute the Apostles
their masters in the sense of the sophist schools.
They would transform the Church into the Academy,
discipleship into philosophy, Apostles into the leaders
of philosophy: but so doing they would give Apos
tolic authority no better basis than the Apostle's
ability, no longer existence than the Apostle's
popularity. Their view of the ministry was frankly
carnal, " of the earth, earthy " : it left no place any
where for a Divine Commission, You remember
how S. Paul deals with it : —
" When one saith, I am of Paul ; and another I am
of Apollos ; are ye not men ? What then is Apollos ?
and what is Paul? Ministers [StaKovoi] through whom
ye believed : and each as the Lord gave to him. I
planted, Apollos watered: but God gave the increase. So
then neither is he that planteth anything, neither is he
that watereth ; but God that giveth the increase. Now
he that planteth and he that watereth are one \zv cicriv]:
but each shall receive his own reward according to his
190 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
own labour. For we are Gods fellow-workers, ye
are God's husbandry, God's building."* It would be
difficult to repudiate more absolutely the Corinthian
partisan conception of the Christian ministry ; but
the Apostle proceeds to develop the true doctrine.
If the essential element of the ministerial character
be indeed a Divine Commission, then obviously
serious consequences must follow ; the Christian
minister is at once weighed with an awful responsi
bility, and strengthened by a sublime independence.
"Let a man so account of us, as of ministers \y-irr] per a<s\
of Christ, and stewards [OIKOVOJULOV?] of the mysteries
of God. Here, moreover, it is required in stewards,
that a man be found faithful. But with me it is
a very small thing that I should be judged of you,
or of man 's judgment [rj VTTO avOptoTriKw ij/xepa?] ; yea,
I judge not mine own self. For I know nothing
against myself : yet am I not hereby justified ; but
he that judgeth me is the Lord. Wherefore judge
nothing before the time until the Lord come, who will
both bring to light the hidden things of darkness and
make manifest the counsels of the hearts ; and then
shall each man have his praise from God"\ This
language is strong, almost aggressive in its egotism :
but it is the egotism of a man defending himself
against unrighteous attack. S. Paul is careful to
show the necessity of the ministry to the Church,
and he separates his argument from his own person.
He describes the Church as a living, complex
organism, "the Body of Christ" : inspired by the
Holy Spirit, almost infinitely rich in variety of
* I Cor. iii. 4-9. f Ibid. iv. 1-5.
THE MINISTRY 191
structure and function, depending for its health
upon the harmonious interaction of all its organs,
every one fulfilling its own separate task, and
thereby ministering to the common welfare. Many
disputations are raised about the Church ; there are
many theories in the air ; and those theories do not
agree together. I know no clearer, no more beautiful,
and no more authoritative teaching on the subject
than that of S. Paul in the twelfth chapter of the
first Corinthian Epistle, and the fourth chapter of the
Epistle to the Ephesians. That teaching represents
the Christian ministry as essential to the Church: the
clergy are organs of the Body, and as such indis
pensable. " Now ye are the body of Christ, and
severally members thereof. And God hath set [eflero]
some in the church, first apostles, secondly propJicts,
thirdly teachers, then miracles, then gifts of healings,
helps, governments, divers kinds of tongues. Are all
apostles ? are all prophets ? are all teachers ? are all
workers of miracles ? have all gifts of healings ? do
all speak with tongues ? do all interpret ? "
Here we find not only the assertion of the Divine
institution of the Christian ministry, and of its
necessity to the Church, but also the statement that
the ministry as constituted by God is various in
order and function. The parallel passage in the
Ephesian Epistle gives a slightly different list. "And
He (i.e. Christ) gave [eScoKev] some to be apostles ; and
some, prophets ; and some, evangelists; and some,
pastors and teachers ; for the perfecting of the saints,
unto the work of ministering, unto the building up of
the body of Christ'' You will observe that in neither
192 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
list do we find the famous names which have been
permanent in the Church, " bishops, presbyters, and
deacons," We know that all these terms were
current in the Apostolic Church. The Epistle to
the Philippians is addressed "to all the saints in
Christ Jesus which are at Philippi, with the bishops
and deacons " [cruv eTnovcoVoi? /cat &a/co'vof 9]. The
Pastoral Epistles make frequent mention of bishops
and deacons. Nowhere, however, in the Pauline
writings are the presbyters or elders mentioned, a
circumstance the more perplexing since we are
assured in the Book of the Acts that the Apostle
was accustomed to " ordain presbyters in every city ";
and in the Epistles of S. Peter and S. James the
"presbyters" are mentioned. The true explanation
probably is the old one, that in the earliest times
"presbyters" or elders and "episkopoi" or bishops
were alternative names for the same officer, the
former title being in common use among the Jewish
Christians, the latter among the Gentile.
I have already observed that the nomenclature of
the Apostolic Church was in a fluid state ; meanings
had not been finally fixed to names. We must here
note that there was a broad distinction between
the ministry of evangelisation and the ministry of
pastoral charge. The Apostolic Church was mainly
a missionary church ; its organization was deter
mined by the necessities of that warfare against
paganism to which it owed its existence. The
Apostles and prophets represent the missionary stage
of the history ; but so soon as the Church had been
planted in any place the need for a pastoral ministry
THE MINISTRY 193
made itself felt. The bishops, or presbyters, and the
deacons represent the settled stage of the history.
It is remarkable that the Teaching of the Twelve
Apostles describes both types of the ministry ; but
it is not difficult to see that in the Church, as de
scribed by that little treatise, there was a certain
suspicion attaching to the "Apostles" and "prophets."
The Evangelistic ministry was receding into the
background, and the settled ministry of edification
replacing it. There are rules laid down for the due
testing of the wandering Apostles and prophets, and
the contingency of impostors is plainly contemplated.
" Not every one that speaketh in the spirit is a
prophet, but only if he have the behaviour of the
Lord. By their behaviour then shall the false
prophet and the prophet be known." The regular,
fixed ministry is still reckoned to belong to an in
ferior type, but it is evidently growing in importance.
" Elect, therefore, for yourselves bishops and deacons
worthy of the Lord, men meek, and not lovers of
money, and truthful, and approved, for they too
minister to you the ministry of the prophets and
teachers. Therefore despise them not, for they are
those that are honoured of you with the prophets
and teachers."
It has been suggested, and the suggestion is very
probable in itself, that commonly the first local
ministers were the first converts. They would be
the chief organizers of the Church life ; they would
have a claim on the gratitude of their fellow-disciples.
" We beseech you, brethren" writes S. Paul to the
Thessalonians, " to know them that labour among you,
Q
194 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
and are over you in the Lord [rou? KOTrtwvras ei/ VJULIV K.
7rpoi'<TTa/ut.€vovs v/uLwv ev /cu/D/o)], and admonish you ; and
to esteem them exceeding highly in love for their
work's sake"* In the Corinthian Epistle we have
a still clearer indication of this personal ministry
based on service. "Now I beseech you, brethren"
writes S. Paul to the Corinthians, " (ye know the
house of Stephanas, that it is the firstfruits of
Achaia, and that they have set themselves to minister
unto the saints), that ye also be in subjection unto
such, and to every one that helpeth in the work and
laboureth" t
" According to this there were a number of people
who were to be regarded as superintendents in the
Church. The claim was based on their having been
the first to believe and on their maintaining the
Church by their ministry. The Apostle's exhorta
tion shows accordingly that here again it was not
a question of an office that had been instituted, but
* I Thess. v. 12, 13.
t xvi. 15, 1 6. 7ra/xt/ca\u; 5e 17x015, cl5e\0o{ (ofSare rV otKiav
Sre^ava, 6Vi ^crrtv ctTrapx^ TTJS 'A^aias, /cai etj dtaKovtav rots £71015
era£aj' eairroi/s), iVa /ecu v/jLels vTrora.ffO"t)ff6e rot's TOIOI/TOIS, /cat Travri
r<j5 ffvvepyovvTt Kal KOTTI&VTI.
" These words suggest that Stephanas was a wealthy or otherwise
influential Corinthian, who with his household made it his aim to use
his position for the benefit of Christians travelling to Corinth from
a distance, all of whom in Apostolic language were saints or holy, as
all alike members of a holy community, and consecrated to a holy life.
Services like these rendered by a man of social eminence made it good
for the members of the Corinthian Ecclesia to look up to him as
a leader. He was, in fact, affording an example of what S. Paul
meant by 6 Trpoi'<rTa./j.€vos, in Rom. xii. 8." (HoRT, Christian Ecclesia,
p. 207.) So Godet, " Rien n'indique qu'il s'agisse ici d'une charge
ecclesiasticjue proprement dite."
THE MINISTRY 195
of a relationship that had grown out of facts, a
relationship founded constantly on voluntary work,
and dependent on the goodwill of the community."
This is very true, but, with the Pauline Epistles
before us, it seems to me impossible to doubt that
the local ministers, however chosen and however
called, were all solemnly ordained to their ministry.
Apart from such Ordination I cannot see what in
telligible meaning can be attached to the solemn
language continually used by S. Paul when speaking
of the ministry. The most natural interpretation
of the Apostle's message to Archippus understands
it as referring to his ordination. " Say to Archippus,
Take heed to the ministry [Sicucovlav] which thou
hast received of the Lord, that thou fulfil it"* The
well-known words to S. Timothy may be com
pared, in which S. Paul bids him " stir up the gift of
God, which is in thee through the laying on of my
[S. Paul's] hands ^ ; and the very solemn charge
to the presbyters of Ephesus. " Take heed unto
yourselves, and to 'all the flock, in the which the Holy
Ghost hath made yott bishops, to feed the Church of
God, which He purchased with His own blood" \
There is a passage in the Epistle of S. Clement
of Rome which may well be quoted here. S.
Clement was the presiding presbyter of Rome at
the end of the first century : he wrote his Epistle
* Col. iv. 17.
t Acts xx. 28. Trpoo^ere eairroty /cat Travrl T£ Trot^ivty, iv $ u/xas
•iji> TreptTronfa-aro 5i4 TOU a't'/iaros TOU Idlov. S. Paul himself had
" ordained " these presbyters : it is evident that he believed intensely
in the sacramental efficacy of such ordination.
196 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
in the name of the Roman Church to the Church
of the Corinthians about the year 95 : the Epistle
is therefore well within the Apostolic period : S. John
was yet living when it was written. S. Clement
wrote on account of disorders which had broken out
at Corinth : there was a kind of revolt against the
local presbyters. In order to restore peace the
writer dwells on the dignity and authority of the
presbyter's office, and he gives the following account
of the origin of the Christian ministry : —
" The Apostles received the Gospel for us from the
Lord Jesus Christ : Jesus Christ was sent forth from
God. So then Christ is from God, and the Apostles
are from Jesus Christ Both therefore came of the
will of God in the appointed order. Having, there
fore, received a charge, and having been fully assured
through the resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ
and confirmed in the Word of God with full assur
ance of the Holy Ghost, they went forth with the
glad tidings that the kingdom of God should come.
So preaching everywhere in country and town, they
appointed their first-fruits when they had proved
them by the Spirit to be bishops and deacons unto
them that should believe." (c. 42.) . . . "And our
Apostles knew through our Lord Jesus Christ that
there would be strife over the bishop's office. For
this cause, therefore, having received complete fore
knowledge, they appointed the aforesaid persons,
and afterwards they provided a continuance, that
if these should fall asleep other approved men
should succeed to their ministration. Those, there
fore, who were appointed by them, or afterward by
THE MINISTRY 197
other men of repute with the consent of the whole
Church, and have ministered unblameably to the
flock of Christ in lowliness of mind, peacefully and
with all modesty, and for a long time have borne
a good report with all — these men we consider to be
unjustly thrust out from their ministration." (c. 44.)
S. Clement bases his exhortation to the disorderly
Corinthians on the Divine Authority, which the
presbyters possessed by virtue of their Ordination
by the Apostles, or in succession from them. In the
same way S. Paul bases the right of the ministry
to receive maintenance from the Church on the
commandment of Christ Himself. "Even so did
the Lord ordain that they which proclaim the gospel
should live of the gospel?*
The ideal which S. Paul set before himself, which
in his writings he has set before his successors in
the Christian ministry, is indeed a noble one. " We
are ambassadors therefore on behalf of Christ as though
God iv ere intr eating by us: we beseech you on behalf
of Christ, be ye reconciled to God" \ He felt himself
endowed with Divine Authority, strengthened with
Divine grace. This faith in their Commission is to
be to the Christian ministers of every age their
* I Cor. ix. 14. It is not clear whether S. Paul is quoting an
actual "logion" of our Lord, or summarising shortly His teaching
on the subject. Probably the former. The Apostle certainly quoted
a saying of Christ, not in the Gospels, in Acts xx. 35, " It is more
blessed to give than to receive" ; and, probably, he does the same in
I Cor. vii. 10, n. There must certainly have been many of Christ's
sayings current in the Apostolic Church, which have now perished.
Possibly the graves of Egypt may yet yield some genuine " words of
Jesus."
t 2 Cor. v. 20.
198 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
stay in troublous times, the spring of their courage,
the unfailing sustenance of their fortitude : it is to
react upon their characters, purging, humbling, en
nobling them : it is to win a way for their message
in the hearts of men, bringing God near to them,
and opening the locked Treasure-house of Eternity.
" Therefore seeing we have this ministry, even as we
obtained mercy, we faint not : but we have renounced
the hidden things of shame, not walking in craftiness,
nor handling the word of God deceitfully : but by the
manifestation of the truth commending ourselves to
every man's conscience in the sight of God*
Even so the message will often fail to win accep
tance : men will harden their hearts, and avert their
eyes. What shall the messenger do? It is the
bitterest of all experiences. He is rent by a thou
sand anxieties. Why that failure ? " His blood will
I require at thy hand? Was it his own blunder, or
dishonesty, or stumbling-block of sin ? Did not the
Lord pronounce His woe on him who caused the
least of His simple ones to stumble ? Let him take
courage : rejection is the lot of the holiest, even of
the Master. " But and if our gospel is veiled, it is
veiled in them that are perishing : in whom the god of
this world hath blinded the minds of the unbelieving,
that the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ,
Who is the image of God, should not dawn upon
them. For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus
as Lord, and ourselves as your servants for Jesus
sake.\ Ah, S. Paul would say, it is not your sacred
character that men will resent : it is your self-
* 2 Cor. iii. I, 2. t Ibid. iii. 3-5.
THE MINISTRY 199
assertion : your Divine Commission will only wake
resistance when you make it the occasion of vanity,
and the servant of self-interest. Live humbly, speak
truly, and you need not fear; "*« everything commend
ing ourselves, as ministers of God, in much patience,
in afflictions, in necessities, in distresses, in stripes, in
imprisonments, in tumults, in labours, in watchings, in
fastings ; in pureness, in knowledge, in long-suffering,
in kindness, in the Holy Ghost, in love unfeigned, in
the word of truth, in the power of God ; by the
armour of righteousness on the right hand and on the
left, by glory and dishonour, by evil report and good
report ; as deceivers, and yet true: as unknown, and
yet well known : as dying, and behold, we live ; as
chastened, and not killed: as sorrowful, yet alway
rejoicing : as poor, yet making many rich ; as having
nothing, and yet possessing all things?*
Such is the Ministerial Ideal : how it mocks selfish
lives and feeble faith. Set it beside the ministry of
Christian History, of contemporary experience, and
how eloquent it is of censure and shame. " Who is
sufficient for these things ? " Who, indeed ? Yet the
Christian ministers of later ages may echo the words
of the Apostle, "Our sufficiency is of God" ; and, as
we look back across the ages of Christian History,
and around on the tumultuous life of our own time,
surely we find abundant authentication of the words.
Two facts about the Christian ministry stand out
with luminous clearness. On the one hand, the
incalculably great evils which flow from its corrup
tion ; on the other, the rare moral beauty with which
it has enriched discipleship. The necessity of the
* Ibid. vi. 4-10.
200 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
ministry might be deduced from this circumstance,
that apart from its healthy working the Church
of Christ languishes, or perishes altogether. De
spise it if you will : heap ridicule upon it : deny its
claims : dispute its value : you cannot escape from
the fact that upon it depends the well-being of
Christianity. The clergy are, and always have been,
the unfailing indicator of the Church's spiritual
health. What the clergy are that the Church will
become. Alas ! that the failures should have been so
many : the scandals so gross and so obdurate. They
who bear the Lord's Commission may well bend
their heads in shame and confusion of face as they
recall the iniquities of the past, and the treasons
of the present. Again and again, by their pride,
their ambition, their rivalries, their corruptions, they
have made the Lord's people to transgress. But
there has been another side to the record of the
Christian ministry. The Church counts among the
saints and martyrs many, very many, of the
Lord's ambassadors : saintly priests, learned Divines,
missionaries burning with holy zeal, pastors who laid
down their lives for their flocks, far-sighted prelates,
guiding the Church in difficult times. Nor has the
great succession ceased. Sometimes from scenes
of holy toil, without recognition and without reward,
as the world counts, the splendid devotion of the
Christian Ministry startles the world ; and some
times the same high witness is yielded from seats
of power, on which beats the fiercest light of public
scrutiny.
CHAPTER III.
PUBLIC WORSHIP
IT is evident to the most superficial student of
Christian antiquity that the earliest and most
effectual influence, which shaped the organization
of the Church, was that of the Jewish synagogue.
In no direction is the effect of that influence more
apparent than in the arrangements for public worship
in the Christian assemblies. " It would hardly be
an exaggeration to say," observes Dean Plumptre,
"that the worship of the Church was identical with
that of the synagogue, modified (i) by the new
truths, (2) by the new institution of the supper of the
Lord, (3) by the spiritual Charismata."* This close
modelling of the Church upon the synagogue re
sulted from the actual circumstances under which
the Church came into existence. The Christian
Church was literally the offspring of the synagogue.
In Jerusalem, and perhaps generally throughout the
Jewish congregations, the name was adopted. S.
James speaks in his Epistle of the Christian syna
gogue. We may suppose, without extravagance,
that in many cases the entire Jewish community
accepted the Apostolic message, and that the worship
* Dictionary of the Bible^ art. " Synagogue."
201
202 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
of the Church succeeded without breach of con
tinuity to the worship of the synagogue. The same
building continued to serve the same purposes under
the new, as formerly under the old regime.
It is evident, therefore, that in order to understand
the conduct of public worship in the Apostolic
Church, we ought in the first place to enquire into
the arrangements actually in existence for the
service of the synagogue.* Those arrangements
are sufficiently well known. The service consisted
of fixed forms of prayer, of psalms, hymns, dox-
ologies, lessons from the Law and the Prophets,
preaching. In the New Testament we find many
references to the synagogue worship. Thus we read
of Christ, that at Nazareth "He entered, as His
custom was, into tlie synagogue on the sabbath day,
and stood up to read. And tJiere was delivered unto
Him tJie book (or roll) of the prophet Isaiah.\ After
reading a passage, perhaps the lesson for the day,J
" He closed tlie book (ro!f) and gave it back . to the
attendant and sat down'' We get a clear view of
the proceedings. The prayers and psalms were
ended. The first lesson from the Law had been
read, and Christ had intervened to read the second
lesson from the Prophets, and to give the customary
* A full and interesting account of the Synagogue, etc., and its
arrangements may be found in EDERSHEIM, Life and Times of Jesus
the Messiah, vol. i. p. 430 fol.
t S. Luke iv. 16.
J "No doubt there was even in ancient times a lectionary, though
certainly not that presently in use, which occupies exactly a year."
"Certain it is that the present lectionary from the prophets did not
exist in early times ; nor does it seem unlikely that the choice of the
passage was left to the reader himself." — Ibid. p. 443, 444.
PUBLIC WORSHIP 203
exhortation. In the Book of the Acts we find a
similar episode in the history of S. Paul and S.
Barnabas. At Antioch, in Pisidia, " they went into
the synagogue on the sabbath day, and sat down.
And after the reading of the law and the prophets the
rulers of the synagogue sent unto them, saying.
Brethren, if ye have any word of exhortation for the
people, say on."*
If we turn to the first Corinthian Epistle, and es
pecially to the fourteenth chapter, we shall find evident
correspondence with the organization of the syna
gogue. With the main subject of that chapter — the
exercise of the charismata — we are not here con
cerned, but its incidental references to the public
worship of the Corinthian Church must be carefully
noted. We observe, in the first place, that the
services were open to all. Undoubtedly the Agapae
and the Lord's Supper were rigidly guarded against
the intrusion of strangers : but these more ordinary
assemblies were intended not only to edify the
faithful, but also to impress the heathen. S. Paul
speaks of the " men unlearned or unbelieving'' Just
as the Greeks and proselytes attended the service
of the synagogue, so did the general multitude have
free access to the public service of the Church. It is
worthy our notice that the Apostle insists on taking
thought for the impression likely to be made upon
these non-Christian visitors by the proceedings they
witnessed. The Corinthians were greatly disposed
to regard with supercilious contempt those who were
less instructed or more scrupulous than themselves.
* Acts xiii. 14, 15.
204 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
S. Paul's profounder insight perceived the mischiefs
which would inevitably flow from that uncharitable
contempt of appearances, which, veiling itself under
the masque of liberty or devotion, scandalized the
heathen and discredited the Church.
Some discussion has been raised as to the precise
meaning to be attached to the word rendered in our
Bibles "unlearned" (t&Wty?). Does it merely mean
simple people, whose ignorance would lay them open
to mistaken ideas of what they saw ? or, does it bear
a more technical meaning, and indicate the cate
chumens, who had not yet been admitted by baptism
into the full membership of the Church ? or, does it
signify ungifted Christians as contrasted with those
who possessed a charisma ? or, private Christians as
against those who held office in the Church? The
word was applied by the Sanhedrists to the Apostles,
whose courage amazed them. " When they beheld
the boldness of Peter and John, and had perceived that
they were unlearned and ignorant men [aypdjUL^aroL K.
^orrat], they marvelled''* Perhaps it is not neces
sary to suppose that S. Paul intended more than
a general meaning. He is insisting on the unedify-
ing character of that unintelligible devotion " in a
tongue" by which the Corinthians set great store.
Intelligibility, he argues, is the first condition of
edification. " Else, if thou bless with the spirit, how
shall he that fillet h the place of the unlearned say the
Amen at thy giving of thanks, seeing he knoweth not
what thou sayest? For thou verily givest thanks
well, but the other is not edified" The use of " the
• Acts iv. 13.
PUBLIC WORSHIP 205
Amen " was directly borrowed from the synagogue.
It assumes the adoption of fixed forms of prayer
intelligibly read. *The Rabbis were wont to de
scribe the meaningless Amen of the worshipper, who
understood not the prayer to which he thus made
response, by a quaint term. They styled it the
" Orphan Amen," just as they styled a psalm to
which neither the name of the author nor the
occasion of its composing is inscribed, an " Orphan
Psalm."
The expression " he that filleth the place of the
unlearned"] has been thought by some to indicate an
actual allotment of space. This seems improbable,
yet we may hardly doubt that in the internal arrange
ment of the place of meeting the Christians followed
the model of the synagogue. In both at the upper
end would be the ark or chest containing the sacred
rolls, from which the lessons were read, and later
those new documents, Epistles and Gospels, which in
time came to form the " New Testament." Around
this ark would be placed the " chief seats " which the
Rabbis coveted, and which, we may suppose, were, in
the Corinthian Assembly, occupied by the "prophets"
To these "good places" in the Christian synagogue
of Jerusalem the "man with a gold ring, in fine
clothing!' was respectfully escorted, while the "poor
man in vile clothing " was left to stand, or given the
worst seat in the synagogue. Perhaps the Jewish
* Vide LIGHTFOOT, Works, xii. p. 545. London, 1823.
f 6 dvairXypuv rbv rbirov rov Idiurov irwr fyet r6 'A/t^ tiri ry <rrj
[But WEIZACKER (ii. p. 250) seems to take the view that a special
place is indicated.]
206 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
practice of placing an eight-branched lamp in front
of the Ark may have been adopted. Lights were
certainly the earliest Christian symbols. In the
centre was the lectern or pulpit on a raised platform.
Here the lessons were read, and teaching given.
The sexes were divided, " men on one side, women
on the other, a low partition, five or six feet high,
running between them." We may doubt whether
the partition existed in any but the assemblies of
Jewish Christians. We are told that the synagogues
had "alms-boxes at or near the door, after the
pattern of those at the temple, one for the poor
of Jerusalem, the other for local charities ; notice-
boards, on which were written the names of offenders
who had been ' put out of the synagogue ' ; a chest
for trumpets and other musical instruments, used at
the New Years, Sabbaths, and other festivals."* All
these arrangements were probably reproduced with
little alteration in the Church. Certainly the
Christian Church would not be behind the Jewish
synagogue in its care for the poor, in its zeal for
discipline, in its use of musical instruments in the
service of God. The pipe, the harp, and the trumpet
are mentioned in i Corinthians xiv., and if it would
be excessive to build anything on an admittedly
vague and incidental reference, yet we may urge that
S. Paul's description of Christian worship in the
Ephesian Epistle — "speaking one with another in
psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and
making melody with your heart to the Lord" — is most
* Dictionary of Bible, art. "Synagogue." See also EDERSHEIM,
/. c.t p. 436.
PUBLIC WORSHIP 207
naturally understood as assuming the use of musical
instruments.
The Jewish practice of standing at prayer with
uplifted or outstretched hands was adopted by the
Church. "/ desire therefore that the men pray in
every place, lifting up holy hands, without wrath
and disputing!'* In one respect, however, S. Paul
distinctly departed from the model of the synagogue,
which, as a rule, he so closely followed. The Jews
were accustomed to veil themselves in token of
penitence and humility when they stood to pray.
This practice the Apostle condemned. The Greek
custom of praying with uncovered head was estab
lished as the rule of the Church. "Every man
praying or prophesying, having his head covered,
dishonoureth his head. But every woman praying
or prophesying with her head unveiled dishonoureth
her headr\ The energy with which S. Paul presses
the matter seems to indicate that there was a strong
movement among the Corinthians to adopt the practice
he condemns. "Judge ye in yourselves: is it seemly
that a woman pray unto God unveiled? Doth not
even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long
hair, it is a dishonour to him ? But if a woman have
long hair it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her
for a covering. But if any man seemeth to be conten
tious we have no such custom, neither the churches of
God'.' We shall have to consider this language more
carefully when we treat of the position of women in
the Apostolic Church.
Undoubtedly a great place was filled in the public
* I Timothy ii. 8. t I Cor. xi. 4,
208 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
worship of the Christian assembly by the unpremedi
tated outpourings of gifted individuals ; nevertheless,
even in that early time the solid framework of the
service was carefully prescribed by authority. The
Psalms and lessons were no doubt selected on some
definite plan, either that of the synagogue or some
other. The prayers were not wholly unregulated.
S. Paul in the first Pastoral Epistle insists on a
certain order and range of subjects. "/ exhort,
therefore, first of all, that supplications, prayers, inter
cessions ', thanksgivings, be made for all men; for
kings and all that are in high place: that we may
lead a tranquil and quiet life in all godliness and
gravity" *
This solid framework of the service was, perhaps,
under the control of the ordained ministry. That
throughout his discussion of the disorders connected
with the public worship of the Corinthian Church
S. Paul should not make a single reference to the
resident officials is, indeed, very astonishing ; it must,
however, be remembered that he was directly con
cerned with regulating the exercise of the charismata,
which admittedly lay outside the authority of the
ordained ministry. That such a ministry existed,
and was charged with the oversight of the worship,
cannot be regarded as an extravagant assumption
in view of the general character of the Epistles,
the analogy of the synagogue, and the subsequent
development of the Church. These Corinthian
Epistles treat at great length of the status and
responsibility of the ordained ministry. Moreover,
* I Timothy ii. i, 2.
PUBLIC WORSHIP 209
we have the direct testimony of the Acts that it
was the normal Apostolic practice to provide for
the government of the churches they founded by
ordaining "presbyters? S. Paul emphasized the
pastoral character of the episcopate to which the
Ephesian presbyters had been admitted. " To feed
the Church of God" would seem in the first place
to carry the notion of teaching. Apart from
rhapsodies and revelations there was the steady,
continuous necessity of instruction, and that must
have been the specific charge of the official ministry.
In reference to this matter, also, the precedent of the
synagogue was most influential. A fully organized
synagogue had its college of elders or presbyters,
and its official executive — the " ruler " or " rulers," the
collectors of the alms, the minister, whose functions
seem to have much resembled those of a modern
verger.* Assuming that the Christian synagogue
was similarly organized, the normal conduct of
public worship would be in the hands of such
officials, save in so far as the charismata super
seded all ordinary system ; and when, with the
* Edersheim enumerates the following synagogue officials : —
(1) "The Chazzau, or minister, who often acts also as a school
master.
(2) "The elders (Zegenin), or rulers (dpxovrej), whose chief is the
Archisynagogos, or Rosh-ha-Keneseth. These are the rulers (Paruasim),
or shepherds (Tro^ves)- These formed the local sanhedrim or tribunal.
But their election depended on the choice of the congregation.
(3) " Officials who officiated during the service, the Sheliach Tsibbur,
or delegate of the congregation— who, as its mouthpiece, conducted
the devotions— the Interpreter or Methurgeman, and those who were
called on to read in the Law and the Prophets, or else to preach." —
Vide Life and Times of Jesus, i. pp. 438, 439.
Canon Gore ( The Church and the Ministry, pp. 399-410) has a learned
P
210 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
wider extension of the Church, the extraordinary
phenomena which marked its beginning became of
rarer occurrence, and finally ceased altogether, these
officials, i.e., the ordained clergy, came to possess
the exclusive control which has ever since belonged
to them. The great principles which S. Paul lays
down have determined the development of the
liturgical worship, which everywhere has replaced
the more spontaneous service of the early days.
" Let all things be done to edifying? " Let all things
be done decently and in order? The sphere of Divine
Worship is the least suited of all spheres for the
display of personal preferences, and the exaltation
of personal importance. The less experiment, the
less novelty, above all, the less excitement the
better. Two paramount considerations, always
present, should chasten individualism and prohibit
irreverence — the permanent needs of the human
worshipper, the revealed character of Almighty God.
There are permanent spiritual needs, and these are
not always as carefully provided for as their import
ance requires. Fashions in public worship make
and interesting note on "The Origin of the Titles 'Bishop,' 'Presbyter,'
' Deacon,' " in which he discusses the relation between the synagogue
officials and the officials of the Church. He concludes " that the
Christian Church borrowed none of the Jewish titles except that of
'presbyter'" . . . "that all our evidence goes to show that the Chris
tian Church had only one organization, while the Jews with their
temple, schools, synagogue, and sanhedrim, had four." He hardly seems
to allow enough for the necessities of the situation ; but with certain reser
vations I do not dispute his conclusion. ' ' All the functions and powers
of the Church were, in fact, summed up at first in the apostles, and
were gradually imparted under their authority and leading to different
officers, who shared the same ministry in distinct grades." The whole
note should be read.
PUBLIC WORSHIP 211
their appearance at intervals, and seem to carry all
before them. Now it is extempore prayer, now it
is hymn singing, now it is elaborate music, now it
is ornate ritual, now it is sensational preaching.
The fickle multitude easily deserts the familiar but
comparatively uninteresting system of the Church,
and flocks greedily after the latest thing in religion.
Yet our needs do not vary with our preferences, nor
can they be conformed to our fashions ; and the
Church, whose ancient system does in the main
represent a continuous effort to match human need,
secures in the long run the loyal acceptance of
faithful disciples. Still more important is the argu
ment which the Apostle builds on the known
character of Him whom we worship. " God is not
a God of confusion, but of peace'' The worship
which is acceptable to Him must correspond to
His character. Above all, it must be intelligent,
and devout, and orderly. When public worship
degenerates into mere lifeless formalism, or into
mere empty convention, or into a wild chaos of
unchecked excitement, how gross is the offence,
how scandalous the spectacle ! Yet who will deny
that such degeneration is both facile and frequent?
We should be ever vigilant against the irreverence
of self-assertion. Our needs and God's majesty
must be the restraints of our frivolity, and the
rebukes of our pride. The counsels of the Preacher
of Israel may well be in our minds as we cross the
threshold of the Lord's House. " Keep thy foot when
thou goest to the house of God: for to draw nigh to
hear is better than to give the sacrifice of fools: for
212 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
they know not that they do evil. Be not rash with thy
mouth, and let not thine heart be hasty before God: for
God is in heaven and thou upon earth: therefore let
thy words be few'' The more we cultivate the true,
sober, restrained temper of devotion, the more dear
to us will become the ordered worship of the Church
of England. There is a modern fashion of speaking
contemptuously about Matins and Evensong, as if
those services represented the very antithesis of the
worship which devout souls would naturally seek.
Of course these services cannot take the place, and
were never intended to take the place, of the supreme
action of Christian Worship — the Holy Eucharist,
from which, according to the wholesome discipline
of the Apostolic Church, all save communicants
were excluded ; but for the purpose of that public
worship, which is the ordinary witness to the outside
world of Christian truth, which is to secure regular
teaching, and to provide a channel for the general
praise, these services of Matins and Evensong, with
their fixed elements of prayer, psalms, confession of
faith, reading of the Scriptures, preaching, do seem
to approve themselves to all who acknowledge the
authority of Apostolic precedents, and have regard
to the standing necessities of human souls.*
* Bp. Lightfoot's dissertation on the liturgical ending of S. Clement's
Epistle is of extreme interest, and directly bears on the subject here
discussed. It must suffice to quote the following : —
4 ' The earliest services of the Christian Church, so far as they were
grafted on the worship of the Jews, would be indebted to the synagogue
rather than to the temple. Recent archaeological discoveries, more
especially in Galilee and in Eastern Palestine, have enlarged our ideas
on this subject. The number, the capacity, and even (in some cases)
PUBLIC WORSHIP 213
the magnificence of the synagogues are attested by their ruins. What
we find at such Jewish centres as Capernaum would certainly not be
wanting in the mighty cities of the world, like Alexandria and Rome.
The ritual would bear some proportion to the buildings ; and thus the
early Christian congregations would find in their Jewish surroundings
ample precedent for any ritual development which for some generations
they could desire or compass. Again, as regards the substance of public
worship, they would naturally build upon the lines traced by their
Jewish predecessors. The common prayer, the lessons from the law,
the lessons from the prophets, the chanting of the psalms or of hymns,
the exposition or homily, all were there ready for adoption. The
eucharistic Celebration — the commemoration of and participation in the
Lord's Passion — was the new and vivifying principle, the centre round
which these adopted elements ranged themselves, being modified as
the circumstances suggested. The earliest account of the Christian
eucharist, as given by Justin Martyr, shows that this is no merely
conjectural view of the genesis of the Christian Celebration."
Apostolic Fathers, part I, vol. i. pp. 392, 393.
CHAPTER IV.
THE GIFT OF TONGUES
IN the appendix to S. Mark's Gospel we read that
before His ascension our Lord foretold to His
disciples that among the " signs " which should follow
upon acceptance of the Christian message should be
the power of speaking " with new tongues" (yAcocrcrcH?
fcoui/a??). On the Day of Pentecost His assurance was
justified by a miraculous gift of utterance, which the
author of the Book of Acts believed to be the faculty
of speaking divers languages, of which the inspired
speakers had previously possessed no knowledge.*
That this is the sacred historian's meaning there
can be no question. The festival crowd, including
representatives of many nationalities, are said to
have recognized with amazement the familiar sounds
of their respective languages. " When this sound was
- heard the multitude came together, and were confounded,
because that every man heard them speaking in his
own language" (777 tdta &aAe'/cTo>).t If these passages
exhausted the witness of the New Testament on the
subject there would be little room for discussion.
* Unfortunately this literal and — as I hold — untenable view is
embedded in our Communion Service. The Whit -Sunday preface
specifically asserts that the xa/)tcrAta of Pentecost was "the gift of
divers languages." t Acts ii. 6.
214
THE GIFT OF TONGUES 215
We should be encountered by a prodigy which has
no parallel in human experience, and which, as far
as we know, has had very little influence on human
history. In the Epistle before us, however, we possess
a detailed and strictly contemporary account of an
extraordinary phenomenon in the Corinthian Church,
which all are agreed to identify with the gift of
Pentecost, and which certainly was not the power
of speaking divers languages, whatever else it may
have been. It is important to remember that S.
Paul's Epistle to the Corinthians is earlier in point
of time than either the appendix to S. Mark's
Gospel or the Book of the Acts, and possesses,
therefore, a superior historical value within its own
sphere. The section of the Epistle, which includes
the xii., xiii., and xiv. chapters, treats of the spiritual
gifts, or charismata, the undisciplined exercise of
which had led to serious confusion and even scandal.
Among these charismata S. Paul mentions " divers
kinds of tongues " (yeV// yXwo-crtoi/), and a supplemental
gift which seems connected with this mysterious
utterance, " the interpretation of tongues " (ep/zj/ye/a
yXtoo-cran'). Having set forth with singular force
and beauty the conception of the Church which
underlay his view of the charismata, and having
exalted in a passage of imperishable charm the
supreme virtue of love, the Apostle in the fourteenth
chapter grapples with the practical question, and
proposes certain regulations in restraint of the
Corinthian abuses. From this chapter we are able
to gather some information about the mysterious
charisma, which we are here considering. Putting
216 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
together the indications before us, we learn that the
charisma of " the tongue " was always unintelligible to
the hearers unless they possessed the power — itself
a charisma — of interpretation (v. 2); that, therefore,
its value as an element in the public worship of the
Church was entirely contingent on the presence of an
interpreter (v. 5) ; that, though generally useless for the
purpose of general edification, it edified the speaker
himself (y. 4) : however, even this was not necessarily
the case, for the speaker might himself be ignorant
of the meaning of the words which rushed from his
lips (v. 14); that this gift, both as unintelligible and,
probably, as accompanied by violent physical ex
citement, was not calculated to make a favourable
impression on casual observers, who might easily
mistake it for insanity (v. 23) ; finally, that in spite of
its mysterious and even violent character, it was not
really outside the control of the individual (vv. 27, 28).
S. Paul, though he thus takes a very unfavourable
view of the practical worth of the charisma in
question, did most certainly hold it to be a genuine
and, for its own purposes, a precious gift of the Holy
Spirit. He himself was richly endowed. "/ thank
God, I speak with tongues more than you all: howbeit
in the church [eV €KK\^<TL(I = in an assembly] / had
rather speak five words with my understanding, that
I might instruct others a!so, than ten thousand words
in a tongue"* Perhaps we may recognize in S. Paul's
description of his vision an analogous experience
to that here referred to. The abrupt and involved
language seems to suggest the awful nature of the
* I Cor. xiv. 1 8, 19.
THE GIFT OF TONGUES 217
ecstasy it attempts to describe. " / know a man in
Christ, fourteen years ago (whether in the body, I
know not; or whether out of the body, I know not;
God knowetJi], such a one caugJit up even to the third
heaven. A nd I know such a man (whether in the body,
or apart from the body, I know not ; God knoweth),
how that he was caught up into Paradise, and heard
unspeakable words, which it is not lawful for a man to
utter?* This unutterableness of the Divine com
munication, arising from the sublime character of
truths " too deep for words," which could be felt but
could not be spoken, is mentioned also in the Roman
Epistle, where the Apostle speaks of the influence
of the Holy Ghost upon the Christian, " the Spirit
Himself maketh intercessions for us with groanings
which cannot be uttered" \ So in I Cor. xiv. 2, " He
that speaketh in a tongue speaketh not unto men, but
unto God, for no man understandeth ; but in the spirit
he speaketh mysteries"
I It is, I think, quite evident that the notion of a
* 2 Cor. xii. 2-4. t Rom. viii. 26.
% Vide E. DE PRESSENSE, Le Sihle Apostolique, ire Periode, p. 153
fol. His decision seems the only reasonable one. " La tradition a pu
subir quelques modifications." He points out that the languages-theory
is really contradicted by the New Testament itself. " Le style des
ecrivains sacres nous montre clairement qu'ils ont appris la langue
grecque, cars ils 1'ecrivent sans correction et la surchargent de locutions
hebraiques."
The traditional view is very moderately stated by Dean PLUMPTRE
in the Diet, of the Bible, art. "Tongues," where the whole subject is
fully discussed. The whole question really turns on the authority
assigned to Acts ii. If the actual language of that chapter must be
maintained, then the traditional view with its immense difficulties
follows obviously ; but if ordinary rules of criticism are to be applied
to New Testament documents, then certainly Acts ii, must be corrected
by I Cor. xiv. J ^o^jc ^^ Lr: C^cs 'j 4±±/^
2i8 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
miraculous knowledge of languages must be rejected.
The narrative of the Pentecostal Outpouring stands
quite by itself, and is not compatible with the rest of
the evidence. It represents a developed tradition
of the history, rather than the history itself. The
subsequent references to the gift of tongues in the
Book of the Acts are in agreement with the Pauline
Epistles. It is not seriously suggested that when
Cornelius and his friends received the Holy Ghost
and began to speak with tongues, they were suddenly
breaking out in various and hitherto unknown lan
guages. It is particularly worthy of notice that
S. Peter, in relating this occurrence to the Church
in Jerusalem, expressly identified the charisma of
Cornelius with that of Pentecost. "As I began to
speak, the Holy Ghost fell on them, even as on us at
the beginning" * Similarly in the case of the twelve
disciples of S. John the Baptist, whom S. Paul found
at Ephesus and whom he baptized. No one supposes
that they spoke foreign languages when, after the
laying on of the Apostle's hands, "the Holy Ghost
came on them, and they spake with tongues, and pro
phesied'' t Moreover, it seems to me that the record
in the second chapter of the Acts is hardly com
patible with the assumption, which the author un
doubtedly makes, that the "tongues" were divers
languages. The observation of the scoffers, " They
are filled with new wine" does not seem very relevant
to a preaching, of which the chief distinction was
that it was expressed, contrary to their expectation,
in their respective mother tongues. S. Peter's defence
* Acts xi. 1 5. t Ibid. xix. 6.
THE GIFT OF TONGUES 219
is hardly what we should expect if the phenomena
which he had to justify was a supernatural knowledge
of foreign languages. The prophecy of Joel, which
he quotes, has no reference to anything at once so
amazing and so commonplace, while it is very rele
vant indeed to such manifestations of the Divine
Influence as those which were common among the
Corinthians. If a knowledge of languages was
supernaturally conveyed, it must have been designed
to facilitate the missionary labours of the Church.
Such, indeed, has been the general belief. But it is
impossible to produce a single instance that any such
knowledge was either possessed or used. All the
evidence points in the opposite direction. The
narrative of the Apostolic preaching at Lystra clearly
indicates that S. Paul and S. Barnabas were ignorant
of "the speech of Lycaonia" and only learnt by
degrees the idolatrous intentions of the people.*
It was a matter of astonishment to the chief captain
that S. Paul could speak Greek, which would hardly
have been the case if the knowledge of languages
had been a characteristic of the Christians, t
The scoffers at Jerusalem derided the inspired
disciples as "filled with new wine'1 It is not without
significance that S. Paul himself should institute a
comparison between such inspiration and drunken
ness. "And be not drunken with wine, wherein is
riot;' he writes to the Ephesians, " but be filled with
* Acts xiv. u, 13, 14. The exclamation of the Lycaonians was
unintelligible to the Apostles, who only grasped the situation when
" the priest of Jupiter, whose temple was before the city, brought oxen
and garlands unto the gates, and would have done sacrifice with the
multitudes." f Ibid. xxi. 37.
220 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
the Spirit" * M. Godet thus describes the state of
the Christian under the influence of this charisma : —
"While drawing him into a state of ecstasy the
Divine Spirit separates him for the moment from
his understanding, which is a faculty of the soul,
or rather the soul herself in its thinking capacity.
Thus his impressions take the character of pure
sentiment, of ineffable emotion : it is a state of
spiritual exhilaration, of which drunkenness is as
it were the coarse counterpart. Such a state was
revealed by extraordinary utterances, consisting of
prayers, praises, or thanksgivings, and expressing the
satisfaction and the aspirations of the saved soul.
Only with such a state the understanding was not
associated. It was, as the Apostle says, " unfruitful"
It is particularly noteworthy that S. Paul does
not draw the inference that the charisma is therefore
valueless, and should be suppressed. Rather he
insists on an intelligent and responsible exercise of
it. " What is it then? I will pray with the. spirit,
and I will pray with the understanding also: I will
sing with the spirit, and I ivill sing with the
understanding also? The Apostle seems to mention
the two principal manifestations of the charisma
in question — prayer and singing. We naturally
compare the familiar language of the Epistle to the
Ephesians, " Speaking one to another in psalms and
hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making
melody with your heart to the Lord'' Joy was,
perhaps, the prevailing temper of Apostolic Chris
tianity. The Gospel meant so much to men who
* Eph. v. 1 8.
THE GIFT OF TONGUES 221
had groaned under the rigid despotism of the
Rabbinic system, or groped despairingly amid the
gross errors of paganism. " Tidings of great joy "
was the announcement of the herald angel, and
every page of the New Testament reveals the fitness
of the description. Everywhere the acceptance of
Christianity expressed itself in a wonderful light-
heartedness, as of men suddenly set free from some
oppressive anxiety. So the converts of Pentecost
"took their food with gladness and singleness of
heart, praising God";* so, on the morrow of their
conversion, "there was much joy in the city"\ of the
Samaritans ; so at Iconium " the disciples were filled
with joy and with the Holy Ghost" \ Continually
this joy of discipleship breaks through the language
of the Epistles. Christians in those first days were
like happy children, too happy to put into intelligible
words their feelings, but singing and humming, and
dancing for joy. Now the charisma of the tongue
seems to me the organ through which most con
spicuously this joy of discipleship expressed itself.
That joy had two elements — the blessed sense of
peace with God, reconciliation with the Father and
the full heart of gratitude for the Redemption ; and
these elements were represented in the fellowship of
fervent prayer, and in the ecstatic pouring forth of
improvised hymns of thanksgiving. The violence
of the phenomenon — inarticulate cries, loud voice, ex
citement which almost suggested insanity or intoxi
cation — only reflected the greatness of the spiritual
crisis through which men were passing. We may
* Acts ii. 46, 47. f Ibid. viii. 8. £ Ibid. xiii. 52.
222 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
find many illustrations in the history of later
Christianity. The gift of tongues itself soon dis
appeared from the normal life of the Church.
S. Irenaeus, indeed, in the second century relates
that in his day there were brethren "who had
prophetic gifts, and spoke through the Spirit in all
kinds of tongues " ; but his evidence stands alone,
for the prophetess mentioned by Tertullian was a
heretic. S. Chrysostom begins his comments on
the passage in the Corinthian Epistle, which treats of
spiritual gifts, with these words : " This whole place
is very obscure ; but the obscurity is produced by
our ignorance of the facts referred to, and by their
cessation, being such as then used to occur, but now
no longer take place." Neither in the Pastoral, nor
in the General Epistles, nor in the Epistle to the
Hebrews is there any clear reference to this charisma.
The little treatise known as The Teaching of the
Twelve Apostles is equally silent, a fact which is the
more significant since the conditions under 'which
the kindred chansma of prophecy should be exer
cised are carefully prescribed. At intervals, however,
generally in sects or communities which are sub
jected to circumstances of extreme difficulty and
pressure, there have appeared phenomena which have
a close resemblance to the charisma as described by
S. Paul. "The movement of the mendicant orders
in the thirteenth century, the prophesyings of the
sixteenth in England, the early history of the
disciples of George Fox, that of the Jansenists in
France, the Revivals under Wesley and Whitefield,
those of a later date in Sweden, America, and
THE GIFT OF TONGUES 223
Ireland, have in like manner been fruitful in ecstatic
phenomena more or less closely resembling those
which we are now discussing." Still closer parallels
were presented in France at the beginning of the last
century, and in England about sixty years ago.*
In every case, however, these exhibitions have been
too definitely connected with extravagances of
doctrine to permit of their being placed on a level
with the manifestation which in the first Christian
* Dean Stanley has an interesting and elaborate discussion of the
' ' Gift of Tongues " in his Commentary on the Corinthian Epistles,
pp. 243—257. lie endeavours with more ingenuity than success
to reconcile the phenomena described in Acts ii. with those described
in I Cor. xiv. His suggestion is that "as even in common life
persons in a highly wrought state of feeling are enabled to understand
each other, though not speaking the same language, so this gift, which
above all others lifted the speaker out of himself, might have the
same effect." He suggests that " Hellenistic Greek, compounded as it
was of Greek, Latin, and Hebrew, and instinct with that peculiar life
and energy which we see it assume in the various styles of the New
Testament, especially in S. Paul and in the Apocalypse, was almost
in itself a ' speaking ' in divers kinds of tongues." "All the various
elements of Aramaic and Hellenic speech, latent in the usual
language of the time, would be quickened under the power of this gift
into a new life, sometimes intelligible, sometimes unintelligible to those
who heard it, but always expressive of the vitality and energy of the
Spirit by which it was animated." He gives two descriptions of the
so-called "gift of tongues" in the followers of Mr. Irving, about
1831-1833, by a sympathetic and an unsympathetic eye-witness. Dr.
Arnold's opinion about those occurrences is expressed in a letter to
Rev. F. C. Blackstone. (Stanley's Life, p. 241.) "If the thing be
real I should take it merely as a sign of the coming of the day of the
Lord — the only use, as far as I can make out, that ever was derived
from the gift of tongues. I do not see that it was ever made a vehicle
of instruction, or ever superseded the study of tongues, but that it was
merely a sign of the power of God, a man being for the time trans
formed into a mere instrument to utter sounds which he himself
understood not." Also Ibid., p. 360, at greater length.
224 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
age testified to the presence of the Divine Spirit.*
"Prayer and singing" — the natural victims of un
disciplined enthusiasm at all times ! Do I mistake
in thinking that the Apostle's rules for controlling
the "gift of tongues" are not without relevance still
in respect of those matters? Restraint of private
feelings in public, reverence, — these, surely, are not
superfluous counsels in these days, when men's
feelings are proposed as the very bases of their
faith, and a strange familiarity, not to say a dis
respect, is indulged in by Christians when addressing
the Almighty, and even exalted as the proper ex
pression of the filial relationship, into which, by the
adoption of grace, Christians have been admitted.
Extempore prayers and popular hymns have renewed
in our own times the extravagances, without the
excuses, of Corinth. " There is a great danger in
ungoverned feeling," observes one of the wisest
spiritual teachers of this century. f "There are
persons more highly gifted with fine delicate sensi
bilities than others ; they are not moved to action
like others, by convictions of the intellect or by a
strong sense of duty ; they can do nothing except
through their affections. All this is very precious,
no doubt, if well used ; but just in proportion as
* " Michael Maurice went himself to London, and was simply
shocked by what he saw and heard at Mr. Irving's church— the wild
voices and artificial excitement." (Life of F. D. Maurice, vol. i.
p. 116.) Dr. Arnold (/. c.) was offended by the religious arrogance of
the Irvingites. "The intolerance of their presumption in calling
themselves the only true Church would, to my mind, go very near
to decide against them."
t F. W. ROBERTSON, Lectures on Epistle to the Corinthians, p. 236.
THE GIFT OF TONGUES 225
feelings are strong do they require discipline. The
temptation is great to indulge from mere pleasure of
indulgence, and from the admiration given to feeling.
It is easier to gain credit for goodness by a glistening
eye, while listening to some story of self-sacrifice,
than by patient usefulness. It is easier to get credit
for spirituality by thrilling at some impassioned
speech on the platform, or sermon from the pulpit,
than by living a life of justice, mercy, and truth.
And hence religious life degenerates into mere in
dulgence of feeling, the excitement of religious
meetings, or the utterance of strong emotion. In
this sickly strife life wastes away, and the man or
woman becomes weak, instead of strong ; for in
variably utterance weakens feeling."
" Feelings " may not be despised, but they must
always be checked, and never wholly trusted.
"Quench not the spirit"; — writes S. Paul, perhaps
with the "gift of tongues" in his mind — "despise
not prophesying*; prove all things; hold fast that
which is good; abstain from every form of evil"
The same balanced sympathy and caution speak
in the conclusion to the discussion of the charis
mata in I Cor. xiv., " Wherefore^ my brethren, desire
earnestly to prophesy ', and forbid not to speak with
tongues. But let all things be done decently and in
order" Be slow to condemn enthusiasm, for it may,
indeed — in spite of external appearances, which
suggest fanaticism — indicate a genuine working of
God upon the human spirit. Be slower still to
give enthusiasm free scope, for under the masque
of its fervour strange elements may come into play
Q
226 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
— pride, and self-centredness, and self-advertisement.
Always keep before you the essential superiority of
the serviceable over the merely devotional activities
of discipleship. "There are gifts which draw ad
miration to a man's self, others which solace and
soothe him personally, and a third class which benefit
others. The world and the Bible are at issue as to
the comparative worth of these. A gifted singer soon
makes a fortune, and men give their guinea and their
ten guineas ungrudgingly for a morning's enjoyment.
A humble teacher in a school or a missionary can
often but only just live. Gifts that are showy and
gifts that please — before these the world yields her
homage, while the lowly teachers of the poor and the
ignorant are forgotten and unnoticed. Only remember
that in the sight of the Everlasting Eye the one is
creating sounds which perish with the hour that
gave them birth, the other is doing a work that is
for ever — building and forming for the eternal world
an immortal human spirit."
CHAPTER V.
MIRACLES
IT does not fall within the scope of this volume
to discuss miracles in themselves. I take for
granted their possibility, and address myself to the
task of discovering the place they held in the Apos
tolic Church. My method is sufficiently simple. In
the first place, I shall briefly put together the evi
dence which we possess ; in the next place, I shall
endeavour to appreciate the facts.
The earliest and in all respects the weightiest
testimony on the subject is that of the Corinthian
Epistles. Miracles are included among the charis
mata of the Spirit. They fall into two classes. On
the one hand, there are "gifts of healings" (xaptV/xara
myixcmov). These may be illustrated by the well-
known passage in S. James' Epistle, where the
association of physical illness with sin is evident.
" Is any among you sick ? let him call for the elders
of the church : and let them pray over him, anointing
him with oil in the name of the Lord: and the prayer
of faith shall save him that is sick, and the Lord shall
raise him up : and if he have committed sins, it shall
be forgiven him. Confess therefore your sins one to
another, and pray for one another that ye may be healed.
227
228 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
The supplication of a righteous man availeth much in
its working" * Here, however, there is no mention
of a special charisma of healing, but only of the
efficacy of prayer. A better parallel is provided by
the records in the Acts. Thus of the cripple at
Lystra we read that S. Paul "fastening his eyes upon
him, and seeing that he had faith to be made whole,
said to him with a loud voice. Stand upright on thy
feet"\ Similar action is attributed to S. Peter, who
healed a paralyzed man at Lydda with the words,
"sEneas, Jesus Christ healeth thee : arise, and make
thy bed" \ The charisma evidently included the
power to recognize a suitable subject for treatment.
The exercise of the miraculous power — if such we
ought to call an action which scarcely lies outside
general experience — was limited in range. Only
persons of a certain temperament, and, perhaps, only
certain classes of physical infirmity, could yield to
the influence of this charisma. Certainly the exist
ence within the Church of inspired faith-healers § did
not exclude the necessity of physicians. S. Paul
himself was afflicted with bad health : and neither
his own prayers nor the miraculous powers which he
possessed could remove his ailment. S. Luke, "the
beloved physician" \( had to bring his medical skill to
the Apostle's aid. S. Timothys "often infirmities"*^
were to be corrected not by religious exercises, but
by a change of diet. I see no reason to think that
* S. James v. 14-17. t Acts xiv. 9. % Ibid. ix. 34.
§ I would refer the reader to Archbishop TEMPLE'S Bampton
Lectures, " The Relations between Religion and Science," especially
Lecture VII.
|| Col. iv. 14. IT I Tim. v. 23.
MIRACLES 229
the Christian of the first century as such ordinarily
enjoyed any advantage from the "gifts of healings"
These may have served a useful purpose as occasional
demonstrations of apparently superhuman power,
arresting the notice of the heathen, and inducing
their belief, but in the normal life of the Christian
community they counted for little. We read in two
passages of the Acts* of many amazing miracles
wrought by S. Peter, and, later, by S. Paul ; but the
account in both cases has an unusual and, so to say,
hyperbolical aspect, which perhaps permits us to
regard it as less historical than the rest of the
narrative, and on any showing these displays of
wonder-working did not continue. Commonly the
Christians were as the rest of men, save for the
comforts and encouragements of their faith. They
fell sick, and died like their neighbours ; like them
they associated sickness and death very closely with
the hostile or penal action of spiritual powers, and
had recourse, therefore, to acts of religion for their
relief in time of illness. Often, no doubt, where will
was strong and faith was ardent very astonishing
recoveries took place, as, indeed, they do still ; but
for the most part the sick had to surrender them-
* (i) Acts v. 1 2- 1 6. "They even carried out the sick into the
streets and laid them on beds and couches, that, as Peter came by, at
the least his shadow might overshadow some one of them."
(2) Acts xix. u, 12. "And God wrought special miracles by the
hands of Paul : insomuch that unto the sick were carried away from
his body handkerchiefs or aprons, and the diseases departed from them,
and the evil spirits went out." The curious story of the Exorcists,
who imitated S. Paul's method with calamitous results to themselves,
then follows, and, as a consequence from it, the sacrifice of "vanities"
by the Ephesians. The whole narrative is extremely difficult.
230 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
selves to the risks of medical treatment in an age
when medical science was in its infancy. The
counsels of the son of Sirach were certainly familiar
to S. Paul, and probably to his converts also. " My
son, in thy sickness be not negligent: but pray unto the
Lord, and He shall heal thee. Put away wrong doing,
and order thine hands aright, and cleanse thy heart
from all manner of sin. . . . Then give place to the
physician, for verily the Lord hath created him: and
let him not go from thee, for thou hast need of him"*
On the other hand, are the " workings of miracles "
(evepyij/mara SvvdjuLewv) a general expression, of which
it is not easy to fix the meaning? "Paul would
speak " — comments M. Godet — " of the faculty of
working every kind of miraculous act, other than
simple healings, and designed to match the needs
of the different situations in which the servant of
Christ may find himself; resurrections of the dead,
castings-out of demons, chastisements inflicted on
faithless Christians or on adversaries, such as
Ananias or Elymas, deliverance such as Paul's at
Melita."f
It is to be remembered that S. Paul claims for
himself this wonder-working power, and advances
the fact as an evidence of his own equality with
"the very chief est apostles" \ "Truly the signs of
an apostle were wrought among you " — he writes to
the Corinthians in his second Epistle — "in all
* Eccles. xxxviii. 9, 10, 12. f Vol. ii. p. 207.
t 2 Cor, xii. 2. ovdtv yap vo-rtp-rjo-a TWV vircpXtav a.Troo-T6\wv, el Kal
ftfju.' TO. fitv crTj/ieta TOV diro<rT6\ov Kareipydffdr] iv vfjuv tv wavy
, 0-77/iei'oiy re Kal rtpa<Tiv /ecu 5vvafJ.€ffiv.
MIRACLES 231
patience, by signs and wonders and mighty works''
Similarly in the first Epistle he declares that
"his speech and his preaching were not in persuasive
words of wisdom, but in demonstration of the spirit
and of power'' * It is not a little astonishing in view
of these statements that in the record of the Acts
there is no hint of miracles at Corinth ; perhaps it
is not necessary to assume that in speaking of " signs
and wonders and mighty works" the Apostle meant
physical prodigies. The establishment of the Church
in Corinth, effected in the teeth of bitter and powerful
opposition, was itself an evident " demonstration of
the spirit'' It must, however, be conceded that the
words are more naturally interpreted of miracles in
the technical sense.
If we examine the recorded miracles of S. Paul we
find that, apart from acts of healing, they consisted
either of punishments inflicted on opponents, or of
exorcism. The raising to life of Eutychus I leave out
of reckoning, because I think the narrative may be
fairly read as the record of a natural event. The
young man was at first assumed to be dead, but the
Apostle discovered the falseness of the assumption.
" Make ye no ado " — he said — "for his life is in him''
An accident of that kind would almost certainly
acquire a miraculous aspect in so credulous an age,
but there is really nothing miraculous about it.f
* I Cor. ii, 4. /ecu 6 \oyos /JLOU KCU rb KT)pvyfj,d /xou OUK tv 7ri#<uy cro$tas
X67ois aXX' Iv ct7ro5f££ei irvevp.aros Kai dwdfj-cus, ij/a rj iriffris vp&v /J.T] •$
tv <ro<j>lq. avdpuTrov aXX' iv Svvdfj.ei 0eoD.
t Acts xx. 7-12. It is to be noted that this is one of the "we"
passages, which are universally recognized as of the highest historical
authority. Yet v. 13 suggests that his companions had left the Apostle
232 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
We have already, in a previous chapter, considered
the meaning of that '''delivery unto Satan for the
destruction of the flesh" and we then saw how it
assumed the Apostolic belief in the empire of Satan
in the world, and how under the circumstances of the
time there would be a large probability of its literal
interpretation in fact. In the Acts we read of the
punishment inflicted on Elymas the Sorcerer. The
Apostle "felled with the Holy Ghost, fastened his eyes
on him, and said, O full of all guile and all villany,
thou son of the devil, thou enemy of all righteous
ness, wilt thou not cease to pervert the right ways
of the Lord? And now, behold, the hand of the
Lord is upon thee, and thou shalt be blind, not seeing
the sun for a season. A nd immediately there fell on
him a mist and a darkness: and he went about seeking
some to lead him by the hand'''* This must be
regarded as an extraordinary exercise of a power,
which normally was used as the sanction of Church
discipline. Commonly S. Paul declined to exercise
authority over those who were not members of the
Church. " What have I to do with judging them
that are without?" he asks in the Epistle before
us. We must assume that there were special
circumstances of aggravation in the case of the
sorcerer Elymas, which justified S. Paul in departing
from his general rule.
still speaking, and were not, therefore, actually present at the episode in
question. However this may be, I do not see any necessity for
understanding more than is actually stated ; S. Paul's expression
literally precludes the notion of a resurrection.
* Acts xiii. 9-1 1.
MIRACLES 233
Probably the commonest type of miracle was that
known as "exorcism." The passage in the Acts,
to which I have already alluded as scarcely historical,
gives prominence to S. Paul's power as an exorcist,
and describes the ignoble failure which followed upon
the attempt made by the sons of Seeva to imitate
his method. "And God wrought special miracles by
the hands of Paul: insomuch that unto the sick were
carried away from his body handkerchiefs or aprons,
and the diseases departed from them, and the evil spirits
went out." The history of the Jewish exorcists, and
as a result the burning of the magical books of the
Ephesians, then follow. We are not here concerned
with this remarkable narrative save in so far as it
supports the contention that the " miracles " of the
early Church, apart from healings and judgments,
were mostly acts of exorcism. The casting out of
devils has a very prominent place in the Gospels.
It is recorded that our Saviour gave to His Apostles
and to the Seventy "power and authority over all
devils"* We learn that there was a disposition to
exult in the possession of this mysterious power, and
that Christ rebuked this disposition. "Behold, I have
given you authority to tread upon serpents and
scorpions, and over all the power of the enemy : and
nothing shall in any wise hurt you. Howbeit in this
rejoice not, that tJie spirits are subject unto you : but
rejoice that your names are written in heaven' 't The
authority, however, was not limited to the disciples,
nor would Christ permit it to be limited. On one
occasion we read that the question was raised by the
* S. Luke ix. i. t Ibid. x. 19, 20.
234 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
Apostles, and decisively answered by our Lord.
"John answered and said, Master, we saw one casting
out devils in TJiy name ; and we forbade him, because
he followelh not with us. But Jesus saith unto him,
Forbid him not: for he that is not against you is
for you''* In the appendix to S. Mark's Gospel the
power to cast out devils is included among the
"signs" which " shall follow them that believe' 't It
cannot be questioned that in that age the practice
of exorcism was the normal characteristic of religious
prominence. It attracted general notice, and pro
voked little, if any, criticism. Exorcism perpetuated
itself in the Church, while every other type of miracle
quickly ceased. The Roman Church to this day
includes among the "minor orders" of clergy that
of the exorcist. In early times this mysterious
power was not limited to an Order, but supposed
to belong to every Christian as such. Now exorcism
was precisely the form of miracle which least affected
the normal course of human life. It is >to this
conclusion that I would bring my discussion.
Miracles played a very small part in the actual
experience of the Church. The crises of need,
through which then, as in later times, Christians had
to pass, were met by the commonplace resources of
prudence and chanty. No miracle provided relief
for the poor Christians of Judaea during the famine
which Agabus foretold. Such relief as came to
them was obtained from the collection in the Gentile
Churches, which S. Paul promoted with such ardour.
The Apostle himself never drew upon his miraculous
* Ibid. ix. 49, 50. t S. Mark xvi. 17.
MIRACLES 235
powers for that sustenance which he earned by his
labour as a tentmaker, or, where that was impossible,
accepted as a gift from the most devoted of his
converts. Always miracles were "signs" not ex
emptions for the Church from normal terrestrial
conditions, still less the decoration of individuals ;
but "signs" convincing indications of superhuman
power mercifully offered to the heathen, to whom
in the first instance, without traditions and without
commendations, the gospel was presented. "Miracles,"
it has been truly said, " are the swaddling clothes of
the infant Churches." It is deeply significant that
in the miraculous age the inspired Authors of the
New Testament should have subordinated them to
the more prosaic and enduring virtues of the
Christian character. A few sentences, a few more
vague references, are all that the Epistles contain
about those miraculous powers which have loomed
so large in the misty retrospect of history ; but the
sacred writers never tire of urging upon Christians
the practical duties of that righteous life to which
their discipleship committed them The " fruits of
the Spirit" will remain the authentic marks of
discipleship when miracles are but a faint memory.
" Love never faileth ; but whether there be prophecies,
they shall be done away ; whether there be tongues, they
shall cease : whether there be knowledge, it shall be
done away" Miracles — it must never be forgotten —
have been the familiar tokens of falsehood ; and,
historically, the claim to work miracles is inseparably
connected with religious imposture. Our Lord pro
phesied that this should be so. " There shall arise
236 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
false Christs, and false prophets, and shall show great
signs and wonders : so as to lead astray, if possible,
even the elect'.'* S. Paul, in like manner, associates
great displays of miraculous power with " the lawless
one" of whom he writes mysteriously to the Thessa-
lonians, "even he, whose coining is according to the
working of Satan with all power and signs and lying
wonder s"\ In the Sermon on the Mount our Saviour
warns us that the power to work miracles may
co-exist with a cold heart, and a dead faith, and
an evil life. '''Many will say to Me in that day, Lord,
Lord, did we not prophesy by Thy Name, and by Thy
Name cast out devils, and by thy Name do many
mighty works? And then will I profess unto them,
I never knew you : depart from Me, ye that work
iniquity "\ It is this constant depreciation of
miracles as compared with moral qualities which
distinguishes the New Testament from most religious
literature of succeeding ages. The closest to His
Master's Heart of all the Apostles was Sv John ;
and as S. Chrysostom long ago observed, no miracle
is directly ascribed to him. It was no sign of grace
in Simon Magus to offer money for the miraculous
power which he observed in the Apostles, and which
degraded those holy men in his mind to his own
category of imposture. It would seem, however,
that Simon Magus, rather than S. Peter, has deter
mined the later estimate of prodigies in the Christian
Church. So far from the apostolic standpoint have
Christians travelled that now the rule of the Roman
* S. Matt. xxiv. 24. t 2 Thess. ii. 9.
± S. Matt. vii. 22.
MIRACLES 237
Church has made the working of miracles the very
test of sanctity.
The craving for the miraculous appears to be an
unfailing evidence of religious decline. The history
of all the great religions of the world will provide
examples of this law. Christianity is no exception.
The individual disciple, not less than the society of
disciples, reveals its working. What is superstition
but the craving for the miraculous? and when did
superstition fail to disturb the moral perspective, and
minister to weakening of character ? It is said that
in the heart of our sceptical modern civilization,
notably in France and in the great cities of America,
to a less extent but in growing measure in this
country, quasi-miraculous movements are attracting
no little attention, and drawing after them no small
number of adherents. Spiritualism, theosophy,
esoteric Buddhism, or by whatever other name
these new Gospels of the Mysterious may be known
— all at least have this in common with debased
religion in every age, that they appeal to that lust
for miracle which our Lord and His Apostles so
constantly rebuked. Perhaps that circumstance
would suffice to assure a reflective man that in
those movements there is scanty promise for society.
They will not minister strength to the will, or
impose the restraints of principle upon the way
ward appetites of our nature. In seeking after the
miraculous men miss the obvious. Star-gazers are
apt to find themselves in ditches. The one perpetual
miracle, which is accessible to all, and which alone
can sustain the searching criticism of the human
238 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
conscience, is the miracle of a holy life. For there
can be no mistake about the source or the witness
of a holy life. Miracles in the common sense can
be imitated and misunderstood ; a holy life never.
It is quite manifest to the simplest understanding,
a message fresh from God, which commands the
audience of every conscience. "A good tree cannot
bring forth evil fruit : neither can a corrupt tree bring
forth good fruit" * Men know that in their inmost
hearts, and therefore, in the long run, they do homage
to righteousness. This is the normal witness of
Christ's disciples ; it is the only test of truth the
world is authorised to demand, or the Church is able
to offer. It is a real test ; for a holy life is mani
festly supernatural. "No man can say, Jesus is Lord
but in the Holy Spirit" \ To own the Lordship
of the Crucified in any worthy and effectual measure
means much, too much for mere human virtue, how
soever buttressed by high traditions and helped
forward by large approbation, so much that only
the grace of God, earnestly sought in prayer and
discipline, can enable anyone to achieve it. It
means the miraculous life inspired by the miraculous
presence. " Know ye not as to your own selves" re
proachfully asks S. Paul of the Corinthians, "that
Jesus Christ is in you ? unless indeed ye be reprobate" %
Beside that miracle all else is petty.
* S. Matt. vii. 18. f i Cor. xii. 3. % 2 Cor. xiii. 5.
CHAPTER VI.
THE CHRISTIAN PROPHETS
NO one can read the New Testament, and
especially the Pauline Epistles, with any care
and not perceive the great place which in the
Apostolic Church was filled by the prophets. The
Church is said to be " built upon the foundation of
the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus Himself being O3.
the chief corner stone!"1 In the Apocalypse we read
that " the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy'' \
It would be easy to multiply quotations ; but there is
no need. Their importance is sufficiently manifest,
but their precise functions are not so clear. The
language of S. Paul seems contradictory. On the
one hand, he speaks of the ''prophets " as constituting
a distinct, class ; both in the Corinthian and in the
Ephesian lists of Christian ministers they are placed
next in order to the "apostles." "And God hath set
some in the church, first apostles, secondly prophets,
thirdly teachers" is the language of the one ; "And
He gave some to be apostles ; and some prophets ; and
some evangelists ; and some pastors and teachers " —
is that of the other. In I Cor. xiv. the "prophets"
appear as a very well-defined group, accustomed to
•
* Eph, ii. 20. t Rev. xix. io.
239
240 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
take an important share in the conduct of public
worship, and perhaps occupying official seats in the
Christian assembly. On the other hand, the Apostle
contemplates the prophesying of the entire Church
as a desirable and not improbable contingency. "For
ye all can prophesy one by one" he writes, " that all may
learn, and all may be comforted!'* He bids the
Corinthians " desire earnestly to prophesy!' f Not
even women were excluded from the prophetic gift.
Nay, S. Paul contemplates their publicly exercising
it. " But every woman praying or prophesying with
lier /lead unveiled dishonoureth her head." J In the
Acts we read of S. Philip the Evangelist that he
" had four daughters which did prophesy" § The
contradiction, however, is only on the surface, and
arises rather from our preconceived notions of
Church order than from any obscurity in the
language of S. Paul. Three things are quite evident.
The prophets were not an order of the ministry in
the traditional sense of the phrase. I see nq reason
for thinking that they received any formal Ordina
tion, though I observe that the contrary is very
commonly assumed. Moreover, the prophetic in
spiration might come, and often did come, to private
Christians of both sexes. Finally, that inspiration,
though occasional and, so to say, intermittent, was
considered to permanently attach to whomsoever
it had once been given. The prophets, both men
and women, were not an ordained official ministry,
but they were a definite, recognized class, recruited
• I Cor. xiv. 31. f Ibid. 39.
£ i Cor. xi. 5. § Acts xxi. 2.
THE CHRISTIAN PROPHETS 241
supernaturally from the body of the faithful. The
prominence of the prophets in the Church was very
brief; in the Pastoral Epistles prophecy is just
alluded to. S. Timothy is reminded of "the pro
phecies which went before on him"* and which
apparently marked him out for the work of the
ministry, as on a memorable occasion S. Paul himself
had been marked out for a missionary venture by the
prophets of Antioch. In the same epistle prophecy
is spoken of as associated with S. Timothy's ordina
tion. " Neglect not the gift that is in tJiee, which was
given thee by prophecy, with the laying on of the hands
of the presbytery "\ How far prophecy continued in
the Church after the Apostolic age had ended it is
by no means easy to determine. The evidence is
conflicting. Canon Gore makes the most of it in
this passage :—
" The gift of prophecy continued as a recognized
endowment of the Church into the second or third
centuries. Certain people were recognized as pro
phets, e.g., Ignatius, Polycarp, and Quadratus. . . .
As in the Apostolic Church there had been pro
phetesses, so too they had their late representative
in Ammia at Philadelphia. S. Irenaeus, besides
denouncing false prophets, protests against those
who would banish prophecy from the Church under
pretence of exposing such pretenders, and witnesses,
like Justin Martyr, to the continuance of prophetic
* /card rdj Trpoayovcras M cr£ irpo<pr]Teia.s. (l Tim. i. 1 8.) See Dr.
HORT'S very interesting explanation of this passage in Christian
Eccksia, p. 181 foil. He translates "which led the way to thee."
t I Tim. iv. 14. IJ.TI afj^\€L TOV £v <roi
irpo<t>r)T€ias /uerd ^7rt#6rews TUV
R
242 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
gifts in his day. ... As a matter of fact, however,
the genuine gift seems to have become exceedingly
rare ; Origen speaks of slight traces of it remaining
to his time." *
The functions of the prophets and the range of
their prophecy may be gathered from the New Testa
ment. They succeeded to the character of the Jewish
prophets of the former dispensation, and modelled
their behaviour on the precedents of the Old Testa
ment. Thus they were considered to stand in such
immediate relationship with the Almighty that their
inspired directions could not be resisted without
impiety. As a matter of fact the conduct of the
Church and of individuals was determined at crises
by the revelations of the prophets. The history of
S. Paul provides many instances of such prophetic
guidance. His long residence at Corinth was thus
determined by a vision in which Christ exhorted him
to constancy and assured him of success. Perhaps
the most remarkable account of this government by
revelation is the following: "And they went through
the region of Phrygia and Galatia, HAVING BEEN
FORBIDDEN OF THE HOLY GHOST to Speak the Word
in Asia; and when they were come over against Mysia
they assayed to go into Bithynia ; AND THE SPIRIT OF
JESUS SUFFERED THEM NOT; and passing by Mysia,
they came down to Troas. And A VISION APPEARED
TO PAUL in the night. There was a man of Mace
donia standing, beseeching him, and saying, Come over
into Macedonia and help us. And when he had seen
the vision, straightway we sought to go forth into
* GORE, The Christian Ministry, pp. 396, 397.
THE CHRISTIAN PROPHETS 243
Macedonia, concluding that GOD HAD CALLED US for
to preach the Gospel unto them'' * The supernatural
guidance is assumed as a matter of course. God
was very near to Christians in the Apostolic age :
and His normal instruments of communication with
the Church were the prophets. In i Cor. xiv. S.
Paul contemplates Divine revelations as quite natu
rally to be looked for in the Christian assembly.
" Let the prophets speak by two or three, and let the
others discern. But if a revelation be made to another
sitting by, let the first keep silence. For ye all can
prophesy one by one, that all may learn, and all may
be comforted : and the spirits of the prophets are subject
to the prophets!' Here the Apostle indicates that
the Church was the critic as well as the recipient
of prophetic communications, and that apart from
special revelations the prophets had messages to
deliver in the assembly. By some unmistakable
tokens the advent of a new revelation in the pro
phet's mind made itself known : the more normal
prophesying was suspended in order that the most
recent " Word of the Lord" might be delivered.
What was the nature of what I have called, for
lack of a better phrase, normal prophesying ?
Perhaps we have the answer in the text, "He
that prophesieth speaketh unto men edification, and
comfort, and consolation" \ S. Ambrose, three cen
turies later, regarded interpreters of the Scriptures
as the representatives of the prophets. Perhaps
* Acts xvi. 6-10.
"f 1 Cor. xiv. 3« o 8£ Trpo<f>r)Tevuv avdpuirois XaXe? olKo8ofj.r\v /cat
Trad/cXTjaii' KO.\
244 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
preaching, especially that which is either addressed
directly to the conscience of the sinner with a view
to his conversion, or is directed to the devout under
standing of the believer in order to edify him by
deeper knowledge of Divine truth) presents the
nearest modern parallel to the ordinary prophesying
of the Apostolic Church. The New Testament
contains a specimen of Apostolic prophecy in the
Apocalypse. That book, in the words of Weizacker,
" has preserved for us a complete picture of the pro
phetic work of the Church."* The central subject
of all prophecy was "the expected appearing of
Christ, and everything that had the most remote
connexion with it in the shape of preparation,
associations, and consequences." The Apostolic
Church lived in the light of that eager hope,
guided itself by the rule of that masterful motive,
purified itself by the terror of that tremendous
thought, " Maran-atha, the Lord is at hand'' Of
this belief the prophets were the exponents : pro
phecy may be said to have waned and passed with
the conviction of Christ's speedy return. Only when
that distracting delusion had disappeared could the
Church attain that permanence of constitution which
protracted residence in the world demanded.
The Church is the critic of prophecy. We are
reminded at once that in Apostolic times, as ever
since, over against every genuine element of Church
life has arisen some base counterfeit. Prophecy was
no exception to the general rule. "Let the prophets
speak by two or three ', and let the others discern" or
* Apostolic Age, vol. ii. p. 269, E.T.
THE CHRISTIAN PROPHETS 245
discriminate.* We learn that among the charismata
of the Holy Ghost there was one which specifically
had reference to the critical function of the Church —
" discernings of spirits " (SiaKpt<T€i$ Tn/ei/yudrow). Those
members of the Church who possessed this special
gift were charged to exercise it in the assembly.
The inspired critics of prophecy were not left with
out any guidance.
"Assuredly," observes M. Godet, "it is not for
nothing that the Apostle has begun this whole dis
cussion on the spiritual gifts by indicating the
precise character which distinguishes true and false
inspirations, by recalling that the one have as their
common character and essence this cry of adoration
— Jesus, Lord! whilst the others tend to the humilia
tion and rejection of Jesus. It was sufficient then
to place every prophecy in relation with this centre
of the entire Christian revelation, the Person of
Christ, and to see to what result the prophecy which
had been heard tended to make little of Him or to
glorify Him." f
We may here consider the passage in the Epistle
to the Romans. J " Having gifts differing according
* I Cor. xiv. 29.
t ii. p. 206. Cf. M. RENAN (S. Paul, p. 412), who gives a different
application to the "discerning of spirits."
" Quelques sons bizarres que pronon9aient les glossolales, et oil se
melaient le grec, le syriaque, les mots anathema, maranatha, les noms
de Jesus, de 'Seigneur,' embarrassaient fort les simples gens. Paul,
consulte a ce sujet, pratique ce qu'on appelait ' le discernement des
esprits,' et cherche a demeler dans ce jargon confus ce qui pouvait
venir de 1'Esprit et ce qui n'en venait pas. "
J tyovres ^ \a.piaij.a.Ta Kara. TT)V X&PIV TV ^oBdcrav r/,iuV
irpo<p-riTtia.v Kara ri]v dvaXoyiav T
246 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
to the grace that was given unto us, whether prophecy,
let us prophesy according to the proportion of our faith"
[or perhaps " of the faith"] The general drift of the
passage seems to prohibit the common and attractive
interpretation, which would understand the Apostle
to refer to the body of revealed truth, and to warn
against any distortion of its balanced harmony.
Rather S. Paul is urging the duty of modesty. The
prophet is to gauge accurately his own spiritual
possibilities. He must not " strain after effects for
which his faith is insufficient."*
So understood the passage may best be compared
with the Apostle's insistence in the Corinthian
Epistle upon the responsibility of the prophet for
the orderly exercise of his charisma. " The spirits
of the prophets are subject to the prophets -."t In
marked contrast to the frenzied rhapsodies of
the pagan priests of Oracular shrines the Christian
prophet never lost his self-control in the access of
inspiration. S. Paul himself lays emphasis> on this
fundamental distinction. " Ye know that when ye
were Gentiles ye were led away unto those dumb idols>
howsoever ye might be led. Wherefore I give you to
understand, that no man speaking in the Spirit of
God saith, Jesus is anathema : and no man can say,
Jesus is Lord, but in the Holy Spirit!' % The test
of prophecy, then, was its bearing upon the Person
of Jesus Christ. S. John speaks to the same effect
in his first Epistle, "Beloved, believe not every spirit,
* Vide SANDAY and HEADLAM, Romans, p. 354. A very learned,
interesting, and serviceable commentary,
t xiv. 32. t i Cor. xii. 2, 3.
THE CHRISTIAN PROPHETS 247
but prove the spirits whether they are of God : because
many false prophets are gone out into the world.
Hereby know ye the Spirit of God : every spirit which
confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of
God: and every spirit which confesseth not Jesus is
not of God: and this is the Spirit of antichrist,
whereof ye have heard that it cometh : and now it
is in the world already!'* The author of the so-
called second Epistle of S. Peter, in like manner,
makes disloyalty to our Saviour the mark of the
false prophet. "-But there arose false prophets also
among the people, as among you also there shall be
false teachers, who shall privily bring in destructive
heresies, denying even the Master that bought them,
bringing upon themselves swift destruction' 't Thus
the test of prophecy was doctrinal ; under the actual
circumstances of the time, however, it was not less
truly a moral test, for the heresies to which the
sacred writers refer had direct connexion with the
practical question, Does discipleship necessitate
righteousness? In the strong phrase of S. Jude
the false prophets were " ungodly men, turning the
grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying
our only Master and Lord, Jesus Christ''
The moral test of the Gospels thus inevitably
became the doctrinal test of the Epistles. The Lord
ship of Jesus involves the reign of righteousness ;
repudiation of righteousness is the practical ex
pression of apostacy from Christ. "Beware of false
prophets" so ran the warning in the Sermon on the
Mount, "which come to you in sheep's clothing, but
* i John iv. 1-3. t 2 Peter ii. I.
248 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
inwardly are ravening wolves. By their fruits ye
shall know them? As if His eyes were resting on
the history of His Church, marking the baleful
tendency to drive the moral into the background
and set up arbitrary tests of doctrinal orthodoxy
and ecclesiastical allegiance, He went on to warn
us in words of merciless lucidity to be under no
delusions. Discipleship did not consist in public
acknowledgment of His Lordship, nor were its
evidences to be sought in ardour of profession, in
zeal of active work, in large apparent success, but
always and everywhere in the moral obedience which
induces righteousness. " Not every one that saith
unto Me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of
heaven : but he that doeth the will of My Father
which is in heaven" It was then a thoroughly
sound instinct which led the early Church in laying
down definite rules for the regulation of the prophets
to make everything turn on the practical and obvious
matter of conduct. The rules laid down in The
Teaching of the Twelve Apostles insist upon a
righteous life as the unfailing test of the genuine
prophet. " Not every one that speaketh in the spirit
is a prophet, but only if he have the behaviour of
the Lord. By their behaviour then shall the false
prophet and the prophet be known. . . .
" And every prophet that teacheth the truth if
he doeth not what he teacheth is a false prophet.
" But whosoever saith in the spirit, Give me money
or any other things, ye shall not hearken to him,
but if he bid to give for others that lack, let no one
judge him."*
* Chap. xi.
THE CHRISTIAN PROPHETS 249
Prophecy, we have said, finds its modern form in
preaching. We may agree with S. Chrysostom
that* "now we retain only the symbols of those
gifts " which cast so bright a lustre on the Apostolic
Church. In his day it would appear that the Pauline
rule was still followed. " For now also," he says,
"we speak two or three, and by course, and when
one is silent another begins. But these are only
signs and memorials of those things. Wherefore
when we begin to speak, the people respond ' with
Thy Spirit', indicating that of old they thus used to
speak, not of their own wisdom, but moved by the
Spirit. But not so now (I speak of mine own case
so far). But the present Church is like a woman
who hath fallen from her former prosperous days,
and in many respects retains the symbols only of
that ancient prosperity, displaying, indeed, the re-
* Horn. XXXVI. 4 in I Cor. (Opera, x. p. 395. Paris, 1837.)
The Saint gives a lively picture of the Church in Antioch :—
" There the very houses were churches ; but now the church itself is
a house, or rather worse than any house. For in a house one may see
much good order, since both the mistress of the house is seated on her
chair with all seemliness, and the maidens weave in silence, and each
of the domestics hath his appointed task in hand. But here great is
the tumult, great the confusion, and our assemblies differ in nothing
from a vintner's shop, so loud is the laughter, so great the disturbance ;
as in baths, as in markets, the cry and tumult is universal. And these
things are here only; since elsewhere it is not permitted even to
address one's neighbour in the Church, not even if one have received
back a long absent friend ; but these things are done without, and very
properly." He says that the church had become a trysting place for
profligates, for business men making bargains, for scandal-bearers, and
the purveyors of political gossip. The whole description is a sug
gestive comment on Church life in the "golden age" of that
"undivided Church," which some people would make the norm of
our doctrine and discipline.
250 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
positories and caskets of her golden ornaments, but
bereft of her wealth ; such an one doth the present
Church resemble." So S. Chrysostom, whom all
Christendom for fifteen centuries has venerated as
the prince of Christian preachers. What words of
humility shall be lowly enough to bewail our present
degradation ! The glorious rhapsody of inspiration,
the vision which opened heaven, the unutterable
ecstasy, the intuition of truth so powerful and so
clear as to constitute a revelation of God, the Divine
insight into the hearts of men — these are no longer
ours, or are ours so faintly and so rarely that in the
common course of our Church life they escape
notice, yet something remains. Still the Christian
preacher's function is prophetic. He is set to
proclaim, to justify, and (alas ! for the weakness of
mortal man) to illustrate the Lordship of Jesus ;
still, in the Church " he that prophesieth speaketh unto
men edification, and comfort, and consolation'' And
still the old test of prophecy holds true of preaching,
" No man speaking in the Spirit of God saith, Jesus
is anathema : and no man can say, Jesus is Lord, but
in the Holy Spirit? What is the general drift and
tendency of the preaching? Does it bring home
to men's consciences as the very central fact of
existence the presence in their midst of Jesus Christ —
living, loving, ruling? Men clamour for much from
the preacher. They seek for eloquence, for origin
ality, for sensation, for pathos, sometimes (though
this is not often) for honesty and learning, and
they criticise freely the preacher's performances; but
do they remember his real function? do they com-
THE CHRISTIAN PROPHETS 251
passionate his awful lot? do they in any measure
help him to preserve single and inviolate his loyalty
to Him, whose representative and mouthpiece he
is? In those first days prophecy, as we have seen,
was no mere function of an official ministry, it was
poured out on every receptive spirit. Should it not still
be so? Public Order, of course, will preclude the
preaching of private Christians ; the conditions of
this late age — the complexity of its problems, the
mass and variety of its knowledge — would deter
untrained men from the task, even if no law pro
hibited. But public preaching does not exhaust the
prophetic mission of the Church. Still the Pauline
counsel may be offered, "desire earnestly to pro
phesy" for the intercourse of common life is rich
in opportunities of that service which prophecy can
render, and prophecy alone. It is not only in Church
that the words are true, "he (or, for the matter of
that, she) that prophesieth speaketh unto men edifica
tion, and comfort, and consolation" though the scene
of that prophecy be the lowliest home, or the
commonest intercourse of business, or the comrade
ship of recreation. And still the essence of prophecy
changes not. Then and now, by preacher or by
private Christian, in public or in private, the old
definition holds true : " the testimony of Jesus is the
Spirit of prophecy!'
CHAPTER VII.
WOMEN IN THE CHURCH
THE first Corinthian epistle deals at some length
with the relation of the sexes in the union of
marriage and in the intercourse of discipleship. The
Apostle was led to devote so much attention to the
subject by the direct request of the Corinthian
Christians. Evidently in Corinth the position as
signed to women by the Gospel was much discussed
and largely misunderstood. The normal relations of
the sexes seemed to be irreconcilable with the new
conditions introduced by Christianity. If, as S. Paul
was wont to insist, "there can be no male and female"
in Christ Jesus* that is, if the basal inequality of sex
had been destroyed, then by what right could the
ancient badges and limitations of inequality continue
in the Christian community? Nay, how could the
subordination of the female in the relationship of
marriage be any longer insisted on ? In Corinth we
infer from the Epistles there was a strong party
devoted to the advocacy of the extreme conse
quences of Christian equality. They would cancel
the subjection based on the natural distinction of
sex, and destroy at once and for ever the limitations
* Galatians iii. 28.
252
WOMEN IN THE CHURCH 253
imposed by law and custom upon the activity of
women. Against this party S. Paul ranged himself
as an uncompromising opponent. He refused to
recognize the claim of the Christian wife in the
interest of devotion to repudiate the marriage bond;*
he insisted on maintaining in the Church that public
subordination of women which was established in the
general custom of society ;t he declined to allow the
possession of high spiritual gifts to be made the plea
for setting aside the decent reticence which ought
always to mark the public behaviour of women.J
S. Paul prevailed : his doctrine has determined the
position of the female sex in Christian society ; and
it will undoubtedly be approved or condemned in
proportion as that position is considered favourable
or the reverse. It is notorious that a large and
perhaps an increasing body of opinion inclines to
regard the Apostle in no friendly spirit. He is a
narrow Rabbinist, binding upon the infant Church
the chains of his own prae-Christian prejudices ; he
is a hard celibate, infecting Christianity with his own
personal contempt for the gentler side of human life ;
he is at bottom under the Apostle and the Christian
always the Oriental, with the Oriental's conviction of
the intrinsic inferiority of the weaker sex. In all
this — it would be dishonest to deny — there is an
element of truth. S. Paul's Rabbinic training un
doubtedly affected his doctrine, as it certainly deter
mined his arguments. His reasoning is obviously
Rabbinic. It has been maintained with large justifi
cation that the intrinsic superiority of the single over
* vii. 3-5. f xi. 3-16. I xiv. 34-36.
254 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
the married state is the underlying assumption of the
seventh chapter. The Apostle would have been
more than human if he had succeeded in wholly
divesting himself of the prevailing Oriental notions
about the female sex. We may allow that Weizacker
says truly : * " Paul did not in any way go beyond
the conception of woman's position, which at bottom
belonged to the whole ancient world," provided
always that we have fairly grasped the new con
ditions under which in Christian circles that concep
tion would have to find practical expression. In that
process the conception itself would be necessarily
modified and even transformed.
The Christian view of woman shaped itself under
four powerful influences. In the first place stands
the Evangelic Tradition. No one can read the
Gospels and observe the place filled by women in
the history of Jesus Christ and fail to perceive that
a low view of woman, that any view short of the
highest, is plainly incompatible with the Christian
religion. We may remark in passing that the
influence of the Gospels has tended to increase with
the progress of time. As the truth about Jesus
Christ became apparent to the understanding of
believers, so the mystery of His Incarnation drew
forth more and more their interest, and stimulated
their devout reflexion. The central figure in the
history of the Incarnation, our Lord Himself apart,
is a woman — the Blessed Virgin Mary. It seems
too evident to require proof that belief in the
Incarnation involves the highest possible view of
* But see Appendix IV., " Celibacy."
WOMEN IN THE CHURCH 255
woman. At the first preaching of the Gospel
attention was mainly centred on the Crucifixion
and Resurrection of our Lord ; the facts connected
with His miraculous Birth were little known, and,
in any case, were not well adapted for the immediate
purposes of the missionaries ; but when the Evangelic
Tradition had been committed to writing, and the
Gospels, substantially in their present form, had
been generally circulated, then the full meaning of
the Incarnation began to reveal itself to the general
body of Christians. There are in human life normal
forces which ever tend to the degradation of women ;
assuredly those forces have been at work within the
sphere of Christianity ; but always behind them has
stood this influence of the Gospel, appealing, and
not in vain, to the conscience of discipleship, and
restraining, where it cannot destroy, the power of
evil. The Christian practice of publicly reading the
Gospels in the regular worship of the Church has
certainly secured from all danger of oblivion the
evangelic prominence of women. The Virgin Mother
of Bethlehem, the sisters of Bethany, the heroic
mourners on Calvary, the holy women at the Tomb
have been stamped ineffaceably on the memory of
Christendom. Nay, as if to cut the roots of that
cynicism which prompts low -views of woman, the
Gospel sets in prominence the pathetic figures of
the adulteress and the harlot. The woman taken
in adultery, that other woman whose sins He forgave
because she loved much, the weeping Magdalen, from
whom He drave the seven demons — who more
precious than these to the thought of discipleship?
256 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
Who more potent to chasten the sensual, and quicken
the despairing, and cleanse the polluted ?
And next, there was the Christian doctrine of
marriage. That doctrine, which was certainly insisted
on from the first as an express commandment of
Christ, must have revolutionized the position of
women wherever it obtained acceptance. We may
allow — what, indeed, seems to have been the fact —
that the Jews, in spite of the technical lawfulness
of polygamy, were practically in that age mono
gamists ; we may recognize to the full whatever
provisions for securing the rights of women the
Jewish law contained ; and even so it is impossible
to overstate the importance of the change which our
Lord effected by His Law of Marriage. Consider
what is involved by the question of the Pharisees
addressed to Christ, " Is it lawful for a man to put
away his wife for every cause?" We are reminded
at once on how low a level the marriage bond was
then discussed. There was a standing dispute
between the two great theological schools ' of the
period on the question not whether divorce was
permissible, but for what causes. " The Sham-
maites restricted them to the commission of an
iniquitous action by the wife (probably adultery) ;
the Hillelites, going to an opposite extreme, . . .
inferred that a divorce was warranted even when
the wife had only spoiled her husband's dinner.
Rabbi Akiba endeavoured, in the same manner, to
prove that a man might lawfully dismiss his wife
if he found another more attractive."* How wide a
* EDERSHEIM, History of the Jewish Nation, p. 274.
WOMEN IN THE CHURCH 257
chasm separates such licentious frivolity from the
majestically simple Law of Christ. Yet that law at
its first promulgation seemed intolerable, impossible,
even to the disciples. " If the case of the man is
so with his wife, it is not expedient to marry I'*
they cried in consternation. A few years passed,
and S. Paul, steeped in Rabbinic prejudices by his
training, but liberated by the love of Christ, can
write about marriage in those dignified and moving
words, which have ever since been treasured by
the Church as setting forth the true ideal of Christian
marriage.
" Wives, be in subjection unto your own husbands, as
unto the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife,
as Christ also is the head of the Church, being Himself
the saviour of the body. But as the Church is subject
to Christ, so let the wives also be to their husbands in
everything. Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ
also loved the Church, and gave Himself up for it :
that He might sanctify it, having cleansed it by the
washing of water with the word, that He might present
the Church to Himself a glorious Church, not having
spot or wrinkle or any such thing : but that it should
be holy and without blemish. Even so ought husbands
also to love their own wives as their own bodies. He
that loveth his own wife loveth himself: for no man
ever hated his own flesh; but nourished and cherished
it, even as Christ also the Church: because we are
members of His body. For this cause shall a man
leave his father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife:
and the twain shall become one flesh. Tliis mystery is
* S. Matt. xix. 10.
S
258 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
great: but I speak in regard of Christ and of the
Church. Nevertheless do ye also severally love each
one his own wife even as himself : and let the wife see
that she fear her husband'' *
Now it is easy to perceive in this passage the
traces of the Rabbinic influence under which the
Apostle had been trained, but it is evident that the
dominating principle is no longer Rabbinic. Marriage
has been lifted out of the merely physical category in
which the Rabbis placed it, and has been brought
into direct relation with the very central belief of
discipleship. It is no mean symbol of that mystic
union which binds together Christ and the Church.
Wifely love may take the character of that self-
surrender in obedience which marks the Church's
love for Christ. The husband's love may represent,
and not unfaithfully, that self-surrender in sacrifice
* Eph. v. 22-33.
Dr. R. W. Dale has a lecture on this passage filled full of sound
thought, tersely and eloquently expressed, vide Epkesians, pp. -349-377.
Canon Gore, in a recent volume, The Epistle to the Ephesians,
pp. 212-228, discusses S. Paul's teaching on the subject of marriage
with characteristic lucidity and force. He boldly maintains the in
feriority of woman " in the moral qualities which are concerned with
government — in justice, love of truth and judgment, stability and
reasonableness." " To maintain that men and women are only
physiologically different is to run one's head against the brick wall
of fact and science, no less than against S. Paul's and S. Peter's
principles."
For an extremely curious and characteristic exhortation to husbands
and wives see S. Chrysostom's comment on this passage, Horn. XX.
in Eph. (Opera, xi. p. 163). It indicates the profound difference
between Eastern and Western standpoints, and gives an interesting
view of domestic life in Constantinople in the fourth century. The
preacher's preference for celibacy is not concealed, yet he draws an
attractive picture of Christian marriage.
WOMEN IN THE CHURCH 259
which marks Christ's love for the Church. The union
in both cases is eternal, mysterious, spiritual.
In the third place there was the evident fact that
the marvellous gifts of the Spirit were given to women
as well as to men. It was impossible to maintain the
inequality of the sexes when God Himself was
plainly treating them as equal.
Finally, there was the logic of experience. In the
history of S. Paul women played no insignificant
part. Sometimes as opponents, sometimes as allies,
he had to reckon with their influence. " The devout
women of honourable estate " took the lead in driving
him from Antioch in Pisidia; at Thessalonica, though
the fury of the Jews was extreme, not a few of the
" chief women " accepted the Gospel ; among the
noble-hearted Berceans, who heard without prejudice
and searched the Scriptures for themselves, were
many " Greek women of honourable estate" Among
the few converts at Athens, we are expressly told,
was " a woman named Damaris" The leading mem
bers of the Philippian Church were the two women,
Euodia and Syntyche, whose rivalries caused some
anxiety to the Apostle. He was on terms of close
friendship with Priscilla or Prisca, whose import
ance may perhaps be inferred from the fact that
she is generally named in front of her husband,
Aquila. Phoebe the deaconess of the ChurcJi in
Cenchrece, is the subject of a separate and very
eulogistic commendation in the Epistle to the
Romans, and among the salutations which conclude
that Epistle we find mention of the names of several
Christian women, generally with a kind little com-
260 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
ment added, " Salute Mary, who bestowed much
labour on you" " Salute Tryphcena and Tryphosa,
who labour in the Lord" " Salute Per sis, the beloved,
which laboured much in the Lord" and so forth. All
of these, if we may judge by their names, were slaves
or freedwomen, but their importance in the Church
had a better basis than that of social consequence.
They were great in service and in suffering.
The expansion of the Church discovered new
problems, in the solution of which women were in
dispensable. It is certain that in the Apostolic age
the office, perhaps even the order of deaconesses,
already existed.
" It is difficult," says M. de Pressense", " to describe
exactly the deaconesses of the primitive Church.
They had their part in distributing alms and visiting
the sick ; undoubtedly also they were occupied with
the Agapae, and lent their aid to the deacons for
whatever required their care in the conduct of* public
worship. We know that in the second century the
deaconesses used to assist women at their Baptism.
That custom, so convenient and so natural, must
have been introduced into the Church from the first
century. The widows above the age of sixty years
registered on the roll of the Church, of whom S.
Paul speaks in his first letter to Timothy, were pro
bably deaconesses. In fact, we should not understand
the duties which were imposed on them if we should
think only of a regular assistance. On the contrary,
nothing is more accordant with the spirit of the
Apostolic Church than to give employment to the
spirit of all its members, and to establish a holy
WOMEN IN THE CHURCH 261
reciprocity between the generous gifts made to
poverty and the precious services which poverty
can render. The widow was indeed better fitted
than the virgin for the office of deaconess, for she
had experience of human life, she knew its great
sufferings, and found thus in her position a quite
special aptitude for exercising a ministry of con
solation."*
While, then, women secured their position within
the Church on these firm foundations of principle
and utility, the danger made its appearance that they
should miss the lesson of their own success, and by
intruding into spheres where, for fundamental reasons
of physique and function, they had no place, should
endanger their newly-acquired liberty. Among the
Jewish Christians, perhaps, the Rabbinic Tradition
was strong enough to counteract this peril ; but
among the freer and more licentious Gentiles the
case was otherwise, and S. Paul found it necessary
to exert his authority to maintain as consistent with
Christian equality the subordination of the female
sex. He insists on the use of the veil in the public
assemblies. The point strikes us at first as scarcely
adequate, and the argument has a somewhat fantastic
appearance ; but we should greatly err if we mis
conceived the real importance of the one or the
permanent truth of the other. Veiling is but a
fashion of dress, and has no abiding authority ; but
in that age veiling was the general custom of society,
and represented, in the general mind, the vital and
eternal interest of modesty. The question at stake
* DE PRESSENSE, Le Sihle Apostolique> ii. p. 243.
262 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
was really this : ought the Church of Christ to
despise and disregard the established conventions
of men in matters where the truth was not con
cerned? S. Paul's principle is stated in his exhor
tation to the Romans. " Take thought for things
honourable in the sight of all men" It is equally
arrogant and uncharitable to offend against the
legitimate custom of general society.
But there was more. The veil represented the fact
of dependence, and its rejection argued revolt against
the Divine government of the universe. " There
exist three relations," comments M. Godet, "which
form between them a kind of hierarchy : at the
bottom, the purely human relation of man and
woman ; higher, the Divine-human relation of Christ
and man ; at the top, the wholly Divine relation
between Christ and God. The common term by
which Paul describes these three relations is that
of head. This figurative expression includes two
ideas : that of a community of life, and that of an
inequality within that community. Thus between
man and woman; by the tie of marriage there is
formed between them the tie of a common life, but
of such a kind that the one is the strong and direct
ing element, the other the receptive and dependent
element. It is the same in the relation between
Christ and man. Formed by the tie of faith, it
constitutes also a community of life in which are
distinguished an active and directing principle, and
a receptive and directed factor. An analogous
relation presents itself higher still in the mystery
of the Divine Essence. By the tie of sonship there
WOMEN IN THE CHURCH 263
is between Christ and God communion of Divine
life, but of such kind that the communication
(T impulsion) proceeds from the Father, and that
' the Son can do nothing but what He seeth the
Father doing!"*
In thus linking on the subordination of women,
which he advocates, to the " vast system of subordi
nation running through the universe " and ultimately
arising from the very Being of God, the Apostle
effectually guards against any distortion of his
teaching into a denial of Christian equality. Sub
ordination is one thing, inferiority is another. The
one touches the order of life, the other the nature
of men. Variety of function entails no inequality
of dignity. Loss of dignity can only result from
failure to perform specific function. This was
S. Chrysostom's answer to the champion of those
women's rights which consist in imitating the specific
habits and activities of men, and it is the true
answer. " But if any say, ' Nay, how can this be
a shame to the women, if she mount up to the
glory of the man ? ' we might make this answer,
' She doth not mount up, but rather falls from her
own proper honour.' Since not to abide within our
own limits, and the laws ordained of God, but to
go beyond is not an addition, but a diminution . . .
the woman acquireth not the man's dignity, but
loseth even the woman's comeliness.''!
S. Paul makes appeal to nature. He points to
the broad physical distinction between the sexes,
* Cotnmentaire sur la ire £piirc aux Corinthiens, vol. ii. pp. 124-5.
t Horn. XXVI. in I Cor. (Opera, x. p. 272).
264 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
indicating distinctiveness of function, and necessi
tating a distinctive ordering of life, and he insists
on respecting this natural dividing line between man
and woman. Herein surely he asserts a principle of
permanent importance. " Fanaticism defies nature "
— I borrow the language of F. W. Robertson —
" Christianity refines it and respects it. Christianity
does not denaturalize, but only sanctifies and refines
according to the laws of nature. Christianity does
not destroy our natural instincts, but gives them a
higher and a nobler direction. . . . And just as the
white light of heaven does not make all things
white, but the intenser it is so much more intense
becomes the green, the blue, or the red ; and just
as the rain of heaven falling on tree and plant
develops the vigour of each — every tree and herb
'yielding seed after his kind' ; and just as leaven
does not change the mass into something new, but
makes elastic and firm and springy that which was
dull and heavy before ; so the Spirit of Christ
develops each nation, sex, and individual, according
to their own nature, and not the nature of another
— making man more manly and woman more
womanly."*
There are many causes at work in modern society
tending to what is called the " emancipation of
woman " : in so far as the movement follows on the
lines of Christian principle it is indeed worthily
styled a movement of emancipation. The functions
of women more justly considered are seen to be
more honourable and essential to the well-being of
* Lectures on the Corinthians > pp. 192, 193.
WOMEN IN THE CHURCH 265
society; her fellowship with man in the holy
marriage bond, rising above the merely physical
union, is seen to extend into the intellectual and
spiritual spheres. It becomes an equal comradeship.
All this is thoroughly accordant with the Gospel.
But the advocate of woman's emancipation does
not always take that line. There is a note of
contempt in the references to woman's sublimest
function — motherhood ; a note of rebellion against
woman's true and normal relationship — wifehood ;
and that note is thoroughly anti-Christian. What
soever proceeds on the theory that woman is man's
true, equal, honourable partner in bearing the strange
burden of existence has its roots in the teaching
of Jesus Christ Whatsoever proceeds on the theory
that woman is man's rival, meeting him on terms of
competition in every sphere that is his, and repudi
ating as far as possible the inexorably marked limits
of the sphere that is her own, ministers ultimately
not to the enfranchisement, but to the degradation
of woman.
CHAPTER VIII.
APOSTOLIC FINANCE
WE had occasion to observe in an earlier chapter
that the Apostolic Church found ready to
hand both in Jewish and in heathen society models
of association upon which it might fashion its polity.
It is, I think, sufficiently evident that in the organiza
tion of finance the Apostles adopted arrangements
then existing in the world, and already familiar to
their converts. Externally the Christian communities
wore the aspect of those associations for almost every
conceivable purpose, secular and religious, with which
the Roman law was well acquainted.
" They had the same names for their meetings, and
some of the same names for their officers. The basis
of association, in the one case as in the other, was the
profession of a common religion. The members, in
the one case as in the other, contributed to or
received from a common fund, and in many cases,
if not universally, shared in a common meal.
Admission was open in the one case as in the other,
not only to free-born citizens, but to women and
strangers, to freedmen and slaves,"*
* HATCH, Bampton Lectures, p. 30.
266
APOSTOLIC FINANCE 267
The Church in those first days needed considerable
funds in order to meet her normal expenditure.
Putting together the scattered notices of the Epistles,
we learn that this normal expenditure fell under five
heads : —
(1) The maintenance of the ministry.
(2) Hospitality.
(3) Maintenance of widows.
(4) Relief of the poor.
(5) Assistance to the persecuted.
I. There can be no doubt whatever that from the
first it has been held to be indispensable to the well-
being of the Church that the task of ministry should
be entrusted to a class of official teachers, who, laying
aside other occupations, should make that task the
business of their lives. The provision for the main
tenance of these persons, thus excluded from the
ordinary employments by which men ^are sustained,
has necessarily been a first charge on the resources
of the Church. S. Paul insists on " the right" of
Christian ministers to their maintenance. "Have
we no right to eat and to drink?"* he asks. They
are workers, and, as such, entitled to their hire ;
they are ministers of religion, and, as such, entitled
to "have their portion with the altar'' They
confer great benefits on the congregations to
whom they minister, and, as benefactors, they have
a claim on the gratitude of the Church. " What
soldier ever serveth at his own charges? If
we sowed unto you spiritual things, is it a great
* /IT? otk t-xpntv t£owriav <(>ayclv /cai reiv. I Cor, ix. 4.
268 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
matter if we shall reap your carnal things ? Know
ye not that they which minister about sacred things
eat of the things of the temple, and they which wait
upon the altar have their portion with the altar?"*
These reasons and analogies might suffice, but in
this case they are but the slighter part of the argu
ment. The maintenance of the clergy is expressly
commanded by Jesus Christ. " Even so did the Lord
ordain that they which proclaim the Gospel should
live of the Gospel" f
But the justice of the claim could not exorcise its
inherent peril. The devotion of the faithful facili
tated the degradation of the clergy. There is a
melancholy suggestiveness about the constant warn
ings against '''filthy lucre " which are addressed to the
clergy. \ To many, even in that age, "godliness" had
come to commend itself as "a way of gain" That
is not to say that the clergy were worse than other
men, but that, being dedicated to the service of
* i Cor. ix. 13. This parallel between the Jewish priesthood and
the Christian ministry is very suggestive of a clear and coherent
doctrine of "Holy Orders." It is easy to make too much of this ; but
at present, in some quarters, there seems a disposition to make too
little.
t I Cor. ix. 14. oirrws Kal 6 Kvpios ditra£ev rots rb cvayytXiov
KarayyAXourni' e/c TOU eua77eX£ou ^rfv.
J Cf. S. Paul's words to the Ephesian presbyters, Acts xx. 33, and
the qualification for a "bishop" in I Tim. iii. 3, " no lover of money,"
d(pi\dpyvpov : for a "deacon," ibid. 8, "not greedy of filthy lucre,"
IJLT] aiaxpoKfpdeu. The Apostle's earnest warning against "the love
of money " seems to be suggested by covetous religious teachers. S.
Peter also exhorts the presbyters against base motives of action.
' ' Tend the flock of God which is among you, exercising the oversight,
not of constraint, but willingly, according unto God ; nor yet for filthy
lucre, but of a ready mind." (i Peter v. 2.)
APOSTOLIC FINANCE 269
eternity, they yet were as the rest of men, whose
business is directly with the things of this world.
There is only one thing more repulsive than a
coveteous, worldly clergyman, and that is the
coveteous, worldly layman who denounces him, and
glows with a spurious moral zeal in the performance.
The clergyman's sacred profession neither alters his
nature nor diminishes his temptations. It but adds
immensely to his responsibilities, and enhances the
gravity of his failures. The Church is bound to
" maintain " the clergy in such wise that they are
enabled to do their work efficiently, beyond that the
precedent of the Apostolic Church does not advance.*
II. The duty of hospitality is frequently insisted on
in the Epistles. " In love of the brethren be tenderly
affectioned one to another . . . communicating to the
necessities of the saints ; given to hospitality "\ "Let
love of the brethren continue. Forget not to show love
unto strangers: for thereby some have entertained
angels unawares'' % It is not hard to understand the
reasons of this insistence. In a literal sense, which
we, in these mild times, can with difficulty imagine,
Christians were then "pilgrims and strangers in the
world" They were thrown back on themselves for
the good offices of society which their pagan neigh-
* Let it be remembered that ministerial efficiency is not secured
when the clergy are so poorly paid as to be unable to purchase books
and sustain intellectual interests. At this moment, partly owing to
poverty, partly to other causes, the Church of England is threatened
with an ignorant clergy. In our case the mischief is particularly serious
because the professional training of the English clergy is almost nil, and
they therefore depend for most of their theological knowledge on their
studies after Ordination.
t Rom. xii. 10, 13. | Ileb. xiii. I, 2.
270 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
hours either could not or would not render. The
Christian " strangers " who, pursuing their errands of
business or pleasure, passed to and fro between the
great cities of antiquity, looked to the Church for
friendly entertainment.
" Every one of those strangers who bore the
Christian name had therein a claim to hospitality.
For Christianity was, and grew because it was, a
great fraternity. The name " brother" by which a
Jew addressed his fellow-Jew, came to be the ordi
nary designation by which a Christian addressed his
fellow- Christian. It vividly expressed a real fact.
For, driven from city to city by persecution, or
wandering from country to country an outcast or
a refugee, a Christian found, wherever he went in
the community of his fellow-Christians, a welcome
and hospitality."* The generosity of the Church was
speedily abused, and precautions against imposture
had to be devised. The use of " letters of commenda
tion* 't was introduced. Of these we have a specimen
in the Epistle to the Romans, " / commend unto you
Phcebe our sister^ who is a servant of the Church that
is at Cenchrece, that ye receive her in the Lord> worthily
of the saints, and that ye assist her in whatsoever
matter she may have need of you ; for she herself also
hath been a succourer of 'many ', and of mine own self"\
The Bishop was in the early Church specially charged
with the duty of organizing the hospitality of the
community over which he presided, and the memory
* HATCH, Bam f ton Lectures, p. 44.
t 2 Cor. iii. I. ^ ^77 xpyfojj.ev ti3s rives crvtrrartfcuw crtoroXwi1 TT/OOJ
u/tas ^ ££ u/iwi'. £ Rom. xvi. 1-3.
APOSTOLIC FINANCE 271
of the fact is still perpetuated in the question ad
dressed to the Bishop in the Consecration Service.
" Will you show yourself gentle, and be merciful for
Christ's sake to poor and needy people, and to all
strangers destitute of help ? " In the fourth century
we find " guest-houses " among the institutions of the
Church.
III. The maintenance of widows is proved by the
regulations on the matter contained in the pastoral
Epistles, and by the account of the institution of the
Seven Deacons in the sixth chapter of the Acts,
" Let none be enrolled as a widow under threescore
years old, having been the wife of one man, well-
reported of for good works ; if she hath brought up
children, if she hath used hospitality to strangers, if
she hath washed the saints feet, if she hath relieved
the afflicted, if she hath diligently followed every good
work'' *
IV. The relief of the poor, at all times a heavy
charge, was at intervals rendered extremely burden
some by sudden and extensive calamities. Such an in
terval of special trial had necessitated the "collection "
frequently referred to in the Corinthian Epistles. We
must remember that poverty was at that time exist
ing on a scale of which we now have no experience.
"It was the crisis of the economical history of the
Western world. There grew and multiplied a new
class in Graeco-Roman society — the class of paupers."
At a slightly later period the Roman Government
exerted itself with vigour to deal with this class.
Private benevolence seems to have co-operated with
* i Tim. v. 9, io.
272 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
the State ; but the economic condition of the Roman
Empire was incurably rotten, and all efforts were
unavailing against the decay of society from within.
Christianity, then, was born into a world groaning
under the problem of poverty, and it made special
appeal to the poverty-stricken ; the Church became
their natural home. The famous "community of
goods," of which we read in the Acts, and which
exercises so powerful a fascination over men's minds
still, at least testifies to the poverty of the earliest
converts, and the strenuous efforts made to relieve
it. In face of the silence of the Epistles, we should
scarcely be justified in understanding the narrative
in the Acts as meaning more than an extraordinary
outburst of liberality. It was a literal carrying out
by the richer Christians of Christ's counsel to the
young man with great possessions. " If ' thou wouldest
be perfect, go, sell that thou hast, and give to the poor,
and thou shalt have treasure in heaven; and come
follow Me'.' Almsgiving became the most indis
pensable of Christian virtues. Both S. James and
S. John propose it as the very test of genuine
discipleship. "If a brother or sister be naked" —
writes the former, and his words have a particular
importance as emanating from the very scene of the
so-called ' community of goods ' — " and in lack of daily
food, and one of you say unto them, Go in peace, be ye
warmed and filled; and yet ye give them not the
things needful to the body: what doth it profit? Even
so faith, if it have not works, is dead in itself''*
" Whoso hath the worlds goods " — writes the latter —
* James ii. 15, 16.
APOSTOLIC FINANCE 273
"and beholdetli his brother in need, and shutteth iip
his compassion from him, how doth the love of God
abide in him?"* The opinion of the sub- Apostolic
Church is reflected in these words of an anonymous
writer of the time, "Fasting is better than prayer,
almsgiving is better than fasting ; blessed is the man
who is found perfect therein, for almsgiving lightens
the weight of sin." f
V. Finally, there were the prisoners and other
victims of persecution. To these reference is made in
the Epistle to the Hebrews. "Remember them that
are in bonds ; as bound with them; them that are evil-
entreated, as being yourselves also in the body"\
Within the period covered by the Epistles per
secution on any general scale hardly existed ; later,
when the Imperial Power had thrown itself into the
attempt to violently suppress the Christian religion,
the care for the victims of persecution in the mines
and in the prisons, as also of the wives and children
deprived by the persecutor of their natural protectors,
became a matter of the first importance.
If these were the normal needs, what were the
normal sources of income? We may, I think, dis
tinguish three. In the first place, were the donations
of wealthy members of the Church. S. Timothy is
specially bidden to stir up the richer Christians to
the duty of munificent giving.
* i John iii. 17.
t Vide the so-called Second Epistle of Clement, c. 16. It may be
regarded as "the earliest Christian homily extant." Bishop Lightfoot
assigns
century."
$ xiii. 3.
T
274 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
" Charge them that are rich in this present world,
that they be not high-minded, nor have their hope set
on the uncertainty of riches, but on God, who giveth us
richly all things to enjoy : that they do good, that they
be rich in good works, that they be ready to distribute,
willing to communicate; laying up in store for them
selves a good foundation against the time to come, that
they may lay hold on the life which is life indeed?*
Especially in the first beginnings of the Church the
self-renouncing bounty of rich converts would be
the main financial resource. The occurrences at
Jerusalem were probably reproduced less conspic
uously elsewhere. " As many as were possessors of
lands or houses sold them, and brought the prices of the
things that were sold, and laid them at the Apostle's
feet; and distribution was made unto each, according
as anyone had need?\ But in the nature of things
this source of income could not permanently provide
for the needs of the Church. Rich enthusiasts, once
having resigned their property, could henceforth do
but little to meet an expenditure which would be
continually on the increase. The devotion of first
beginnings does not commonly survive them. As
the Church settled her organization on a normal
basis, she had need for another and securer source
of income. This she found in the regular offerings
of her members. The collection, which originally
was suggested by the distress of the famine-stricken
brethren in Judaea, would almost inevitably develop
into a permanent institution. " Now concerning the
collection (Xoy/a?) for the saints — writes S. Paul —
* i Tim. vi. 17-19. t Acts iv. 34, 35.
APOSTOLIC FINANCE 275
as I gave order (Siera^a) to the Churches of Galatia,
so also do ye. Upon the first day of the week let
each one of you lay by him (-Trap eaimo riOerw) in
store, as he may prosper, that no collections le made
when I come. And when I arrive ', whomsoever ye
shall approve by letters, them will I send to carry your
bounty unto Jerusalem; and if it be meet for me to
go also, they shall go with me"* This passage
deserves careful consideration. The object of the
collection is first stated: it is "for the saints" ; in
the Roman Epistle, where the same matter is dealt
with, it is more precisely stated to be "for the poor
among the saints that are at Jerusalem! 't S. Paul
characteristically places the collection on a basis of
principle. The Jews had a special claim on the
bounty of the Gentiles. "For if the Gentiles have been
made partakers of their spiritual things, they oive it
to them also to minister unto them in carnal things"
Perhaps we may again recognize the influence of
his Rabbinic training. We are told that " collections
were made among the Jews in foreign nations, for
the poor Rabbins dwelling in Judaea, in the same
manner as they were made among Christians in
foreign nations for the poor Jews converted to
Christianity in Judaea." \ Then the method of
making the collection is laid down. There is to
be a weekly offering proportioned to income as
reckoned by the Christian contributor in the sight of
God. The gift must be honestly assessed, willingly
given. "Let each man do according as he hath
* I Cor. xvi. 1-4. f Rom. xv. 26.
t Vide J. LIGHTFOOT, Works t vol. xii. p. 556. London, 1825.
276 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
purposed in his heart, not grudgingly or of necessity,
for God loveth a cheerful giver''* The Apostle
insists on the religious solemnity of these weekly
contributions. It does not seem clear whether the
Corinthians were to bring their weekly offerings
into the assembly, and there present them, or lay
them by at home against the Apostle's arrival. In
the next century the collection was, as it is still,
publicly made at the Holy Communion. S. Justin
describes it in these words, which will serve to
illustrate what we have said as to the expenditure
of the Church :-
" On the so-called day of the Sun there is a
meeting of all of us who live in cities or the country,
and the memoirs of the Apostles or the writings of
the prophets are read, as long as time allows. Then
when the reader has ceased, the president gives by
word of mouth his admonition and exhortation to
follow these excellent things. Afterwards we all
rise at once and offer prayers ; and, as I said, when
we have ceased to pray, bread is brought, and wine
and water, and the president likewise offers up
prayers and thanksgivings to the best of his power,
and the people assents with its Amen. Then follows
the distribution to each and the partaking of that
for which thanks were given, and to them that are
absent a portion is sent by the hand of the deacons.
Of those that are well-to-do and willing every one
gives what he will according to his own purpose,
and the collection is deposited with the president,
and he it is that succours orphans and widows, and
* 2 Cor. ix. 7.
APOSTOLIC FINANCE 277
those that are in want through sickness or any other
cause, and those that are in bonds, and the strangers
that are sojourning, and in short he has the care of
all that are in need." (Apol. i. c. 67.) This passage
was written rather less than a century after S. Paul
wrote the Corinthian Epistles, and it may be taken
to represent fairly the practice of the sub- Apostolic
Church.
It is eminently deserving notice how carefully the
Apostle provides for the efficient administration of
the money collected. The Corinthians are to elect
persons in whom they had confidence, and to these
the charge of the money is to be entrusted. S. Paul
will not run any risks of suspicion which has even
a semblance of justification. " Whomsoever ye shall
approve by letters, them will I send to carry your
bounty to Jerusalem'' He states the principle on
which he acted in the second Epistle, " avoiding this,
that any man should blame us in the matter of this
bounty which is ministered by us : for we take thought
for things honourable, not only in the sight of the Lord>
but also in the sight of men''* It had been well for
the Church if this Apostolic principle had been
allowed to govern her finance. Unhappily the
precise contrary has been the case. Ecclesiastical
finance is commonly a by-word among business men
for incompetence, extravagance, and a species of
unctuous dishonesty. That this impression rather
represents the past than the present is, I think,
certain ; the system on which the special funds
(for the rest is in chaos) of the Church are now
* 2 Cor. viii. 20, 21.
2/8 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
managed is framed on business models, and often
administered by able men of business. But as
much cannot be said for the countless semi-religious
schemes of benevolence, which raise and expend
immense sums of money. It is the duty of every man
who cares for the good name of religion and the
interest of philanthropy to withhold support from
all financially unsatisfactory projects of piety or
benevolence. The greatest possible publicity ought
always to attach to the management of public funds.
Unhappily the finance of the Church is still to the
mass of men a veiled and suspected mystery. The
most vigilant guard should be maintained against
anything which can wound consciences or provoke
contemptuous criticism. Now the clergy, in their
efforts to raise funds for Church work, are everywhere
emulating the arts of the cheap-jack and the ad
vertising agent We can imagine the indignant
amazement with which S. Paul would have con
templated a modern bazaar. What words of strong
scorn would have rushed from his lips ! It may
fairly be questioned whether the Church would not
better fulfil her mission by worshipping again, as
at the first, in private houses and beneath the open
heaven, than by so degrading herself in order to
raise money for costly fabrics. But the blame must
not fall on the clergy alone. Let blame fall on them
in the first place, but let some censure be reserved
for the Christian laity, whose languid zeal for Christ
will not be moved to action without the excitement
of sham-commerce and the stimulus of real folly.
Finally, I think, it is not excessive to suppose that,
APOSTOLIC FINANCE 279
at least in Jewish circles, the resident ministry were
held to succeed to the claim of the Mosaic priesthood
in the matter of " tithes and first-fruits" It is possible,
perhaps probable, that this claim only obtained
practical recognition after the destruction of Jeru
salem, and the practical abolition of Judaism which
that tremendous catastrophe involved. In any case
The Teaching of the Twelve Apostles is evidence of
the claim in the sub-Apostolic Church.
" But every true prophet who wishes to settle
among you is worthy of his food.
" Likewise a true teacher is himself worthy, like
the workman of his food.
" Therefore thou shalt take and give all the first
fruit of the produce of the wine-press and threshing-
floor, of oxen and sheep, to the prophets, for they
are your chief priests.
" But if ye have no prophets, give to the poor."*
The financial aspect of ministerial claims is not
the highest or noblest aspect of the subject, but
it is an aspect which cannot be wholly ignored.
I am not one of those who pitch the financial
standard very high. Maintenance does not mean
more than maintenance, though that must (unless
the efficiency of the clergy is to diminish) include
provision for intellectual as well as merely physical
needs. I have ventured to urge in season, and (as
some might say) out of season, the urgent need for
more simplicity of life and self-restraint among the
clergy. No one will accuse me of an excessive
ardour for clerical privileges and clerical rights.
* Chap. xiii.
280 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY .
Therefore, perhaps, I may be permitted to point to
the spiritual mischiefs which are plainly resulting
from clerical poverty, and which must become worse
as time advances. Is it nothing that the ambassadors
of heaven are broken down with domestic anxieties,
that teachers should be distracted by the menace of
want, that Christ's witnesses should be too poor to be
brave, too dependent to be faithful ?
Let it be frankly admitted that the clergy at their
Ordination ought to renounce, and ought to be under
stood to have renounced what, in common parlance,
are called " professional prospects." I resent very
strongly those comparisons between the Church and
the " other professions," which imply the claim of the
clergyman to regard his sacred calling as a means of
money-making in the same sense as is legitimate and
right in the case of the lawyer or the doctor. I think
the clergyman should have as few domestic ties as
possible. Improvident marriages are doubly blame
worthy in a clergyman, and the laity who encourage
or excuse such marriages offend against the best
interests of the Church. Bearing this in mind, the
case is yet stronger for the maintenance of the clergy
in physical and mental efficiency. An inefficient
clergy is manifestly a grave injury to religion. And
an underbred, uneducated, I might even say in view
of the facts which have come to light recently, an
underfed and underclothed clergy, must be an in
efficient clergy. The ultimate sufferer is the Church
herself. It is surely a time when every Christian
ought to examine his own conscience on the subject.
Tithes and first-fruits are for most modern church-
APOSTOLIC FINANCE 281
men a name and nothing more. The dwindling rent-
charge which endows some of the parishes takes
nothing out of any man's pocket save in a sense
that is true of every lawful due. But the duty to
regularly contribute according to income rests on
every disciple, and to neglect that duty must inflict
on the negligent or niggardly Christian grave spiritual
loss. The time has come in the Church of England
for plain speaking on the subject. Unless there is
a general and speedy awakening of the Christian
conscience, and, as a result, a large increase in the
regular contributions of churchmen to the income
of the Church, it is as certain as any future event can
be, that within the next generation the area of
Christian work will be seriously contracted, and its
quality gravely, if not irreparably injured.
CHAPTER IX.
CONCLUSIONS
THE first impression left on the mind by an
inquiry into the Christianity of the Apostolic
age is probably one of unpleasant surprise. Most
men appeal to the New Testament in the interest
either of their own system of faith and order or of
their denunciation of all existing systems. The
advocates of a system will hardly be satisfied with
the witness of the Apostolic age ; the advocates of
individualism will hardly be satisfied either. There
was a very vigorous Church system in the Apostolic
age, but it was very unlike any system with which
we are acquainted. This unlikeness of original
Christianity to any modern counterpart is not wholly
to the disadvantage of our own time. The Apos
tolic Church as revealed in the Corinthian Epistles
was far indeed from perfection. Gross moral scandals
existed ; the members were by no means free from
the spirit of rivalry and hatred ; the " unity of the
Body of Christ" was more apparent than real.
There was much superstition even in those first
days, and it would be difficult to find any sufficient
parallel in subsequent ages to the shocking profanities
282
CONCLUSIONS 283
which marked the Corinthian Eucharist* Those
who expect to find their ecclesiastical ideal in the
Apostolic age will be rudely disappointed. It is,
indeed, often the case that uninstructed students,
reading the New Testament with little understanding
of its contents, are apt to think of that period as
a golden age, which provokes the envy while it
rebukes the corruptions of all succeeding times.
The intelligent student, however, will escape that
error.
The habitual assumption of ecclesiastical advocates,
that the Church of Christ started on its history with
a complete equipment of organization, of which,
forsooth, their own system — Papal, or Episcopalian,
or Congregational or the like — is the sole existing
representative, is disallowed by a serious study of
Apostolic Christianity. We see a Church in the
process of reaching an organization, and we mark
the pressure of circumstances as the principal ex
ternal agent in that process. We see that while
most later polities can find their germs in the
Apostolic Church, none can find their model. The
authority of original Christianity cannot be un
reservedly claimed on behalf of any existing Church
* The nearest parallel I can think of is the Test Act Communion
of the last century, the evil effects of which are still perceptible.
I attribute to the disgust provoked in pious minds by that official
profanation of the Eucharist the powerful but unreasoning reluctance
of many excellent and in all other respects Christian men to receive
the Holy Sacrament. They unconsciously perpetuate the notion, which
had but too much justification a century ago, that "going to the table"
was the mark of the loose liver and the mere worldling ; argued, in fact,
a low level of spiritual sincerity.
284 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
order. It must suffice that that authority is friendly,
or at least not adverse.
Of two opposing conceptions of the Church, I
venture to affirm that they are condemned by the
witness of Apostolic Christianity. The modern
Roman theory, which bases unity on common
obedience to a visible, earthly Head, is not merely
ignored, but also positively contradicted by the
New Testament. That S. Paul should denounce
the schismatic tendencies of his Corinthian converts,
that he should urge the sinfulness of division and
dilate on the unity of the Church as Christ's Body,
and should never so much as hint at the existence
of any centre of unity, Divinely provided in the
person of S. Peter and his successors, is sufficient
proof that he himself had no knowledge that any
such existed. This, however, is not all ; his doctrine
about the Church precludes the existence of any
visible centre of unity. What room can be found
for the Roman doctrine in such a passage as this,
in which the Apostle specifically declares the con
stituents of the Church's unity, " There is one body,
and one Spirit, even as also ye were called in one hope
of your calling : one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one
God and Father of all, Who is over all, and through
a!/, and in all."* It is no answer to my contention
to adduce the verse in the Gospel in which our
Saviour declared that He would build His Church
on S. Peter, or on S. Peter's faith, or on S. Peter's
confession (for the verse has never been unanimously
understood, and probably never will be). My purpose
* Eph. iv. 4.
CONCLUSIONS 285
in this volume has been, apart from all prejudice, to
see what the Apostolic Church was, and what it
believed. The Gospels give place to the Epistles in
that inquiry. You may make what you will of
Christ's words to S. Peter, I point out to you that
in the Apostolic age nobody suspected that they
carried the modern Roman sense.*
Further, the notion of an invisible Church, which
has no necessary Sacraments and no Divinely ordered
ministry (which is essentially the doctrine of the
Plymouth Brethren and the Quakers), finds no
support in the Apostolic age. The ministry and
the Sacraments evidently held a great place in the
Christianity of the Apostles. To go no farther than
the Corinthian Epistles, it is plain that a Christianity
which dispenses with an ordained ministry, and
despises visible Sacraments, would have seemed a
strange thing both to the Corinthians and to the
Apostle. The circumstances of the Corinthian
Church led S. Paul to speak at some length on the
character and claims of the Christian ministry, and
on the awful dignity of the Sacraments. To this
cause we owe the careful teachings on those subjects
which mark his Epistles to the Corinthians. Thus
* Not long ago I attended a meeting at which Father Rivington
ventured some courageous statements as to the Roman claims. Sub
sequently I was allowed to ask a question, and I asked " Whether
he could name a single passage in the Epistles which even remotely
suggested that the Apostolic Church recognized any supremacy in
S. Peter, such as is assumed by modern Roman Catholics?" He
replied, "The Gospels are quite sufficient for me." Of course, the
whole issue is what the Petrine texts in the Gospels really mean ; and
in deciding that issue the silence of the Epistles is absolutely decisive
so far as the Roman interpretation is concerned.
286 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
of the ministry, " Let a man so account of us, as of
ministers of Christ, and stewards of the mysteries of
God" " God hath set some in the Church, first
Apostles, secondly prophets, thirdly teachers? "Even
so did the Lord ordain that they which preach the
gospel should live of the Gospel? If S. Paul was
right in thus maintaining that the regular Christian
ministry had a Divine institution, was responsible to
God alone, and by Christ's express commandment
was maintained by the Church in order to confine
itself to its sacred work, then it seems evident that
the Plymouth Brother is wrong in rejecting that
ministry.
So of the Sacraments, they are essential to the
Christianity of S. Paul. "/# one Spirit were we
all baptized into one body, whether Jews or Greeks,
whether bond or free." Nor can the notion that the
Apostle refers to some wholly inward experience be
entertained for one moment. When he indignantly
asks the Corinthians, " Were ye baptized into the name
of Paul?" he is clearly referring to their public
Baptism into the Divine Name. When he says to
them, " Ye were washed, ye were sanctified, ye were
justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ, and in
the Spirit of our God" he is plainly pointing them
back to that solemn moment of their Baptism, when
they were admitted into Christ's Church, and began
their new life of discipleship. Of the Holy Com
munion S. Paul had to speak much, for the worst
abuses of the Corinthians had gathered round that
Sacrament. Their divisions and their sensuality
argued a strange contempt of that which Christ
CONCLUSIONS 287
instituted as the bond of unity and the means of
purifying grace.
" The cup of blessing which we bless, is it not a
communion of the Blood of Christ? The bread which
we break, is it not a communion of the Body of Christ?
seeing that we, who are many, are one bread, one body ;
for we all partake of the one bread'' S. Paul rehearses
the institution of the Eucharist, and then declares
the meaning of the Sacrament. " For as often as
ye eat this bread and drink the cup, ye proclaim the
Lords death till He come" It is, I think, manifest
that those modern Christians — whether Quakers or
Salvationists, or howsoever called — who reject the
Sacraments are acting in direct opposition to the
Apostolic Church.
Our inquiries will, on the whole, make us very
tolerant of diversities of religious practice, so long
as they do not involve any offence against essential
Christianity. We shall hold somewhat lightly by
ecclesiastical customs, however venerable and con
venient ; and certainly we shall be vigilant against
claiming for them an authority which they do not
really possess. But we shall take a very grave view
of any conduct which tends to break up the unity
of the Church. Especially shall we deprecate the
notion that it is a matter of indifference whether or
not Christians come together for common worship.
We shall be very sceptical of a unity which can
rest content with breaches of external communion ;
but we shall not exaggerate the real value of an
external unity. The schismatical spirit within the
Corinthian Church had not actually broken up the
288 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
visible fellowship, but it had robbed that fellowship
of meaning. The schismatical spirit, which at bottom
is the spirit of mere self-assertion, the very opposite
of that fraternal spirit which should inspire the
family of God, may co-exist with a very strong
sense of the importance of external unity. The
only effectual remedy for that besetting malady is
the cultivation of the Divine virtue of love or charity.
We observe in the Apostolic Church that the ten
dency which we may call Congregationalism was
powerful, and that it was steadily resisted by
S. Paul. The Church cannot be limited to a place
or a nation ; the general practice and belief of
Christians constitute an authority which must not
be ignored or lightly resisted.
Our inquiry will certainly have helped us to get
a just perspective of Christianity. We can see that
the essence of Christ's Religion was, in the first days,
believed to consist pre-eminently in an honest service
of a living Master and Lord. Doctrines which, in
later times, have been made the tests of Christian
fellowship were then unknown. It is not necessarily
to be inferred that such doctrines are false. They
may be, and in some cases plainly are, inevitably
developed products of the earlier stage. But in some
cases the attitude and spirit of the Apostolic Church
are plainly incompatible with the later doctrines.
To give but two sufficient examples : The Roman
teaching about the Virgin Mary cannot be reconciled
with the New Testament. The position of woman
in the Church was a subject of urgent concern at
Corinth. S. Paul was directly requested to deal
CONCLUSIONS 289
with it ; and he does so in the first Corinthian
Epistle with great care. Is it conceivable that if
he had held the modern Roman view of S. Mary
he could have totally excluded her name from his
argument? In the Epistles to the Romans and
the Galatians S. Paul treats at length of the Redemp
tion. He draws out the famous parallel between the
first Adam and the second ; but never once does he
make any more specific reference to S. Mary than
the general statement that Christ was " born of a
woman'' Is it conceivable that the Apostle could
have thus avoided all direct mention of the Blessed
Virgin if he had believed her to be, as modern
Roman preachers declare, the " second Eve," the
sinless Mother of the new creation ? The present
Pope has recently informed us that to hope for
salvation without praying for S. Mary's help is as
reasonable as to seek to fly without wings. Is it
not answer enough to point to these Epistles,
wherein the whole subject of salvation is discussed
by Apostles, and where S. Mary's name is never
once mentioned? Apostolic Christianity was inno
cent of Mariolatry.
My other instance is of another kind. There
are numerous Christians who maintain that a true
believer can never fail of salvation ; some would
also say that he can never fall into sin. Such
teaching is condemned by an appeal to Apostolic
Christianity. What meaning could attach to the
earnest and anxious warnings with which the
Epistles are filled if they to whom those Epistles
were addressed neither did sin, nor could sin ? It
U
290 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
is evident on the face of the New Testament, that
the Christians whose spiritual state is therein dis
played were men to whom discipleship meant no
abrupt and easy passage from sin to holiness, but
rather men who were committed to a sustained and
difficult conflict with evil, who often failed, who
sometimes failed scandalously and even irrecoverably,
but who never lost the sense of conflict, as the very
first consequence of their Christian profession. The
student of Apostolic Christianity will have learned
nothing if he has not learned this. To be a Christian
before all things meant to live righteously, to bring
life under the government of Christ's Law, to act
with habitual reference to Christ's return to judgment.
The Apostolic age had its difficult problems ; they
were not precisely the same problems as those which
face men now, but they were certainly not less grave
and perplexing. They were solved — not easily, not
without preliminary essays at solution which failed,
never without much effort and anxiety. For the
Apostolic age was pre-eminently the age of the
Holy Spirit. Christians lived, and acted, and made
decisions, and tried experiments, and started institu
tions, and shaped their whole religious polity under
the overmastering conviction that the Spirit of God
was living in the Church and governing it. Here
is the real superiority of Apostolic Christianity. In
spite of many faults and much scandal it was a
genuinely spiritual thing. The very extravagances,
which S. Paul rebukes, reveal the ardour of Christian
enthusiasm and the strength of Christian conviction.
To the Apostolic Church, perhaps, we may apply the
CONCLUSIONS 291
words which Christ spoke of the penitent woman in
the Pharisee's house, " Her sins, which are many, are
forgiven : for she loved much!' Love to Jesus Christ,
necessarily expressing itself in love towards the
brethren and towards all men, was the vital prin
ciple of Apostolic Christianity. " If any man loveth
not the Lord, let him be anathema" Those first
Christians lived almost in the shadow of the Cross of
Calvary, on which the measureless love of Christ had
been displayed, and their Christianity drew its energy
from the fact. S. Paul tells us that he found in the
" Word of the Cross" the one prevailing argument.
At Corinth especially he had proved its power.
" / determined not to know anything among you,
save Jesus Christ, and Him crucified!' so he sum
marizes his preaching to the Corinthians. He can
not, of course, mean that throughout his eighteen
months' stay in Corinth he never spoke of anything
save of Christ's death. We can gather from the
Epistles that his teaching covered the whole field
of faith and conduct, but he means that the inspiring
motive which he always proposed, the basis of all his
doctrine, the consideration which he always urged
was this : Jesus Christ's love for sinners shown by the
Crucifixion. He spoke with convincing force, for he
spoke from a full heart. His own religion had had
no other source ; his own spiritual conflict was waged
by no other inspiration. " For the love of Christ
constraineth us : because we thus judge, that one died
for all, therefore all died: and He died for all, that
they which live should no longer live unto themselves,
but unto Him who for their sakes died and rose again''
292 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
He built his appeals on this foundation. Christian
liberty must yield to a more pathetic claim. "Through
thy knowledge he that is weak perisheth, the brother for
whose sake Christ died" Christian liberality must
flow at the bidding of that August Example. " For
ye know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ \ that
though He was rich, yet for your sakes He became
poor, that ye through His poverty might become rick"
The Church is venerable and sacred, for it is Christ's
Body; the Holy Sacrament is awful, for it is the
Lord's Supper. The clergy are clothed with au
thority, for they are "ambassadors on behalf of
Christ" The ordinary physical activities of human
life are sacred, for the Christian's body is a " member
of Christ" The slave can cheerfully bear his bond
age, for he is the Lord's freedman. Apparent failure
need not discourage, for "ye know that your labour is
not vain in the Lord" Death has no terrors for the
loyal disciple, for he would much rather " be absent
from the body, and at home with the Lord" But life
with its duties, and opportunities, and claims, and
problems is a solemn thing, for " we must all be made
manifest before the judgment-seat of Christ ; that each
one may receive the things done in the body, according
to what He hath done, whether it be good or bad"
Christ fills the whole horizon of Apostolic Chris
tianity : therefore if love of Christ be absent, the
very possibility of discipleship is lacking. "If any
man loveth not the Lord, let him be anathema"
Here I would find the moral of the history ; I
would make this the practical inference. If we
would indeed vindicate our lineage from the Apostolic
CONCLUSIONS 293
Church, we too must fill our spiritual horizon with
Jesus Christ. Hitherto we have been forcing before
men other things, true, precious, even necessary in
their place, but as we present them — torn out of their
religious context, separated from their true con
nexions, stripped of their real justifications — both
unintelligible and unprofitable. The Church, the
Sacraments, the priesthood, the Bible, the preaching
— these are paraded before the eyes of men, who,
whether they know it or not, are longing for Jesus
Christ. Cardinal Manning somewhere relates that
he was deeply shocked by reading of a large public
meeting in America where the Church was hissed
and the name of Jesus received with cheers. I have
myself heard a great assembly of self-styled Secu
larists in East London cheer our Saviour with obvious
sincerity. There is a very deep truth, however dis
creditable to us Christians, revealed by this attitude.
Jesus Christ and Him crucified must come first and
remain first. On that foundation the rest can be
builded ; apart from that foundation the rest is
positively mischievous.
And here also is our one hope of reunion. It
is vain to put forward schemes of comprehension by
which men are invited to compromise in the sphere
of religion where compromise is treason. But let us
all, whatever our religious preferences, whatever our
denominational description, set Jesus Christ and Him
crucified in the supreme place, and insist on every
thing being justified with reference to Him, and
upon the darkness of our divisions the day-star of
unity will begin to rise. For everything will find
294 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
its true level and be seen in its true proportions. A
mightier force than that of religious preferences, or
than that of sectarian loyalty, will bear upon us,
humbling our pride, enlightening our ignorance,
abashing our prejudices, enkindling our affections —
the force of Jesus crucified. When we bring all
our mutual condemnations under this sufficient,
Apostolic sentence, " If any man loveth not the Lord
let him be anathema " — for him in our Church fellow
ship we have no place, — we shall not be far from
uniting in the Apostolic salutation, " Grace be with
all tJtem that love our Lord Jesus Christ in uncorrupt-
ness" — of such, however ignorant and wrongheaded,
we can spare none, for such, however we regard them,
or they describe themselves, are disciples of Jesus,
and members of His mystical body. "No man can
say, Jesus is Lord, but in the Holy Spirit"
APPENDICES
I. ST. PAUL'S TEACHING AT CORINTH
II. APOSTOLIC SUCCESSION
III. CONFESSION
IV. CELIBACY
APPENDIX I.
S. PAUL'S TEACHING AT CORINTH
IN the Acts (chap, xviii.) we learn that S. Paul's sojourn
in Corinth lasted for no less than eighteen months, and
that it fell into two distinct periods. In the first and
shortest the Apostle "reasoned in the synagogue every
Sabbath, and persuaded Jews and Greeks." Opposition
was violent and unscrupulous, and it was met by an
unusual vehemence on the part of S. Paul, which reached
a climax on the arrival of Silas and Timothy from Mace
donia, presumably with tidings of Jewish persecutions.
11 Paul was constrained (arvv€i\m) by the Word, testifying
to the Jews that Jesus was the Christ." His new vigour
brought matters to the crisis which occasioned the public
and formal separation of disciples from the synagogue,
and their organization as a Christian Ecclesia, which met
at the house of Titus Justus. Then the second and
longest period of the Corinthian sojourn began. It is
evident that the Apostle was convinced of the decisive
importance of his own action at this time. The history
of the independent Christian Ecclesia was inaugurated
by a special Divine intervention, in which S. Paul was
commanded to go forward with his undertaking, and
assured of God's protection and assistance. Relying on
this supernatural assurance he continued in Corinth for
a long time, " teaching the Word of God." What was the
297
298 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
range and character of that long course of teaching?
That it was far more extensive and detailed than is
commonly thought may perhaps be inferred from the
contemptuous language of Gallio. The Jews brought a
perplexing mass of complaints before the proconsul, which
he could only describe as " questions about words and
names, and your own law." The indirect evidence of the
Epistles to the Corinthians confirms this inference. There
is (with the exception of i Cor. xv., which stands quite by
itself) very little deliberate theological instruction in these
Epistles, but they assume a very considerable theological
knowledge. It would seem that S. Paul's teaching had
included the following : —
1. TJie Evangelic Tradition— the Life, Passion, Death,
Resurrection, Ascension of Christ.
2. Interpretation of the Old Testament in the light of
Christian Belief. See especially i Cor. x. i-i i ; 2 Cor. iii.
3. A detailed doctrine of the Person and Work of our
Saviour. It must be remembered that the great theological
treatise, the Epistle to the Romans, and what may be
almost described as its rough draft, the Epistle to the
Galatians, belong to the same chronological group with
the Corinthian Epistles, and may be taken to illustrate
them. i Cor. i. 30 assumes a large background of
theological knowledge. " But of Him (i.e., God) are ye
in Christ Jesus, Who was made unto us wisdom from
God, and righteousness, and sanctification, and redemp
tion." The great key words of the Pauline theology are
here found in the least theological of his Epistles.
SiKcuocrwr/, ayccur/xos, aTroAtrr/Daxris.
4. A very definite and rich teaching about the Holy
Spirit. S. Paul never thinks it necessary to explain his
references to the Spirit, which are numerous, e.g., i Cor. ii.
10-16; iii. 16; vi. n, 19; xii. Necessarily resulting from
S. PAUL'S TEACHING AT CORINTH 299
this we find that Trinitarian doctrine of a very positive
kind was familiar to the Corinthians. The formula,
2 Cor. xiii. 14, implies a very definite and coherent
Trinitarian belief.
5. Eschatological doctrine, e.g., iii. 13-15; vi. 2, 3. The
most probable explanation of this passage understands a
reference to the final consummation. The point to be
noticed is the quiet assumption that the Corinthians were
quite familiar with the subject. " Know ye not that the
saints shall judge the world? . . . Know ye not that we
shall judge angels?" The Epistles to the Thessalonians
were written during the Apostle's stay at Corinth, and
they are very rich in eschatological suggestions.
6. Careful moral teaching, especially in connexion with
the Sacrament of Holy Baptism.
7. Ecclesiastical customs, the Tra/aaSdcrcis which the
Apostle had delivered to the Corinthians, i Cor. xi. i ;
cf. 2 Thess. iii. 6.
The formula "Know ye not?" occurs no less than ten
times in the first Epistle to the Corinthians. It has been
suggested that it ought to be understood as a specific
reference to Apostolic teachings, but an examination of
the passages in which it appears prohibits this. They
are the following: iii. 16; v. 6; vi. 2, 3, 9, 15, 16, 19;
ix. 13, 24.
APPENDIX II.
APOSTOLIC SUCCESSION
IT can hardly be disputed by any well-informed student
that the conventional Anglican teaching about the
Apostolic Succession is in many respects gravely objection
able.* It states boldly as a fact what is at best a probable
supposition, and it is made to carry the burden of practical
inferences so serious that nothing but the clearest and
most convincing proofs could sufficiently commend them
to the acceptance of thoughtful Christians. It ought to
be admitted that in its crude traditional form the doctrine
* Such teaching as that given on "The Ministry of the Church," in
a popular and in many respects excellent manual, by the Rev. VERNON
STALEY, The Catholic Religion. What could be more arbitrary than
this : " The only possible meaning of the saying, f Lo I am with you
always, even unto the end of the world,' is this. ' I will be with the
ministry of which you are but the first members. I will be with you,
and not only with you, but also with all who shall come after you in
the ministry. You will die, but your office will live on, and I will be
with that office in the persons of your successors, even unto the end of
the world.' Thus we have the great promise on which the doctrine of
the Apostolic Succession rests" (p. 20). It is held by many inter
preters that the promise of Christ was addressed to the general
company of the disciples, whose presence is hinted at in verse 17
("some doubted"). It is simply not true that the passage admits
of no other meaning than that stated. The words are not the com
missioning of an order, but of a society. They are quite compatible
with the view that the inspired society may develop organizations
of teaching and government to match its necessities ; and, in fact, this
is the testimony of Church History.
300
APOSTOLIC SUCCESSION 301
of Apostolic Succession is subsequent to the Apostolic
Age. Only with very large deductions can we allow the
truth of the familiar Embertide hymn : —
" His twelve Apostles first He made
His ministers of grace,
And they their hands on others laid
To fill in turn their place."
For the Apostles, strictly speaking, had no successors.
Their functions were unique and incommunicable. In a
more general sense the Christian ministry, however desig
nated or organized, stands in the Apostolic Succession.
The crucial question is, Have we any sufficient grounds
for pleading Apostolic authority in its extremest, most
obligatory shape for that type of ecclesiastical order which
we now call Episcopal ? That the threefold ministry can
be traced in a continuous line to Apostolic times is now
generally admitted ; that any other type of ecclesiastical
order can be so traced may be securely denied; but,
though these facts do undoubtedly confer on the Episcopal
regime a prestige, a value, and an interest which are unique,
can it be reasonably maintained that they justify the rigid
and tremendous conclusion that non-Episcopal ministries
are necessarily invalid ? Since it is certain that the three
fold ministry is not absolutely coeval with the Church,
and since it is admittedly not based on any known com
mandment of Christ, can it be justly claimed that now the
threefold ministry belongs to the " esse " of the Church ?
These questions seem equally difficult and important.
For the higher the theory of the Church the greater must
be the authority of its permanent agreements, and the
threefold ministry certainly represents one of the most
permanent of all such agreements. The Divine Right
of the ministry as certified by the Episcopal Succession
302 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
from the Apostles was never questioned from the second
century to the sixteenth. It would seem that to abandon
a system so long-standing could hardly fail to involve the
gravest spiritual consequences. But the commentary of
nearly four centuries on the Reformation does not seem
to correspond with the requirements of the rigid Episcopal
theory. Christianity, it is contended, has been most
Apostolic outside the Apostolic Succession, most Christian
outside the sphere of Sacramental grace. This is an
exaggeration of facts which, exaggeration apart, must be
faced.
There is, of course, another side to the question. The
witness of the last four centuries is by no means uniformly
favourable to " Protestantism." Ecclesiastical anarchy is
seen to have evils of its own scarcely less baleful than
those of hierarchic absolutism. The decay of the Christian
character through sectarian competition and conflict is
hardly less ruinous than the debasement of the Christian
life by ignorance and superstition. But this must be
allowed. The evils of Protestant anarchy are very gener
ally admitted, and are on the way to be overcome. The
nineteenth century is more united and charitable than the
seventeenth; but the evils of absolutism, at least so far
as the Roman Church represents absolutism, seem to grow
more inveterate and baleful. The Christianity of Southern
Europe and Southern America is perhaps less intellectual
and moral to-day than in the seventeenth century. On the
whole view of the last four centuries I think it must be
admitted that non-Episcopalian Christianity has proved its
power to stand the moral test of discipleship proposed by
our Lord at least as well as Episcopalian. Its "fruits,"
religious, social, political, intellectual, are indisputable. We
are, then, driven to ask, How far shall all this affect our
doctrine of Apostolic Succession? Is the "Witness of
APOSTOLIC SUCCESSION 303
History " valid up to the sixteenth century and not beyond ?
Is the development of the Christian Ecclesia to be ar
bitrarily arrested at the second century or the fourth?
The Roman Church seems to stand for a truth when she
answers in the negative these questions, though her arbi
trary application of the truth she admits robs her admission
of practical result. At all hazards it would seem that a
living belief in the Church, as a Divinely Inspired Society,
must require a willingness to revise past conclusions by
present experience. It seems involved in the conviction
that the Holy Spirit is continuously present in the Church,
that we should give the greatest importance to the latest
Christian experience. For that must be supposed to reflect
His most recent guidance. Definitions must be adequate,
if they are to be received as true. The strict conventional
Episcopalian definition of the Church is ceasing to be
adequate ; the probability is that within a few generations
it will become as patently inadequate as the kindred
Roman definition. Probably, however, both definitions
are rather lightly held. Men may be illogical, they are
rarely in large numbers consciously absurd.
For the present, perhaps, the wisest course for the
modest churchman is (i) to loyally adhere to the system
of his own church; (2) to abstain from any positive
condemnation of other ecclesiastical systems, except in so
far as they advance exclusive claims ; (3) to frankly
recognize the " fruits of the Spirit " wherever manifested ;
(4) to discourage all proselytizing as between Christian
denominations ; (5) to gladly unite in combined action
with other Christians wherever such union does not hurt
consciences and involve insincerity.
Jeremy Taylor's contemptuous description of proselytizing
might be usefully studied by the bustling zealots of our
own day.
304 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
" . . . it is enough to weary the spirit of a disputer, that
he shall argue till he hath lost his voice, and his time, and
sometimes the question too; and yet no man shall be of
his mind more than was before. How few turn Lutherans,
or Calvinists, or Roman Catholics, from the religion either
of their country or interest ! Possibly two or three weak
or interested, fantastic and easy, prejudicate and effeminate
understandings, pass from church to church, upon grounds
as weak as those, for which formerly they did dissent ; and
the same arguments are good or bad, as exterior accidents
or interior appetites shall determine. I deny not but, for
great causes, some opinions are to be quitted ; but when I
consider how few do forsake any, and when any do, often
times they choose the wrong side, and they that take the
righter do it so by contingency, and the advantage is also so
little, I believe that the triumphant persons have but small
reason to please themselves in gaining proselytes, since
their purchase is so small, and as inconsiderable to their
triumph as it is unprofitable to them who change for the
worse or for the better upon unworthy motives. In all this
there is nothing certain, nothing noble. But he that follows
the work of God, that is, labours to gain souls, not to a sect
and a subdivision, but to the Christian Religion, that is, to
the faith and obedience of the Lord Jesus, hath a promise
to be assisted and rewarded ; and all those that go to
heaven are the purchase of such undertakings, the fruit
of such culture and labours : for it is only a holy life that
lands us there." — Dedication of the Life of Christ;
Works , vol. ii. p. 12. London, 1828.
The conscience of Christendom is certainly being deeply
moved on the subject of religious division. The desire for
a worthier expression in the external sphere of that " unity
of the Spirit " which all Christians profess is forcing all
devout disciples to criticise with anxious severity the
APOSTOLIC SUCCESSION 305
stumbling-blocks to fellowship. The exclusive claims of
types of ecclesiastical order constitute, perhaps, the most
obdurate and general of such stumbling-blocks. Most of
those claims are certainly false, all are probably exaggerated,
all may be ultimately found to be baseless. In any case, it
must be a good thing that we should consider them with
the grave consciousness of their practical effects, and an
entire willingness to abandon them if the duty of Disciple-
ship, that is, the Interest of Truth, so require.
APPENDIX III.
CONFESSION
IT is well known that in the earliest church the practice
of private confession to the individual priest did not
exist.* It was not until the fifth century that it received
official recognition ; it was not until the thirteenth that, in
the West, it was made compulsory. The inference is very
commonly drawn that any insistence on the practice must
be regarded as an unwarrantable infringement of Christian
liberty, and therefore to be firmly resisted.
It is not, however, sufficiently remembered that private
confession to the Christian minister, though -itself a
comparatively modern practice, represents an important and
indeed essential element of discipleship as conceived in
the Apostolic age. The mode of confession, whether
public or private, whether made in presence of the
congregation or in that of the priest, is, after all, a matter
of secondary importance. In some mode confession of
sins is necessary, in some sense the Church is endowed
with "the power of the keys," by some means the
" ministry of reconciliation " must be fulfilled by the
ordained ministry. The grave fact is that vast numbers of
* The history of the practice is traced in the article "Exomologesis"
in Dictionary of Christian Antiquity ', where references are given. See
also Bishop Reichel's sermon on "Confession" in Cathedral and
University Sermons, pp. 266-302, for a learned and fair statement of the
case against the practice.
306
CONFESSION 307
modern Christians have largely lost all real conception
of repentance, that in repudiating (rightly enough) the
exaggerated and mechanical procedure of the Mediaeval
Church, they have provided for themselves no alternative
discipline. Moreover, it ought not to be forgotten that
private confession to the Christian minister has the
sanction of many centuries and many saints. It is not too
much to say that it is commended by the general ex
perience and the holiest examples of the Christian Society.
Yet it is very evident that much dislike exists among
English churchmen to a religious practice which is allowed,
and, under certain circumstances, recommended in the
Prayer Book. I am not here concerned with the subject
of private confession, save in so far as it represents an
element of Apostolic Christianity.
Open acknowledgment of faults in the presence of others
was certainly practised among the Jews, and adopted into
the regular custom of the infant Church. Two passages
seem to be conclusive on this point.
(i) S. James v. 14-16. "Is any among you sick? let
him call for the elders (TOVS irpto-fivTepovs) of the Church ;
and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in
the name of the Lord : and the prayer of faith shall save
him that is sick, and the Lord shall raise him up; and
if he have committed sins (a/ia/rrias), it shall be for
given him. Confess, therefore, your sins one to another,
(e£o/zoA.oy€icr#e ovv dAAvjAois ra? ajuaprt'as), and pray one
for another, that ye may be healed (ta$Jre)." It is to be
specially noted that (a) the presbyters are present, and
presumably the recipients of the sick man's confession;
(ft) forgiveness is apparently conditioned by confession,
" Confess, therefore" etc. ; (y) the connexion between sin
and bodily illness is assumed ; the forgiveness of the one
involves recovery from the other. We may compare the
308 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
narrative in the Gospel of S. Mark ii. 1-12. Christ forgives
the sins of the man sick of the palsy. The association of
physical distress and moral evil underlies S. Paul's words in
i Cor. xi. 30.
(2) i John i. 9. " If we confess (o/zoAoyw/xev) our sins,
He is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins, and
to cleanse us from all unrighteousness." The word
o/^oAoyeu', to confess, certainly indicates a public acknow
ledgment with the lips. Thus, to give but one example,
S. Paul in Romans x. 10 distinguishes between inward
faith and outward confession of faith, " with the heart man
believeth unto righteousness ; and with the mouth con
fession is made (6/xoA.oyen-cu) unto salvation."
Such open acknowledgment of sins was the recognized
evidence of repentance. The multitudes who were con
verted by S. John the Baptist are said to have confessed
their sins (S. Matt. iii. 6); and in Acts xix. 18 we read
that many penitent Ephesians, dismayed by the fate of
the sons of Sceva, "came, confessing and declaring their
deeds."
It seems a reasonable inference that the undoubted
practice* of the sub- Apostolic Church obtained from the
first, that the normal preliminary to Baptism and Holy
Communion was such open acknowledgment of sin. The
penitential system of the early Church had its roots in
Apostolic practice.
* The Didache contains two directions which sufficiently illustrate
the sub- Apostolic practice, e.g. ,
iv. 14. "In the congregation (Iv tKKXyatq.) thou shalt confess thy
transgressions, and thou shalt not come to thy prayer with an evil
conscience."
xiv. I. "And on the Lord's day of the Lord (/card KvpiaK^v 5e
Kvpiov) come together and break bread, and give thanks, having
before confessed your transgressions [irpo[<r]€^o/jio\oyrj<rdfj.€voi rd
VJJLWV], that your sacrifice may be pure.
CONFESSION 309
The famous commission to the Apostles, S. John xx. 23,
can hardly be altogether separated from the subject of
confession.* The same writer records the words of Christ
and gives the admonition to confession. He could hardly
fail to connect the two. And if this be conceded, then
the bold practice of the Church of England in including
the famous words in the formula of ordination to the
priesthood is not wholly destitute of justification.
Confession does not seem to necessarily involve a
sacerdotal theory of the Christian ministry. I know no
reason why confessions should not be heard and absolution
pronounced by a layman, provided he be duly com
missioned by the Church ; there are obvious practical
reasons why the clergy should normally hear confessions;
it is not necessary to assume any other. There is an
admirable sermon on "The Restoration of the Erring,"
by Robertson, of Brighton, which sets forth very im
pressively the deep truth which, with whatever admixture
of irrelevant and erroneous ideas, is represented by " the
confessional." He treats of the same subject also in his
Expository Lectures on the Epistles to the Corinthians.
Lecture XL, on "The Christian Idea of Absolution," is
especially noteworthy. I do not see any vital discrepancy
between the Catholic doctrine and the following : —
"Inasmuch as S. Paul absolved, let us learn the true
* But it must not be pressed too far. Bp. WESTCOTT'S remarks
(S. John, p. 295) are not always sufficiently remembered. "The
commission must be regarded properly as the commission of the
Christian Society, and not as that of the Christian ministry. . . .
It is impossible to contemplate an absolute individual exercise
of the power of ' retaining ' ; so far it is contrary to the scope of the
passage to seek in it a direct authority for the absolute individual
exercise of the ' remitting.' "
It is well known that the words of S. John xx. 23 are not found
in any Ordinal earlier than the twelfth century.
310 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
principle of ministerial absolution. Humanity is the
representative of Deity. The Church is the representative
of Humanity, the ideal of Humanity. The minister is
the representative of the Church. When, therefore, the
minister reads the absolution, he declares a Fact. It does
not depend on his character or his will. It is a true voice
of man on earth echoing the Voice of God in heaven.
But if the minister forgets his representative character;
if he forgets that it is simply in the name of Humanity
and God, ' in the person of Christ ' ; if by any mysterious
language or priestly artifices he fixes men's attention on
himself, or his office, as containing in it a supernatural
power not shared by other men ; then, just so far, he does
not absolve or free the soul by declaring God. He binds
it again by perplexed and awe-engendering falsehood, and,
so far, is no priest at all ; he has forfeited the priestly power
of Christian Humanity, and claimed instead the spurious
power of the priesthood of Superstition." Something must
be allowed for the polemical atmosphere of 1851, when
these words were spoken ; they cannot in my opinion
be accepted as an adequate statement of the Christian
doctrine; but they do not seem to me necessarily incom
patible with it, and they are certainly sufficient to justify
the practice of private confession. Personally I am con
vinced — and experience deepens the conviction — that there
are deep spiritual needs which by that practice alone can
receive satisfaction ; that those needs are far more widely
distributed than is commonly supposed; that the Church
of England fails to provide adequately for the spiritual
necessities of the people, wherever the " ministry of recon
ciliation " is not so fulfilled as to bring frankly within the
reach of penitents that " benefit of absolution " of which
the Prayer Book speaks. I believe that one of the most
urgent reforms needed in our Church is the regulation of
CONFESSION 311
the confessional. That the gravest risks are incurred by
our present system, or no-system, seems to me too obvious
to need argument. Confessions are being heard in ever-
increasing numbers all over the country. This is, to my
thinking, on the whole, a hopeful sign of our religious
state. But the doctrine and procedure of confession are
almost as various as the parishes. In one place the full
Roman theory is insisted on, in another arbitrary rules are
adopted, in others little or no teaching on the subject
exists. Here confessions are heard in open Church, here
in the vestry, here (a reprehensible practice) in the
vicarage. All priests alike are supposed to be competent
for the most delicate and difficult duty which any man
can be called to perform. In all this I perceive almost
infinite possibilities of danger. Two reforms are, to my
thinking, imperative, both of which have the sanction of
Christian experience: (i) The appointment of confessors,
or, at least, the restriction of this ministry to priests of cer
tain standing and position. No man ought ordinarily to
be called upon to face this great duty without experience
and without training. (2) The authorisation of public
"confessionals." The publicity of private confession —
if I may be allowed the paradox — is the best security
against scandal. Unfortunately the silly clamour against
"confessional boxes" raised by some fanatics gives little
hope that this sensible arrangement can be adopted for
a long while to come.
APPENDIX IV.
CELIBACY
THE reputation of S. Paul has suffered from his
apparent preference for the celibate life. It may
be useful to examine the passage which most clearly
indicates that preference (i Cor. vii. 1-9, 32-40). There
seem to have been persons among the Corinthians who
condemned the single life as in itself wrong; there were
others who magnified it as the only worthy state. The
one party followed the prevailing Rabbinic view; the
other opposed to that view an extravagant asceticism.
The Apostle, therefore, while asserting the legitimate and
reasonable character of celibacy, is careful to point out
the conditions under which the celibate life may rightly
and wisely be adventured. "// ts good [KaAov] for a
man not to touch a woman" i.e., it is an honourable
and excellent thing to lead the single life. This,
however, does not altogether settle the practical question.
So S. Paul immediately advances two limiting con
siderations. " But, because of fornications [Sia Sf ras
Tro/Dveias] let each man have his own wife, and let each
woman have her own husband" In view of the low
moral standard which obtained among the Corinthian
Christians, in view of the sensual habits in which many
of them had grown up, in view of the prevailing licentious
ness of Corinth, he could not advise celibacy. Marriage
312
CELIBACY 313
was a more prudent course. He stops to insist (against
the ascetics) on an honest fulfilment of conjugal duty.
He will not hear of that refusal to accept the obligations
of marriage, which subsequently became very common in
the Church.
S. Chrysostom, commenting on this passage, denounces
the pseudo-chastity of Christian wives, which became
the occasion of much misery and sin. Returning to the
subject of celibacy, the Apostle avows his own preference
for that state. " Yet I would that all men were even
as I my self. n He recognizes, however, the equal honour
of marriage. " Howbeit each man hath his own gift
[xa/otoyxa] from God) one after this manner •, and another
after that" This verse gives S. Paul's doctrine in a
nutshell. Both marriage and celibacy are honourable
and excellent states ; both demand in the individual a
distinctive " gift from God" Men must be "called" to
the one or the other. The essential thing for every
man is to know and obey his own vocation.
"But I say to unmarried and to the widow s> It is good
\K.a.\uv\for them if they abide even as /." He repeats his
former proposition that the single life is honourable and
excellent, and adds the second limiting consideration.
"But if tJiey have not continency^ let them marry : for it
is better to marry than to burn " [TTU/DOIXT '6 ><u]. By this
forcible expression S. Paul describes the unhappy condition
of the man who, without the x°LPL(rlJia of continence, en
deavours to live the celibate life. He is consumed by
the inward fires of an unceasing conflict between his
will and his passions; if he escape the Charybdis of
sensuality it is only to be wrecked on the Scylla of
cynicism. There is a close parallel between this passage
and i Cor. vi. 1 2. There also the Apostle first propounds
the truth, and then states the qualifying considerations.
314 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
All things are lawful for It is good for a man not to
we j touch a woman;
but but
not all things are expedient. because of fornications, let each
man have his own wife, etc»
All things are lawful for me; It is good for them if they
abide even as I;
but but
I will not be brought under the if they have not continency,
poiuerof any. let them marry: for it is
better to marry than to burn.
Later in the chapter S. Paul advances two reasons for
his preference for celibacy. The first is obsolete, the last
is of permanent validity. " I think therefore that this is
good by reason of the present distress " [8ia rryv ei/coTwcrav
dvdyKrjv]. The reference is probably to the ending of the
age which the whole Apostolic Church believed to
be imminent. Experience has proved that this convic
tion was mistaken, and we may fairly cancel the argument
built upon a demonstrable error. We cannot so easily
dismiss the following reason : "But I would have you to be
free from cares. He that is unmarried is careful for the
things of the Lord: but he that is married is careful for
the things of the world, how he may please his wife. A nd
there is a difference also between the wife and the virgin.
She that is unmarried is careful for the things of the Lord,
that she may be holy both in body and in spirit : but she that
is married is careful for the things of the world, how she
may please her husband. And this I say for your own
profit ; not that I may cast a snare upon you, but for that
which is seemly, and that ye may attend upon the Lord with
out distraction"
It does not seem a fair inference from this teaching that
S. Paul considered celibacy as intrinsically superior to
CELIBACY 315
marriage. He regarded both as honourable, but under
existing circumstances and for certain purposes preferred
celibacy.
It may be permitted to observe that the Pauline teaching
demands the particular attention of the Church of England
at this time. In our anxiety to escape the very obvious
mischiefs of compulsory celibacy we have rushed into the
opposite extreme of discouraging and suspecting all
celibacy. The result has been disastrous. The extreme
poverty of a married clergy threatens spiritual independ
ence and official efficiency. The squalid distractions of
domestic life on the border-land of actual want are equally
unfavourable to parochial energy and intellectual exertion.
Even the Rabbis made an exception in favour of students
of the law. They were exempted from the obligation to
marry. We have swept away the condition of celibacy,
even from our fellowships, to the lasting injury of collegiate
life, and the loss of sound learning. Surely the time has
come when this domestic fanaticism may give place to a
calmer temper. The Pauline doctrine of two states,
celibacy and marriage, equally honourable, but not equally
serviceable, may well command our attention. We may
recognize at last that all men are not equally fitted for
the same work, that all varieties of religious work cannot
be equally performed by all men. We need an allocation
of spheres. In the missionary field and in the great town
parishes experience suggests that a celibate clergy working
in companies would best serve the Church. In other
places it may be that married men would be most useful.
TWO DISCOURSES
I. THE ADMINISTRATION OF HOLY BAPTISM IN LARGE
URBAN PARISHES
PREACHED BEFORE THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD, IN ST. MARY'S,
ON JUNE X4TH, 1896
II. THE SOCIAL INFLUENCE OF CHRISTIANITY
PREACHED IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY, ON MARCH CTH, 1898
THE
ADMINISTRATION OF HOLY BAPTISM
IN LARGE URBAN PARISHES
S. MARK x. 14
PREACHED BEFORE THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD, IN S. MARY'S,
ON JUNE 14x11, 1896
"But when Jesus saw it, He was moved with indignation,
and said unto them, Suffer the little children to come unto
Me: forbid them not, for of such is the Kingdom of
heaven."— -S. MARK x. 14.
THESE words are, perhaps, more familiar than any
others to English Christians. They are incorporated
in the Baptismal Service, where they provide the scriptural
basis for the exhortation which the minister is charged to
address to the congregation, which our Prayer Book assumes
to be present when Holy Baptism is administered in the
Church. I have, therefore, chosen them as the text of a
sermon which proposes to treat of a matter of considerable
and, I think, urgent practical importance, the administration
of Holy Baptism in the Church of England.
There is a strong and suggestive contrast between the
ancient and the modern practice of Christians in this
matter. The protracted preparations and the elaborate
ceremonial of former times have alike almost disappeared.
The prevalence of the custom of baptizing infants neces
sarily annihilated the one; the Protestant reaction against
3«9
320 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
all ceremony naturally affected the other. For centuries
adult Baptism was the general rule in the Church ; the
famous Catechetical Lectures of S. Cyril of Jerusalem,
delivered in the Lent of 347, clearly assume that the
catechumens were adult; and, indeed, the Church was
mainly a Missionary Church through those ages, which
we call primitive, and which we have generally agreed to
invest with special authority. It would seem sufficiently
probable that the Baptism of infants was allowed in
Apostolic times; it is clear that once allowed, it would
speedily become prevalent; natural affection, not to say
also the incorrigible superstition of mankind, would tend
to erect an occasional indulgence into a universal rule.
There are evidences, however, of misgivings in the Church
on the subject, and it is certain that throughout the first
four centuries infant Baptism was by no means considered
obligatory on Christian parents.
In order to make clear the drift of my discourse I will
submit three propositions as the heads or subjects of
discussion : —
I. That the administration of Holy Baptism was
anciently regarded as involving large risk to the Christian
society, and was, therefore, conditioned by securities.
II. That under the circumstances of urban life these
securities are now worthless.
III. That the modern practice of unconditioned, indis
criminate baptizing is indecent in itself, discreditable to
the Church, and highly injurious to religion.
I shall conclude with hazarding a few suggestions for
the reformation of the existing practice, which I shall hope
to have shown to involve most serious scandal.
(i) The Church is a visible society, and Holy Baptism
is the formal admission of a new member. No doubt this
is very far from an adequate account of the Sacrament, but
HOLY BAPTISM 321
it is, so far as it goes, a true account. My present purpose
does not require me to approach what I will call the
theology of Holy Baptism, I am mainly concerned with its
ecclesiastical aspect. The first and not the least important
effect of Baptism is admission into a visible society — the
society of the Catholic Church. Every human society
must be intimately interested in the character of those who
seek admission into the number of its members; it will
guard the avenues to membership with tests and in
quisitions of every kind, designed to reduce to the
narrowest limits the risk of admitting unsatisfactory, or
scandalous, or treacherous persons. The Catholic Church
also, following the self-protective policy of all human
societies, took precautions against this risk. One, and
that perhaps the most effectual security, was provided by
the hostility of the world. There was comparatively slight
inducement to false profession of discipleship when every
profession conferred a title to oppression, imprisonment,
and death. Yet (so native to man is imposture) there
is no lack of evidences to show that even in the ages of
persecution the Church was disturbed and degraded by
hypocrites. These, however, became more numerous in
prosperous times, and the Church had to depend for her
defence against the intrusion of unworthy members upon
such securities as she could herself devise. Careful in
struction before Baptism, the greatest publicity and
solemnity in the administration of the Sacrament, and the
system of sponsors — about which we must speak im
mediately — were the principal of these securities. The
elaborate and graduated system of instruction, which
makes its appearance in the fourth century, had been
gradually developed, and was, perhaps, at all times rather
an ecclesiastical ideal than an actual practice ; but we may
at least deduce from it that a very careful and thorough
Y
322 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
course of teaching was in the theory of the Church the
normal preliminary to Baptism. The Sacrament was
administered but twice in the year, at the great Church
Festivals; the Bishop himself presided, and every effort
seems to have been made to invest the whole procedure
with awful and expressive solemnity. Sponsors, in the case
of adults, were primarily witnesses to character ; they seem
to have also been charged with the duty of preparing
catechumens for the actual ceremonies of Baptism. So
the office of sponsorship was of some importance, and was
frequently held by members of the clerical order. *"The
ancients excluded all catechumens, energumens, heretics,
and penitents ; that is, all persons who were never yet in
full communion with the Church, as being themselves
unbaptized ; or else such as had forfeited the privileges
of their Baptism by their errors, or crimes, or incapacity."
It is obvious that when the practice of baptizing infants
became general the sponsor became a more important
functionary. The risk incurred by the Church in admitting
to her membership those of whose character she could
have no assurance was manifest, and the securities by
which she endeavoured to protect herself were by no
means as insignificant as we, judging the past by the
present, are apt to suppose. fThe children who were
baptized were entitled to Baptism by the fact of their
birth of Christian parents. The analogy of circumcision,
which probably in the first instance determined the
practice of the Church, would suggest the rigid limitation
of the Sacrament to those who were "born within the
covenant." In later times, under the influence of a
developed doctrine of original sin, the limits of the
* Dictionary of Christian Antiquities, art. "Sponsors."
t Vide JEREMY TAYLOR, Of Baptizing Infants % vol. ii. p. 284.
HOLY BAPTISM 323
covenant were less rigidly observed, but always in default
of the Christian parent the Church required a sponsor, or
sponsors, who could really fulfil the functions of the
Christian parent.
* " It cometh sometime to pass," saith S. Augustine,
"that the children of bond-slaves are brought to Baptism
by their lord ; sometime the parents being dead, the friends
alive undertake that office ; sometimes strangers or virgins
consecrated unto God, which neither have nor can have
children of their own, take up infants in the open streets,
and so offer them unto Baptism, whom the cruelty of
unnatural parents casteth out and leaveth to the adventure
of uncertain pity, as therefore he which did the part of a
neighbour was a neighbour to that wounded man whom
the parable of the Gospel describeth; so they are fathers
although strangers that bring infants to Him, which maketh
them the sons of God." In the phrase of " some kind of
men" — observes Hooker, commenting on this passage —
"they used to be termed witnesses, as if they came but
to see and testify what is done. It savoureth more of
piety to give them their old accustomed name of fathers
and mothers in God, whereby they are well put in mind
what affection they ought to bear towards those innocents,
for whose religious education the Church accepteth them as
pledges." It would seem, indeed, that in ancient times the
God-parent was held responsible for the physical mainten
ance as well as for the spiritual up-bringing of the baptized
infant. Probably both responsibilities were largely trans
ferred to the Church herself, regarded as "really and
ultimately the spiritual mother" of all the baptized; but
the danger of this would be comparatively slight, nay, there
would be obvious counterbalancing advantages, so long as
the physical and the spiritual responsibilities were conjoined;
* Quoted in Hooker, Book v. cl. 64, s. 5.
324 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
it was only when the physical was completely severed from
the spiritual, as has been the almost universal fact in
modern times, that the mischiefs with which we are so
unhappily familiar have arisen. The spiritual respon
sibilities of sponsors have, indeed, been frequently asserted.
The Synod of Chelsea in the year 787,* to give but one
example from the annals of our own Church, enacted " that
all who receive children from the font know that they are
sureties to the Lord, according to their undertaking, for the
renouncing of Satan, his works and pomps, and for the
believing of the faith ; that they teach them the Lord's
Prayer and the Creed while they are coming to ripeness of
age, for if they do not, what is promised to God on behalf
of them that cannot speak shall be with rigour exacted of
them."
The curious prohibition of parents from acting as
sponsors for their own children — a prohibition which was
only removed by the Convocation of Canterbury in 1865
by a canon which, I think, has never been ratified by the
Crown, and therefore possesses no legal force— together
with the still more curious applications of the doctrine of
spiritual affinity in the matter of marriage, must be inter
preted as indications of the great importance attached to
the religious obligations of sponsorship. In the West,
Confirmation, originally administered at the time of
Baptism, and still so administered in the Churches of
the East, came to be separated from it by an interval
of years, and may, perhaps, have had the character of
an official ratification by the Bishop of the action of his
presbyters in baptizing infants. |A learned modern writer
represents Confirmation as forming with Baptism but a
* HADDAN and STUBBS, Councils, iii. p. 448 (cf. the nth can. of
Council of Clovesho in 747. — Ibid. p. 366).
t Canon MASON, The Relation of Confirmation to Baptism,
HOLY BAPTISM 325
single Sacrament, and, indeed, forming the principal part
of that Sacrament; but the great neglect which has
overtaken Confirmation, both in mediaeval and in
modern times, seems to suggest that this opinion was
not generally admitted in the Church. This very brief
review of the subject may, perhaps, justify the state
ment that the Church has always exacted securities for
the Christian up-bringing of the infants she has received
by Baptism into her membership, and that apart from such
securities the baptism of infants can find no sufficient
justification.
(2) I advance to show that under the circumstances of
urban life there are no longer any adequate securities
for the Christian up-bringing of a very large proportion
of the children who are baptized. The law of the modern
Church, expressed in the Rubrics of the Prayer Book,
does, indeed, provide very careful regulations designed to
secure the religious nurture of the baptized; but the law
is largely obsolete, and, in many places, wholly unworkable.
Baptism is no longer limited to the "children of the
covenant " ; probably the majority of English churchmen
would endorse the language of Hooker (which I am bound
to confess seems to me to go beyond the lines both of
reason and piety), and would not be greatly averse to
ignoring that limitation on the ground that it is "against
both equity and duty to refuse the mother of believers
herself, and not to take her in this case (i.e., of parents
who are unbelieving or 'accursed') for a faithful parent."
But in this case Hooker supposes, what the primitive
Church insisted upon, that adequate sponsors are present,
prepared to take the place of the parents. This sup
position, as we shall see, cannot any longer be made.
The Rubric insists on the publicity of Baptism. It is
to be administered "when the most number of people
326 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
come together: as well for that the congregation there
present may testify the receiving of them that be newly
baptized into the number of Christ's Church : as also
because in the Baptism of Infants every man present
may be put in remembrance of his own profession made
to God in his Baptism." The service, indeed, assumes
throughout the presence of a congregation. But the
publicity which the Rubric was intended to secure no
longer attaches to the administration of Holy Baptism
in large parishes. The excessive (according to the modern
standard) lengthening of the service, and (a still more
formidable difficulty) the conduct of the infants (not
rarely children above the age of two years) who, if they
must be allowed to make no resistance to the grace of
the Sacrament, do plainly and beyond all question resist
the Sacrament itself, are practical obstacles to the carrying
out of the Rubric, which cannot be surmounted.
Let me describe to you the actual method of administer
ing Holy Baptism in a large urban parish. On a week-
night evening, or on Sunday afternoons, times When the
absence of the congregation can be counted upon, the
priest in a large town parish takes his stand at the font
to administer the Sacrament of Holy Baptism to all who
desire it. The candidates arrive in the arms of their
mothers, who are sometimes assisted on these occasions
by the monthly nurse, or a neighbour to whom baptisms
and burials have an attraction not possessed by the other
ordinances of religion, or a district visitor, or even, though
this is almost unknown, by the father. No inquiries of
any kind are addressed to them beyond the question with
which the service begins, and the questions as to
names and addresses necessary for the rilling in of the
register. The service proceeds ; there are no sponsors
save those whom I have mentioned. Often they cannot
HOLY BAPTISM 327
read ; oftener they won't. They do not answer the
questions, so solemn and so important, which are ad
dressed to the sponsors; but with persistence the priest
may, if he deem it worth his while, succeed in getting them
to say after him the required responses. The service is
over in half an hour, and the party retires to the pothouse
and the slum. This is no exaggerated picture, not, thank
God, of all, perhaps not of most, but certainly of very
many baptisms as now administered in large parishes.
The sponsor-system has wholly broken down. I have
been at some pains to ascertain the facts. For one great
parish with a population of 15,000 souls, in which the
average annual number of baptisms was about 500, I can
speak with the authority of personal knowledge and the
shame of personal responsibility. The majority of infants
were really without sponsors, for the mother or friend who
brought them to the font had no idea, not even the faintest,
of spiritual responsibility as attaching to the act. " If the
rule about godparents were enforced in this parish," writes
the vicar of a great dock parish where more than 1000
infants are baptized every year, "the greater number of
children would have to remain unbaptized." " The rule
about sponsors," observes the vicar of a large East -end
parish, " is wholly broken." He adds the following obser
vations, which I make no apology for quoting : " The
effect of enforcing the rule in all cases would med sententia
stop all baptisms at any church where the rule was so
enforced, or possibly cause a reversion to the old custom
hereabouts of securing attendance of sponsors by standing
' a pot,' which came to be the recognized value of a
sponsor." "The chief effect of insisting on the rule in
all cases, I feel," writes a very well-known priest, whose
opinion carries great weight, "would be that many children
would die unbaptized." "The rule about sponsors," writes
328 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
another, " is fully observed in about 20 per cent. There
is always one sponsor, but sometimes only the mother."
He calculates that the enforcement of the Rubric would
reduce by 75 per cent, the number of baptisms, and he
adds 'this observation, " I do not believe in a stringent
rule for such parts as this. It would lead to paid sponsors,
as in old days, or to the neglect of baptism." I will add
but one more expression of opinion ; it is from a well-
known and highly-respected East -end clergyman. " If
the rule were enforced in all cases it would cause a great
grievance, as there is a strong feeling in favour of having
the children baptized, and the monthly nurses seem to
have it on their conscience to bring the mother and child
before the month is up, and if the baptism is refused
because there was no godfather or insufficient number of
godparents it would cause a great scandal ; on the other
hand, if the male parent were enforced to attend in order
that the child might be baptized, it would cause still greater
scandal in the fact of an utterly irreligious being compelled
to go through the form of sponsorship in order to obtain
the baptism of his child. This, of course, would be
aggravated were two male sponsors pressed for." The
initial security of sponsors having been dispensed with,
it is no matter for surprise that the careful instruction of
the children, which sponsors were intended to ensure, has
in very many cases shared the same fate. The common
assumption that in a Christian country, equipped with large
and detailed machinery of spiritual provision, there is a
general probability reaching even to practical certainty that
all children will come under Christian training cannot be
rightly made. I desire to make very clear to you that in a
large proportion of cases the baptized children were suffered
to grow up without Christian instruction. Two facts may
sufficiently authenticate this statement : the remarkably
HOLY BAPTISM 329
small proportion of the baptized who are presented for
Confirmation, and the failure of the religious bodies to get
the poorer children into Sunday-schools. I estimate that
about one-fourth of the baptized (who reach the age of
Confirmation) are actually confirmed. Without wearying
you with statistics, I venture to submit that estimate with
some confidence. That 75 per cent, of the baptized should
fail of Confirmation gives the measure of the practical
worth of the Rubrics and exhortations of the Prayer Book
and Canons. In every parish with which I am acquainted,
and I have taken great pains to reach the facts, a very
large proportion of the children, and they the poorest and
roughest children, do not attend the Sunday-schools, nor
if they did would they be much benefited. Sunday-
schools have enjoyed, and I believe do still enjoy in
some quarters, a considerable reputation. This reputation,
however, is largely factitious, arising less from the merits of
the schools themselves than from their importance in
current political controversy. It suits the interest of the
Christian advocate for the de-christianizing of the elemen
tary schools to make the most of this pretended substitute
for doing the proper work of those schools. The fanatics
of voluntaryism magnify a system which is sufficiently
certified by its incompetence to be voluntary. But Sunday-
schools are, as far as religious education is concerned, of
little real worth. There is little teaching and no discipline ;
the teachers know neither what to teach, nor how to teach ;
a precarious and intermittent attendance is secured by
periodical bribes to the children.* If any think that the
* The actual worth of the religious teaching of the Sunday-school
may be gauged by the fact, to which representatives of all churches
and denominations bear witness, that the vast majority of Sunday-
school scholars abandon attendance at public worship as soon as they
leave school. Personally I think Sunday-schools not rarely have a
330 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
Sunday-schools can take over from the elementary schools
the task of teaching religion to the poor and rough children,
he is labouring under a delusion which a slight acquaint
ance with the facts of urban life would speedily dispel.
The home, the day-school, and the Church are the three
agencies by which the baptized child must be taught the
grace and the duty of that Christian membership conferred
upon him (though often in such strange fashion) by the
sacrament of Holy Baptism. But the home is commonly
in no sense Christian ; it is a breach of the law of England
in most urban schools to teach a baptized child the doc
trines of his religion : the Church, overweighted with
duties, is wholly unable to supply the defects of home
and school. Baptism in infancy in very many cases repre
sents the entire contact with Christianity which our people
receive, until with characters hardened into fixed types,
with habits formed and dispositions developed, they pass
out of school into the great life of the nation.
(3) I submit to you, and this is my final proposition,
that the practice which works out to this miserable
confusion, the modern practice of unconditioned, indis
criminate baptizing is indecent in itself, discreditable to
the Church, and highly injurious to religion. That it is
indecent will hardly be disputed by any who recognize
the fidelity of the picture I have drawn (a picture drawn
from life) of the existing method of administering this
Sacrament in the crowded urban parishes. I am not
preferring an indictment against my clerical brethren;
direct effect in creating that disgust of religious observance which is
one of the most remarkable features of the present situation. But
I admit that the parish priest is almost compelled to have a Sunday-
school, thanks to the activity of the Dissenters, who are devoted to
that institution, and the selfishness of the parents, who greatly value
it as a means of taking their children off their hands for much of
Sunday.
HOLY BAPTISM ,331
the description which I have given was certainly true
of my own parish. I associate myself absolutely with
them; they, I know, are much exercised in con
science on the subject. That it is discreditable to the
Church will not, I think, be disputed. Certainly the
scandalous laxity which presides over the admission of
new members into the Divine society augurs ill for the
future discipline of those members. It is notorious that
the indiscriminate use of the Prayer Book services for
marriage and for burial inflicts acute distress on many
consciences ; but so long as the mass of people, however
morally and spiritually unworthy, are yet formally Christians,
by title of their Baptism, it is extremely difficult to limit
the use of these offices. It is not charity to indulge in
the solemn mockery of their use in the cases where the
assumption of Christianity cannot be reasonably made ; it
is grievous and baleful imposture. It strengthens in the
general mind that insincerity of religious expression which
is, perhaps, the besetting peril of those who worship by
means of fixed formularies. Here are forms, beautiful,
full of devotion, instinct with the pure ardours of disciple-
ship, and they are used under circumstances which
transform them into hideous satire. It is inevitable that
the habit should grow of regarding the language as properly
what it plainly is actually, unmeaning, a decent convention,
a mere form, as destitute of significance as the plumes on
the hearse and the staves in the hirelings' hands. The
habit required by the abuse of one formulary readily extends
to the use of another, and that lethargic acquiescence of
unspiritual people in the use of devotional language (which
is the bane of Anglicanism) becomes general. Our Church
life draws a taint of hypocrisy from the laxity with which
the Sacrament of the new birth is administered. There is
a further mischief; the gravity of post -baptismal sin, so
332 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
fearfully real to the mind of the primitive Church, has
absolutely perished from the general mind. When no
difference is perceptible between the baptized and the
unbaptized ; when, indeed, as is not rarely the case, the
fact of Baptism is only discovered by an appeal to the
register, the baptized child having been suffered to grow up
in total ignorance of the circumstance, it is manifest that
no distinction can be drawn between sin before and sin
after Baptism ; yet the authority of Holy Scripture unites
with the consistent belief of the early Church, a belief
wonderfully expressed in that elaborate penitential system,
which at once amazes us by its detail and appals us by its
severity, in drawing the distinction clearly and deeply. Is
it any marvel that our people have come to think so meanly
of the great Sacrament, which we ourselves dishonour by
such amazing laxity? Is it any marvel that they easily
acquiesce in the blasphemy of the modern Ana-baptist, or,
as he prefers to call himself, perhaps to conceal the
heinousness of his practice, the Baptist? How can we
expect simple people to revere a Sacrament which is
administered as we administer it? Our laxity lends a
plausibility to the doctrines of heresy, which in themselves
they do not possess. We are ourselves mainly responsible
for that low estimate of Holy Baptism which we deplore in
our people. Is it indeed to Christ that we bring these
children, whom we so baptize that they never know they
are Christ's? Have we any authority thus recklessly to
bestow the Gift of the Regenerating Spirit? I say with
Tertullian, though far indeed from endorsing his views,
"There will be more caution used in worldly matters.
Cautius agetur in secularibus ut cui substantia terrena non
creditur, divina credatur."
It is easy to build up an indictment, it is not so easy
to find the remedy even for admitted abuses. Yet I
HOLY BAPTISM 333
cannot accept the position that nothing can be done to
rescue the Sacrament of Holy Baptism from the contempt
into which it has been permitted to fall. We must un
doubtedly be content to act slowly. The existing system
has been gradually developed, and it is firmly rooted. It
must be gradually reformed ; at least, the attempt can be
made and ought to be made to direct the mind of the
Church to the subject. It is not, brethren, only among
the very poor that the obligations of sponsorship are lightly
regarded, and not rarely altogether ignored. If it were
matter of conscience among the professed members of the
Church to give meaning to the solemn language of the
Prayer Book on this subject, I am very sure the effect for
good would be felt widely. I plead for the enforcement of
the twenty-ninth of the Canons of 1603, wherever reason
ably practicable, at least for the general assertion of the
principle which that Canon enshrines, when it enacts that
no person " shall be admitted godfather or godmother
to any child at Christening or Confirmation before the said
person so undertaking hath received the Holy Com
munion." In the great urban parishes, at least, the
practice of canvassing for Baptism might be stopped.
District visitors have much to answer for in this matter.
Much would be gained if it were made clear by those in
authority, and especially by their Lordships the Bishops,
that this urging of Baptism where there are no securities
for Christian up-bringing is indefensible and mischievous.
I think it ought to be possible to direct the devotion
of Communicant Guilds to the subject. Why should not
the pious zeal, which S. Augustine describes as marking
the consecrated virgins of the primitive Church, be
emulated by modern Christians who would undertake,
always with the full consent of the parents, to stand as
sponsors to the children of the very poor? The energies
334 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
which are now wasted in Sunday-schools might be most
happily employed in the instruction of god-children. Why
should not sponsorship take its place among the recognized
works of the Church ? A guild of sponsors— all communi
cants — combined for mutual counsel and intercession
might be a source of great blessing to a parish. The
general standard of duty in the matter would be raised,
and it might be possible to advance towards a real
enforcement of the Rubrics. When all, however, is done
that can be done, I cannot conceal from myself that we
must face the necessity of greatly reducing the number of
the baptized. It goes against the grain, I know, to even in
appearance hedge round the Sacrament with restrictions.
We dread calling forth against ourselves that ''indigna
tion " which was provoked in our Saviour by those officious
disciples, who would have barred the babes from His
presence, and if, indeed, the withholding of Baptism
involved that consequence our anxiety would be well-
founded ; but who would adventure to affirm so much ? I
submit that our present laxity rather hinders than facilitates
access to Christ. We degrade religion, we create stumbling-
blocks, we hurt consciences, we endanger the Church.
Can it be truly said that we help the children for whose
sake we incur such losses ? When at least seventy per cent,
of the urban population is baptized and — as His Lordship
of London has recently informed us — less than five per
cent, receives the Holy Communion, it is evident that we
have reached a state in which it is impossible to acquiesce
and to retain the self-respect of our discipleship. The fact
that the irreligious masses are baptized hinders the
missionary action of the Church. The Christian preacher is
deprived of his true objective, he cannot call sinners to the
" Washing of regeneration" he has to persuade them that
they are already washed. It would be interesting on this
HOLY BAPTISM 335
point to know the opinion of the mission-preachers of the
Church, now a numerous body. I do not, however, think
the practical convenience or inconvenience of any practice
demonstrably indefensible ought to be admitted into the
discussion of the Church's duty with regard to it. I
submit that the existing method of administering Holy
Baptism is as little consistent with the dignity of the
Sacrament as it is congruous with the practice of the
Church in past ages. I have shown that it violates the
actual law of the Church, and I have endeavoured to show
that it involves grave and extended scandal. If my
contentions are as sound as they are sincere I have made
out a case for immediate and thorough, though cautious
and gradual reform.
THE
SOCIAL INFLUENCE OF CHRISTIANITY.
S. MATTHEW v. 13.
PREACHED ON THE SECOND SUNDAY IN LENT, MARCH 6TH, 1898,
IN WESTMINSTER ABBEY.
" Ye are the salt of the earM"—S. MATTHEW v. 13.
THERE are no speculations at once more attractive and
more precarious than those which attempt to estimate
the social results of religions. The attractiveness is obvious
and intelligible. Religion is the most deeply interesting
thing in the world. Whether it attract or repel, this
quality of interest is always present. Religion appeals to
the deepest elements of human nature, and it raises every
question into which it enters on to a higher platform. The
conscience is directly concerned, the heart is directly
affected, the imagination is powerfully stirred by every
religious appeal. There is always the solemn charm of
mystery ; the chance, always moving in the background of
the mind and disturbing the order of thought, that there
may be truth in claims, apparently the most extravagant;
validity in reasonings, apparently the most grotesque. In
the religious sphere the spirit is oppressed by an ignorance
so profound that a positive attitude seems an outrage on
modesty. Where it is certain that all know so little, who
shall be sure that he really knows anything at all? And
yet there is no subject upon which men speak so con-
336
INFLUENCE OF CHRISTIANITY 337
fidently. The results of religion upon the characters and
fortunes of nations are reckoned up and set down with
amazing precision, and the estimates are as various as they
are precise. Moreover, it is difficult to discover the prin
ciples of investigation which have been followed. Yet it
would seem that no inquiries more plainly demand careful
adhesion to sound principles. For none are more in
herently difficult. The complexity of human life is such
that no force works in isolation. There is a subtle and
constant interplay of forces, out of which results emerge
which may not rightly be ascribed to any single cause.
Again, causes disguise themselves wonderfully, and the
effects of one factor are easily mistaken for those of
another. A large uncertainty must always attach to all
conclusions as to the social results of religion.
11 Ye are the salt of the earth" Our Lord distinctly
attributes to His Church the character of a social force.
"»$#// "is the familiar symbol of that which purifies and
preserves. Among the Jews it was not merely, as among
ourselves, an article of common domestic use, but also an
important element in the sacrificial service of religion.
Elsewhere our Lord directly refers to the religious use of
salt. " For everyone shall be salted with fire. Salt is good,
but if tJie salt have lost its salt ness, wherewith will ye season
it? Have salt in yourselves, and be at peace one with
another" An ancient reading, now by the revisers rele
gated to the margin, adds the words, " and every sacrifice
shall be salted with salt"
" Ye are tJie salt of the earth" Our Lord avoids the
abstract terms in which modem philosophers and reformers
so freely indulge. We are apt to forget that " Christianity "
is only a synonym for Christians themselves when we are
discussing social questions. " Ye, i.e. My disciples, are
the salt of the earth" Perhaps the truest guide to a due
z
333 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
estimate of the social influence of Christianity is the study
of individual discipleship. How does a Christian man's
creed affect his social conduct ? Evidently to a very large
extent the behaviour and influence of the Christian in
society have no relation whatever to his religion. The
determining factors for the most part lie outside the range
of his own choice. His place in society is prescribed for
him ; his powers of body and mind are not such as he
might have chosen for himself; he acts under the authority
of laws, traditions, customs, conventions, fashions, ideas
which are, as the climate, wholly outside his control.
Where is there any place for the action of his discipleship ?
How shall he be the " salt of the earth " ? I do not think
it sufficient to answer that he must be truthful, honest,
just, industrious. So much is required of all good citizens ;
so much the general consent of reasonable men demands
and approves. Without doubt the Christian will have
motives for his civic virtue which his religion, and only
his religion, could provide ; but we are not now discussing
motives. The social worth of virtue is independent of
its motives. I suppose the social influence of the Christian
citizen will reduce itself to the single category of character.
How far does the Christian gain for himself " the mind of
Christ""} How far does his social influence reflect the
Christian character? The Sermon on the Mount opens
with a description of the Christian character. This is the
purpose of the Beatitudes. Christ shows the constituent
elements of that character which should express disciple
ship, and constitute His followers the "satt" and the
"light" of society.
" Ye are the salt of the earth." Christians are to rebuke
and disprove the wisdom of the world by setting before
society the spectacle of lives governed by other principles,
directed to other ends, and by that very fact bringing into
INFLUENCE OF CHRISTIANITY 339
the world's life a purifying influence which can restrain the
action of the normal corruption, and quicken society with
new moral energy. We know but too well that Christian
lives are often strangely unworthy expositions of the Mind
of Christ. We know also how prone men are to credit
Christianity with the very faults which Christianity is
unable to restrain. The ill-conduct of Christians is a
great, nay, the very greatest stumbling-block in the way
of Christianity — though in itself such ill-conduct argues
nothing against the religion it disgraces. So in reviewing
the history of civilization, or striving to interpret the
enigma of contemporary society, the student must be on
his guard against crediting Christianity with scandals which
may indicate rather the defeat than the triumph of
Christian principles. It is easy to build up a formidable
case against the Church if you limit your inquiry and
select your facts. Thus it has been argued with much
plausibility that Christianity has favoured slavery, resisted
political liberty, even degraded the female sex. It is
obvious that for such contentions much may be said.
There is a copious literature of social and political servility
which professes to be Christian, and the doctrines of
ascetism were certainly degrading to womankind ; yet a
very little reflection will demonstrate the paradoxical
character of all such contentions. Slavery has perished
throughout Christendom ; political liberty is unknown
outside that sphere; nowhere else is the position of
woman so honourable and so secure. Such results carry
the vindication of Christianity from the suspicions which
are suggested by some facts of Christian history. The
real drift of Christ's Religion shows itself on a broad
view of the facts, and we should be mad reasoners if we
interpreted the details without regard to the general
effect
340 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
Then, I think, we should always remember the extreme
difficulty of the material upon which Christianity has to
act. Human nature is a very intractable material from
which to fashion the fair creations of social righteousness.
It takes impressions very gradually ; it learns very slowly
and by definite stages. It would seem that the elements of
right have to be beaten into the dull intelligence of the race
one by one. Here, perhaps, is the explanation of some of
the problems of Christian history. How can you reconcile,
men ask, the severe, penitential system of the early Church
with the compassion of the Gospel, or the extravagant
exaltation of celibacy with the Christian doctrine of
marriage, or the detailed legalism of the mediaeval Church
with the spirituality of Christ's teaching? Perhaps the
answer must be found in the actual conditions of men's
apprehension of the truth. Before the compassion of
the Gospel can minister to righteousness the gravity of
sin must have been grasped; and that lesson was effectu
ally taught by the iron system of primitive penance.
Before the true nobility of marriage can be understood
men must learn the lesson of chastity ; and that lesson
was printed indelibly on the general mind by the ascetics.
Before spiritual liberty can be securely proposed the majesty
of the law must have been understood ; and that, perhaps,
was borne in on men's minds by the masterful government
of the mediaeval Church. There is advance in the
religious education of mankind. The truth is not grasped
at once, but gradually and fragmentarily, "by divers portions
and in divers manners" The partial teaching, regarded
from the standpoint of complete knowledge, has a repulsive
appearance ; insisted on in the teeth of wider teachings it
may be really mischievous ; but in its own time it matched
the urgent necessities of the race, and provided the in
dispensable condition of moral progress. The influence
INFLUENCE OF CHRISTIANITY 341
of the Church has ever been exerted upon actual society ;
it has, therefore, taken a myriad forms, addressing itself
to the varying circumstances of human living, but always
it has proved itself a purifying and preserving force, "the
salt of the earth."
Three things, perhaps, are always contributed by Christi
anity to the welfare of society. The Gospel brings to the
world the gift of social hope. It upholds a social ideal,
not as a mere aspiration, still less as a satire on the
world's life, but as a practicable object, which can be
gained and which will be gained. The Christian may
not despair of society, however unpromising the social
outlook may be. He believes that the Almighty has a
purpose to fulfil in human history, and that the course
of the world's life is not wholly independent of His will.
Moreover, the Gospel brings to everyone who receives it
the conviction that social service is a religious duty. The
selfish withdrawal from the social task, whether in despair
or in self-absorption, is the repudiation of a Divine Com
mission. Every Christian feels a certain responsibility for
the world's sin, and for the sorrows which at once reflect
and avenge it. Christ's example challenges every disciple.
" We must work the works of Him that sent Afe, while it
is day: the night comet h when no man can work." The
world is saved from acquiescing in its scandals by the
Divine indignation of Christ's disciples. There is no
conspicuous evil of human society which has not provoked
the resentment of the Christian conscience. In the back
ground of every Christian's mind is the conviction that
it is his duty to resist evil where it meets him, and to
attack abuses when they cross his path. Finally, the
Gospel brings to everyone who receives it the conviction
that personal righteousness is a social duty and the con
dition of social service. Primarily the Christian's task is
342 APOSTOLIC CHRISTIANITY
to illustrate in his own sphere the mind of Christ. The
Christian conscience has always chafed against any sever
ance of the disciple's practice from his profession. In the
early centuries the custom obtained among persons who
made pretensions to piety to adorn their garments with
sacred pictures in place of those commonly adopted.
" Bedizened with such figures they supposed — as Austerius,
Bishop of Amasia in Pontus, in the last half of the fourth
century, asserts — that their dress must be well-approved in
the sight of God. This excellent churchman advises them
rather to dispose of such garments, for as much as they
would bring, and use the proceeds to honour the living
images of God; instead of carrying about the sick of the
palsy on their garments, rather to look up the actually sick
and relieve them ; instead of wearing on their bodies a
kneeling penitent in embroidery, rather to mourn over
their own sins with a penitent spirit."*
Such has always been the attitude of the Christian
conscience towards the parade of piety. Translate your
creed into conduct, give a social expression to disciple-
ship, be yourself the illustration of your religion.
In so contributing to the world's life the elements of
hope, of duty, and of personal discipline Christianity
counteracts deep, normal tendencies making for corruption
and decay, and literally fulfils the Word of the Divine
Founder, " Ye are the salt of the earth."
The civilization of antiquity broke down beneath the
burden of its own pollutions; the machinery of govern
ment could not sustain the cynical wickedness of those
who worked it. Philosophy had no message of hope, no
power of moral restoration, no coercive motive of self-
discipline. It sank into satire and despair. The civiliza
tions of the East appear to contain no quickening principle,
* NEANDER, vol. iii. p. 388.
INFLUENCE OF CHRISTIANITY 343
detecting abuses, waging war with them, always straining
and striving after social advance — they petrify and}pass.
The latest civilization of the West — if by so great a
name we may describe the achievement of the century's
labour to banish the Christian elements from a society
which has grown from the depths of savagery to the heights
of an unequalled culture, under the tutelary influence of
the Church — seems to discover a fatal inability to secure
uprightness of character. Prodigal of brave doctrines, of
social duty, the secularist is doomed to see his hopes
dashed to pieces on the sunken rocks of human selfishness.
At the summit of material prosperity society threatens to
collapse in a bankruptcy of character. Christianity in the
social sphere stands for hope and the sense of duty, and
the diffused leaven of personal righteousness; and let us lay
it well to heart, Christianity is but the sum of the various
moral impressions of individual Christian lives. Upon us
all — who own ourselves the disciples of Christ, who in
Holy Baptism were solemnly sealed as His " soldiers and
servants " — lies the great obligation to be in our several
spheres the exponents of the Gospel, not merely, if at
all, in word of formal teaching, not often, if ever, by
the violences of political action, but always and everywhere
by the silent, ceaseless testimony of righteous lives — lives
which visibly bear the Christian stamp, which are a
continual rebuke to all the baseness of the world, a
continual challenge to all the goodness in society — lives
which, wherever lived, in cottage or in palace, in
" the strife of tongues and the tumult of the city" or amid
the solemn silences of immemorial hills, are great, and
lofty, and fruitful, pouring into the general life unfailing
streams of purity and hope, the " salt" and "light" of the
earth.
PLYMOUTH
WILIIAM BRKNDON AND SON
PRINTERS
A CATALOGUE OF BOOKS
PUBLISHED BY METHUEN
AND COMPANY: LONDON
36 ESSEX STREET
W.C
CONTENTS
PAGE
General Literature, . . . 2-19
Ancient Cities, ... 19
Antiquary's Books, . 20
Beginner's Books, ... 20
Business Books, ao
Byzantine Texts, ... 21
Churchman's Bible, . . 21
Churchman's Library, . . 21
Classical Translations, . 21
Commercial Series, . . 22
Connoisseur's Library, . 22
Library of Devotion, . . 23
Standard Library, . . 23
Half-Crown Library, . . 24
Illustrated Pocket Library of
Plain and Coloured Books, 24
Junior Examination Series, 26
Junior School-Books, . . 26
Leaders of Religion, . . 27
PAGE
Little Blue Books, . . 27
Little Books on Art, . . 27
Little Galleries, ... 28
Little Guides, .... 28
Little Library, ... 28
Miniature Library, . . 30
Oxford Biographies, . . 30
School Examination Series, 30
Social Questions of To-day, 31
Textbooks of Science, . . 31
Textbooks of Technology . 31
Handbooks of Theology, . 31
Westminster Commentaries, 32
Fiction, 33.36
The Strand Novels, . . 37
Books for Boys and Girls, . 38
Novels of Alexandre Dumas, 38
Methuen's Sixpenny Books, 39
FEBRUARY 1906
A CATALOGUE OF
MESSRS. METHUEN'S
PUBLICATI ONS
Colonial Editions are published of all Messrs. METHUEN'S Novels issued
at a price above is. 6W., and similar editions are published of some works of
General Literature. These are marked in the Catalogue. Colonial editions
are only for circulation in the British Colonies and India.
An asterisk denotes that a book is in the Press.
I.P.L. represents Illustrated Pocket Library.
S.Q.S. represents Social Questions Series.
PART I. — GENERAL LITERATURE
Abbot (Jacob). See Little Blue Books.
Abbott (J. H. M.). Author of 'Tommy
Cornstalk.1 AN OUTLANDER IN
ENGLAND: BEING SOME IMPRESSIONSOF
AN AUSTRALIAN ABROAD. Second Edition.
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
AcatOS (M. J.). See Junior School Books.
Adams (Frank). JACKSPRATT. With 24
Coloured Pictures. Super Royal i6mo. vs.
Adeney (W. F.), M.A. See Bennett and
Adeney.
/Eschylus. See Classical Translations.
/Esop. See I.P.L.
Ainsworth (W. Harrison). See I.P.L.
Alderson (J. P.). MR. ASQUITH. With
Portraits and Illustrations. Demy Zro.
7s. 6d. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Aldis (Janet). MADAME GEOFFRIN,
HER SALON, AND HER TIMES.
With many Portraits and Illustrations.
Second Edition. Demy 8z>o. IQS. 6d. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Alexander (William), D.D., Archbishop
of Armagh. THOUGHTS AND
COUNSELS OF MANY YEARS.
Demy i6;«0. "zs. 6d.
Alken (Henry). THE NATIONAL
SPORTS OF GREAT BRITAIN. With
descriptions in English and French. With
51 Coloured Plates. Royal Folio. Five
Guineas net. The Plates can be had
separately in a Portfolio. ,£3, 3*. net.
See also I.P.L.
Allen (Jessie). See Little Books on Art.
Allen (J. Romilly), F.S.A. See Antiquary's
Books.
Almack (E.). See Little Books on Art.
Amherst (Lady). A SKETCH OF
EGYPTIAN HISTORY FROM THE
EARLIEST TIMES TO THE PRE
SENT DAY. With many Illustrations.
Dttny l*o. los. 6ft. net.
Anderson (F. M.). THE STORY OF THE
BRITISH EMPIRE FOR CHILDREN.
With many Illustrations. Cr. 8v0. zs.
Anderson (J. Q.), B.A., Examiner to Lone on
University, NOUVELLE GRAMMAIUE
FRANCAISE. Cr. 8vo. zs.
EXERCICES DE GRAMMAIRE FRA.V-
CAISE. Cr. 8vo. is. 6d.
An'drewes (Bishop). PRECES PR I-
VATAE. Edited, with Notes, by F. E.
BRIGHTMAN, M. A. , of Pusey House, Oxfo: d.
Cr. 8v0. 6s.
Anglo- Australian. AFTER-GLOW ME-
MORIES. Cr. 8v0. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Aristophanes. THE FROGS. Translated
into English by E. W. HUNTINGFORD,
M.A. Cr. 8vo. zs. 6d.
Aristotle. THENICOMACHEAN
ETHICS. Edited, with an Introduction
and Notes, by JOHN BURNET, M.A., Pio-
fessor of Greek at St. Andrews. Cheaper
issue. Demy 8v0. IQS. 6d. net.
Ashton (R.). See Little Blue Books.
Atkins (H. G.). See Oxford Biographies.
Atkinson (C. M.). JEREMY BENTHAM.
Demy 8va. $s. net.
Atkinson (T. D.). A SHORT HISTORY
OF ENGLISH ARCHITECTURE.
With over 200 Illustrations. Fcap. 8t/ >.
*A3*GLOSSARY OF TERMS USED I.*
ENGLISH ARCHITECTURE. Him-
trated. Fcap. 8vo. 3*. 6d. net.
Auden (T.), M.A., F.S.A. See Ancient Citie ;.
Aurelius (Marcus). See Standard Library
and W. H. D. Rouse.
Austen (Jane). See Little Library an 1
Standard Library.
Aves (Ernest). See Books on Business.
Bacon (Francis). Se« Little Library an i
Standard Library.
GENERAL LITERATURE
Baden~Powell (R. S. S.), Major.General.
THE DOWNFALL OF PREMPEH. A
Diary of Life in Ashanti, 1895. Illustrated.
Third Edition.. Large Cr. Zvo. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
THE MATABELE CAMPAIGN, 1896.
With nearly 100 Illustrations. Fourth
Edition. Large Cr. &vo. ' 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
*Bajrot (Richard). THE LAKE OF
CO MO. Cr. 8vo. 3*. 6d. net.
Bailey (J. C.), M.A. See Cowper.
Baker (W. Q.), M.A. See Junior Examina
tion Series.
Baker (Julian L.), F.I.C., F.C.S. See Books
on Business.
Balfour (Graham). THE LIFE OF
ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON. Second
Edition. Two Volumes. Demy Zvo. 25$. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Bally (S. E.). See Commercial Series.
banks (Elizabeth L.). THE AUTO
BIOGRAPHY OF A 'NEWSPAPER
GIRL.' Second Edition. Cr. Zvo. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Barbara (R. H.). See Little Library.
Baring (The Hon. Maurice). WITH
THE RUSSIANS IN MANCHURIA.
Third Edition. Demy 8vo. js. fid. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Baring- Gould (S.). THE LIFE OF
NAPOLEON BONAPARTE. With over
450 Illustrations in the Text, and 12 Photo
gravure Plates. Gilt top. Large quarto.
THE' TRAGEDY OF THE CAESARS.
With numerous Illustrations from Busts,
Gems, Cameos, etc. Fifth Edition. Royal
8vo. i of. 6d, net.
A BOOK OF FAIRY TALES. With
numerous Illustrations by A. J. GASKIN.
Second Edition. Cr. %vo. Buckram. 6s.
OLD ENGLISH FAIRY TALES. With
numerous Illustrations by F. D. BEDFORD.
Second Edition. Cr. 8vo. Buckram. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
THE VICAR OF MORWENSTOW. Re
vised Edition. With a Portrait. Cr. Zvo.
3j. 6d.
DARTMOOR : A Descriptive and Historical
Sketch. With Plans and numerous Illus
trations. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
THE BOOK OF THE WEST. Illustrated.
Tiuevolumes. Vol. I. Devon. Second Edition.
Vol. H. Cornwall. Second Edition. Cr. 8ve>.
6s. each.
A BOOK OF NORTH WALES. Illus-
trated. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
A BOOK OF SOUTH WALES. Illustrated.
Cr. &ve. 6s.
A BOOK OF BRITTANY. Illustrated. Cr..
Svf. 6s.
A BOOK OF THE RIVIERA. Illustrated.
Cr. 8»*. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
*THE RHINE. Illustrated. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
A BOOK OF GHOSTS. With 8 Illustra
tions by D. MURRAY SMITH. Second Edi
tion. Cr. Bvff. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
OLD COUNTRY LIFE. With 67 Illustra
tions. Fifth Edition. Large Cr.Zvo. 6s.
A GARLAND OF COUNTRY SONG:
English Folk Songs with their Traditional
Melodies. Collected and arranged by S.
BARING-GOULD and H. F. SHBPPARD.
Demy $to. 6s.
SONGS OF THE WEST: Folk Songs of
Devon and Cornwall. Collected from the
Mouths of the People. ByS. BARING-GOULD,
M.A., and H. FLEETWOOD SHEPPARD, M.A.
New and Revised Edition, under the musical
editorship of CECIL J. SHARP, Principal of
the Hampstead Conservatoire. Large /tti-
ferial fa'O. 55-. net.
See also Little Guides and Half-Crown
Library.
Barker (Aldred F.). See Textbooks of
Technology.
Barnes (W. E.), D.D. See Churchman's
Bible.
Barnett (Mrs. P. A.). See Little Library.
i Baron (R.R.N.), M.A. FRENCHPROSE
COMPOSITION. Second Edition. Cr.Bvf.
?s.6d. Key, 3S.net. See also Junior School
Books.
Barron (H. M.), M.A., Wadham College,
Oxford. TEXTS FOR SERMONS. With
a Preface by Canon SCOTT HOLLAND.
Cr. Zvo. 3-r. 6d.
Bartholomew (J. G.), F.R.S.E. See C. G.
Robertson.
Bastable(C. F.), M.A. See S.Q.S.
Batson (Mrs. Stephen). A BOOK OF
THE COUNTRY AND THE GARDEN.
Illustrated by F. CARRUTHERS GOULD and
A. C. GOULD. Demy 8v<>. ior. 6d.
A CONCISE HANDBOOK OF GARDEN
FLOWERS. Fcap. 8vo. 3*. 6d.
Batten (Loring W.), Ph.D., S.T.D. THE
HEBREW PROPHET. Cr. 8va. 35. 6d.
net.
l3eaman(A. Hulme). PONSASINORUM;
OR, A GUIDE TO BRIDGE. Second
Edition. Fcap. 8vo. 2J.
Beard (W. S.). See Junior Examination
Series and Beginner's Books.
Beckford (Peter). THOUGHTS ON
HUNTING. Edited by J. OTHO PAGET,
and Illustrated by G. H. JALLAND. Second
Edition. Demy Zvo. 6s.
Beckford (William). See Little Library.
Beeching (H. ;C.), M.A., Canon of West
minster. See Library of Devotion.
Begbie (Harold). MASTER WORKERS.
Illustrated. Demy 8vt. 7*. 6d. net.
Behmen (Jacob). DIALOGUES ON THE
SUPERSENSUAL LIFE. Edited by
BERNARD HOLLANB. Fcap. 8«/». 3*. $d.
MESSRS. METHUEN'S CATALOGUE
Belloc (Hillaire). PARIS. With Maps and
Illustrations. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
*MARIE ANTOINETTE. With many
Portraits and Illustrations. Demy Bvo.
J2S. 6d. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
BeIIot(H.H. L.), M.A. THE INNER AND
MIDDLE TEMPLE. With numerous
Illustrations. Crown. Bvo. 6s. net.
See also L. A. A. Jones.
Bennett (W. H.)f M.A. A PRIMER OF
THE BIBLE. Second Edition. Cr. Bvo.
ss. 6d.
Bennett (W. H.) and Adeney (W. F.). A
BIBLICAL INTRODUCTION, Third
Edition. Cr. Bvo. is. 6d.
Benson (Archbishop) GOD'S BOARD:
Communion Addresses. Fcap. 8vo. 3*. 6d.
net.
Benson (A. C.), M.A. See Oxford Bio
graphies.
Benson (R. M.). THE WAY OF HOLI
NESS: a Devotional Commentary on the
irgth Psalm. Cr. Bvo. ss.
Bernard (E. R.), M.A., Canon of Salisbury.
THE ENGLISH SUNDAY. Fcap. Bvo.
is.6d.
Bertouch (Baroness de). THE LIFE
OF FATHER IGNATIUS. Illustrated.
Demy Bvo. IDJ. 6d. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Betham- Ed wards (M.). HOME LIFE IN
FRANCE. Illustrated. Fourth Edition.
Demy Bvo. "js. 6d. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Bethune- Baker (J. F.), M.A. See Hand
books of Theology.
Bidez (M.). See Byzantine Texts.
Biggs (C. R. D.), D.D. See Churchman's
Bible.
Bindley (T. Herbert), B.D. THE OECU
MENICAL DOCUMENTS OF THE
FAITH. With Introductions and Notes.
Cr. Bvo. 6s.
Binns (H. B.). THE LIFE OF WALT
WHITMAN. Illustrated. Demy Bvo.
ioJ. 6d. net-
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Binyon (Laurence). THE DEATH OF
ADAM , AN D OT H E R PO E M S Cr. Bvo.
3^. 6d. net.
*WILLIAM BLAKE. In 2 volumes.
Quarto. £i, is. each.
Vol. i.— THE BOOK OF JOB.
BirnstingI (Ethel). See Little Books en Art.
Blackmantle (Bernard). See I. P. L.
Blair (Robert). See I. P. L.
Blake (William). See I. P. L. and Little
Library.
Blaxland (B.), M.A. See Library of
Devotion.
Bloom (T. Harvey), M.A. SHAKE-
SPEARE'SGARDEN. Illustrated.
Fcap. Bvo. 3*. 6tf. ; leather, 4*. 6d. net.
See also Antiquary's Books.
Blouet (Henri). See Beginner's Books.
Boardman (T. H.), M.A. See Textbook?
of Science.
Bodley (J. E. C.), Author of France. THE
CORONATION OF EDWARD VII.
Dewy Bvo. sis. net. By Command of the
King.
Body (George), D.D. THE SOULS
PILGRIMAGE t Devotional Readings
from his writings. Selected by J. H. BUR v,
B.D., F.R.S.E. Pott Bvo. 2s. 6d.
Bona (Cardinal). See Library of Devotior .
Boon (F. C.). See Commercial Series.
Borrow (George). See Little Library.
Bos (J. Ritzema). AGRICULTURAL
ZOOLOGY. Translated by J. R. AIN ,-
WORTH DAVIS, M.A. With 155 Illustrations.
Cr. Bvo. Third Edition. 3*. 6d.
Botting (C. G.), B.A. EASY G R E E <
EXERCISES. Cr. Bvo. 25. See aho
Junior Examination Series.
Boulton(E. S.), M.A. GEOMETRY O:\
MODERN LINES. Cr. Bvo. zs.
Boulton (William B.). THOMAS
GAINSBOROUGH With 40 Illustn..
tions. Second Ed. Demy Bvo. js.6d.ne..
SIR JOSHUA REYNOLDS, P.R.A. Wit i
49 Illustrations. Dewy Bvo. is. 6d. net.
Bowden(E. M.). THE IMITATION Or
BUDDHA : Being Quotations fror i
Buddhist Literature for each Day in th :
Year. Fifth Edition. Cr. i6mo. 2S. 6d.
Boyle (W.). CHRISTMAS AT THE ZOO
With Verses by W. BOYLE and 24 Coloured
Pictures by H. B. NEICSON. Super Roya '
l6»!0. 2S.
Brabant (F. G.), M.A. See Little Guides.
Bradley (J. W.). See Little Books on Art.
'Brailsford (H. N.). MACEDONIA.
Illustrated. Demy Bvo. izs.6d.net.
Brodrick (Mary) and Morton (Anderson).
A CONCISE HANDBOOK OF EGYP
TIAN ARCHAEOLOGY. Illustrated. Cr.
Bvo. is. 6d.
Brooke (A. S.), M.A. SLINGSBY AND
SLINGSBY CASTLE. Illustrated. Cr.
Bvo. js. 6d.
Brooks (E. W.). See Byzantine Texts.
Brown (P. H.), LL.D., Fraser Professor of
Ancient (Scottish) History at the University
of Edinburgh. SCOTLAND IN THE
TIME OF QUEEN MARY. Demy Bvo.
7s. 6d. net.
Browne (Sir Thomas). See Standard
Library.
Brownell (C. L.). THE HEART OF
JAPAN. Illustrated. Third Edition.
Cr. Bvo. 6s. ; also Demy Bvo. 6d.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Browning (Robert). See Little Library.
Buckland (Francis T.). CURIOSITIES
OF NATURAL HISTORY. Illustrated
by H. B. NEILSON. Cr. fro. 3*. f>d.
GENERAL LITERATURE
Buckton (A. M.) THE BURDEN OF
ENGELA : a Ballad-Epic. Second Edition.
Cr. 8vff. S.T. 6d. net.
EAGER HEART : A Mystery Play. Fourth
Edition. Cr. %vo. is. net.
Budge (E. A. Wallis). THE GODS OF
THE EGYPTIANS. With over _ 100
Coloured Plates and many Illustrations.
Two Volumes, Royal 2>vo. ^3, 3^. net.
Bull (Paul), Army Chaplain. GOD AND
OUR SOLDIERS. Second Edition.
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Bulley (Miss). See S.Q.S.
Bunyan (John). THE PILGRIM'S PRO
GRESS. Edited, with an Introduction,
by C. H. FIRTH, M.A. With 39 Illustra
tions by R. ANNING BEI.L. Cr. Zvo. 6s.
See also Library of Devotion and Standard
Library.
Burch (G. J.), M.A., F.R.S. A MANUAL
OF ELECTRICAL SCIENCE. Illus
trated. Cr. 8ve. 3J.
Burgess (Qelett). GOOPS AND HOW TO
BE THEM. Illustrated. Small 4(0. 6s.
Burke (Edmund). See Standard Library.
Burn (A. E.), D.D., Prebendary of Lichfield.
See Handbooks of Theology.
Burn (J. H.), B.D. See Library of Devotion.
Burnand (Sir F. C.). RECORDS AND
REMINISCENCES. With a Portrait by
H. v. HERKOMER. Cr. 8vo. Fourth and
Cheaper Edition. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published. |
Burns (Robert), THE POEMS OF. Editad
by ANDREW LANG and W. A. CRAIGIE. With
Portrait. T/iird Edition. Demy 8v0, gilt
top. 6s.
Burnside (W. F.), M.A. OLD TESTA-
MENT HISTORY FOR USE IN
SCHOOLS. Cr. Sva. 3*. 6d.
Burton (Alfred). See I.P.L.
Butler (Joseph). See Standard Library.
Caldecott (Alfred), D.D. See Handbooks
of Theology.
Calderwood (D. S.), Headmaster of the Nor
mal School, Edinburgh. TEST CARDS
IN EUCLID AND ALGEBRA. In three I
packets of 40, with Answers, i s. each. Or !
in three Books, price 2^., 2^., and -$d.
Cambridge (Ada) [Mrs. Cross]. THIRTY
YEARS IN AUSTRALIA. Demy Zvo.
75. 6d.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Canning (George). See Little Library.
Capey (E. F. H.). See Oxford Biographies.
Careless (John). See I. P. L.
Carlyle (Thomas). THE FRENCH
REVOLUTION. Edited by C. R. L.
FLETCHER, Fellow of Magdalen College,
Oxford. Three Volumes. Cr. 8z>0. i8s.
.
an'.
rfield (Lord), THE LETTERS OF,
HIS SON. Edited, with an Introduc
THE LIFE AND LETTERS OF OLIVER
CROMWELL. With an Introduction
by C. H. FIRTH, M.A., and Notes and
Appendices by Mrs. S. C. LOMAS. Three
Volumes. Demy %'jo. i8.y. net.
Carlyle (R. M. and A. J.), M.A. See Leaders
of Religion.
*Carpenter (Margaret). THE CHILD
IN ART. Illustrated. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
Chamberlin (Wilbur B.). ORDERED
TO CHINA. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Cbanner (C. C.) and Roberts (M. E.).
LACEMAKING IN THE MIDLANDS,
PAST AND PRESENT. With 16 full-
page Illustrations. Cr. 8vo. zs. 6d.
Chapman (S. J.). See Books on Business.
Chatterton (Thomas). See Standard
Li bra
Cheste
TO HIS SON.
tion by C. STRACHEY, and Notes by A.
CALTHROP. Two Volumes. Cr. 8vo. izs.
"Chesterton (G. K.). DICKENS. With
Portraits and Illustrations. Demy 8vo.
•js. 6d. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Christian (F. W.). THE CAROLINE
ISLANDS. With many Illustrations and
Maps. DemyZvo. i-2s.6d.net.
Cicero. See Classical Translations.
Clarke (F. A.), M.A. See Leaders of Religion.
Cleather (A. L.) and Crump (B.).
RICHARD WAGNER'S MUSIC
DRAMAS : Interpretations, embodying
Wagner's own explanations. In Four
Volumes. Fcap 8vo. ?s. 6d. each.
VOL. i.— THE RING OF THE NIBELUNG.
VOL. ii.— PARSIFAL, LOHENGRIN, and
THE HOLY GRAIL.
VOL. in.— TRISTAN AND ISOLDE.
Clinch (G.). See Little Guides.
Clough (W. T.). See Junior School Books. '
Coast (W. G.), B.A. EXAMINATION
PAPERS IN VERGIL. Cr. Zvo. zs.
Cobb (T.). See Little Blue Books.
Cobb (W. F.), M.A. THE BOOK OF
PSALMS : with a Commentary. DcmyK-vo.
jos. 6d. net.
Coleridge (S. T.), SELECTIONS FROM.
Edited by ARTHUR SYMONS. Fcap. 8v0.
2S. 6d. net.
Collingwood (W. G.). See Half-Crown
Library.
Collins (W. E.), M.A. See Churchman's
Library.
Colonna. HYPNEROTOMACHIA POLI-
PHILI UBI HUMANA OMNIA NON
NISI SOMNIUM ESSE DOCET
ATQUE OBITER PLURIMA SCITU
SANE QUAM DIGNA COMMEMO-
RAT. An edition limited to 350 copies' on
handmade paper. Folio. Three Guineas net.
Combe (William). See I. P. L.
Cook (A. M.), M.A. See E. C. Marchant.'
MESSRS. METHUEN'S CATALOGUE
Cooke-Taylor (R. W.). See S.Q.S.
Corelli (Marie). THE PASSING OF THE
GREAT QUEEN : Feat. t,to. is.
A CHRISTMAS GREETING. CV. 4to. u.
Corkran (Alice). See Little Books on Art.
Cotes ( Rosemary). DANTE'S GARDEN.
With a Frontispiece. Second Edition.
Fcap. Zvo. as. 6d. ; leather, y. 6d. net.
BIBLE FLOWERS. With a Frontispiece
and Plan. Fcap. %vo. zs. 6d. net.
Cowley (Abraham). See Little Library.
Cowner (William), THE POEMS OF.
Edited with an Introduction and Notes by
J. C. BAILEY, M.A. Illustrated, including
two unpublished designs by WILLIAM
BLAKE. Demy Zvo. to*. 6d. net.
Cox (J. Charles), LL.D., F.S.A. See Little
Guides, The Antiquary's Books, and Ancient
Cities.
Cox (Harold), B.A. See S.Q.S.
Crabbe (George). See Little Library.
Craigie(W. A.). A PRIMER OF BURNS.
CV. &vo. as. 6d.
Craik (Mrs.). See Little Library.
Crashaw (Richard). See Little Library.
Crawford (F. G.). See Mary C. Danson.
*Cross (J. A.). A LITTLE BOOK OF
RELIGION. Fcap. 8™. vs. 6d. net.
Crouch (W.). BRYAN KING. With a
Portrait. Cr. 8vo. y. 6d. net.
Cruikshank ((].). THE LOVING BAL
LAD OF LORD BATEMAN. With n
Plates. Cr. i6mo. u. 6d. net.
Crump (B.). See A. L. Cleather.
Cunliffe (Sir F. H. E.), Fellow of All Souls'
College, Oxford. THE HISTORY OF
THE BOER WAR. With many Illus
trations, Plans, and Portraits. In 2 vols.
Quarto. 15^. each.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Cunynghame(r1. ), C.B., See Connoisseur's
Library.
Cutts (E. L.), D. D. See Leaders of Religion.
Daniell (Q. W.), M.A. See Leaders of
Religion.
Danson (Mary C.) and Crawford (F. G.).
FATHERS IN THE FAITH. Fcap.
Zvo. is. 6d.
Dante. LA COM MEDIA DI DANTE.
The Italian Text edited by PAG«T TOVNBEE,
M.A.,D.Litt. Cr. Ivo. 6s.
T H E PU R G A T O R I O O F D A N T E.
Translated into Spenserian Prose by C.
GORDON WRIGHT. With the Italian text.
Fcap. Zve. zj. 6d. net.
See also PagetToynbee, Little Library and
Standard Library.
Darley (George). See Little Library.
D'Arcy (R. F.), M.A. A NEW TRIGON
OMETRY FOR BEGINNERS. Cr. too.
as. 6d.
Davenport (Cyril). See Connoisseur's
Library and Little Books on Art.
*Davey (Richard). THE PAGEANT OF
LONDON With 40 Illustrations in
Colour by JOHN FULLEYLOVE, R. I. In
Two Volumes. Demy Svo. js. 6d. n:t.
Each volume may be purchased separate y.
VOL. i. — TOA.D. 1500.
VOL. ii. — A.D. 1500 TO 1900.
Davis (H. W. C.), M.A., Fellow and Tutor
of Balliol College , Author of ' Ch arlemagn -. '
ENGLAND UNDER THE NORMANS
AND ANGEVINS : 1066-1272. Wi h
Maps and Illustrations. DentyZvo. ios.6c'..
net.
Dawson (A. J.). MOROCCO. Illustrated
Demy 8w. IQJ. 6d. net.
Deane (A. C.). See Little Library.
Delbos (Leon). THE METRIC SYSTEM.
Cr. %vo. as.
Demosthenes. THEOLYNTHIACS AN 3
PHILIPPICS. Translated by OTHO
HOLLAND. Cr. Zvo. 2*. 6d.
Demosthenes. AGAINST CONON AN])
CALLICLES. Edited by F. DARWIM
SWIFT, M.A. Fcap. 8v0. 2t.
Dickens (Charles). See Little Library an 1
I.P.L.
Dickinson (Emily). POEMS. Cr. Bvc.
4J. 6d. net.
Dickinson (G. L.), M.A., Fellow of King1 i
College, Cambridge. THE GREEK
VI EW OF LIFE. Fourth Edition. CV
8?'0. 2S. f>d.
Dickson (H. N.). F.R.Met. Soc
METEOROLOGY. Illustrated. Cr.too
2s. 6d.
Dilke(Lady). SeeS.Q.S\
Dillon (Edward). See Connoisseur'sLibran
and Little Books on Art.
Ditchfield (P. H.), M.A., F.S.A.
THE STORY OF OUR ENGLISH
TOWNS. With an Introduction bj
AUGUSTUS JESSOI-P, D.D. Second Edition.
Cr. Bf>f>. 6s.
OLD ENGLISH CUSTOMS: Extant at
the Present Time. Cr. Zvo. 6s.
See also Half-crown Library.
Dixon (W. M.), M.A. A PRIMER OF
TENNYSON. Second Edition. Cr. Sva.
zs. 6d.
ENGLISH POETRY FROM BLAKE TO
BROWNING. Second Edition. Cr. Zvo.
•zs. 6d.
Dole (N. H.). FAMOUS COMPOSERS.
With Portraits. Two Volumes. Demy
Bvo. i2i. net.
Doney (May). SONGS OF THE REAL.
Cr. Zvo. 3$. 6d. net.
A volume of poems.
Douglas (James). THE MAN IN THE
PULPIT. Cr. &~'0. zs. 6d. net.
Dowden (J.), D.D., Lord Bishop of Edin-
burgh. See Churchman's Library.
Drage (G.). See Books on Business.
GENERAL LITERATURE
Driver (S. R.), D-D., D.C.L., Canon ofChrist
Church, Regius Professor of Hebrew in the
University of Oxford. SERMONS ON
SUBJECTS CONNECTED WITH THE
OLD TESTAMENT. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
See also Westminster Commentaries.
Dry(Wakeling). See Little Guides.
Dryhurst (A. R.). See Little Books on Art.
Duguid (Charles). See Books on Business.
Dunn (J.T)., D.Sc., and Mundella(V. A.).
GENERAL ELEMENTARY SCIENCE.
With 114 Illustrations. Second Edition.
Cr. Bvo. $s. 6d.
Dun stan (A. E.), B.Sc. See Junior School
Books and Textbooks of Science.
Durham (The Earl of). A REPORT ON
CANADA. With an Introductory Note.
Demy Bvo. 45. 6d. net.
Dutt(W. A.). A POPULAR GUIDE TO
NORFOLK. Medium Bvo. 6d. net.
THE NORFOLK BROADS. With
coloured Illustrations by FRANK SOUTH-
GATE. Cr. Bvo. 6s. See also Little Guides.
Earle(John), Bishop of Salisbury. MICRO-
COSMOGRAPHIE, OR A PIECE OF
THE WORLD DISCOVERED. Post
\6rno. zs net.
Edmonds (Major J. E.). R.E. ; D.A.Q.-
M.G. See W. Birkbeck Wood.
Edwards (Clement). SeeS.Q.S.
Edwards (W. Douglas). See Commercial
Series.
Egan (Pierce). See I.P.L.
*Egerton H. E., M.A. A HISTORY OF
BRITISH COLONIAL POLICY. New
and Cheaper Issue. Demy Bvo. js. 6d. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Ellaby (C. G.). See The Little Guides.
Ellerton (F. G.). See S. J. Stone.
Ellwood (Thomas), THE HISTORY OF
THE LIFE OF. Edited by C. G. CRUMP,
M.A. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
Eplctetus. See W. H. D. Rouse.
Erasmus. A Book called in Latin EN
CHIRIDION MILITIS CHRISTIANI,
and in English the Manual of the Christian
Knight.
From the edition printed by Wynken de
Worde, 1533. Fcap. Bvo 3*. 6d. net.
Fairbrother(W. H.), M.A. THE PHILO-
SOPHY OF T. H. GREEN. Second
Edition. Cr. Bvo. v. 6d.
Farrer (Reginald). THE GARDEN OF
ASIA. Second Edition. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
*Fea (Allan). BEAUTIES OF THE
SEVENTEENEH CENTURY. With
TOO Illustrations. Demy Bvo, izs.6d.net.
FELISSA; OR, THE LIFE AND
OPINIONS OF A KITTEN OF SENTI
MENT. With 12 Coloured Plates. Post
i6mo. ts. 6d. net.
Ferrier (Susan). See Little Library.
Fldler (T. Claxton), M.Inst. C.E. See
Books on Business.
Fielding (Henry). See Standard Library.
Rnn {S. W.), M. A. See Junior Examination
Series.
Firth (C. H.), M.A. CROMWELL'S
ARMY: A History of the English Soldier
during the Civil Wars, the Commonwealth,
and the Protectorate. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
Fisher (G. W.), M.A. ANNALS OF
SHREWSBURY SCHOOL. Illustrated.
Demy Bvo. ioj. 6d.
FitzGerald (Edward). THE RUBAIYAT
OF OMAR KHAYYAM. Printed from
the Fifth and last Edition. With a Com
mentary by Mrs. STEPHEN BATSON, and a
Biography of Omar by E. D. Ross. Cr.
Bvo. 6s. See also Miniature Library.
*FitzGerald (H. P.). A CONCISE HAND
BOOK OF CLIMBERS, TWINERS,
AND WALL SHRUBS. Illustrated.
Fcap. Bvo. 3-r. 6d. net.
Flecker (W. H.), M.A., D.C.L., Headmaster
of the Dean Close School, Cheltenham.
THE STUDENT'S PRAYER BOOK.
THE TEXT OF MORNING AND EVENING
PRAYER AND LITANY. With an Introduc
tion and Notes. Cr. Bvo. zs. 6d.
Flux (A. W.), M.A., William Dow Professor
of Political Economy in M'Gill University,
Montreal. ECONOMIC PRINCIPLES.
Demy Bvo. fs. 6d. net.
Fortescue (Mrs. G.). See Little Books on Art.
Fraser (David). A MODERN CAM
PAIGN; OR, WAR AND WIRELESS
TELEGRAPHY IN THE FAR EAST.
Illustrated. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Fraser (J. F.). ROUND THE WORLD
ON A WHEEL. With 100 Illustrations.
Fourth Edition Cr. Bvo. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
French (W.), M.A. See Textbooks of
Science.
Freudenreich (Ed. von). DAIRY BAC
TERIOLOGY. A Short Manual for the
Use of Students. Translated by J. R.
AINSWORTH DAVIS, M.A. Second Edition.
Revised. Cr. Bvo. ?s. 6d.
Fulford (H. W.), M.A. See Churchman's
Bible.
C. G., and F. C. G. JOHN BULL'S AD
VENTURES IN THE FISCAL WON
DERLAND. By CHARLES GEAKE. With
46 Illustrations by F. CARRUTHERS GOULD.
Second Edition. Cr. Bvo. is. net.
*Gallaher (D. ) and Stead (D. W.). THK
COMPLETE RUGBY FOOTBALLER.
With an Account of the Tour of the New
Zealanders in England. With Illustra
tions. Demy Bvo. los. 6d. net.
Gallichan (W; M.). See Little Guides.
Gambado (Geoffrey, Esq.). See I.P.L.
Gaskell (Mrs.). See Little Library and
Standard Library.
Gasquet, the Right Rev. Abbot, O.S.B. See
! Antiquary's Books.
MESSRS. METHUEN'S CATALOGUE
George (H. B.), M. A. , Fellow of New College,
Oxford. BATTLES OF ENGLISH HIS
TORY. With numerous Plans. Fourth
Edition. Revised, with a new Chapter
including the South African War. Cr. 8vt>.
3£.&
A HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHY OF THE
BRITISH EMPIRE. Second Edition.
Cr. too. y. 6d.
Gibbins (H. de B.), Litt.D., M.A. IN
DUSTRY IN ENGLAND : HISTORI
CAL OUTLINES. With 5 Maps. Fourth
Edition. Demy 8v0. IQJ. 6d.
A COMPANION GERMAN GRAMMAR.
Cr. 8vo. is. 6d.
THE INDUSTRIAL HISTORY OF
ENGLAND. Tenth Edition. Revised.
With Maps and Plans. Cr. 8v0. 3*.
ENGLISH SOCIAL REFORMERS.
Second Edition. Cr. 8i>0. ss. 6d.
See also Commercial Series and S.Q.S.
Gibbon (Edward). THE DECLINE AND
FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE.
A New Edition, edited with Notes, Appen
dices, and Maps, by ]. B. BURY, M.A.,
Litt.D., Regius Professor of Greek at Cam
bridge. In Seven Volumes. Demy 8z>0.
Gilt top, Bs.6d.each. Also^Cr. 8v0. 6s.
each.
MEMOIRS OF MY LIFE AND WRIT
INGS. Edited by G. BIRKBECK HILL,
LL.D. Demy 8v0, Gilt top. 8s. 6d. Also
Cr. Zve. 6s.
See also Standard Library.
Gibson (E. C. S.), D.D., Lord Bishop of
Gloucester. See Westminster Commentaries,
Handbooks of Theology, and Oxford Bio
graphies.
Gilbert (A. R.). See Little Books on Art.
Gloag (M.)« See K. Wyatt.
Godfrey (Elizabeth). A BOOK OF RE
MEMBRANCE. Edited by. Fcap. 8v0.
zs. 6d. net.
Godley(A. D.), M.A., Fellow of Magdalen
College, Oxford. LYRA FRIVOLA.
Third Edition. Fcap. 8vo. vs. 6d.
VERSES TO ORDER. Second Edition.
Fcap. Zvo. ss. 6d.
SECOND STRINGS. Fcap. 8vo. -25. 6d.
Goldsmith (Oliver). THE VICAR OF
WAKEFIELD. Fcap. ^mo. With 10
Plates in Photogravure by Tony Johannot.
Leather, zs. 6d. net. See also I.P.L. and
Standard Library.
Goodrich -Freer (A.). IN A SYRIAN
SADDLE. Demy 8v0. js. 6d. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Goudge (H. L.), M.A., Principal of Wells
Theological College. See Westminster Com
mentaries.
Graham (P. Anderson). See S.Q.S.
Granger (F. S.), M.A., Litt.D. PSYCH
OLOGY. Second Edition. Cr.8vo.2s.6d.
THE SOUL OF A CHRISTIAN. Cr. 8vo.
6s.
Gray (E. M'Queen). GERMAN PASSAGES
FOR UNSEEN TRANSLATION. Cr.
8vo. 2$. 6d.
Gray (P. L.), B.Sc. THE PRINCIPLES OF
MAGNETISM AND ELECTRICITY:
an Elementary Text-Book. With i3i
Diagrams. Cr. 8vo. 3^. 6d.
Green (G. Buckland), M.A., late Fellow
of St. John's College, Oxon. NOTES O>?
GREEK AND LATIN SYNTAX. O.
8v0. 3$. 6d.
Green (E. T.), M.A. See Churchman s
Library.
Greenidge (A. H. J.), M.A. A HISTOR /
OF ROME: During the Later Republ c
and the Early Principate. In Six Volume.-.
DemyZvo. Vol. I. (133-104 B.C.)- los. 6t'.
net.
Greenwell (Dora). See Miniature Library.
Gregory (R. A.). THE VAULT OJ-
HEAVEN. A Popular Introduction f>
Astronomy. Illustrated. Cr. 8vo. 2s. 6a.
Gregory (Miss E. C.). See Library cf
Devotion.
Greville Minor. A MODERN JOURNAL
Edited by J. A. SPENDER. Cr. 8vo
3*. 6d. net.
Grubb(H. C.). See Textbooks of Technology
Guiney (Louisa I.). HURRELI
FROUDE : Memoranda and Comments.
Illustrated. Demy %vo. ioi. 6d. net.
Gwynn(M. L.). A BIRTHDAY BOOK.
New and cheaper issue. Royal %>vo. 55. net.
Hackett (John), B.D. A HISTORY OF
THE ORTHODOX CHURCH OF
CYPRUS. With Maps and Illustrations.
Demy 8ve. 155. net.
Haddon (A. C.), Sc.D.,' F.R.S. HEAD-
HUNTERS BLACK, WHITE, AND
BROWN. With many Illustrations and a
Map. Demy 8v0. 15*.
Hadfield(R. A.). See S.Q.S.
Hall (R. N.) and Neal (W. G.). THE
ANCIENT RUINS OF RHODESIA,
Illustrated Second Edition^ revised.
Demy 8v0. IOT. 6d. net.
A Co'onial Edition is also published.
Hall (R. N.). GREAT ZIMBABWE.
With numerous Plans and Illustrations.
Second Edition. Royal 8v0. zis.net.
Hamilton (F. J.), D.D. See Byzantine Texts.
Hammond (J. L.). CHARLES JAMES
FOX. Demy 8v0. IDJ. 6d.
Hannay (D.). A SHORT HISTORY OF
THE ROYAL NAVY, Illustrated. Two
Volumes. Demy 8v0. -js. 6d. each. Vol. I.
1200-1688.
Hannay (James O.), M.A. THE SPIRIT
AND ORIGIN OF CHRISTIAN
MONASTICISM. Cr. %vo. 6s.
THE WISDOM OF THE DESERT. Fcap.
8v0. 35. 6d. net.
Hare (A. T.), M.A. THE CONSTRUC
TION OF LARGE INDUCTION COILS
With numerous Diagrams. Demy 8v0. 6s.
GENERAL LITERATURE
Harrison (Clifford). READING AND
READERS. Fc<tp. Zve. 2j. 6d.
Hawthorne ( Nathaniel). See Little Library.
HEALTH, WEALTH AND WISDOM.
Cr. 8vff. is. net,
Heath (Frank R.). See Little Guides.
Heath (Dudley). See Connoisseur's Library.
Hello (Ernest). STUDIES IN SAINT-
SHIP. Translated from the French by
V. M. CRAWFORD. Fcap Kvo. y. 6d.
Henderson (B. W.), Fellow of Exeter
College, Oxford. THE LIFE AND
PRINCIPATE OF THE EMPEROR
NERO. Illustrated. New and cheaper
issue. Demy 8vo. -js. 6d. net.
AT INTERVALS. FeapZvo. 2j. 6d. net.
Henderson (T. F.). See Little Library and
Oxford Biographies.
Henley (W. E.). See Half-Crown Library.
Henson (H. H.), B.D., Canon of Westminster.
APOSTOLICCHRISTIANITY: As Illus
trated by the Epistles of St. Paul to the
Corinthians. Cr. 8710. 6s.
LIGHT AND LEAVEN : HISTORICAL AND
SOCIAL SERMONS. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
DISCIPLINE AND LAW. Fcap. Bvt.
2s. 6d.
Herbert (George). See Library of Devotion.
Herbert of Cherbury (Lord). See Minia
ture Library.
Hewlns (W. A. S.), B.A. ENGLISH
TRADE AND FINANCE IN THE
SEVENTEENTH CENTURY. Cr. 8vo.
is. 6d.
Hewitt (Ethel M.) A GOLDEN DIAL.
A Day Book of Prose and Verse. Fcap.
%vo. aj. 6d. net.
Hevwood (W.). PALIO AND PONTE :
A Book of Tuscan Games. Illustrated.
Royal 8vo. au. net.
HHbert (T.). See Little Blue Books.
HH1 (Clare). See Textbooks of Technology.
Hill (Henry), B.A., Headmaster of the Boy's
High School, Worcester, Cape Colony. A
SOUTH AFRICAN ARITHMETIC.
Cr. 8va. 35. 6d.
HHIegas (Howard C.). WITH THE
BOER FORCES. With 24 Illustrations.
Second Edition. Cr. 87-0. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Hirst (F. W.) See Books on Business.
Hobhouse (Emily). THE BRUNT OF
THE WAR. With Map and Illustrations.
Cr. Svo. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Hobhouse (L. T.), Fellow of C.C.C., Oxford.
THE THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE.
De»ty %vo. TOJ. 6d. net.
Hobson(J. A.), M.A. INTERNATIONAL
TRADE : A Study of Economic Principles.
Cr. 8?'0. aj. 6d. net.
PROBLEMS OF POVERTY. Fifth Edition.
Cr. Zvff. 2*. 6d.
Hodgkin (T.)f D.C.L. See Leaders of
Religion.
A
Hodgson (Mrs. W.) HOW TO IDENTIFY
OLD CHINESE PORCELAIN. Second
Edition. Post 8vo. 6s.
Hogg (Thomas Jefferson). SHELLEY
AT OXFORD. With an Introduction by
R. A. STREATFEILD. Fcap. 8vo. is. net.
Holden-Stone (Q. de). See Books on
Business.
Holdich (Sir T. H.), K.C.I.E. THE
INDIAN BORDERLAND: being a
Personal Record of Twenty Years. Illus
trated . Demy Zvo. 10$. 6d. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Holds-worth (W. S.), M.A. A HISTORY
OF ENGLISH LAW. In. Two Volumes.
Vol. I. Demy 8vo. 103. 6d. net.
Holland (Canon Scott). See Library of
Devotion.
Holt (Emily). THE SECRET OF POPU
LARITY : How to Achieve Social Success.
Cr. Bvt>. 3^. 6d. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
HoIyoake(Q. J.). THE CO-OPERATIVE
MOVEMENT TO-DAY. Fourth Edition.
Cr. 8v o. 2S. 6d.
Hone (Nathaniel J.). See Antiquary's Books.
Hoppner. See Little Galleries.
Horace. See Classical Translations.
Horsburgh (E. L. S.), M.A. WATERLOO :
A Narrative and Criticism. With Plans.
Second Edition. Cr. 8vo. $s. See also
Oxford Biographies.
Horth(A. C.). See Textbooks of Technology.
Horton(R. F.),D.D. See Leaders of Religion.
Hosie (Alexander). MANCHURIA. With
Illustrations and a Map. Second Edition.
Dtmy 8z>0. 7*. 6d. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
How (F. D.). SIX GREAT SCHOOL
MASTERS. With Portraits and Illustra
tions Second Edition. DemySvo. js. 6d.
HoweIl(Q.). SeeS. Q. S.
Hudson (Robert). MEMORIALS OF A
WARWICKSHIRE PARISH. Illustrated.
Demy 8z>0. 15*. net.
Hughes (C. E.). THE PRAISE OF
SHAKESPEARE. An English Anthol
ogy. With a Preface by SIDNEY LEE.
Demy 8vo. 3*. 6<t. net.
Hughes (Thomas). TOM BROWN'S
SCHOOLDAYS. With an Introduction
and Notes by VERNON RBNDALL. Leather.
Royal -$-21110. vs. 6d. net.
Hutchinson (Horace G.) THE NEW
FOREST. Illustrated in colour with
50 Pictures by WALTER TVNDALE and 4
by Miss LUCY KEMP WELCH. Large
Demy Zvo. -z\s. net.
Hutton (A. W.), M.A. See Leaders of
Religion and Library of Devotion.
Hutton (Edward). THE CITIES OF
UMBRIA. With many Illustrations, of
which 20 are in Colour, by A. PISA. Second
Edition. Cr. 8-y0. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
2
10
MESSRS. METHUEN'S CATALOGUE
ENGLISH LOVE POEMS. Edited with
an Introduction. Fcap. Svo. 3$. 6d. net.
Hutton (R. H.). See Leaders of Religion.
Mutton (W. H.). M.A. THE LIFE OF
SIR THOMAS MORE. With Portraits.
Second Edition. Cr. Svo. $s. See also
Leaders of Religion.
Hyett (F. A.). A SHORT HISTORY OF
FLORENCE. Demy Svo. 7s. 6d. net.
Ibsen (Henrik). BRAND. A Drama.
Translated by WILLIAM WILSON. Third
Edition. Cr. Svo. 3*. 6d.
Inge (W. R.), M.A., Fellow and Tutor of
Hertford College, Oxford. CHRISTIAN
MYSTICISM. The Bampton Lectures for
1899. Demy Svo. 12*. 6d. net. See also
Library of Devotion.
lnnes(A. D.), M.A. A HISTORY OF THE
BRITISH IN INDIA. With Maps and
Plans. Cr. Svo. 6s.
ENGLAND UNDER THE TUDORS.
With Maps. Demy Svo.' los. 6d. net.
Jackson (C. E.), B.A. See Textbooks of
Science.
Jackson (S.), M.A. See Commercial Series.
Jackson (F. Hamilton). See Little Guides.
Jacob (P.), M.A. See Junior Examination
Series.
Jeans (J. Stephen). See S. Q. S. and Busi
ness Books.
Jeffreys(D. Gwyn). DOLLY'S THE ATRI-
CALS. Described and Illustrated with 24
Coloured Pictures. Super Royali6mo. zs.6d.
Jenks (E.), M.A., Reader of Law in the
University of Oxford. ENGLISH LOCAL
GOVERNMENT. Cr. Svo. zs. 6d.
Jenner (Mrs. H.). See Little Books on Art.
Jessopp (Augustus), D.D. See Leaders of
Religion.
kJevons(F. B.), M.A., Litt.D., Principal of
Hatfield Hall, Durham. RELIGION IN
EVOLUTION. Cr. 8w. 3*. 6d. net.
See also Churchman's Library and Hand
books of Theology.
Johnson (Mrs. Barham). WILLIAM BOD-
HAM DONNE AND HIS FRIENDS.
Illustrated. Demy Svo. \os.6d.net.
Johnston (Sir H. H.), K.C.B. BRITISH
CENTRAL AFRICA. With nearly 200
Illustrations and Six Maps. Third Edition.
Cr. 4to. iSs. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Jones (R. Crorapton), M.A. POEMS
OF THE INNER LIFE. Selected by.
Elei>enth Edition. Fcap. Svo. zs. 6d. net.
Jones (H.). See Commercial Series.
Jones (L. A. Atherley), K.C., M.P., and
Bellot (Hugh H. LO. THE MINERS-
GUIDE TO THE COAL MINES
REGULATION ACTS. Cr.Svo. zs. 6d. net.
"COMMERCE IN WAR. Demy Svo. 2is.
mi.
Jon son (Ben). See Standard Library.
Julian (Lady) of Norwich. REVELA-
TIONS OF DIVINE LOVE. Edited by
GRACE WARRACK. Cr. Svo. 3.1. 6d.
Juvenal. See Classical Translations.
'Kappa.' LET YOUTH BUT KNOW:
A Plea for Reason in Education. Cr. Svo.
35. 6d. net.
Kaufmann (M.). See S. Q. S.
Keating (J. F.), D.D. THE AGAPE AND
THE EUCHARIST. Cr. Svo. .3*. 6d.
Keats (John). THE POEMS OF. Editec
with Introduction and Notes by E. de Selin
court, M.A. Demy Svo. js. 6d. net. See
also Little Library, Standard Library, and
E. de Selincourt.
Keble(John). THE CHRISTIAN YEAR.
With an Introduction and Notes by W. LOCK,
D.D., Warden of Keble College. Illustrated
byR.ANNiNaBELL. Third Edition. Fcap.
Svo. 3* . 6d. ; padded morocco^ 5*. See also
Library of Devotion.
Kempis (Thomas a). THE IMITATION
OF CHRIST. With an Introduction by
DEAN FARRAR. Illustrated by C. M. GERE.
Third Edition. Fcap.Svo. 3* . 6d. ; padded
morocco. 55. See also Library of Devotion
and Standard Library.
Also Translated by C. BIGG, D.D. Cr.
Svo. 3*. 6d
Kennedy (Bart.). THE GREEN
SPHINX. Cr.Svo. 3*. 6d. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Kennedy (James Houghton), D.D., Assist
ant Lecturer in Divinity in the University of
Dublin. ST. PAUL'S SECOND AND
THIRD EPISTLES TO THE CORIN-
THI ANS. With Introduction, Dissertations
and Notes. Cr. Svo. 6s. '
Kestell (J. D.). THROUGH SHOT AND
FLAME : Being the Adventures and Ex
periences of J. D. KESTELL, Chaplain to
General Christian de Wet. Cr. Svo. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Kimmins (C. W.), M.A. THE CHEMIS
TRY OF LIFE AND HEALTH. Illus-
trated. Cr. Svo. 2s. 6d.
Kinglake (A. W.). See Litt.e Library.
Kipling (Rudyard). BARRACK-ROOM
BALLADS. 7$rd Thousand. Twenty-
first Edition. Cr. Svo. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
THE SEVEN SEAS. 6znd Thousand. Tenth
Edition. Cr. Svo. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
THE FIVE NATIONS, ^st Thousand.
Second Edition. Cr. Svo. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published
DEPARTMENTAL DITTIES. Sixteenth
Edition. Cr. Svo. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
* Knight (Albert E.). THE COMPLETE
CRICKETER. Illustrated. Demy Svo.
•jt. 6d. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
GENERAL LITERATURE
ii
Knowllng (R. J.), M.A., Professor of New
Testament Exegesis at King's College,
London. See Westminster Commentaries.
Lamb (Charles and Mary), THE WORKS
OF. Edited by E. V. LUCAS. Illustrated.
In Seven Volumes. DemyZvo. js.6d.cach.
THE LIFE OF. See E. V. Lucas.
See also Little Library.
Lambert (F. A. H.)- See Little Guides.
Lambros ''Professor). See Byzantine Texts.
Lane- Poole (Stanley). A HISTORY OF
EGYPT IN THE MIDDLE AGES. Fully
Illustrated. Cr. 8v0. 6s.
Langbridge(F.),M.A. BALLADSOFTHE
BRAVE : Poems of Chivalry, Enterprise,
Courage, and Constancy. Second Edition.
Cr. 8v0. -2S. 6d.
Law (William). See Library of Devotion
and Standard Library.
Leach (Henry). THE DUKE OF DEVON
SHIRE. A Biography. With 12 Illustra
tions. Denty 8v0. 1 2S. 6d. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
*Le Braz (Anatole). THE LAND OF
PARDONS. Translated by FRANCES M.
GOSTLING. Illustrated in colour. Crown
Lee (Captain L. Melville). A HISTORY
OF POLICE IN ENGLAND. Cr. 8v0.
35. 6d. net.
Leigh (Percival). THE COMIC ENGLISH
GRAMMAR. Embellished with upwards
of 50 characteristic Illustrations by JOHN
LEECH. Post \6rno. zs. 6d. net.
Lewes (V. B.), M. A. AIR AND WATER.
Illustrated. Cr. %vo. vs. 6d.
•Lewis (Mrs. Qwynn). A CONCISE
HANDBOOK OF GARDEN SHRUBS.
Illustrated. Fcap. 8r>o. 35. 6d. net.
Lisle (Fortune"ede). See Little Bookson Art.
Littlehales(H.). See Antiquary's Books.
Lock (Walter), D.D., Warden of Keble
College. ST. PAUL, THE MASTER-
BUILDER. Second Edition. Cr. 8v0.
35. 6d.
THE BIBLE AND CHRISTIAN LIFE.
Cr. 8v0, 6s.
See also Leaders of Religion and Library
of Devotion.
Locker (F.). See Little Library.
Longfellow (H. W.). See Little Library.
Lorimer (George Horace). LETTERS
FROM A SELF-MADE MERCHANT
TO HIS SON. Fourteenth Edition. C*.
8v0. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
OLD GORGON GRAHAM. Second Edition.
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Lover (Samuel). See I. P. L.
E. V. L. and C. L.IO. ENGLAND DAY BY
DAY : Or, The Englishman's Handbook to
Efficiency. Illustrated by GBORGU MORROW.
fourth Edition. Fcap. 4/0. is. net.
Lucas (E.V.). THE LIFE OF CHARLES
LAMB. With numerous Portraits and
Illustrations. Third Edition. Two Vols.
Denty 8vo. sis. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
A WANDERER IN HOLLAND. With
many Illustrations, of which 20 are in Colour
by HERBERT MARSHALL. Fifth Edition.
Cr. 8v0. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
THE OPEN ROAD : a Little Book for Way
farers. Ninth Edition. Fcap. 8v0. 55. ;
India Paper, js. 6d.
THE FRIENDLY TOWN : a Little Book
for the Urbane. Second Edition. Fcap.
8v0. 55. ', India Paper ^ js. 6d.
Lucian. See Classical Translations.
Lyde (L. W.), M. A. See Commercial Series.
Lydon (Noel S.). See Junior School Books.
Lyttelton(Hon. Mrs. A.). WOMEN AND
THEIR WORK. Cr. 8vo. is. (>d.
M. M. HOW TO DRESS AND WHAT TO
WEAR. Cr. 8v0. is. net.
Macaulay (Lord). CRITICAL AND HIS-
TORICAL ESSAYS. Edited by F. C. MON
TAGUE, M.A. Three Volumes. Cr. 8v0. i8s.
The only edition of this book completely
annotated.
M 'Allen (J. E. B.;, M.A. See Commercial
Series.
MacCulloch (J. A.). See Churchman's
Library.
MacCunn (Florence A.). MARY STUART.
With over 60 Illustrations, including a
Frontispiece in Photogravure. Demy 800.
los. 6d. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published. See
also Leaders of Religion.
McDermott(E. R.). See, Books on Business.
M'Dowall(A. S.). See Oxford Biographies.
Mackay(A. M.). See Churchman's Library.
Magnus (Laurie), M.A. A PRIMER OF
WORDSWORTH. Cr. 8vo. is. 6d.
Mahaffy(J. P.), Lift.D. A HISTORY OF
THE EGYPT OF THE PTOLEMIES.
Fully Illustrated. Cr. 8v0. 6s.
Maitland(F.W.), LL.D., Downing Professor
of the Laws of England in the University of
Cambridge. CANON LAW IN ENG
LAND. RoyalSvo. 75. 6d.
Maiden (H. E.), M.A. ENGLISH RE
CORDS. A Companion to the History of
England. Cr. 8vo. 3$. 6d.
THE ENGLISH CITIZEN : HIS RIGHTS
AND DUTIES. Third Edition. Cr.Zvo.
is. 6d.
A SCHOOL HISTORY OF SURREY.
Illustrated. Cr. 8v0. is. 6d.
Marchant (E. C.), M.A., Fellow of Peter-
house, Cambridge. A GREEK ANTHO
LOGY Second Edition. Cr. Zvo. 3$. 6d.
Merchant (C. E.)), M.A., and Cook (A. M.),
M.A. PASSAGES FOR UNSEEN
TRANSLATION. Third Edition. Cr.
8v0. 3-r. 6d.
12
MESSRS. METHUEN'S CATALOGUE
Marlowe (Christopher). Sec Standard
Library.
Marr (J. E.), F.R.S.. Fellow of St John's Col
lege, Cambridge. THE SCIENTIFIC
STUDY OF SCENERY. Second Edition.
Illustrated. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
AGRICULTURAL GEOLOGY. Illustrated.
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
Marvell (Andrew). See Little Library.
MasefieId,(John). SEA LIFE IN NEL
SON'S TIME. Illustrated. Cr. 8vo.
y. 6d. net.
*ON THE SPANISH MAIN. With Por
traits and Illustrations. Demy 8vo. IQS. 6d.
net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Maskeil (A.). See Connoisseur's Library.
Mason (A. J.), D.D. See Leaders of Religion.
Massee (George). THE EVOLUTION OF
PLANT LIFE : Lower Forms. Illustrated.
Cr. 8vo. 2S. 6d.
Massinger (P.). See Standard Library.
Masterman (C. F. G.), M.A. TENNYSON
AS A RELIGIOUS TEACHER. Cr.
8vo. 6s.
*Matheson(Hon. E. F.). COUNSELS OF
LIFE. Feap. 8vo. 35. 6d. net.
May (Phil). THE PHILiMAY ALBUM.
Second Edition, +to. \s. net.
Mellows (Emma S.). A SHORT STORY
OF ENGLISH LITERATURE. Cr.
%vo. y. 6d.
Methuen (A. M. S.). THE TRAGEDY
OF SOUTH AFRICA. Cr. 8vo. 2s. net.
Also Cr. 8vo. yt. net.
A revised and enlarged edition of the
author's ' Peace or War in South
Africa. '
ENGLAND'S RUIN: DISCUSSED IN Six-
TEEM LETTERS TO THE RIGHT HON.
JOSEPH CHAMBERLAIN, M.P. Seventh Edi
tion. Cr. Bvo. -$d. net.
Micfcell (E. B.). THE ART AND PRAC
TICE OF HAWKING. With 3 Photo
gravures by G. E. LODGK, and other Illus
trations. Demy Eva. los. 6d.
Millais (J. G.). THE LIFE AND LET
TERS OF SIR JOHN EVERETT
MILLAIS, President of the Royal Academy.
With many Illustrations, of which 2 are in
Photogravure. New Edition. Demy 8ro.
•js. Gd. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
-MilIin(G. P.). PICTORIAL GARDEN
ING. Illustrated. Cr. 8z>o. 35. 6d. net.
Milli* (C. T.), M.I.M.E. See Textbooks of
Technology.
Milne (J. G.), M.A. A HISTORY OF
ROMAN EGYPT. Fully Illustrated.
Cr. &v*. 6s.
Milton (John), THE POEMS OF, BOTH
ENGLISH AND LATIN, Compos'd at
several times. Printed by his true Copies.
The Songs were set in Musick by M-.
HENRY LAWES, Gentleman of the Kin? s
Chappel, and one of His Majesties Private
Musick.
Printed and publish'd according to Order.
Printed by RUTH RAWORTH for HUM
PHREY MOSELEY, and are to be sold at th^
signeof the Princes Armesin Pauls Church
yard, 1645,
See also Little Library Standard Library,
and R. F. Towndrow.
Minchin (H. C.),M.A. See R. Peel.
Mitchell (P. Chalmers), M.A. OUTLINES
OF BIOLOGY. Illustrated. Second Edi
tion. Cr. 8v0. 6s.
Mitton (G. E.). JANE AUSTEN ANE
HER TIMES. With many Portraits anc
Illustrations. Second Edition. Demy Bvo.
ior. 6d. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
4 Moil (A.).' See Books on Business.
Moir (D. M.X See Little Library.
Money (L. G. Chiozza). RICHES AND
POVERTY Second Edition Demy Svo.
$s. net.
Montaigne. See C. F. Pond.
Moore (H. E.). See S. Q. S.
Moran (Clarence G.). See Books on Business.
More (Sir Thomas). See Standard Library.
Morfill (W. R.), Oriel College, Oxford. A
HISTORY OF RUSSIA FROM PETER
THE GREAT TO ALEXANDER II.
With Maps and Plans. Cr. 8vo. 3*. 6d.
Morich (R. J.), late of Clifton College. See
School Examination Series.
*Morris (J.). THE MAKERS OF JAPAN.
With many portraits and Illustrations.
Demy 8vo. izs. 6d. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Morris (J. E.). See Little Guides.
Morton (Miss Anderson). See Miss Brod-
rick.
THE MOTOR YEAR-BOOK FOR 1906.
With many Illustrations and Diagrams.
Demy 8vo. js- ^d. net.
Moule(H. C. G.), D.D., Lord Bishop of Dur.
ham. See Leaders of Religion.
Muir (M. M. Pattison), M.A. THE
CHEMISTRY OF FIRE. Illustrated.
Cr. 8vo. 25. 6d.
Mundella (V. A.), M.A. See J. T. Dunn.
Munro(R.), LL.D. See Antiquary's Books.
Naval Officer (A). See I. P. L.
Neal (W. G. ). See R. N. Hall.
Newman (J. H.) and others. See Library
of Devotion.
Nichols (J. B. B.). See Little Library.
Nicklin (T.), M.A. EXAMINATION
PAPERS IN TKUCYDIDES. Cr. 8vo. zs.
Nimrod. See I. P. L.
•Norgatc (G. L« G.). SIR WALTER
SCOTT. Illustrated. Demybzj. ?s.6d. net.
GENERAL LITERATURE
Norregaard (B. W.). THE GREAT
SIEGE : The Investment and Fall of Port
Arthur. Illustrated. Demy too. 10$. 6d. net.
Northcote (James), R.A. THE CONVER-
SATIONS OF JAMES NORTHCOTE,
R.A., AND JAMES WARD. Edited by
ERNEST FLETCHER. With many Portraits.
Demy too. los. 6d.
Norway (A. H.;. NAPLES. With 25 Col-
cured Illustrations by MAURICE GRBIFFEN-
HAGEN. A New Edition. Cr. too. 6s.
Novalis. THE DISCIPLES AT SAIS AND
OTHER FRAGMENTS. Edited by Miss
UNA BIRCH. Fcap. too. 3*. &/.
*OIdfieId (W. J.), Canon of Lincoln.
PRIMER OF RELIGION. Fcap too.
2f. 6d.
Oliphant (Mrs. ). See Leaders of Religion.
Oman(C. W.C.), M.A., Fellow of All Souls',
Oxford. A HISTORY OF THE ART OF
WAR. Vol. ii.: The Middle Ages, from
the Fourth to the Fourteenth Century. Illus
trated. Demy too. IOT. 6d. net.
Ottley (R. L.), D.D. See Handbooks of
Theologyjand Leaders of Religion.
Overtoil (J. H.)« See Leaders of Religion.
Owen (Douglas). See Books on Business.
Oxford (M. N.), of Guy's Hospital. A HAND-
BOOK OF NURSING. Third Edition.
Cr. too. 3-y. 6d.
Pakes (W. C. C.). THE SCIENCE OF
HYGIENE. Illustrated. Demy too. 15*.
Palmer (Frederick). WITH KUROKI IN
MANCHURIA. Illustrated. Third
Edition. Demy too. js. 6d. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Parker (Gilbert). A LOVER'S DIARY.
Fcap. too. 5*.
*Parkes (A. K.). SMALL LESSONS ON
GREAT TRUTHS. Fcap. too. is. 6d.
Parkinson (John). PARADISI IN SOLE
PARADISUS TERRESTRIS, OR A
GARDEN OF ALL SORTS OF PLEA
SANT FLOWERS. Folio. £4, +s. net.
Parmenter (John). HELIO-TROPES, OR
NEW POSIES FOR SUNDIALS, 1625.
Edited by PERCIVAL LANDON. Quarto.
3j. 6d. net.
Parmentier (Prof. Leon). See Byzantine
Texts.
Pascal. See Library of Devotion.
Paston (George). SOCIAL CARICA
TURES IN THE EIGHTEENTH
CENTURY. Imperial Quarto. £2, vs. 6d.
net. See also Little Books on Art and I. P. L.
Paterson(W. R.)(Benjamin Swift). LIFE'S
QUESTIONINGS. Cr. too. 3*. 6d. net.
Patterson (A. H.). NOTES OF AN EAST
COAST NATURALIST. Illustrated in
Colour by F. SOUTHGATE. Second Edition.
Cr. too. 6f.
NATURE IN EASTERN NORFOLK*
A series of obserrations on the Birds,
Fishes, Mammals, Reptiles, and stalk*
eyed Crustaceans found in that neigh*
bourhood, with a list of the species. With
12 Illustrations in colour, by FRANK
SOUTHGATE. Second Edition. Cr. tot. 6s.
Peacock (N.). See Little Books on Art.
Pearce (E. H.), M.A. ANNALS OF
CHRIST'S HOSPITAL. Illustrated.
Demy too. js. 6d.
Peel (Robert), and Mlnchin (H. C.), M.A.
OXFORD. With 100 Illustrations in
Colour. Cr. too. 6s.
Peel (Sidney), late Fellow of Trinity College,
Oxford, and Secretary to the Royal Com
mission on the Licensing Laws. PRACTI
CAL LICENSING REFORM. Second
Edition. Cr. too. is. 6d.
Peters (J. P.). D.D. See Churchman's
Library.
Petrie ( W. M. Flinders), D. C. L. , LL. D. , Pro-
fessor of Egyptology at University College.
A HISTORY OF EGYPT, FROM THE
EARLIEST TIMES TO THE PRESENT DAY.
Fully Illustrated. In six -volumes. Cr.
too. 6s. each.
VOL. i. PREHISTORIC TIMES TO XVlTH
DYNASTY. Fifth Edition.
VOL. ii. THE XVIlTH AND XVIIlTH
DYNASTIES. Fourth Edition.
VOL. in. XIXTH TO XXXTH DYNASTIES.
VOL. iv. THE EGYPT OF THE PTOLEMIES.
J. P. MAHAFFY, Litt.D.
VOL. v. ROMAN EGYPT. J. G. MILNE, M.A.
VOL. vi. EGYPT IN THE MIDDLE AGES.
STANLEY LANE-POOLE, M.A.
RELIGION AND CONSCIENCE IN
ANCIENT EGYPT. Illustrated. Cr
too. ss. 6d.
SYRIA AND EGYPT, FROM THE TELL
ELAMARNATABLETS. Cr. too. ss. 6d.
EGYPTIAN TALES. Illustrated by TRIS
TRAM ELLIS. In Two Volumes. Cr. too.
3J. 6d. each.
EGYPTIAN DECORATIVE ART. With
120 Illustrations. Cr. too. 31. 6d.
Phillips (W. A.). See Oxford Biographies.
Phillpotts (Eden). MY DEVON YEAR.
With 38 Illustrations by J. LEY PETHY-
BRIDGE. Second and Cheaper Edition.
Large Cr. too. 6s.
UP ALONG AND DOWN ALONG.
Illustrated by CLAL-DE SHKFPERSON.
Cr. 4(0. 5*. net.
A volume of poems.
Picnaar (Philip). WITH STEYN AND
I>E WET. Second Edition. Cr. too.
3*. 6d.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Plarr (Victor G.) and Walton (F. W.). A
SCHOOL HISTORY OF MIDDLE-
SEX. Illustrated. Cr. too. i*. 6d.
Plato. See Standard Library.
MESSRS. METHUEN'S CATALOGUE
Plautus. THE CAPTIVI. Edited, with
an Introduction, Textual Notes, and a Com
mentary, by W. M. LINDSAY, Fellow of
Jesus College, Oxford. Demy 8vo. ioj. 6d.
net.
Plowden-Wardlaw (J. T.), B.A., King's
College, Cambridge. See School Examina
tion Series.
Pocock (Roger). A FRONTIERSMAN.
Third Edition. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Podmore (Frank). MODERN SPIRI-
TUALISM. Two Volumes. Demy 8vo.
21*. net.
A History and a Criticism.
Poer (J. Patrick Le). A MODERN
LEGIONARY. Cr.Svo. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Pollard (Alice). See Little Books on Art.
Pollard (A. W.). OLD PICTURE BOOKS.
Illustrated. DemySvo. "js.6d.net.
PoIlard(Eliza F.). See Little Books on Art.
Pollock (David), M.I.N.A. See Books on
Business.
Pond (C. F.). A DAY BOOK OF MON
TAIGNE. Edited by. Fcap. 8vo. 3J. 6d.
net.
Potter (M. C.), M.A., F.L.S. A TEXT-
BOOK OF AGRICULTURAL BOTANY.
Illustrated. Second Edition. Cr. Zvo.
4S. 6d.
Power (J. O'Connor). THE MAKING
OF AN ORATOR. Cr. Zvo. 6s.
Pradeau (G.). A KEY TO THE TIME
ALLUSIONS IN THE DIVINE
COMEDY. With a Dial. Small quarto.
3*. 6d.
Prance (G.). See Half-Crown Library.
Prescott (O. L.). ABOUT MUSIC, AND
WHAT IT IS MADE OF. Cr. 8vo.
?s. 6d. net.
ce (L. L.), M.A., Fellow of Oriel College,
Oxon. A HISTORY OF ENGLISH
POLITICAL ECONOMY. Fourth Edi
tion. Cr. &vo. 2S. 6d.
Primrose (Deborah). A MODERN
BCEOTIA. Cr. 8w. 6*.
Pugin and Rowlandson. THE MICRO
COSM OF LONDON, OR LONDON IN i
MINIATURE. With 104 Illustrations in I
colour. In Three Volumes. Small $to,
£3, S.T. net.
' Q ' (A. T. Quiller Couch). See Half-Crown
Library.
Ouevedo Villegas. See Miniature Library.
G.R. and E.S. THE WOODHOUSE COR
RESPONDENCE. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Rackham (R. B.)t M.A. See Westminster
Commentaries.
Randolph (B. W.), D.D. See Library of
Devotion.
Rannie (D. W.), M.A. A STUDENT'S
HISTORY OF SCOTLAND. Cr. *vo.
Rashdall (Hastings), M.A., Fellow and
Tutor of New College, Oxford. DOC
TRINE; AND DEVELOPMENT. Cr.
8vo. 6s.
Rawstorne (Lawrence, Esq.). See I.P.L.
*Raymond (Walter). A SCHOOL
HISTORY OF SOMERSETSHIRE.
Illustrated. Cr. 8vo. is. 6d.
A Real Paddy. Seel.P-L.
Reason (W.), M.A. See S.Q.S.
Redfern (W. B.), Author of ' Ancient Wood
and Iron Work in Cambridge,' etc
ROYAL AND HISTORIC GLOVED
AND ANCIENT SHOES. Profuselj
Illustrated in colour and half-tone. Quarto
£2, 2s. net.
Reynolds. See Little Galleries.
1 Rhodes (W. E.). A SCHOOL HISTORY
OF LANCASHIRE. Illustrated. Cr.Svo.
is. 6d.
Roberts (M. E.). See C. C. Channer.
Robertson (A.), D.D., Lord Bishop of
Exeter. REGNUM DEI. The Bampton
Lectures of 1901. Demy 8vo. i-2s.6d.net.
Robertson (C. Grant). M.A., Fellow of All
Souls' College, Oxford, Examiner in the
Honours School of Modern History, Oxford,
1901-1904. SELECT STATUTES, CASES,
AND CONSTITUTIONAL DOCU
MENTS, 1660-1832. Demy 8vo. los. 6d.
net.
Robertson (C. Grant) and Bartholomew
(J. G.), F.R.S.E., F.R.G.S. A HIS
TORICAL AND MODERN ATLAS OF
THE BRITISH EMPIRE. Quarto.
4*. 6d. net.
Robertson (Sir G. S.),, K. C.S.I. See
Half-Crown Library.
Robinson (A. W.), M.A. See Churchman's
Bible.
Robinson (Cecilia). THE MINISTRY
OF DEACONESSES. With an Introduc-
tion by the late Archbishop of Canterbury.
Cr. 8vo. S.T. 6d.
Robinson (F. S.). See Connoisseur's Library.
Rochefoucauld (La). See Little Library.
Rodwell (G.), B.A. NEW TESTAMENT
GREEK. A Course for Beginners. With
a Preface by WALTER LOCK, D.D., Warden
of Keble College. Fcap. 8vo. 3*. 6d.
Roe (Fred). ANCIENT COFFERS AND
CUPBOARDS: Their History and De-
scription. Illustrated. Quarto. £3, 35. net.
OLD OAK FURNITURE. With many
Illustrations by the Author, including a
frontispiece in colour. Demyftvo. ios.6d.
net.
Rogers (A. G. L.), M.A. See Books on
Business.
Roscoe (E. S.). ROBERT HARLEY,
EARL OF OXFORD. Illustrated. Demy
8vo. is. 6d.
This is the only life of Harley in existence.
See also Little Guides.
GENERAL LITERATURE
Rose (Edward). THE ROSE READER.
Illustrated. Cr. 8vo. 2*. 6d. Also in 4
Parts. Parts I. and II. 6d. each ; Part
III. 8d. ; Part IV. xorf.
*Rouse (W. H. D.). WORDS OF THE
ANCIENT WISE : Thoughts from Epic-
tetus and Marcus ' Aurelius. Edited by.
Fcap. 8vo. 3-r. 6d. net.
Rowntree (Joshua). THE IMPERIAL
DRUG TRADE. Second Edition. Cr.
8vo. S.T. net.
Ruble (A. E.), D.D. See Junior School
ooks.
Russell (W. Clark). THE LIFE OF
ADMIRAL LORD COLLINGWOOD.
With Illustrations by F. BRANGWYN.
Fourth Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
St. Ansletn. See Library of Devotion.
St. Augustine. See Library of Devotion.
St. Cyres (Viscount). See Oxford Bio
graphies.
St. Francis of Assist. See Standard
Library.
'Saki1 (H. Munro). REGINALD. Second
Edition. Fcap. 8vo. zs. 6d. net.
Sales (St. Francis de). See Library of
Devotion.
Salmon (A. L.). A POPULAR GUIDE
TO DEVON. Medium 8vo. 6d. net. See
also Little Guides.
Sargeant (J.), M.A. ANNALS OF
WESTMINSTER SCHOOL. Illustrated.
Demy 8vo. js. 6d.
Sathas (C.). See Byzantine Texts.
Schmitt (John). See Byzantine Texts.
Scott (A. M.). WINSTON SPENCER
CHURCHILL. With Portraits and lllus-
trations. Cr. 8vo. 3*. 6d.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
SeeIey(H. Q.), F.R.S. DRAGONS OF THE
AIR. Illustrated. Cr. Zvo. 6s.
'Selincourt (E. de). A DAY BOOK OF
KEATS. Edited by. Fcap. 8vo. 3*. 6d.
net.
Sells (V. P.), M.A. THE MECHANICS
OF DAILY LIFE. Illustrated. Cr. 8vo.
2s. 6d.
Selous (Edmund). TOMMY SMITH'S
ANIMALS. Illustrated by G. W. ORD.
Fourth Edition. Fcap. %vo. 2S. 6d.
Settle (J. H.). ANECDOTES OF
SOLDIERS, in Peace and War. Cr. 8vo .
3*. 6d. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Shakespeare (William).
THE FOUR FOLIOS, 1623; 1632; 1664;
1685. Each Four Guineas net, or a com
plete set, Twelve Guineas net.
The Arden Shakespeare.
Demy 8vo. zs. 6d. net each volume.
General Editor, W. J. CRAIG. An Edition
of Shakespeare in single Plays. Edited
with a full Introduction, Textual Notes,
and a Commentary at the foot of the page.
HAMLET. Edited by EDWARD DOWDEN,
Litt.D.
ROMEO AND JULIET. Edited by EDWARD
DOWDEN, Litt.D.
KING LEAR. Edited by W. J. CRAIG.
JULIUS CAESAR. Edited by M. MAC-
MI LLAN, M.A.
THE TEMPEST. Edited by MORETON
LUCE.
OTHELLO. Edited by H. C. HART.
TITUS ANDRONICUS. Edited by H. B.
BAILDON.
CYMBELINE. Edited by EDWARD DOWDEN.
THE MERRY WIVES OF WINDSOR.
Edited by H. C. HART.
A MIDSUMMER NIGHT'S DREAM.
Edited by H. CUNINGHAM.
KING HENRY V. Edited by H. A. EVANS.
ALL'S WELL THAT ENDS WELL.
Edited by W. O. BRIGSTOCKE.
THE TAMING OF THE SHREW.
Edited by R. WARWICK BOND.
TIMON OF ATHENS. Edited by K.
DHIGHTON.
MEASURE FOR MEASURE. Edited by
H. C. HART.
•TWELFTH NIGHT. Edited by MORKTON
LUCE.
THE MERCHANT OF VENICE. Edited
by C. KNOX POOLER.
*TROILUS AND CRESSIDA. Edited by
K. DEIGHTON.
The Little Quarto Shakespeare. Edited
by W. J. CRAIG. With Introductions and
Notes. Pott i6mo. In 40 Volumes.
Leather^ price is. net each volume.
Mahogany Revolving Book Case. los. net.
See also Standard Library.
Sharp (A.). VICTORIAN POETS. Cr.
8vo. zs. 6d.
Sharp (Cecil). See S. Baring-Gould.
Sharp (Mrs. E. A.). See Little Books on
Art.
Shedlock (J. S.) THE PIANOFORTE
SONATA. Cr. 8vo. 55.
Shelley (Percy B.). ADONAIS ; an Elegy
on the death of John Keats, Author of
' Endymion,' etc. Pisa. From the types of
Didot, 1821. zs. net.
Sheppard (H. F.), M.A. See S. Baring-
Gould.
Sherwell (Arthur), M.A. SeeS.Q.S.
Shipley (Mary E.). AN ENGLISH
CHURCH HISTORY FOR CHILD-
REN. With a Preface by the Bishop of
Gibraltar. With Maps and Illustrations.
Part I. Cr. 8vo. zs. (>d. net.
Sichel (Walter). DISRAELI : A Study
in Personality and Ideas. With 3 Portraits.
Demy 8vo. 1 2s. 6d. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
See also Oxford Biographies.
Sime (J.). See Little Books on Art.
16
MESSRS. METHUEN'S CATALOGUE
Slmonson (O. A.). FRANCESCO
GUARD I. With 41 Plates. Imperial
4&>. £2, 2s. net.
Sketchley (R. E. D.). See Little Books on
Art.
Skipton (H. P. K.). See Little Books on
Art.
Sladen (Douglas). SICILY: The New
Winter Resort. With over 200 Illustrations.
Second Edition, Cr. Bvo. 5$. net.
Small (Evan), M.A. THE EARTH. An
Introduction to Physiography. Illustrated.
Cr. Bvo. 2s. 6d.
Smallwood (M. O.). See Little Books on
Art.
Smedley(F. E.). Seel.P.L.
Smith (Adam). THE WEALTH OF
NATIONS. Edited with an Introduction
and numerous Notes by EDWIN CANNAN,
M.A. Two volumes. Detny Bvo. 21*.
net.
See also English Library.
Smith (Horace and James). See Little
Library.
Smith (H. Bompas), M.A. ANEW
JUNIOR ARITHMETIC. Crown Bvo.
Smith (R. Mudle). THOUGHTS FOR
THE DAY. Edited by. Fcap. Bvo.
3$. (>d. net.
Smith (Nowell C.). See W. Wordsworth.
Smith (John Thomas). A BOOK FOR
A RAINY DAY: Or Recollections of the
Events of the Years 1766-1833. Edited by
WILFRED WHITTEN. Illustrated. Demy
Bvo. i2j. 6d. net.
Snell (F. J.). A BOOK OF EXMOOR.
Illustrated. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
Snowden(C. E.). A HANDY DIGEST OF
BRITISH HISTORY. Demy Bvo. 4s. 6d.
Sophocles. See Classical Translations.
Sornet (L. A.). See Junior School Books.
South (Wilton E.), M.A. See Junior School
Books.
Southey (R.). ENGLISH SEAMEN.
Edited by DAVID HANNAY.
Vol. I. (Howard, Clifford, Hawkins,
Drake, Cavendish). Second Edition. Cr.
3vo. 6s.
Vol. II. (Richard Hawkins, Grenville,
Essex, and Raleigh). Cr. Bvo. 6s.
See also Standard Library.
S pence (C. H.), M.A. See School Examina
tion Series.
Spooner (W. A.), M.A. See Leaders of
Religion.
*Staley (Edgcumbe). THE GUILDS OF
FLORENCE. Illustrated. Royal Bvo.
2i5. net.
Stanbridge (J. W.), B.D. See Library of
Devotion.
•Stancllffe.* GOLF DO'S AND DONT'S.
Second Edition. Fcap. Bvo. is.
Stead (». W.). Sse D. Gallaher.
Stedman (A. M. M.), M.A.
INITIA LATINA : Easy Lessoni on Elemen-
tary Accidence. Eighth Edition. Fcap.
Bvo. is.
FIRST LATIN LESSONS. Ninth Edi-
tion. Cr. Bvo. zs.
FIRST LATIN READER. With Note;
adapted to the Shorter Latin Primer and
Vocabulary. Sixth Edition revised1, iBmo.
is.6d.
EASY SELECTIONS FROM C^SAR.
The Helvetian War. Second Edition
1 8 mo. is.
EASY SELECTIONS FROM LIVY. The
Kings of Rome. iBmo. Second Edition.
is.6d.
EASY LATIN PASSAGES FOR UNSEEN
TRANSLATION. Tenth Edition Fcap.
Bvo. is. 6d.
EXEMPLA LATINA. First Exercises
in Latin Accidence. With Vocabulary.
Third Edition. Cr. Bvo. is.
EASY LATIN EXERCISES ON THE
SYNTAX OF THE SHORTER AND
REVISED LATIN PRIMER. With
Vocabulary. Tenth and Cheaper Edition,
re-written. Cr. 8vo. is. 6d. Original
Edition, ss. 6d. KEY, 31. net.
THE LATIN COMPOUND SENTENCE :
Rules and Exercises. Second Edition.
Cr. Bvo. u. 6d. With Vocabulary, ss.
NOTANDA QUAEDAM : Miscellaneous
Latin Exercises on Common Rules and
Idioms. Fourth Edition. Fcap. &vo.
is. 6d. With Vocabulary, zs. Key, 2*.
net.
LATIN VOCABULARIES FOR REPE
TITION : Arranged according to Subjects.
Thirteenth Edition. Fcap. Kvo. is. 6d.
A VOCABULARY OF LATIN IDIOMS.
iZmo. Second Edition, is.
STEPS TO GREEK. Second Edition, re
vised, i&nto. is*
A SHORTER GREEK PRIMER. Cr.
Bvo. is. 6d.
EASY GREEK PASSAGES FOR UNSEEN
TRANSLATION. Third Edition, re
vised. Fcap. Bvo. is. 6d.
GREEK VOCABULARIES FOR RE
PETITION. Arranged according to Sub-
jects. Fourth Edition. Fcap. Bvo. it. 6d.
GREEK TESTAMENT SELECTIONS.
For the use of Schools. With Introduc
tion, Notes, and Vocabulary. Fourth
Edition. Fcap. Bvo. 2S. 6d.
STEPS TO FRENCH. Seventh Edition.
iBmo. Bd.
FIRST FRENCH LESSONS. Seventh Edi
tion , revised. Cr. Bvo. is.
EASY FRENCH PASSAGES FOR UN
SEEN TRANSLATION. Fifth Edi
tion, revised. Fcap. Bve. is. 6d.
GENERAL LITERATURE
EASY FRENCH EXERCISES ON ELE-
MENTARY SYNTAX. With Vocabu-
lary. Fourth Edition. Cr. Zvo. ts. 6d.
KEY. y. net.
FRENCH VOCABULARIES FOR RE
PETITION : Arranged according to Sub
jects. Twelfth Edition. Fcap. 8vo. is.
See also School Examination Series.
Steel (R. Elliott), M.A.., F.C.S. THE
WORLD OF SCIENCE. With 147
Illustrations. Second Edition. Cr. 8vo. zs. 6d.
See also School Examination Series.
Stephenson (C.), of the Technical College,
Bradford, and Suddards (F.) of the
Yorkshire College, Leeds. ORNAMEN
TAL DESIGN FOR WOVEN FABRICS.
Illustrated. Demy %vo. Third Edition.
7s.6J.
Stephenson (J.), M.A. THE CHIEF
TRUTHS OF THE CHRISTIAN
FAITH. Crtnun. %vo. 3*. 6d.
Sterne (Laurence). See Little Library.
Sterry (W.). M.A. ANNALS OF ETON
COLLEGE. Illustrated. DemyZvo. Ts.6d.
Steuart (Katherine). BY ALLAN
WATER. Second Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
Stevenson (R. L.) THE LETTERS OF
ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON TO
HIS FAMILY AND FRIENDS.
Selected and Edited by SIDNEY COLVIN.
Sixth Edition. Cr. 8vo. i2S.
LIBRARY EDITION. Demy Zvo. 2 voh. 25*.
net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
VAILIMA LETTERS. With an Etched
Portrait by WILLIAM STRANG. Fifth
Edition. Cr. 8vo. Buckram. 6s
A Colonial Edition is also published.
THE LIFE OF R. L. STEVENSON. See
G. Balfour.
Stevenson (M. I.). FROM SARANAC
TO THE MARQUESAS. Being Letters
written by Mrs. M. I. STEVENSON during
1887-8. Cr. 8vo. 6s. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
LETTERS FROM SAMOA. Edited and
arranged by M. C. BALFOUR. With many
Illustrations. Cr. Zvo. 6s. net.
Stoddart (Anna M.)« See Oxford Bio
graphies.
Stokes (F. G.), B.A. HOURS WITH
RABELAIS. From the translation of SIR
T. URQUHART and P. A. MOTTEUX. With
a Portrait in Photogravure. Cr. %vo. 3*. 6d.
net.
Stone (S. J.). POEMS AND HYMNS.
With a Memoir by F. G. ELLERTON,
M.A. With Portrait. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
*Storr (Vernon F.), M.A., Lecturer in
the Philosophy of Religion in Cambridge
University ; Examining Chaplain to the
Archbishop of Canterbury; formerly Fellow
of University College, Oxford. DEVELOP
MENT AND DIVINE PURPOSE Cr.
%vo. 5*. net.
A
Straker (F.). See Books on Business.
Streane (A. W.)» D.D. See Churchman's
Bible.
Stroud (H.), D.Sc., M.A. See Textbooks of
Science.
Strutt (Joseph). THE SPORTS AND
PASTIMES OF THE PEOPLE OF
ENGLAND. Illustrated by many engrav
ings. Revised by J. CHARLES Cox, LL.D.,
F.S.A. Quarto, zis. net.
Stuart (Capt. Donald). THE STRUGGLE
FOR PERSIA. With a Map. Cr. too. 6s.
*Sturch (F.), Staff Instructor to the Surrey
County Council. SOLUTIONS TO T i E
CITY AND GUILDS QUES I IONS
IN MANUAL INSTRUCTION DRAW
ING. Imp. ±to. 5.?. net.
Suckling (Sir John). FRAGMENTA
AUREA : a Collection of all the Incom
parable Peeces, written by. And punlished
by a friend to perpetuate his memory.
Printed by his own copies.
Printed for HUMPHREY MoSKLBV, and
are to be sold at his shop, at the sign of the
Princes Arms in St. Paul's Churchyard,
1646.
Suddards (F.). See C. Stephenson.
Surtees (R. S.). See I.P.L.
Swift (Jonathan). THE JOURNAL TO
STELLA. Edited by G. A. AITKEN. Cr.
8vo. 6s.
Symes (J. E.), M.A. THE FRENCH
REVOLUTION. Second Edition. Cr. 8vo.
ss. 6d.
Sympson(E. M.), M.A., M.D. SeeAncient
Cities.
Syrett (Netta). See Little Blue Books.
Tacitus. AGRICOLA. With Introduction
Notes, Map, etc. By R. F. DAVIS, M.A.,
Fcaj>, &vo. zs.
GERMANIA. By the same Editor. Fcap.
8v0. 2s. See also Classical Translations.
Tallack (W.). HOWARD LETTERS
AND MEMORIES. Demy 8vo. los. 6d.
net.
Tauler (J.). See Library of Devotion.
Taunton (E. L.). A HISTORY OF THE
JESUITS IN ENGLAND. Illustrated.
Demy %vo. 2 is. net.
Taylor (A. E.). THE ELEMENTS OF
METAPHYSICS. DemyZvo. ios.6d.net.
Taylor(F.Q.), M.A. See Commercial Series.
Taylor (I. A.). See Oxford Biographies.
Taylor (T. M.), M.A., Fellow of Gonville
and Caius College, Cambridge. A CON
STITUTIONAL AND POLITICAL
HISTORY OF ROME. Cr. Bvo. 7s. 6d.
Tennyson (Alfred, Lord). THE EARLY
POEMS OF. Edited, with Notes and
an Introduction, by J. CHURTON COLLINS,
M.A. Cr. %vo. 6s.
IN MEMORIAM, MAUD, AND THE
PRINCESS. Edited by J. CHURTON
COLLINS, M.A. Cr. 8vo. 6s. See also
Little Library.
MESSRS. METHUEN'S CATALOGUE
Terry (C. S.). See Oxford Biographies.
Terton (Alice). LIGHTS AND SHADOWS
IN A HOSPITAL. Cr. &vo. 3s. 6d.
Thackeray (W. M.). See Little Library-
Theobald (F. V.), M.A. INSECT LIFE.
Illustrated. Second Ed. Revised. Cr. 8vt>.
25. 6d.
Thompson (A. H.). See Little Guides.
THeston(MaryW.). DAILY STRENGTH
FOR DAILY NEEDS. Twelfth Edition.
Medium i6mo. zs.6d.net. Also an edition
in superior binding, 6s.
Tompkins (H. W.), F.R.H.S. See Little
Guides.
Towndrow (R. F.). A DAY BOOK OF
MILTON. Edited by. Fcaj>. &vo. y.6d.
net.
Townley (Lady Susan). MY CHINESE
NOTE-BOOK With 16 Illustrations and
2 Maps. Third Edition. Demyftvo. los.
6d. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
*Toynbee (Paget), M.A., D.Litt. DANTE
IN ENGLISH LITERATURE. Demy
8vo. izs. 6d. net.
See also Oxford Biographies.
Trench (Herbert). DEIRDRE WED and
Other Poems. Cr. &-'&. 5*.
Trevelyan (Q. M. ), Pel low of Trinity College,
CambrirlCe. ENGLAND UNDER THE
STUARTS. With Maps and Plans. Second
Edition. Demy 8vo. ior. 6d. net.
Troutbeck (Q. EA See Little Guides.
Tyler (E. A.), B.A., F.C.S. See Junior
School Books.
Tyrell-Qill (Frances). See Little Books on
Vardon (Harry). THE COMPLETE
GOLFER. Illustrated. Sixth Edition.
Demy Bvo. tos. 6d. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Vaughan (Henry). See Little Library.
Voegelin (A.), M.A. See Junior Examina
tion Series.
Waddell(Col. L. A.), LL.D..C.B. LHASA
AND ITS MYSTERIES. With a Record
of the Expedition of 1903-1904. With 2000
Illustrations and Maps. Dewy &vo. zis.
net.
*Also Third and Cheaper Edition. With
155 Illustrations and Maps. Demy
8z"». Jos. 6d. net.
Wade (G. W.), D. D. OLD TESTAMENT
HISTORY. With Maps. Third Edition.
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
Wagner (Richard). See A. L. Cieather.
Wall(J. C.). DEVILS. Illustrated by the ,
Author and from photographs. Demy &vo. ,
4S. 6d. net. See also Antiquary's Books.
Walters (H. B.). See Little Books on Art.
Walton (F. W.). See Victor G. Plarr.
Walton (Izaac) and Cotton (Charles).
See I.P.L., English Library, and Little
Library.
Warmelo(D. S. Van). ON COMMANDO.
With Portrait. Cr. 8vo. 35. 6d.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Warren-Vernon (Hon. William), M.A.
READINGS ON THE INFERNO OF
DANTE, chiefly based on the Commentary
of BENVENUTO DA IM»LA. With an Intro
duction by the Rev. Dr. MOORE. In Two
Volumes. Second Edition. Cr. Svo. ii,s.
net.
Waterhouse (Mrs. Alfred). WITH THE
SIMPLE-HEARTKD : Little Homilies to
Women in Country Places. Second Edition.
Small Pott 8vo. as. net. See also Little
Library.
Weatherhead (T. C.), M.A. EXAMINA
TION PAPERS IN HORACE. Cr. 8z».
2s. See also Junior Examination Series.
Webb (W. T.). See Little Blue Books.
Webber (F. C.). See Textbooks of Techno
logy.
Wells (Sidney H.). See Textbooks of
Science.
Welis(J.), M.A. , Fellowand Tutor ofWadhai a
College. OXFORD AND OXFORJ)
LIFE. Third Edition. Cr. &vo. 3*. 6d.
A SHORT HISTORY OF ROME. Sixth
Edition. With 3 Maps. Cr. &vo. 3$. 6V.
See also Little "Guides.
'Westminster Gazette' Office Boy
(Francis Brown). THE DOINGS OT
ARTHUR. Cr. t,to. zs. 6d. net.
Wetmore (Helen C.). THE LAST OF
THE GREAT SCOUTS ('Buffalo Bill')
Illustrated. Second Edition. Demy Bvo. 6*
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Whibley (C). See Half-crown Library.
Whibley (L.), M.A., Fellow of Pembrok,
College, Cambridge. GREEK OLIGAR
CHIES : THEIR ORGANISATIONS
AND CHARACTER. Cr. Zvo. 6s.
Whitaker(G. H.), M.A. See Churchman ';
Bible.
White (Gilbert). THE NATURAL
HISTORY OF SELBORNE. Edited by
L. C. Mi ALL, F. R.S., assisted by W. WARDE
FOWLER, M.A. Cr. 8vo. 6s. See also
Standard Library.
Whitfield (E. E.). See Commercial Series.
Whitehead (A. W.). GASPARDDE
C O L I G N Y. Illustrated. Demy 8vo.
Whftetoy (R. Lloyd), F.I.C., Principal of
the Municipal Science School, West Brom-
wich. AN ELEMENTARY TEXT
BOOK OF INORGANIC CHEMISTRY.
Cr. Svo. zs. 6d.
Whitley (Miss). See S.Q.S.
Whitten (W.). See John Thomas Smith.
Whyte(A. G.), B.Sc. See Books on Business,
Wilberforce (Wilfrid). See Little Books
on Art.
Wilde (Oscar). DE PROFUNDIS. Sixth
Edition. Cr. 8vo. <$s. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
GENERAL LITERATURE
Wllkins(W. H.), B.A. See S.Q.S.
Wilkinson (J. Frome). See S.Q.S.
*WilIiams (A.). PETROL PETER: or
Mirth for Motorists. Illustrated in Colour
by A. W. MILLS. Demy i,to. 3^. 6d. net.
Williamson (M. G.). See Ancient Cities.
Williamson (W.). THE BRITISH
GARDENER. Illustrated. Demy 8vo.
ioj. 6dr.
Williamson (W.), B.A. See Junior Ex-
amination Series, Junior School Books, and
Beginner's Books.
Willson (Beckles). LORD STRATH-
CONA : the Story of his Life. Illustrated.
Demy 8vo. js. 6d.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Wilmot-Buxton (E. M.). MAKERS OF
EUROPE. Cr. &vo. Fourth Ed. 3s. 6d.
A. Text-book of European History for
Middle Forms.
THE ANCIENT WORLD. With Maps and
Illustrations. Cr. 8vo. 35. 6d.
See also Beginner's Books.
Wilson (Bishop.). See Library of Devotion.
Wilson (A. J.). See Books on Business.
Wilson (H. A.). See Books on Business.
Wilton (Richard), M.A. LYRA PAS-
TORALIS : Songs of Nature, Church, and
Home. Pott 8vo. zs. 6d.
Winbolt (S. E.), M.A. EXERCISES IN
LATIN ACCIDENCE. Cr. 8™. is. 6d.
LATIN HEXAMETER VERSE: An Aid
to Composition. Cr. Zvo. 3$. 6d. KEY,
W5indTe(B. C. A.), D.Sc., F.R.S. See Anti-
quary's Books, Little Guides and Ancient
Cities.
Winterbotham (Canon), M.A., B.Sc.,
LL. B. See Churchman's Library.
Wood (J. A. E.). See Textbooks of
Technology.
Wood (J. Hickory). DAN LENO. Illus-
trated. Third Edition. Cr. &vo. 6s.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Wood (W. Birkbeck), M.A.,late Scholar of
Worcester College, Oxford, and Edmonds
(Major J. E.), R.E., D.A.Q.-M.G. A
HISTORY OF THE CIVIL WAR IN
THE UNITED STATES. With an
Introduction by H. SPENSER WILKINSON.
With 24 Maps and Plans. Demy 8vo.
tzs. 6d. net.
Wordsworth (Christopher). See Anti
quary's Books.
* Wordsworth (W.). THE POEMS OF.
With Introduction and Notes by NOWELL
C. SMITH, Fellow of New College, Oxford.
In Four Volumes. Demy 8vo. $s. net
each. See also Little Library.
Wordsworth (W.) and Coleridge (S. T.).
See Little Library.
Wright (Arthur), M.A., Fellow of Queen's
College, Cambridge. See Churchman's
Library.
Wright (C. Gordon). See Dante.
Wright (J. C.). TO-DAY. Fcap. i6mo.
is. net.
Wright (Sophie). GERMAN VOCABU
LARIES FOR REPETITION. Fcap. 8w.
is. 6d.
Wrong (George M.), Professor of History
in the University of Toronto. THE
EARL OF ELGIN. Illustrated. Demy
Zvo. js. 6d. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Wyatt(Kate) and Gloag (M.). A BOOK
OF ENGLISH GARDENS. With 24
Illustrations in Colour. Cr. %vo. ios.6s.net.
Wylde(A. B.). MODERN ABYSSINIA.
With a Map and a Portrait. Demy 8v0.
i5J. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published
Wyndham (George). THE POEMS OF
WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE. With an
Introduction and Notes. Demy 8v0. Buck
ram, gilt top. ioj. 6d.
Wyon (R.). See Half-crown Library.
Yeats (W. B.). AN ANTHOLOGY OF
IRISH VERSE. Revised and Enlarged
Edition. Cr. 8vo. -^s. 6d.
Young ( Filson). THE COMPLETE
MO T O R I S T. With 138 Illustrations.
Fifth Edition. Dsrtty 8v0. 125. 6d. net.
A Colonial Edition is also published.
Young (T. M.). THE AMERICAN
COTTON INDUSTRY: A Study of
Work and Workers. Cr.Svo. Cloth, zs.6d. ;
paper boards, is. 6d>.
Zimmern (Antonia). WHAT DO WE
KNOW CONCERNING ELECTRI
CITY? Fcap.Zvo. is.6d.net.
Ancient Cities
General Editor, B. C. A. WINDLE, D.Sc., F.R.S.
Cr. 8vo. 45. 6d. net.
CHESTER. By B. C. A. Windle, D.Sc. F.R.S.
Illustrated by E. H. New.
SHREWSBURY. By T. Auden, M.A., F.S.A.
Illustrated.
CANTERBURY. By J. C. Cox, LL.D., F.S.A.
Illustrated.
Illus-
^EDINBURGH. By M. G. Williamson.
trated by Herbert Railton.
'LINCOLN. By E. Mansel Sympson, M.A..
M.D. Illustrated by E. H. New.
20
MESSRS. METHUEN'S CATALOGUE
Antiquary's Books, The
General Editor, J. CHARLES COX, LL.D., F.S.A.
A series of volumes dealing with various branches of English Antiquities ;
comprehensive and popular, as well as accurate and scholarly.
Demy $>vo. 7s. 6d. net.
ARCHEOLOGY AND FALSE ANTIQUITIES.
By R. Munro, LL.D. Illustrated.
ENGLISH MONASTIC LIFE. By the Right
Rev. Abbot Gasquet, O.S B. Illustrated.
Third Edition.
REMAINS OK THB PREHISTORIC AGE IN SHRINES OF BRITISH SAINTS. ByJ. C. Wai.
ENGLAND. By B. C. A. Windle, D.Sc., ! With numerous Illustrations and Plans.
F.R. S. With numerous Illustrations and
Plans.
OLD SERVICE BOOKS OF THE ENGLISH
CHURCH. By Christopher Wordsworth,
M.A., and Henry Littlehales. With
Coloured and other Illustrations.
CELTIC ART. By ]. Romilly Allen, F.S.A.
With numerous Illustrations and Plans.
THE ROYAL FORESTS OF ENGLAND. By F.
C. Cox, LL.D., F.S.A. Illustrated.
*THE MANOR AND MANORIAL RECORDS
By Nathaniel J. Hone. Illustrated.
*SEALS. ByJ. Harvey Bloom. Illustrated.
Beginner's Books, The
Edited by W. WILLIAMSON, B.A.
EASY FRENCH RHYMES. By Henri Blouet.
Illustrated. Fcap. Bv0. is.
EASY STORIES FROM ENGLISH HISTORY. By
E. M. Wilmot-Buxton, Author of ' Makers
of Europe.' Cr. 8vo. is.
EASY EXERCISES IN ARITHMETIC. Arranged
by W. S. Beard. Fcap. Svo. Withou
Answers, is. With Answers, is. -$d,
EASY DICTATION AND SPELLING. By W
Williamson, B.A. Fourth Edition. Fcap
Zvo. is.
Business, Books on
Cr. 8vo. 2s. 6d. net.
A series of volumes dealing with all the most important aspects of commercial and
financial activity. The volumes are intended to treat separately all the considerable
industries and forms of business, and to explain accurately and clearly what they do
and how they do it. Some are Illustrated. The first volumes are —
PORTS AND DOCKS. By Douglas Owen.
RAILWAYS. By E. R. McDermott.
THE STOCK EXCHANGE. By Chas. Duguid.
Second Edition.
THR BUSINESS OF INSURANCE. By A. J.
Wilson.
THE ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY : LIGHTING,
TRACTION, AND POWER. By A. G. Whyte,
B.Sc.
THE SHIPBUILDING INDUSTRY: Its History,
Science, Practice, and Finance. By David
Pollock, M.I.N.A.
THE MONEY MARKET. By F. Straker.
THE BUSINESS SIDE OF AGRICULTURE. By
A. G. L. Rogers, M.A.
LAW IN BUSINESS. By H. A. Wilson.
THE BREWING INDUSTRY. By Julian L.
Baker, F.I. C.F.C.S.
THE AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY. By G. de H.
Stone.
MINING AND MINING INVESTMENTS. By
'A. Moil.1
THE BUSINESS OF ADVERTISING. By Clarenct
G. Moran, Barrister-at-Law. Illustrated.
TRADE UNIONS. By G. Drage.
CIVIL ENGINEERING. By T. Claxton Fidler,
M.Inst. C.E. Illustrated.
THE IRON TRADE. ByJ. Stephen Jeans. Illus
trated.
MONOPOLIES, TRUSTS, AND KARTELLS. By
F. W. Hirst.
THE COTTON INDUSTRY AND TRADE. By
Prof. S. J. Chapman, Dean of the Faculty
of Commerce in the University of Man
chester. Illustrated.
*THE COAL INDUSTRY. By Ernest Aves.
Illustrated.
GENERAL LITERATURE
Byzantine Texts
Edited by J. B. BURY, M.A., Litt.D.
A series of texts of Byzantine Historians, edited by English and foreign scholars.
ZACHARIAH OF MITYLENE. Translated by F.
J. Hamilton, D.D., and E. W. Brooks.
Demy Svo, 125. 6d. net.
EVAGRIUS. Edited by Ldon Parmentier and
M. Bidez. Demy Bvo. los. 6d. net.
THE HISTORY OF PSELLUS. Edited by C.
Sathas. Demy 8vo. 15*. net.
ECTHESIS CHRONICA. Edited by Professor
Lambros. Demy 8v0. js. 6d. net.
THE CHRONICLE OF MOREA. Edited by John
Schmitt. Demy^vo. j$s.net.
Churchman's Bible, The
General Editor, J. H. BURN, B.D., F.R.S.E.
A series of Expositions on the Books of the Bible, which will be of service to the
general reader in the practical and devotional study of the Sacred Text.
Each Book is provided with a full and clear Introductory Section, in which is
stated what is known or conjectured respecting the date and occasion of the com
position of the Book, and any other particulars that may help to elucidate its meaning
as a whole. The Exposition is divided into sections of a convenient length, corre
sponding as far as possible with the divisions of the Church Lectionary. The
Translation of the Authorised Version is printed in full, such corrections as are
deemed necessary being placed in footnotes.
THE EPISTLE OF ST. JAMES. Edited by
H. W. Fulford, M.A. Fcap. Bva. is. 6<f.
ttet.
ISAIAH. Edited by W. E. Barnes, D.D. Two
Volumes. Fcap. Bvo. aj. net each. With
Map.
THE EPISTLE OF ST. PAUL THE APOSTLE TO
THE EPHESIANS. Edited by G. H. Whitaker,
M.A. Fcap. 8vt>. is. 6d. net.
Library, The
BURN, B.D., F.R.S.E.
EVOLUTION. By F. B. Jevons, M.A., Litt.D
Cr. Bvff. 3$. 6d.
THE OLD TESTAMENT AND THE NEWSCHOLAR-
SHIP. By J. W. Peters, D.D. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
THE CHURCHMAN'S INTRODUCTION TO THE
OLD TESTAMENT. By A. M. Mackay, B.A.
Cr. Bvo. 3-r. 6d.
THE CHURCH OF CHRIST. By E. T. Green,
M.A. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
COMPARATIVE THEOLOGY. By J. A. Mac-
Culloch. Cr. Bvo. 6s,
THE EPISTLE OF ST. PAUL THE APOSTLE TO
THE GALATIANS. Edited by A. W. Robin
son, M.A. Second Edition. Fcap. Bvo.
is. 6d. net.
ECCLESIASTES. Edited by A. W. Streane,
D.D. Fcap. Bvo. is. 6d. net.
THE EPISTLE OF ST. PAUL THE APOSTLE TO
THE PHILIPPIANS. Edited by C. R. D.
Biggs, D.D. Second Edition. Fcap Bvo.
is. 6d. net.
Churchman's
General Editor, J. H.
THE BEGINNINGS OF ENGLISH CHRISTIANITY.
ByW. E.Collins, M.A. With Map. Cr. Bvo.
js. 6d.
SOME NEW TESTAMENT PROBLEMS. By
Arthur Wright, M.A. Cr. 8z<o. 6s.
THE KINGDOM OF HEAVEN HERE AND HERE
AFTER. By Canon Winterbotham, M.A.,
B.Sc., LL.B. Cr. Bvo. 35. 6d.
THE WORKMANSHIP OF THE PRAYER BOOK :
Its Literary and Liturgical Aspects. By J.
Dowden, D.D. Second Edition. Cr. Bvo.
y. 6d.
Classical Translations
Edited by H. F. Fox, M.A., Fellow and Tutor of Brasenose College, Oxford.
Crown 8vo.
A series of Translations from the Greek and Latin Classics, distinguished by literary
excellence as well as by scholarly accuracy.
AESCHYLUS — Agamemnon, Choephoroe, Eu-
menides. Translated by Lewis Campbell,
LL.D. sj.
CICERO— De Oratore I. Translated by E. N.
P. Moor, M.A. 3*. 6d.
CICERO — Select Orations (Pro Milone, Pro
Mureno, Philippic n., in Catilinam). Trans
lated by H. E. D. Blakiston, M.A. 5s.
CICERO — De Natura Deorum. Translated by
F. Brooks, M.A. 3*. 6d.
{Continued.
22
MESSRS. METHUEN'S CATALOGUE
CLASSICAL TRANSLATIONS— continued.
CICERO— De Officiis. Translated by G. B.
Gardiner, M.A. zs. 6<7.
HORACE— The Odes and Epodes. Translated
by A. D. God ley, M.A. «.
LUCIAN — Six Dialogues (Nigrinus, Icaro-Me-
nippus, The Cock, The Ship, The Parasite,
The Lover of Falsehood) Translated by S.
T. Irwin, M.A. 3*. 6<t.
SOPHOCLES— Electra and Ajax. Translated by
E. D. A. Morshead, M.A. zs. 6d.
TACITUS — Agricola and Germania. Trans
lated by R. B. Townshend. zs. 6d.
THE SATIRES OF JUVENAL. Translated by
S. G. Owen. zs. 6d.
Commercial Series
Edited by H. DE B. GIBBINS, Litt.D., M.A.
Crown 8v0.
A series intended to assist students and young men preparing for a commercial
career, by supplying useful handbooks of a clear and practical character, dealii g
with those subjects which are absolutely essential in the business life.
COMMERCIAL EDUCATION IN THEORY AND
PRACTICE. By E. E. Whitfield, M.A. 5^.
An introduction to Methuen's Commercial
Series treating the question of Commercial
Education fully from both the point of view
of the teacher and of the parent.
BRITISH COMMERCE AND COLONIES FROM
ELIZABETH TO VICTORIA. By H. de B.
Gibbins, Litt.D., M.A. Third Edition, is.
COMMERCIAL EXAMINATION PAPERS. By H.
de B. Gibbins, Litt.D., M.A. is. 6d.
THE ECONOMICS OF COMMERCE, By H. de
B. Gibbins, Litt.D., M.A. Second Edition.
js. 6d.
A GERMAN COMMERCIAL READER. By S. E.
Bally. With Vocabulary. 2*.
A COMMERCIAL GEOGRAPHY OK THE BRITISH
EMPIRE. By L. W. Lyde, M.A. fourth
Edition, zs.
A COMMERCIAL GEOGRAPHY OF FOREIGN
NATIONS. By F. C. Boon, B.A. as.
A PRIMER OF BUSINESS. By S. Jacksoi,
M.A. Third Edition, is. 6d.
COMMERCIAL ARITHMETIC. By F. G. Taylcr,
M.A. Fourth Edition, is. 6d.
FRENCH COMMERCIAL CORRESPONDENCE. 1 y
S. E. Bally. With Vocabulary. Tkitd
Edition, zs.
GERMAN COMMERCIAL CORRESPONDENCE. By
S. E. Bally. With Vocabulary. Secon i
Edition, zs. 6d.
A FRENCH COMMERCIAL READER. By S. 1 .
Bally. With Vocabulary. Second Edition. 2. .
PRECIS WRITING AND OFFICE CORRESPOND -
ENCE. By E. E. Whitfield, M.A. Secon t
Edition, zs.
A GUIDE TO PROFESSIONS AND BUSINESS.
By H. Jones, is. 6d.
THE PRINCIPLES OF BOOK-KEEPING BY DOUBLJ :
ENTRY. By J. E. B. M'Allen, M.A. zs.
COMMERCIAL LAW. By W. Douglas Edwards
Second Edition, zs.
Connoisseur's Library, The
Wide Royal %vo. 255-. net.
A sumptuous series of 20 books on art, written by experts for collectors, superbly
ustrated in photogravure, collotype, and colour. The technical side of the art is
illustrated
duly treated.
The first volumes are —
MEZZOTINTS. By Cyril Davenport. With 40
Plates in Photogravure.
PORCELAIN. By Edward Dillon. With 19
Plates in Colour, 20 in Collotype, and 5 in
Photogravure.
MINIATURES. By Dudley Heath. With 9
Plates in Colour, 15 in Collotype, and 15 in
Photogravure,
IVORIES. By A. Maskell. With 80 Plates in
Collotype and Photogravure.
ENGLISH FURNITURE. By F. S. Robinson.
With 160 Plates in Collotype and one in
Photogravure. Second Edition.
*EUROPEAN ENAMELS. By H. CUNYNGHAME,
C.B. With many Plates in Collotype and a
Frontispiece in Photogravure.
GENERAL LITERATURE
Devotion, The Library of
With Introductions and (where necessary) Notes.
Small Pott Svo, cloth, 2s. ; leather, 2s. 6d. net.
These masterpieces of devotional literature are furnished with such Introductions
and Notes as may be necessary to explain the standpoint of the author and the
obvious difficulties of the text, without unnecessary intrusion between the author and
the devout mind.
THE CONFESSIONS OF ST. AUGUSTINE. Edited
by C. Bigg, D.D. Fifth Edition.
THE CHRISTIAN YEAR. Edited by Walter
Lock, D. D. Third Edition.
THE IMITATION OF CHRIST. Edited by C.
Bigg, D.D. Fourth Edition.
A BOOK OF DEVOTIONS. Edited by J. W.
Stanbridge. B.D. Second Edition.
LYRA JNNOCENTIUM. Edited by Walter
Lock, D.D.
A SERIOUS CALL TO A DEVOUT AND HOLY
LIFE. Edited by C. Bigg, D.D. Second
Edition.
THE TEMPLE. Edited by E. C. S. Gibson,
D . D. Secon d Edition .
A GUIDE TO ETERNITY. Edited by J. W.
Stanbridge, B.D.
THE PSALMS OF DAVID. Edited by B. W.
Randolph, D.D.
LYRA APOSTOLICA. By Cardinal Newman
and others. Edited by Canon Scott Holland
and Canon H. C. Beeching, M.A.
THE INNER WAY. By J. Tauler. Edited by
A. W. Hutton, M.A.
THE THOUGHTS OF PASCAL. Edited by C.
S. Jerrain, M.A.
ON THE LOVE OF GOD. By St. Francis de
Sales. Edited by W. J. Knox-Little, M.A.
A MANUAL OF CONSOLATION FROM THE
SAINTS AND FATHERS. Edited by J. H.
Burn, B.D.
THE SONG OF SONGS. Edited by B. Blaxland.
M.A.
THE DEVOTIONS OF ST. ANSELM. Edited by
C. C. J. Webb, M.A.
GRACE ABOUNDING. By JohnBunyan. Edited
by S. C. Freer, M.A.
BISHOP WILSON'S SACRA PRIVATA. Edited
by A. E. Burn, B.D.
LYRA SACRA : A Book of Sacred Verse.
Edited by H. C. Beeching, M.A., Canon of
Westminster.
A DAY BOOK FROM THE SAINTS AND FATHERS.
Edited by J. H. Burn, B.D.
HEAVENLY WISDOM. A Selection from the
English Mystics. Edited by E. C. Gregory.
LIGHT, LIFE, and LOVE. A Selection from the
German Mystics. Edited by W. R. Inge,
M.A.
*AN INTRODUCTION TO THE DEVOUT LIFE.
By St. Francis de Sales. Translated and
Edited by T. Barns, M.A.
Standard Library, The
In Sixpenny Volumes.
THE STANDARD LIBRARY is a new series of volumes containing the great classics of the
world, and particularly the finest works of English literature. All the great masters will be
represented, either in complete works or in selections. It is the ambition of the publishers to
place the best books of the Anglo-Saxon race within the reach of every reader, so that the
series may represent something of the diversity and splendour of our English tongue. The
characteristics of THE STANDARD LIBRARY are four : — i. SOUNDNESS OF TEXT. 2. CHEAPNESS.
3. CLEARNESS OF TYPE. 4. SIMPLICITY. The books are well printed on good paper at a
price which on the whole is without parallel in the history of publishing. Each volume con
tains from 100 to 250 pages, and is issued in paper covers, Crown 8vo, at Sixpence net, or in
cloth gilt at One Shilling net. In a few cases long books are issued as Double Volumes
or as Treble Volumes.
The following books are ready with the exception of those marked with a t, which denotes
that the book is nearly ready : —
THE MEDITATIONS OF MARCUS AURELIUS.
The translation is by R. Graves.
THE NOVELS OF JANE AUSTEN. In 5 volumes.
VOL. i. — Sense and Sensibility.
ESSAYS AND COUNSELS and THE NEW
ATLANTIS. By Francis Bacon, Lord
Verulam.
tRELiGio MEDICI and URN BURIAL. By
Sir Thomas Browne. The text has been
collated by A. R. Waller.
THE PILGRIM'S PROGRESS. By John Bunyan.
REFLECTIONS ON THE FRENCH REVOLUTION.
By Edmund Burke.
tTuR ANALOGY OF RELIGION, NATURAL AND
REVEALED. By Joseph Butler, D.D.
[Continued.
MESSRS. METHUEN'S CATALOGUE
THE STANDARD LIBRARY— continued.
THE POEMS OF THOMAS CHATTERTON. In 2
volumes.
tVol. i.— Miscellaneous Poems.
fVol. ii.— The Rowley Poems.
fViTA NUOVA. By Dante. Translated into
English by D G. Rossetti.
TOM JONES. By Henry Fielding. Treble Vol.
tCRANFORD. By Mrs. Gaskell.
THE HISTORY OF THE DECLINE AND FALL OF
THE ROMAN EMPIRE. By Edward Gibbon.
In 7 volumes.
Vol. v. is nearly ready.
The Text and Notes have been revised by
T. B. Bury, Litt.D., but the Appendices of
tne more expensive edition are not given.
tTHE VICAR OP WAKEFIELD. By Oliver
Goldsmith.
THE POEMS AND PLAYS OF OLIVER GOLDSMITH.
THE WORKS OF BEN JONSON.
iVoL. i.— The Case is Altered. Every Man
in His Humour. Every Man out of His
Humour.
The text has been collated by H. C. Hart.
THE POEMS OF JOHN KEATS. Double volume.
The Text has been collated by E. de
Selincourt.
ON THE IMITATION OF CHRIST. By Thomas
a Kempis.
The translation is by C. Bigg, DD., Canon
of Christ Church.
fA SERIOUS CALL TO A DEVOUT AND HOLY
LIFE. By William Law.
THE PLAYS OF CHRISTOPHER MARLOWE.
tVol. i.— Tamburlane the Great.
THE PLAYS OF PHILIP MASSINGER.
tVol. i.— The Duke of Milan.
THE POEMS OF JOHN MILTON. In 2 volumes.
tVol. i.— Paradise Lost.
THE PROSE WORKS OF JOHN MILTON.
fVoL. i.— EikonokJastes and The Tenure of
Kings and Magistrates.
SELECT WORKS OF SIR THOMAS MORE.
tVol. i.— Utopia and Poems.
tTHE REPUBLIC OF PLATO. Translated by
Sydenham and Taylor. Double Volume.
The translation has been revised ty
W. H. D. Rouse.
tTHE LITTLE FLOWERS OF ST. FRANCI;.
Translated by W. Hey wood.
THE WORKS OF WILLIAM SHAKESPEARE. In
10 volumes.
VOL. i.— The Tempest ; The Two Gentlemen
of Verona ; The Merry Wives of Windsor ;
Measure for Measure ; The Comedy c f
Errors.
VOL. 1 1.— Much Ado About Nothing ; Love' s
Labour's Lost; A Midsummer Night' i
Dream ; The Merchant of Venice ; As You
Like It.
VOL. in.— The Taming of the Shrew ; All ' ;
Well that Ends Well; Twelfth Night ; Th.;
Winter's Tale.
Vol. iv.— The Life and Death of King John
The Tragedy of King Richard the Second
The First Part of King Henry iv. ; Tht
Second Part of King Henry iv.
tVol. v.— The Life of King Henry v. ; The
First Part of King Henry vi. ; The Second
Part of King Henry vi.
THE LIFE OF NELSON. By Robert Southey.
tTHE NATURAL HISTORY AND ANTIQUITIESOF
SELBORNE. By Gilbert White.
THE LIFE OF JOHN RUSKIN. By W. G.
Collingwood.M.A. With Portraits. Sixth
Edition.
ENGLISH LYRICS. By W. E. Henley. Second
Edition.
THE GOLDEN POMP. A Procession of English
Lyrics. Arranged by A. T. Quiller Couch.
Second Edition.
CHITRAL : The Story of a Minor Siege. By
Sir G. S. Robertson, K.C.S.I. Third
Edition. Illustrated.
Half-Crown Library
Crown 8vo. 2s. 6d. net.
STRANGE SURVIVALS AND SUPERSTITIONS. By
S. Baring-Gould. Third Edition.
YORKSHIRE ODDITIES AND STRANGE EVENTS.
By S. Baring-Gould. Fourth Edition.
ENGLISH VILLAGES. By P. H. Ditchfield,
M.A., F.S.A. Illustrated.
A BOOK OF ENGLISH PROSE. By W. E.
Henley and C. Whibley.
THE LAND OF _ THE BLACK MOUNTAIN.
Being a Description of Montenegro. By
R. Wyon and G. Prance. With 40 Illustra
tions.
Illustrated Pocket Library of Plain and Coloured Books, The
Fcap 8vo. 3-y. 6d. net each volume.
A series, in small form, of some of the famous illustrated books of fiction and
general literature. These are faithfully reprinted from the first or best editions
without introduction or notes. The Illustrations are chiefly in colour.
COLOURED BOOKS
OLD COLOURED BOOKS. By George Paston.
With 16 Coloured Plates. Fcap. Svo. 2*. net.
THE LIFE AND DEATH OF JOHN MYTTON, ESQ.
By Nimrod. With 18 Coloured Plates by
Third
Henry Alken and T. J. Rawlins.
Edition.
[Continued.
GENERAL LITERATURE
ILLUSTRATED POCKET LIBRARY OF PLAIN AND
THE LIFE OP A SPORTSMAN. By Nimrod.
With 35 Coloured Plates by Henry Alken.
HANDLE Y Cuoss. By R. S. Surtees. With
H Coloured Plates and zoo Woodcuts in the
Text by John Leech.
MR. SPONGE'S SPORTING Tou*. By R. S.
Surtees. With 13 Coloured Plates and 90
Woodcuts in the Text by John Leech.
JORROCKS' JAUNTS AND JOLLITIES. By R. S.
Surtees. With 15 Coloured
Alken.
This volume
Plates by H.
reprinted from the ex
tremely rare and costly edition of 1843, which
contains Alken's very fine illustrations
instead of the usual ones by Phi/.
ASK MAMMA. By R. S. Surtees. With 13
Coloured Plates and 70 Woodcuts in the
Text by John Leech.
THE ANALYSIS OF THE HUNTING FIELD. By
R. S. Surtees. With 7 Coloured Plates by
Henry Alken, and 43 Illustrations on Wood.
THE TOUR OF DR. SYNTAX IN SEARCH OF
THE PICTURESQUE. By William Combe.
With 30 Coloured Plates by T. Rowlandson.
THE TOUR OF DOCTOR SYNTAX IN SEARCH
OK CONSOLATION. By William Combe.
With 24 Coloured Plates by T. Rowlandson.
THE THIRD TOUR OF DOCTOR SYNTAX IN
SEARCH or A WIFE. By William Combe.
With 24 Coloured Plates by T. Rowlandson.
THE HISTORY OF JOHNNY QUAE GENUS : the
Little Foundling of the late Dr. Syntax.
By the Author of ' The Three Tours. ' With
24 Coloured Plates by Rowlandson.
THE ENGLISH DANCE OF DEATH, from the
Designs of T. Rowlandson, with Metrical
Illustrations by the Author of ' Doctor
Syntax.' Two Volumes.
This book contains 76 Coloured Plates.
THE DANCE OF LIFE: A Poem. By the Author
of 'Doctor Syntax.' Illustrated with 26
Coloured Engravings by T. Rowlandson.
LIFE IN LONDON: or, the Day and Night
Scenes of Terry Hawthorn, Esq., and his
Elegant Friend, Corinthian Tom. By
Pierce Egan. With 36 Coloured Plates by
I. R. and G. Cruikshank. With numerous
Designs on Wood.
REAL LIFE IN LONDON : or. the Rambles
and Adventures of Bob Tallyho, Esq., and
his Cousin, The Hon. Tom Dashall. By an
COLOURED BOOKS — continued.
Amateur (Pierce Egan). With 31 Coloured
Plates by Alken and Rowlandson, etc.
Two Volumes.
THE LIFE OF AN ACTOR. By Pierce Egan.
With 27 Coloured Plates by Theodore Lane,
and several Designs on Wood.
THE VICAR OF WAKEFIELP. By Oliver Gold
smith. With 24 Coloured Plates by T. Row-
landson.
THE MILITARY ADVENTURES OF JOHNNY
NEWCOME. By an Officer. With 15 Coloured
Plates by T. Rowlandson.
THE NATIONAL. SPORTS OF GREAT BRITAIN.
With Descriptions and 51 Coloured Plates
by Henry Alken.
This book is completely different from the
large folio edition of 'National Sports' by
the same artist, and none of the plates are
similar.
THE ADVENTURES OF A POST CAPTAIN. By
A Naval Officer. With 24 Coloured Plates
by Mr. Williams.
GAMONIA : or, the Art of Preserving Game ;
and an Improved Method of making Planta
tions and Covers, explained and illustrated
by Lawrence Rawstorne, Esq. With 15
Coloured Plates by T. Rawlins.
AN ACADEMY FOR GROWN HORSEMEN : Con
taining the completes! Instructions for
Walking, Trotting, Cantering, Galloping,
Stumbling, and Tumbling. Illustrated with
27 Coloured Plates, and adorned with a
Portrait of the Author. By Geoffrey
Gambado, Esq.
REAL LIFE IN IRELAND, or, the Day and
Night Scenes of Brian Boru, Esq., and his
Elegant Friend, Sir Shawn O'Dogherty.
By a Real Paddy. With 19 Coloured Plates
by Heath, Marks, etc.
THE ADVENTURES OF JOHNNY NEWCOMB IN
THE NAVY. By Alfred Burton. With 16
Coloured Plates by T. Rowlandson.
THE OLD ENGLISH SQUIRE: A Poem. By
John Careless, Esq. With 20 Coloured
Plates after the style of T. Rowlandson.
*TnE ENGLISH SPY. By Bernard Black-
mantle. With 72 Coloured Plates by R.
Cruikshank, and many Illustrations on
wood. Two Volumes.
PLAIN BOOFS
THE GRAVF : A Poem. By Robert Blair.
Illustrated by 12 Etchings executed by Louis
Schiavonetti from the original Inventions of
William Blake. With an Engraved Title Page
and a Portrait of Blake by T. Phillips, R.A.
The illu.tratiens are reproduced in photo
gravure.
ILLUSTRATIONS OF THE BOOK OF JOB. In.
vented and engraved by William Blake.
These famous Illustrations — 21 in number
— are reproduced in photogravure.
FABLES.
Thomas Bewick.
With 380 Woodcuts by
[CfntiHntd
26
MESSRS. METHUEN'S CATALOGUE
ILLUSTRATED POCKET LIBRARY OF PLAIN AND COLOURED BOOKS— continued.
WINDSOR CASTLE. ByW. Harrison Ainsworth.
With 22 Plates and 87 Woodcuts in the Text
by George Cruikshank.
THE TOWER OF LONDON. By W. Harrison
Ainsworth. With 40 Plates and 58 Woodcuts
in the Text by George Cruikshank.
FRANK FAIRLEGH. By F. E. Smedley. With
30 Plates by George Cruikshank.
HANDY ANDY. By Samuel Lover. With 24
Illustrations by the Author.
THB COMPLEAT ANGLER. By Izaak Walton
and Charles Cotton. With 14 Plates and 77
Woodcuts in the Text.
This volume is reproduced from the beai t i-
ful edition of John Major of 1824.
THE PICKWICK PAPERS. By Charles Dicke is.
With the 43 Illustrations by Seymour and
Phiz, the two Buss Plates, and the 32 Cm-
temporary Onwhyn Plates.
Junior Examination Series
Edited by A. M. M. STEDMAN, M.A. Fcap. 8vo. is.
This series is intended to lead up to the School Examination Series, and is intended
for the use of teachers and students, to supply material for the former and practice
for the latter. The papers are carefully graduated, cover the whole of the subject
usually taught, and are intended to form part of the ordinary class work. They
may be used vivft, voce or as a written examination.
JUNIOR FRENCH EXAMINATION PAPERS. By
F. Jacob, M.A.
JUNIOR LATIN EXAMINATION PAPERS. By C.
G. Bolting, M.A. Third Edition.
JUNIOR ENGLISH EXAMINATION PAPERS. By
W. Williamson, B.A.
JUNIOR ARITHMETIC EXAMINATION PAPERS.
By W. S. Beard. Second Edition.
JUNIOR ALGEBRA EXAMINATION PAPERS. By
S. W. Finn, M.A.
JUNIOR GREEK EXAMINATION PAPERS. By V.
C. Weatherhead, M.A.
JUNIOR GENERAL INFORMATION EXAMIN/ -
TION PAPERS. By W. S. Beard.
*A KEY TO THE ABOVE. Crown Zvo. y. 6V.
JUNIOR GEOGRAPHY EXAMINATION PAPER: .
By W. G. Baker, M.A.
JUNIOR GERMAN EXAMINATION PAPERS. B/
A. Voegelin, M.A.
Junior School-Books
Edited by O. D. INSKIP, LL.D., and W. WILLIAMSON, B.A.
A series of elementary books for pupils in lower forms, simply written
by teachers of experience.
A CLASS-BOOK OF DICTATION PASSAGES. By
W. Williamson, B.A. Eleventh Edition.
Cr. Zvo. is. (>d.
THE GOSPRL ACCORDING TO ST. MATTHEW.
Edited by E. Wilton South, M.A. With
Three Maps. Cr. %vo. is. 6d.
THE GOSPEL ACCORDINGTO ST. MARK. Edited
by A. E. Rubie, D.D. With Three Maps.
Cr. 8vo. is. 6d.
A JUNIOR ENGLISH GRAMMAR. By W. William-
son, B.A. \Vith numerous passages for parsing
and analysis, and a chapter on Essay Writin g.
Third Edition. Cr. 8vo. as.
A JUNIOR CHEMISTRY. By E. A. Tyler, B.A. ,
F.C.S. With 78 Illustrations. Second Edi
tion. Cr. Zt'O. vs. 6d.
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. Edited by A.
E. Rubie, D.D. Cr. 8vo. as.
A JUNIOR FRENCH GRAMMAR. By L. A.
Sornet and M. J. Acatos. Cr. Zvo. is.
ELEMENTARY EXPERIMENTAL SCIENCE. PHY
SICS by W. T. Clough, A.R.C.S. CHEMISTRY
by A. E. Dunstan B.Sc. With 2 Plates and
154 Diagrams. Third Edition. Cr. Bvo.
ss. 6d.
A JUNIOR GEOMETRY. By Noel S. Lydon.
With 239 Diagrams. Second Edition. Cr.
8r>0. 2s.
*A JUNIOR MAGNETISM AND ELECTRICITY. By
W. T. Clough. Illustrated. Cr. Zvo.
ts. 6d.
ELEMENTARY EXPERIMENTAL CHEMISTRY.
By A. E. Dunstan, B.Sc. With 4 Plates
and 109 Diagrams. Cr. &vo. zs.
A JUNIOR FRENCH PROSE COMPOSITION.
By R. R. N. Baron, M.A. Cr. &vo. zs.
*THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST. LUKE. With
an Introduction and Notes by William
Williamson, B.A. With Three Maps. Cr.
GENERAL LITERATURE
Leaders of Beligion
Edited by H. C. BEECHING. M.A., Canon of Westminster.
Cr. 8vo. 2s. net.
With Portraits.
A series of short biographies of the
and thought of all ages and countries.
CARDINAL NEWMAN. By R. H. Mutton.
JOHN WESLEY. By J. H. Overton, M.A.
BISHOP WILBERFORCE. By G. W. Daniell,
M.A.
CARDINAL MANNING. By A. W. Hutton, M.A.
CHARLES SIMEON. By H. C. G. Moule, D.D.
JOHN KEBLE. By Walter Lock, D.D.
THOMAS CHALMERS. By Mrs. Oliphant.
LANCELOT ANDREWES. By R. L. Ottley,
D.D. Second Edition.
AUGUSTINE OF CANTERBURY. By E. L.
Cutts, D.D.
most prominent leaders of religious life
WILLIAM LAUD. By W. H. Hutton, M.A.
Third Edition.
JOHNK.NOX. ByF.MacCunn. Second Edition.
JOHN HOWE. By R. F. Horton, D.D.
BISHOP KEN. By F. A. Clarke, M.A.
GEORGE Fox, THE QUAKER. ByT. Hodgkln.
D.C.L.
JOHN DONNE. By Augustus Jessopp, D.D.
THOMAS CRANMER. By A. J. Mason, D.D.
BISHOP LATIMER. By R. M. Carlyle and A.
J. Carlyle, M.A.
BISHOP BUTLER. By W. A. Spooner, M.A.
Little Blue Books, The
General Editor, E. V. LUCAS.
Illustrated. Demy i6»io. 2s. 6d.
A series of books for children. The aim
exciting stories about normal children, the
expressed.
1. THB CASTAWAYS OF MEADOWBANK. By
Thomas Cobb.
2. THE BEF.CHNUT BOOK. By Jacob Abbott.
Edited by E. V. Lucas.
•?. THE AIR GUN. By T. Hilbert.
A SCHOOL YEAR. By Netta Syrett.
5. THE PEELES AT THE CAPITAL. By Roger
Ashton.
of the editor is to get entertaining or
moral of which is implied rather than
THE TREASURE OF PRINCEGATE PRIORY,
By T. Cobb.
Mrs. BARBERRY'S GENERAL SHOP. By
Roger Asbton.
A BOOK OF BAD CHILDREN. By W. T.
Webb.
9. THE LOST BALL. By Thomas Cobb.
Little Books on Art
With many Illustrations. Demy l6mo. 2s. 6d. net.
A series of monographs in miniature, containing the complete outline of the
subject under treatment and rejecting minute details. These books are produced
with the greatest care. Each volume consists of about 200 pages, and contains from
30 to 40 illustrations, including a frontispiece in photogravure.
HOLBEIN. Mrs. G. Fortescue.
BURNE-JONKS. Fortunee de Lisle. Second
Edition.
REMBRANDT. Mrs. E. A. Sharp
GREEK ART. H.B.Walters. Second Edition.
BOOKPLATES. E.Almack.
REYNOLDS, J. Sime. Second Edition.
ROMNEY. George Paston.
WATTS. R. E. D. Sketchley.
LEIGHTON. Alice Corkran.
COROT. Alice Pollard and Ethel Birnstingl.
RAPHAEL. A. R. Dry hurst.
VELASQUEZ. Wilfrid Wilberforce and A. R. I MILLET. Netta Peacock.
^:iu"* ' ILLUMINATED MSS. J. W. Bradley.
•CHRIST IN ART. Mrs. Henry Jenner.
JEWELLERY. Cyril Davenport.
Gilbert.
GREUZE AND BOUCHER. Eliza F. PollarJ.
VANDYCK. M. G. Smallwood.
TURNER. Frances Tyrell-Gill.
DURER. Jessie Allen.
HOPPNKR. H. P. K. Skipton.
CLAUDE. Edward Dillon.
*THE ARTS OF JAPAN. Edward Dillon.
28
MESSRS. METHUEN'S CATALOGUE
Little Galleries, The
Demy i6mo. 2s. 6d. net.
A serie* of little books containing examples of the best work of the great painte-s.
Each volume contains 20 plates in photogravure, together with a short outline of the
life and work of the master to whom the book is devoted.
A LITTLE GALLERY OF REYNOLDS.
A LITTLE GALLERY OF ROMNEY.
A LITTLE GALLERY OF HOPPNER.
A LITTLE GALLERY OF MILLAIS.
A LITTLE GALLERY OK ENGLISH POETS.
Little Guides, The
Small Pott 8vo, cloth, 2s. 6ct. net.; leather, 3*. 6d. net.
Me
J. Wells,
ew. Sixth
By A.
Edition.
OXFORD AND ITS COLLEGES.
M.A. Illustrated by E. H.
Edition.
CAMBRIDGE AND ITS COLLEGES.
Hamilton Thompson. Second
Illustrated by E. H. New.
THE MALVERN COUNTRY. By B. C. A.
Windle, D.Sc., F.R.S. Illustrated by E.
H. New.
SHAKESPEARE'S COUNTRY. By B. C. A.
Windle, D.Sc., F.R.S. Illustrated by E.
H. New. Second Edition.
SUSSEX. By F. G. Brabant, M.A. Illustrated
by E. H. New.
WESTMINSTER ABBEY. By G. E. Troutbeck.
Illustrated by F. D. Bedford.
NORFOLK. By W. A. Dutt. Illustrated by
B. C. Boulter.
CORNWALL. By A. L. Salmon.
by B. C Boulter.
BRITTANY. By S. Baring-Gould.
by J. Wylie.
HERTFORDSHIRE. By H. W. Tompkins,
F.R.H.S. Illustrated by E. H. New.
THE ENGLISH LAKES. By F. G. Brabant,
M.A. Illustrated by E. H. New.
KENT. By G. Clinch. Illustrated by F. D.
Bedford.
Illustrated
Illustrated
ROME By C. G. Ellaby. Illustrated by B.
C. Boulter.
THE ISLE OP WIGHT. By G. Clinch. Ilh s-
trated by F. D. Bedford.
SURREY. By F. A. H. Lambert. Illustrated
by E. H. New.
BUCKINGHAMSHIRE. By E. S. Roscoe. Illus
trated by F. D. Bedford.
SUFFOLK. By W. A. Dutt. Illustrated by J.
Wylie.
DERBYSHIRE. By J. C. Cox, LL.D., F.S.A.
Illustrated by J. C. Wall.
THE NORTH RIDING OF YORKSHIRE. ByJ. i:.
Morris. I. Illustrated by R. J. S. Bertram.
HAMPSHIRE. By J. C. Cox. Illustrated ly
M. E. Purser.
SICILY. By F. H. Jackson. With many
Illustrations by the Author.
DORSET. By Frank R. Heath. Illustrated.
CHESHIRE. By W. M. Gallichan. Illustrate 1
by Elizabeth Hartley.
^NORTHAMPTONSHIRE. J3y Wakeling Drj .
Illustrated.
•THE EAST RIDING OF YORKSHIRE. By J. F
Morris. Illustrated.
•OXFORDSHIRE. By F. G. Brabant. Illus
trated by E. H. New.
*ST. PAUL'S CATHEDRAL. By George Clinch.
Illustrated by Beatrice Alcock.
Little Library, The
With Introductions, Notes, and Photogravure Frontispieces.
Small Pott Svo. Each Volume, doth, is. 6d. net ; leather, 2s. 6d. net.
A series of small books under the above title, containing some of the famous work?
in English and other literatures, in the domains of fiction, poetry, and belles lettres.
The series also contains volumes of selections in prose and verse. The books are
edited with the most scholarly care. Each one contains an introduction which
gives (i ) a short biography of the author ; (2) a critical estimate of the book. Where
they are necessary, short notes are added at the foot of the page.
Each volume has a photogravure frontispiece, and the books are produced with
great care.
Anon. ENGLISH LYRICS, A LITTLE
BOOK OF.
Austen (Jane). PRIDE AND PREJU
DICE. Edited by E. V. LCCAS. Two
^'flumes.
NORTHANGER ABBEY. Edited by E. V
LUCAS.
Bacon (Francis). THE ESSAYS
LORD BACON. Edited by
WRIGHT.
OF
GENERAL LITERATURE
Edited by JOHN
Barham (R. H.). THE INGOLDSBY
LEGENDS. Edited by J. B. ATLAV.
Two Volumes.
Barnctt(Mrs. P. A.). A LITTLE BOOK
OF ENGLISH PROSE.
Beckford (William). THE HISTORY
OF THE CALIPH VATHEK. Edited
by E. DENISON Ross.
Blake (William). SELECTIONS FROM
WILLIAM BLAKE Edited by M.
PERUGINI.
Borrow (George). LAVENGRO. Edited
by F. HINDES GKOOME. Two Volumes.
THE ROMANY RYE.
SAMPSON.
Browning (Robert). SELECTIONS
FROM THE EARLY POEMS OF
ROBERT BROWNING. Edited by W.
HALL GRIFFIN, M.A.
Canning (George). SELECTIONS FROM
THE ANTI-JACOBIN: with GEORGE
CANNING'S additional Poems. Edited by
LLOYD SANDERS.
Cowley (Abraham). THE ESSAYS OF
ABRAHAM COWLEY. Edited by H. C
MlNCHlN.
Crabbe (George). SELECTIONS FROM
GEORGE CRABBE. Edited by A. C
DEANE.
Cralk (Mrs.). JOHN HALIFAX,
G E N T L E M A N. Edited by ANNE
MATHESON. Two Volumes.
Crashaw (Richard). THp; ENGLISH
POEMS OF RICHARD CRASHAW.
Edited by EDWARD HUTTON.
Dante (AHghieri). THE INFERNO OF
DANTE. Translated by H. F. GARY.
Edited by PAGET TOYNBEE, M.A., D.Litt.
THE PURGATORIO OF DANTE. Trans
lated by H. F. GARY. Edited by PAGET
TOYNBEE, M.A., D.Litt.
THE PARADISO OF DANTE. Trans-
lated by H. F. GARY. Edited by PAGET
TOYNBEE, M.A., D.Litt.
Darley (George). SELECTIONS FROM
THE POEMS OF GEORGE DARLEY.
Edited by R. A. STREATFEILD.
Deane (A. C.). A LITTLE BOOK OF
LIGHT VERSE.
Dickens (Charles). CHRISTMAS BOOKS.
Two Volumes.
Ferrler (Susan). MARRIAGE. Edited
by A. GOODRICH - FREER and LORD
IDDESLEIGH. Two Volumes.
THE INHERITANCE. Two Volumes.
Gaskell(Mrs.). CRANFORD. Edited by
E. V. LUCAS. Second Edition.
Hawthorne (Nathaniel). THE SCARLET
LETTER. Edited by PERCY DEARMEK.
Henderson (T. F.). A LITTLE BOOK i
OF SCOTTISH VERSE.
Keats (John). POEMS. With an Intro
duction by L. BINYON, and Notes by J.
MASEFIELD.
Kinglake (A. W.). EOTHEN. With an
Introduction and Notes. Second Edition.
Lamb (Charles). ELIA, AND THE
LAST ESSAYS OF ELIA. Edited by
E. V. LUCAS.
Locker (F.). LONDON LYRICS. Edited
by A. D. GODLEY, M.A. A reprint of the
First Edition.
Longfellow (H. W.). SELECTIONS
FROM LONGFELLOW. Edited by
L. M. FAITH FULL.
Marvell (Andrew). THE POEMS OF
ANDREW MARVELL. Edited by E.
WRIGHT.
Milton (John). THE MINOR POEMS
OF JOHN MILTON. Edited by H. C.
BEBCHING, M.A., Canon of Westminster.
Molr(D. M.). MANSIEWAUCH. Edited
by T. F. HENDERSON.
Nichols (J. B. B.). A LITTLE BOOK OF
ENGLISH SONNETS.
Rochefoucauld (La). THE MAXIMS OF
LA ROCHEFOUCAULD. Translated
by Dean STANHOPE. Edited by G. H.
POWELL.
Smith (Horace and James). REJECTED
ADDRESSES. Edited by A. D. GODLEY,
M.A.
Sterne (Laurence). A SENTIMENTAL
JOURNEY. Edited by H. W. PAUL.
Tennyson (Alfred, Lord). THE EARLY
POEMS OF ALFRED, LORD TENNY
SON. Edited by J. CHURTON COLLINS,
M.A.
IN ME MORI AM. Edited by H. C.
BEECHING, M.A.
THE PRINCESS. Edited by ELIZABETH
WORDSWORTH.
MAUD. Edited by ELIZABETH WORDSWORTH.
Thackeray ( W. M.). VANITY FAIR.
Edited by S. GWYNN. Three Volumes.
PENDENNIS. Edited by S. GWYNN.
Three Volumes.
ESMOND. Edited by S. GWYNN.
CHRISTMAS BOOKS. Edited by S. GWYNN.
Vaughan (Henry). THE POEMS OF
HENRY VAUGHAN. Edited by EDWARD
HUTTON.
Walton (Izaak). THE COMPLEAT
ANGLER. Edited by J. BUCHAN.
Waterhouse (Mrs. Alfred). A LITTLE
BOOK OF LIFE AND DEATH. Edited
by. Eighth Edition.
Wordsworth (W.). SELECTIONS FROM
WORDSWORTH. Edited by NOWELL
C. SMITH.
Words worth (W.) and Coleridge (S. T.).
LYRICAL BALLADS. Edited by GEORGE
SAMPSON.
MESSRS. METHUEN'S CATALOGUE
Miniature Library
Reprints in miniature of a few interesting books which have qualities of
humanity, devotion, or literary genius.
EUPHRANOR : A Dialogue on Youth. By
Edward FitzGerald. From the edition pub
lished by W. Pickering in 1851. Demy
Leather, 2*. net.
POLONIUS: or Wise Saws and Modern In
stances. By Edward FitzGerald. From
the edition published by W. Pickering in
1852. Detny ymo. Leather, zs. net.
THE RuBAiYAT OF OMAR KHAYYAM. By
Edward FitzGerald. From the ist edition
of 1859, Third Edition. Leather, is. net.
THE LIKE OF EDWARD, LORD HERBERT o*
CHERBURY. Written by himself. From
the edition printed at Strawberry Hill in
the year 1764. Medium ^z»to. Leather,
zs. net.
THE VISIONS OF DOM FRANCISCO QUEVEDO
VILLEGAS, Knight of the Order of St
James. Made English by R. L. From th«:
edition printed for H. Herringman, 1668
Leather, zs. net.
POEMS. By Dora Greenwell. From the edi
tion of 1848. Leather, zs. net.
Oxford Biographies
Fcap. Svo. Each volume^ cloth^ zs. 6d. net ; leather, 35. 6d. net.
These books are written by scholars of repute, who combine knowledge and
literary skill with the power of popular presentation. They are illustrated from
authentic material.
DANTE ALIGHIERI. By Paget Toynbee, M.A., I ROBERT BURNS. By T. Y. Henderson.
D.Litt. With 12 Illustrations. Second] With 12 Illustrations.
Edition. \ CHATHAM. By A. S. M'Dowall. With 12
SAVONAROLA. By E. L. S. Horsburgh, M.A. Illustrations.
With 12 Illustrations. Second Edition. ST. FRANCIS OF ASSISI. By Anna M. Stod-
JOHN HOWARD. By E. C. S. Gibson, D.D., i dart. With 16 Illustrations.
Bishop of Gloucester. With 12 Illustrations. CANNING. By W. Alison Phillips. With 12
TENNYSON. By A. C. BENSON, M.A. With Illustrations.
9 Illustrations. BEACONSFIELD. By Walter Sichel. With 12
WALTER RALEIGH. By I. A. Taylor. With Illustrations.
12 Illustrations.
ERASMUS. By E. F. H. Capey.
With
Illustrations.
THE YOUNG PRETENDER. By C. S. Terry.
With 12 Illustrations.
GOETHE. By H. G. Atkins. With 12 Illus
trations.
*FENELON. By Viscount St. Cyres. With
12 Illustrations.
School Examination Series
Edited by A. M. M. STEDMAN, M.A. Cr. Zvo. 2s. 6d.
FRENCH EXAMINATION PAPERS. By A. M. i
M. Stedman, M.A. Thirteenth Edition.
A KEY, issued to Tutors and Private j
Students only to be had on application
to the Publishers. Fifth Edition.
Crown &vo. 6s. net.
LATIN EXAMINATION PAPERS. By A. M. M.
Stedman, M.A. Thirteenth Edition.
KEY (Fourth Edition) issued as above.
6s. net.
GREBK EXAMINATION PAPERS. By A. M. M.
Stedman, M.A. Eighth Edition.
KBY (Tkird Edition) issued as above.
6*. net.
GKKMA* SXAUINATTOM PAFKRS. By R. J.
Morich. Sixth Sdili^n.
KEY (Third Edition) issued as above.
6s. net.
HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY EXAMINATION
PAPERS. By C. H. Spence, M.A. Second
Edition.
PHYSICS EXAMINATION PAPERS. By R. E.
Steel, M.A., F.C.S.
GENERAL KNOWLEDGE EXAMINATION
PAPERS. By A. M. M. Stedman, M.A.
Fifth Edition.
KEY (Third Edition) issued as above.
7*. net.
EXAMINATION PAPERS IN ENGLISH HISTORY.
By J. Tait Plowden-Wardlaw, B.A.
GENERAL LITERATURE
Social Questions of To-day
Edited by H. DE B. GIBBINS, Litt.D., M.A. Crown Svo. as. 6d.
A series of volumes upon those topics of social, economic, and industrial intersst
that are foremost in the public mind.
By G.
F.
TRADE UNIONISM — NEW AND OLD.
Howell. Third Edition.
THE COMMERCE OF NATIONS. By C.
Bastable, M.A. Third Edition.
THE ALIEN INVASION. By W. H. Wilkins.B. A.
THE RURAL EXODUS. Bv P. Anderson
Graham.
LAND NATIONALIZATION. By Harold Cox,
B.A. Second Edition.
A SHORTER WORKING DAY. By H. de B.
Gibbins and R. A. Hadfield.
BACK TO THE LAND. An Inquiry into Rural
Depopulation. By H. E. Moore.
TRUSTS, POOLS, AND CORNERS. By J. Stephen
Jeans.
THE FACTORY SYSTEM. By R. W. Cooke
Taylor.
WOMEN'S WORK. By Lady Dilke, Miss
Bulley, and Miss Whitley.
SOCIALISM AND MODERN THOUGHT. By M.
Kauffmann.
THE PROBLEM OF THE UNEMPLOYED. By J.
A. Hobson, M.A.
LIFE IN WEST LONDON By Arthur Sherwell,
M.A. Third Edition.
RAILWAY NATIONALIZATION.
Edwards.
By Clement
UNIVERSITY AND SOCIAL SETTLEMENTS. By
W. Reason, M.A.
Textbooks of Science.
PRACTICAL MECHANICS. By Sidney H. Wells. '
Third Edition. Cr. Svo. y. 6d.
PRACTICAL PHYSICS. By H. Stroud, D.Sc., i
M.A. Cr. Svo. 3*. 6d.
PRACTICAL CHEMISTRY. Part i. By W.
French, M.A. Cr.Svo. ThirdEdition. is.6d.
PRACTICAL CHEMISTRY. Part H. By W.
French, M.A., and T. H. Boardman, M.A.
Cr. Svo. is. 6d.
EXAMPLES IN PHYSICS. By C. E. Jackson,
B.A., Science Master at Bradford Grammar
School. Cr. Svo. 2s. 6d.
ELEMENTARY ORGANIC CHEMISTRY. By A. E.
Dunstan, B.Sc., Head of Chemical Depart
ment, East Ham Technical College. Illus-
trated. Cr. Svo.
Technology, Textbooks of
Edited by G. F. GOODCHILD, B.A., B.Sc., and G. R. MILLS, M.A.
Fully Illustrated.
How TO MAKE A DRESS. By J. A. E. Wood. 3*. 6d.
Third Edition. Cr. Svo. is. 6d.
CARPENTRY AND JOINERY. By F. C. Webber.
Fourth Edition. Cr. Svo. 3*. 6d.
MILLINERY, THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL.
By Clare Hill. Second Edition. Cr.Svo. 2*.
TECHNICAL ARITHMETIC AND GEOMETRY.
By C. T. Millis, M.I.M.E. Cr. Svo.
Theology, Handbooks of
Edited by R. L. OTTLEY, D.D., Professor oi Pastoral Theology at Oxford,
and Canon of Christ Church, Oxford.
The series is intended, in part, to furnish the clergy and teachers or students of
Theology with trustworthy Textbooks, adequately representing the present position
of the questions dealt with ; in part, to make accessible to the reading public an
accurate and concise statement of facts and principles in all questions bearing on
Theology and Religion.
AN INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY OF TEX
TILE DESIGN. By Aldred F. Barker. Dimy
Svo. 75. 6d.
BUILDERS' QUANTITIES. By H. C. Grubb.
Cr. Svo. 4^. 6d.
REPOUSS£ METAL WORK. By A. C. Horth.
Cr. Svo. 2s. 6d.
THE XXXIX. ARTICLES OF THE CHURCH OF
ENGLAND. Edited by E. C. S. Gibson,
D.D. Third and Cheaper Edition in one
Volume. Demy Svo. i2s. 6d.
AN INTRODUCTION TO THE HISTORY OF
RELIGION. By F. B. Jevons. M.A.,
Litt.D. Third Edition. Demy Svo. ios.6d.
THE DOCTRINE OF THE INCARNATION. By R.
L. Ottley, D.D. Second and Cheaper
Edition. Demy Zvo. izs. 6d,
AN INTRODUCTION TO THE HISTORY OF THE
CREEDS. By A. E. Burn, B.D. Demy
Svo. IQS. 6d.
THE PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION IN ENGLAND
AND AMERICA. By Alfred Caldecott, D.D.
Demy Svo. xor. 6d.
A HISTORY OF EARLY CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE.
ByJ. F. Bethune Baker, M.A. Demy Svo.
tot. 6d.
MESSRS. METHUEN'S CATALOGUE
Westminster Commentaries, The
General Editor, WALTER LOCK, D.D., Warden of Keble College,
Dean Ireland's Professor of Exegesis in the University of Oxford.
The object of each commentary is primarily exegetical, to interpret the author's
meaning to the present generation. The editors will not deal, except very subor-
dinately, with questions of textual criticism or philology ; but, taking the Engli ;h
text in the Revised Version as their basis, they will try to combine a hearty accept
ance of critical principles with loyalty to the Catholic Faith.
THE BOOK OF GENESIS. Edited with Intro
duction and Notes by S. R. Driver, D.D.
Fourth Edition Demy 8v0. ior. 6d.
THE BOOK OK JOB. Edited by E. C. S. Gibson,
D.D. Second Edition. Demy too. 6s.
THE ACTS OF THE APOSTLES. Edited by R.
B. Rackham, M.A. Demy too. Second and
Cheaper Edition* los. fid.
THE FIRST EPISTLE OF PAUL THE APOST .E
TO THE CORINTHIANS. Edited by HVL.
Goudge, M.A. Demy too. 6s.
"•
THE EPISTLE OF ST. JAMES. Edited with In
troduction and Notes by R. J. Knowlinj,
M.A. Demy too. 6s.
PART II. — FICTION
Albanesi (E. Maria). SUSANNAH AND
ONE OTHER. Fourth Edition. Cr.
too. 6s.
THE BLUNDER OF AN INNOCENT.
Second Edition. Cr. too. 6s.
CAPRICIOUS CAROLINE. Second Edi
tion. Cr. too. 6s.
LOVE AND LOUISA. Second Edition.
Cr. too. 6s.
PETER, A PARASITE. Cr. too. 6s.
THE BROWN EVES OF MARY. Third
Edition. Cr. too. 6*.
Anstey (F.). Author of 'Vice Versa.' A
BAYARD FROM BENGAL. Illustrated
by BERNARD PARTRIDGE. Third Edition.
Cr. too. 3* . 6d.
Bacheller (Irving'), Author of 'Eben Holden.'
DARREL OF THE BLESSED ISLES.
Third Edition. Cr. too. 6s.
Bagot (Richard). A ROMAN MYSTERY.
Third Edition. Cr. too. 6s.
THE PASSPORT. Fourth Ed. Cr.8vo.6s.
Baring-Gould (S.). ARMINELL. Fifth
Edition. Cr. too. 6s.
URITH. Fifth Edition. Cr.too. 6s.
IN THE ROAR OF THE SEA. Seventh
Edition. Cr. too. 6s.
CHEAP JACK ZITA. Fourth Edition.
Cr. too. 6s.
MARGERY OF QUETHER. Third
Edition. Cr. S-'O. 6s.
THE QUEEN OF LOVE. Fifth Edition.
Cr. to>o. 6s.
JACQUETTA. Third Edition. Cr.too. 6s.
KITTY ALONE. Fifth Edition. Cr. too. 6s.
NOEMI. Illustrated. Fourth Edit ion. Cr.
Zvo. 6s.
THE BROOM-SQUIRE. Illustrated.
Fifth Edition. Cr. too. 6s.
DARTMOOR IDYLLS. Cr. too. 6s.
THE PENNYCOMEQUICKS. Third
Edition. Cr. too. 6s.
GUAVAS THE TINNER. Illustrated.
Second Edition. Cr. too. 6s.
BLADYS. Illustrated. Second Edition.
Cr. too. 6s.
PABO THE PRIEST. Cr. too. 6s.
VVINEFRED. Illustrated. Second Editior,
Cr. too. 6s.
ROYAL GEORGIE. Illustrated. Cr. too. 6 .
MISS QUILLET. Illustrated. Cr. Sva. 6 .
CHRIS OF ALL SORTS. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
IN DEWISLAND. Second Edition. Cr.
8v0. 6s.
LITTLE TU'PENNY. A New Edition. 6c.
See also Strand Novels and Books fcr
Boys and Girls.
Barlow (Jane). THE LAND OF THH
SHAMROCK. Cr. too. 6s. See alss
Strand Novels.
Barr (Robert). IN THE MIDST O)'
ALARMS. Third Edition. Cr. %*>o. 6:.
THE MUTABLE MANY. TAird Edition.
THE COUNTESS TEKLA. Third Edition .
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
THE LADY ELECTRA. Second Edition
Cr. &vo. 6s.
THE TEMPESTUOUS PETTICOAT
Illustrated. Third Edition. Cr. 8zv. 6s
See also Strand Novels and S. Crane.
Begbie (Harold). THE ADVENTURE.^
OF SIR JOHN SPARROW. Cr. 8vo. 6s
Belloc(Hllaire). EMMANUEL BURDEN
MERCHANT. With 36 Illustrations b5
G. K. CHESTERTON. • Second Edition
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
FICTION
33
Benson (E. F.) DODO. Fourth Edition.
Cr. 8z'ff. 6s. See also Strand Novels.
Benson (Margaret). SUBJECT TO
VANITY. Cr.toa. y. 6d.
Bourne (Harold C.). See V. Langbridge.
Burton (J. Bloundelle). THE YEAR
ONE : A Page of the French Revolution.
Illustrated. Cr. 8v0. 6s.
THE FATE OF VALSEC. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
A BRANDED NAME. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
See also Strand Novels.
Capes (Bernard), Author of 'The Lake of
Wine.' THE EXTRAORDINARY CON-
FESSIONSOF DIANA PLEASE. Third \
Edition. Cr. 8v0. 6s,
A JAY OF ITALY. Fourth Ed. Cr.8v0. 6s.
*LOAVES AND FISHES. Cr. 8v0. 6s.
Chesney (Weatherby). THE TRAGEDY ;
OF THE GREAT EMERALD. Cr. \
8v0. 6s.
THE MYSTERY OF A BUNGALOW.
Second Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
See also Strand Novels.
Clifford (Hugh). A FREE LANCE OF
TO-DAY. Cr. 8v0. 6s.
Clifford (Mrs. W. K.). See Strand Novels
and Books for Boys and Girls.
Cobb (Thomas). A CHANGE OF FACE.
Cr. 8v0. 6s.
Corelli (Marie). A ROMANCE OF TWO
WORLDS. Twenty-Sixth Edition. Cr.
8v0. 6s.
VENDETTA. Twenty-Second Edition. Cr.
8vo. 6s.
THELMA. Thirty-Third Edition. Cr.
8vo. 6s.
ARDATH: THE STORY OF A DEAD
SELF. Sixteenth Edition. Cr. 8v0. 6s.
THE SOUL OF LILITH. Thirteenth Edi
tion. Cr. 8?>0. 6s.
WORMWOOD. Fourteenth Edition. Cr.
8vo. 6s.
BARABBAS: A DREAM OF THE
WORLD'S TRAGEDY. Fortieth Edi-
tion. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
THE SORROWS OF SATAN. Fiftieth'
Edition. Cr. 8v0. 6s.
THE MASTER CHRISTIAN. 167^ '
Thousand. Cr. Zvo. 6s.
TEMPORAL POWER : A STUDY IN \
SUPREMACY. i30*A Thousand. Cr.
8v0. 6s.
GOD'S GOOD MAN : A SIMPLE LOVE i
STORY. 1 34 /A Thousand. Cr. Zvo. 6s. I
THE MIGHTY ATOM. A New Edition. \
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
BOY. A New Edition. Cr. 8-0. 6s.
JANE. A New Edition. Cr. 8v0. 6s.
Crockett (S. R.), Author of 'The Raiders,'
etc. LOCHINVAR. Illustrated. Third
Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
THE STANDARD BEARER. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
Croker (B. M.). THE OLD CANTON
MENT. Cr.8v0. 6s.
JOHANNA. Second Edition. Cr.8z-o. 6s.
THE HAPPY VALLEY. Third Edition.
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
A NINE DAYS' WONDER. Third
Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
PEGGY OF THE BARTONS. Sixth
Edition. Cr. 8v0. 6s.
ANGEL. Fourth Edition. Cr. Zvo. 6s.
A STATE SECRET. Third Edition. Cr.
Dawson3(Francis W.). THE SCAR. Cr.
DawsonV. J). DANIEL WHYTE.
Cr. 8v0. 3-j1. 6d.
Doyle (A. Conan), Author of 'Sherlock
Holmes.' 'The White Company,' etc.
ROUND THE RED LAMP. Ninth
Edition. Cr. &v0. 6s.
Duncan (Sara Jeannette) (Mrs. Everard
Cotes). THOSE DELIGHTFUL
AMERICANS. Illustrated. Third Edition.
Cr. 8vo. 6s. See also Strand Novels.
Findlater(J. H.). THE GREEN GRAVES
OF BALGOWRIE. Fifth Edition.
Cr. 8v0. 6s.
See also Strand Novels.
Findlater (Mary). A NARROW WAY.
Third Edition. Cr. 8vo.. 6s.
THE ROSE OF JOY. Third Edition.
Cr. 8v0. 6s.
See also Strand Novels.
Fitzpatrick (K.) THE WEANS AT
RUWALLAN. Illustrated. Second Edi
tion. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
Fitzstephen (Gerald). MORE KIN
THAN KIND. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
Fletcher (J. S.). LUCIAN THE
DREAMER. Cr. Zvo. 6s.
Fraser(Mrs. Hugh), Author of ; The Stolen
Emperor.' THE SLAKING OF THE
SWORD. Cr. 8v0. 6s.
*THE SHADOW OF THE LORD. Cr.
8ve>. 6s.
*Fuller-Maitland (Mrs.), Author of ' The
Day Book of Bethia Hardacre.1 BLANCHE
ESMEAD. Cr.Svo. 6s.
Gerard (Dorothea), Author of ' Lady Baby.
THE CONQUEST OF LONDON.
Second Edition. Cr. 8v0. 6s.
HOLY MATRIMONY. Second Edition.
Cr. 8v0. 6s.
MADE OF MONEY. Cr. 8v0. 6s.
THE BRIDGE OF LIFE. Cr. 8vo. 6*.
THE IMPROBABLE IDYL. Third
Edition. Cr. 8v0. 6s.
See also Strand Novels.
Gerard (Emily). THE HERONS'
TOWER. Cr. 8va. 6s.
Gissine (George). Author of 'Demos,' 'In
the Year of Jubilee,' etc. THE TOWN
TRAVELLER. Second Ed. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
THE CROWN OF LIFE. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
Gleig (Charles). BUNTER'S CRUISE.
Illustrated. Cr. Zvo. 3*. 6d.
Harraden (Beatrice). IN VARYING
MOODS. A New Edition. Cr. too. 6*.
34
MESSRS. METHUEN'S CATALOGUE
"THE SCHOLAR'S DAUGHTER. Cr.
Bvo. 6s.
Harrod (F.) (Frances Forbes Robertson).
THE TAMING OF THE BRUTE. Cr.
Bvo. 6s.
Herbertson (Agnes Q.). PATIENCE
DEAN. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
Hichens (Robert). THE PROPHET OF
BERKELEY SQUARE. Second Edition.
Cr. Bvo. 6s.
TONGUES OF CONSCIENCE. Second
Edition. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
FELIX. Fifth Edition. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
THE WOMAN WITH THE FAN. Sixth
Edition. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
BYEWAYS. Cr. Bvo. v- 6d.
THE GARDEN OF ALLAH. Twelfth
Edition. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
THE BLACK SPANIEL. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
Hobbes (John Oliver), Author of ' Robert
Orange.1 THE SERIOUS WOOING.
Cr. Bvo. 6s.
Hope (Anthony). THE GOD IN THE
CAR. Tenth Edition. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
\ CHANGE OF AIR. Sixth, Edition.
Cr. Bvo. 6s.
A MAN OF MARK. Fifth Edition. Cr.
THIC* CHRONICLES OF COUNT AN
TONIO. Sixth Edition. Cr.Bvo. 6s.
PHROSO. Illustrated by H. R. MILLAR.
Sixth Edition. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
SIMON DALE. Illustrated. SixthEdition.
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
THE KING'S MIRROR. Fourth Edition.
Cr. Bvo. 6s.
QUISANTE. Fourth Edition. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
THE DOLLY DIALOGUES. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
A SERVANT OF THE PUBLIC. Illus
trated. Fourth Edition. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
Hope (Graham), Author of ' A Cardinal and
his Conscience,' etc., etc. THE LADY
OF LYTE. Second Ed. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
Hough (Emerson). THE MISSISSIPPI
BUBBLE. Illustrated. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
Housman (Clemence). THE LIFE OF
SIRAGLOVALEDEGALIS. Cr.Bvo.6s.
Hyne (C. J. Cutcliffe), Author of ' Captain
Kettle.' MR. HORROCKS, PURSER.
Third Edition. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
Jacobs (W. W.). MANY CARGOES.
Twenty- Eighth Edition. Cr. Bvo. 3*. f>d.
SEA URCHINS. Twelfth Edition. Cr.
Bvff. 3-r. 6d.
A MASTER OF CRAFT. Illustrated. Sixth
Edition. Cr. Bvo. 3*. 6d.
LIGHT FREIGHTS. Illustrated. Fifth
Edition. Cr. Bvo. 35. 6d.
James (Henry). THE SOFT SIDE. Second
Edition. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
THE BETTER SORT. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
THE AMBASSADORS. Second Edition.
Cr. &vo. 6s.
THE GOLDEN BOWL. Third Edition.
Cr. &vt. 6s.
Janson (Gustaf). ABRAHAM'S SACRI
FICE. Cr. Br>o. 6s.
Keays (H. A. Mitchell). HE THAT
EATETH BREAD WITH ME. Cr.
Bvo. 6s.
Langbridge (V.) and Bourne (Z.
Harold.). THE VALLEY OF IN
HERITANCE. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
Lawless (Hon. Emily). WITH ESSEX
IN IRELAND. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
See also Strand Novels.
Lawson (Harry), Author of 'When tie
Billy Boils.' CHILDREN OF THE
BUSH. Cr.Bvo. 6s.
LeQueux(W.). THE HUNCHBACK OK
WESTMINSTER. Third Edition. Cr.
Bvo. 6s.
THE CLOSED BOOK. Third Edition
Cr. Bvo. 6s.
THE VALLEY OF THE SHADOV.
Illustrated. Third Edition. Cr.Bvo. 6r.
BEHIND THE THRONE. Third Edition.
Cr. Bvo. 6s.
Levett-Yeats (S.). ORRAIN. Second
Edition. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
Long (J. Luther), Co- Author of 'The
Darling of the Gods.' MADAM •!
BUTTERFLY. Cr.Bvo. 2s. 6d.
SIXTY JANE. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
Lowis (Cecil). THE MACHINATION -
OF THE MYO-OK. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
Lyall (Edna). DERRICK VAUGHA^ ,
NOVELIST, vnd Thousand. Cr. Bv< .
is. 6d.
M'Carthy (Justin H.), Author of ' If I wer
King.' THE LADY OF LOYALT1
HOUSE. Illustrated. Third Edition. Ct.
THE DRYAD. Second Edition. Cr. Bvo. 6s
Macdonald (Ronald). THE SEA MAID
Cr. Bvo. 6s.
Macnaughtan (S.). THE FORTUNE Ol
CHRISTINA MACNAB. Third Edition
Cr. Bvo. 6s.
Malet (Lucas). COLONEL ENDERBY'S
WIFE. Fourth Edition. Cr.Bvo. 6s.
A COUNSEL OF PERFECTION. Neu
Edition. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
THE WAGES OF SIN. Fourteenth Edition
Cr. Bvo. 6s.
THE CARISSIMA. Fourth Edition. Cr.
Bvo. 6s.
THE GATELESS BARRIER. Fourth Edi-
tion. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
THE HISTORY OF SIR RICHARD
CALMADY. Seventh Edition. Cr.Bvo. 6s.
See also Books for Boys and Girls.
Mann (Mrs. M. E.). OLIVIA'S SUMMER.
Second Edition. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
A LOST ESTATE. A New Edition.
Cr. Bvo. 6s.
THE PARISH OF HILBY. A New Edition.
THE PARISH NURSE. Fourth Edition.
Cr. Bvo. 6s.
FICTION
35
GRAN'MA'S JANE. Cr. tea. 6s.
MRS. PETER HOWARD. Cr. Zvo. 6*.
A WINTER'S TALE. A New Edition.
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
ONE ANOTHER'S BURDENS. A New
Edition, Cr. 8vo. 6s.
ROSE AT HONEYPOT. Second Ed. Cr.
8vo. 6s. See also Books for Boys and Girls.
Marriott (Charles), Author of 'The
Column.' GENEVRA. Second Edition.
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
Marsh (Richard). THE TWICKENHAM
PEERAGE. Second Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
A DUEL. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
THE MARQUIS OF PUTNEY. Second
Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
See also Strand Novels.
Mason (A. E. W.), Author of 'The Four
Feathers,1 etc. CLEMENTINA. Illus
trated. Second Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
Mathers (Helen), Author of ' Corain' thro'
the Rye.1 HONEY. Fourth. Edition.
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
GRIFF OF GRIFFITHSCOURT. Cr. 8vo.
6s.
THE FERRYMAN. Second Edition. Cr.
8vo. 6s.
Maxwell (W. B.)f Author of 'The Ragged
Messenger.' VIVIEN. Seventh Edition.
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
THE RAGGED MESSENGER. Third
Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
FABULOUS FANCIES. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
Meade(L. T.). DRIFT. Second Edition.
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
RESURGAM. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
VICTORY. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
See also Books for Girls and Boys.
Meredith (Ellis). HEART OF MY
HEART. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
'Miss Molly' (The Author of). THE
GREAT RECONCILER. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
Mitford (Bertram). THE SIGN OF THE
SPIDER. Illustrated. Sixth Edition.
Cr. 8vo. 3^. 6d.
IN THE WHIRL OF THE RISING.
Third Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
THE RED DERELICT. Second Edition.
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
Montresor (F. F.), Author of 'Into the
Highways and Hedges.1 THE ALIEN.
Third Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
Morrison (Arthur). TALES OF MEAN
STREETS. Sixth Edition. Cr.8vo. 6s.
A CHILD OF THE JAGO. Fourth Edition.
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
TO LONDON TOWN. Second Edition.
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
CUNNING MURRELL. Cr. 8ve. 6s.
THE HOLE IN THE WALL. Fourth Edi
tion. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
DIVERS VANITIES. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
Nesbit (E.). (Mrs. E- Bland). THE RED
HOUSE. Illustrated. Fourth Edition.
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
See also Strand Novels.
Norrls (W. E.). THECREDIT OF THE
COUNTY. Illustrated. Second Edition.
THE EMBARRASSING ORPHAN, Cr.
8vo. 6s.
NIGEL'S VOCATION. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
BARHAM OF BELTANA. Second Edition.
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
See also Strand Novels.
Ollivant (Alfred). OWD BOB, THE
GREY DOG OF KENMUIR. Eighth
Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
Oppenheim (E. Phillips). MASTER OF
MEN. Third Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
Oxenham (John), Author of ' Barbe of
Grand Bayou. ' A WEAVER OF WEBS.
Second Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
THE GATE OF THE DESERT. Fourth
Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
Pain (Barry). THREE FANTASIES.
Cr. 8vo. is.
LINDLEY KAYS. Third Edition. Cr.
8vo. 6s.
Parker (Gilbert). PIERRE AND HIS
PEOPLE. Sixth Edition.
MRS. FALCHION. Fifth Edition. Cr.8vo.
THE TRANSLATION OF A SAVAGE.
Second Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
THE TRAIL OF THE SWORD. Illus-
trated. Ninth Edition. Cr. Zvo. 6s.
WHEN VALMOND CAME TO PONTIAC :
The Story of a Lost Napoleon. Fifth
Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
AN ADVENTURER OF THE NORTH:
The Last Adventures of 'Pretty Pierre.'
Third Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
THE SEATS OF THE MIGHTY. Illus-
trated. Fourteenth Edition. Cr. 8vo. C. .
THE BATTLE OF THE STRONG: a
Romance of Two Kingdoms. Illustrated.
Fifth Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
THE POMP OF THE LAVILETTES.
Second Edition. Cr. 8v0. y. 6d.
Pemberton (Max). THE FOOTSTEPS
OF A THRONE. Illustrated. Third
Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
I CROWN THEE KING. With Illustra
tions by Frank Dadd and A. Forrestier.
Cr. 8va. 6s.
Phillpotts (Eden). LYING PROPHETS.
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
CHILDREN OF THE MIST. Fifth Edi
tion. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
THE HUMAN BOY. With a Frontispiece.
Fourth Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
SONS OF THE MORNING. Second
Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
MESSRS. METHUEN'S CATALOGUE
THE RIVER. Third Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
THE AMERICAN PRISONER. Third
Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
THE SECRET WOMAN. ' Fourth Edition.
KNOCK AT A VENTURE. With a Frontis
piece. Third Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
*THE PORTREEVE. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
See also Strand Novels.
Pickthall (Marmaduke). SAID THE
FISHERMAN. Fifth Edition. Cr. 8vo.
6s.
BRENDLE. Second Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
•Q,' Author of 'Dead Man's Rock.' THE
WHITE WOLF. Second Edition. Cr.
&vo. 6s.
THE MAYOR OF TROY. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
Rhys (Grace). THE WOOING OF
SHEILA. Second Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
THE PRINCE OF LISNOVER. Cr. 8vo.
6s.
Rhys (Grace) and Another. THE DI
VERTED VILLAGE. Illustrated by
DOROTHY GWYN JEFFREYS. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
Ridge (W. Pett). LOST PROPERTY.
Second Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
'ERB. Second Edition. Cr. 8v0. 6s.
A SON OF THE STATE. A New Edition.
Cr. 8vo. 3*. 6d.
A BREAKER OF LAWS. A New Edition.
MRS*. GAlitR'S BUSINESS. Illustrated.
Second Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
SECRETARY TO BAYNE, M.P. Cr. 8vo.
3S. 6d.
Ritchie (Mrs. David G.). THE TRUTH
FUL LIAR. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
Roberts (C. G. D.). THE HEART OF
THE ANCIENT WOOD. Cr. 8vc.
3s. 6d.
Russell (W. Clark). MY DANISH
SWEETHEART. Illustrated. Fifth
Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
HIS ISLAND PRINCESS. Illustrated.
Second Edition. Cr. 6vo. 6s.
ABANDONED. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
See also Books for Boys and Girls.
Sergeant (Adeline). ANTHEA'S WAY.
Cr. &vo. 6s.
THE PROGRESS OF RACHAEL. Cr.
8v0. 6s.
THE MYSTERY OF THE MOAT. Second
Edition. Cr. Bvo. 6s.
MRS. LYGON'S HUSBAND. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
THE COMING OF THE RANDOLPHS.
Cr. Bvo. 6s.
See also Strand Novels.
Shannon (W. F.). THE MESS DECK
Cr. 8v0. $s. 6d.
See also Strand Novels.
Sonnlschsen (Albert). DEEP-SEA VAOA-
BONDS. Cr. 8va. 6s.
Thompson (Vance). SPINNERS OF
LIFE. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
Urquhart (M.), A TRAGEDY IN COM-
MONPLACE. Second Ed. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
Waineman (Paul). BY A FINNISH
LAKE. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
THE SONG OF THE FOREST. (>.
8vff. 6s. See also Strand Novels.
Waltz (E. C.). THE ANCIENT LAN D-
MARK: A Kentucky Romance. Cr. 8:>o.
6s.
Watson (H. B. Marriott). ALARUMS
AND EXCURSIONS. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
CAPTAIN FORTUNE. Third Eaition.
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
TWISTED EGLANTINE. With 8 Ilks-
trations by FRANK CRAIG. Second Editiot.
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
*THE HIGH TOBY. With a Frontispiece
Cr. 8vo. 6s. See also Strand Novels.
Wells (H. G.). THE SEA LADY. C-.
8vo. 6s.
Wey man (Stanley), Author of ' A Gentlema n
of France.' UNDER THE RED ROBl .
With Illustrations by R. C. WOODVILLI .
Nineteenth Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
White (Stewart E.)f Author of ' The Blaze 1
Trail.' CONJUROR'S HOUSE. /*
Romance of the Free Trail. Second Edition .
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
White (Percy). THE SYSTEM. Thin*
Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s. *
THE PATIENT MAN. Second Edition
Cr. 8v0. 6s.
Williamson (Mrs. C. N.), Author of 'Tht
Barnstormers.' THE ADVENTURt
OF PRINCESS SYLVIA. Cr. 8vo. 3s. 6d.
THE WOMAN WHO DARED. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
THE SEA COULD TELL. Second Edition.
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
THE CASTLE OF THE SHADOWS.
Third Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
PAPA. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
*LADY BETTY ACROSS THE WATER.
Cr. 8vo. 6s.
Williamson (C. N. and A. M.). THE
LIGHTNING CONDUCTOR: Being the
Romance of a Motor Car. Illustrated.
Thirteenth Edition. Cr. Zvo. 6s.
THE PRINCESS PASSES. Illustrated.
Sixth Edition. Cr. 8vo. 6s.
MY FRIEND THE CHAUFFEUR. With
1 6 Illustrations. Sixth Edition. Cr.
8vo. 6s.
*Wyllarde (Dolf), Author of 'Uriah the
Hittite.' THE PATHWAY OF THE
PIONEER. Cr.Bzw. 6s.
FICTION
The Strand Novels
Cr. Svo. Cloth, is. net.
ENCOURAGED by the great and steady sale of their Sixpenny Novels, Messrs. Methuen hare
determined to issue a new series of fiction at a low price under the title of ' THE STRAND
NOVELS.' These books are well printed and well bound in cloth, and the excellence of their
quality may be gauged from the names of those authors who contribute the early volumes of
Messrs. Methuen would point out that the books are as good and as long as a six shilling
novel, that they are bound in cloth and not in paper, and that their price is One Shilling net.
They feel sure that the public will appreciate such good and cheap literature, and the books can
be seen at all good booksellers.
The first volumes are —
Balfour (Andrew). VENGEANCE IS
MINE.
Baring- Gould (S.). MRS. CURGENVEN
OF CURGENVEN.
•DOMITIA.
*THE FROBISHERS.
Barlow (Jane), Author of 'Irish Idylls.
FROM THE EAST UNTO THE
WEST
A CREEL OF IRISH STORIES.
*THE FOUNDING OF FORTUNES.
Barr (Robert). THE VICTORS.
Bartram (George). THIRTEEN EVEN-
INGS.
Benson (E. F.), Author of 'Dodo.' THE
CAPSINA.
Bowles (G. Stewart). A STRETCH OFF
THE LAND.
Brooke (Emma). THE POET'S CHILD.
Bullock (Shan F.). THE BARRYS.
THE CHARMER.
THE SQUIREEN.
THE RED LEAGUERS.
Burton (J. Bloundelle). ACROSS THE
SALT SEAS.
THE CLASH OF ARMS.
DENOUNCED.
*FORTUNE'S MY FOE.
Capes (Bernard). AT A WINTER'S FIRE.
Chesney (Weatherby). THE BAPTIST
RING.
THE BRANDED PRINCE.
THE FOUNDERED GALLEON.
JOHN TOPP.
Clifford (Mrs. W. K.). A FLASH OF
SUMMER.
Collingwood (Harry). THE DOCTOR
OF THE 'JULIET.'
Cornford (L. Cope). SONS OF ADVER
SITY.
Crane (Stephen). WOUNDS IN THE
RAIN.
Denny (C. E.). THE ROMANCE OF
UPFOLD MANOR.
Uickgon (Harris). THE BLACK WOLF'S
BREED.
Dickinson (Evelyn). THE SIN OF
ANGELS.
*Duncan (Sara J.). THE POOL IN THE
DESERT.
*A VOYAGE OF CONSOLATION.
Bmbree (C. F.). A HEART OF FLAME.
Fenn (G. Manville). AN ELECTRIC-
SPARK.
Findlater (Jane H.). THE DAUGHTER
OF STRIFE.
*Findlater(Mary). OVER THE HILLS.
Forrest (R. E.). THE SWORD OF
AZRAEL.
Francis (M. E.). MISS ERIN.
Gallon (Tom). RICKERBY'S FOLLY.
Gerard (Dorothea). THINGS THAT
HAVE HAPPENED.
Glanville (Ernest). THE DESPATCH
RIDER.
THE LOST REGIMENT.
THE KLOOF BRIDE.
THE INCA'S TREASURE.
Gordon (Julien). MRS. CLYDE.
WORLD'S PEOPLE.
Goss (C. F.). THE REDEMPTION OF
DAVID CORSON.
*Gray (E. M 'Queen). MY STEWARD-
SHIP.
Hales (A. G.). JAIR THE APOSTATE.
Hamilton (Lord Ernest). MARYHAMIL-
TON.
Harrison (Mrs. Burton). A PRINCESS
OF THE HILLS. Illustrated.
Hooper (I.). THE SINGER OF MARLY.
Hough (Emerson). THE MISSISSIPPI
BUBBLE.
•Iota1 (Mrs. Caffyn). ANNE MAULE-
VERER.
Mepson (Edgar). KEEPERS OF THE
Kelly (Florence Finch). WITH HOOPS
OF STEEL.
Lawless (Hon. Emily). MAELCHO.
Linden (Annie). A WOMAN OF SENTI-
MENT.
*Lorimer (Norma). JOSIAH'S WIFE.
Lush (Charles K.). THE AUTOCRATS.
Macdonnell (A.). THE STORY OF
TERESA.
Macgrath (Harold). THE PUPPET
CROWN.
MESSRS. METHUEN'S CATALOGUE
Mackle (Pauline Bradford). THE VOICE
IN THE DESERT.
Marsh (Richard). THE SEEN AND
THE UNSEEN.
•GARNERED.
•A METAMORPHOSIS.
MARVELS AND MYSTERIES.
BOTH SIDES OF THE VEIL.
Mayall (J. W.). THE CYNIC AND THE
SYREN.
Monkhouse (Allan). LOVE IN A LIFE.
Moore (Arthur). THE KNIGHT PUNC-
TILIOUS.
Nesblt (Mrs. Bland). THE LITERARY-
SENSE.
Norris(W. E.). AN OCTAVE.
01!phant(Mrs.). THE LADY'S WALK.
SIR ROBERT'S FORTUNE.
THE TWO MARY'S.
Penny (Mrs. F. A.). A MIXED MAR
AGE.
Phillpotts (Eden). THE STRIKING
HOURS.
FANCY FREE.
Randall (J.). AUNT BETHIA'S BUTTON.
'Raymond (Walter). FORTUNE'S DAR-
LING.
*Rayner (Olive Pratt). ROSALBA.
Rhys (Grace). THE DIVERTED VILL
AGE.
Rickert (Edith). OUT OF THE CYPRESS
SWAMP.
Roberton(M. H.). A GALLANT QUAKER.
Saunders (Marshall). ROSE A CHAR-
LITTE.
Sergeant (Adeline). ACCUSED AND
ACCUSER.
BARBARA'S MONEY.
THE ENTHUSIAST.
A GREAT LADY.
*THE LOVE THAT OVERCAME.
THE MASTER OF BEECHWOOD.
UNDER SUSPICION.
*THE YELLOW DIAMOND.
Shannon (W. F.). JIM TWELVES.
^Strain (E. H.). ELMSLIE'S DRAG NET.
Stringer (Arthur). THE SILVER POPP\.
Stuart (Esrae). CHRISTALLA.
Sutherland (Duchess of). ONE HOUR
AND THE NEXT.
Swan (Annie). LOVE GROWN COLD.
i Swift (Benjamin). SORDON.
Tanqueray (Mrs. B. M.). THE ROYAL
QUAKER.
I Trafford-Taunton (Mrs.E.W.). SILENT
DOMINION.
'Upward (Allen). ATHELSTANE FORD
Waineman (Paul). A HEROINE FROM
FINLAND.
Watson (H. B. Marriott). THE SKIRTS
OF HAPPY CHANCE.
Books for Boys and Girls
Illustrated. Crown 8vo. s. 6
THE GETTING WELL op DOROTHY. By Mrs.
W. K. Clifford. Second Edition.
THE ICELANDER'S SWORD. By S. Banner-
Gould.
ONLY A GUARD-ROOM DOG. By Edith F..
Cutheil.
THE DOCTOR OF THE JULIET. By Harry
Collingwood.
LITTLE PETER. By Lucas Malet. Second
Edition.
MASTER ROCKAFELLAR'S VOYAGE. By W.
Clark Russell.
THE SECRET OF MADAMK DK MONLUC. By
the Author of " Mdlle. Mori."
SYD BELTON : Or, the Boy who would not go
to Sea. By G. Manville Fenn.
THE RED GRANGE. By Mrs. Molesworth.
A GIRL OF THE PEOPLE. By L. T. Meade.
Second Edition.
HEPSY GIPSY. By L. T. Meade. *s. 6d.
THE HONOURABLE Miss. By L. T. Meade.
THERE WAS ONCE A PRINCE. By Mrs. M. E.
Mann.
WHFN ARNOLD CO.VFS HOME. By Mrs. M. E.
Mann.
The Novels of Alexandre Dumas
Price 6d. Double Volumes^ is.
THE THREE MUSKETEERS. With a long
Introduction by Andrew Lang. Double
volume.
THK PRINCE OF THIEVES. Second Edition.
ROBIN HOOD. A Sequel to the above.
THE CORSICA* BROTHERS.
GEORGES.
CROP-EARED JACQUOT; JANE; Etc.
TWENTY YEARS AFTER. Double volume.
AMAURY.
THE CASTLE or EPPSTEIN.
THE SNOWBALL, and SULTANETTA.
CECILE ; OK, THE WEDDING GOWN.
ACT*.
FICTION
39
Tim BLACK TULIP.
THE VICOMTE DE BRAGELONNE.
Part i. Louise de la Valliere. Double
Volume.
Part ii. Th« Man in the Iron Mask.
Double Volume.
THE CONVICT'S SON.
THE WOLF-LEADER.
NANON; OR, THE WOMEN' WAR. Double
volume.
PAULINE; MURAT; AND PASCAL BRUNO.
THE ADVENTURES OF CAPTAIN PAMPHILE.
FERNANDE.
GABRIEL LAMBERT.
CATHERINE BLUM.
THE CHEVALIER D'HARMENTAL. Double
volume.
SYLVANDIRE.
THE FENCING MASTER.
THE REMINISCENCES OF ANTONY.
CONSCIENCE.
PERE LA RUINF.
*THR GREAT MASSACRE. The first part of
Queen Margot.
*HENRI OF NAVARRE. The second part of
Queen Margot.
*THE WILD DUCK SHOOTER.
Illustrated Edition.
Demy 8vo. Cloth,
THK THREE MUSKETEERS. Illustrated in
Colour by Frank Adams, as. 6d,
THE PRINCE OF THIEVES. Illustrated hi
Colour by Frank Adams. 2S.
ROBIN HOOD THE OUTLAW. Illustrated in
Colour by Frank Adams. 2$.
THE CORSICAN BROTHERS. Illustrated in
Colour by A. M. M'Lellan. is. 6d.
THE WOLF-LEADER. Illustrated in Colour
by Frank Adams, if. 6d.
GEORGES. Illustrated in Colour by Munro Orr.
2$.
TWENTY YEARS AFTER. Illustrated in Colour
by Frank Adams. 3*.
AMAURY. Illustrated in Colour by Gordon
Browne. 2*.
THE SNOWBALL, and SULTANETTA. Illus
trated in Colour by Frank Adams, zs.
THE VICOMTE DE BRAGELONNE. Illustrated in
Colour by Frank Adams.
Part i. Louise de la Valliere. 3*.
Part ii. The Man in the Iron Mask. 3*.
*CROP-EARED JACQUOT ; JANE ; Etc. Illus.
trated in Colour by Gordon Browne, us.
THE CASTLE OF EPPSTEIN. Illustrated in
Colour by Stewart Orr. is. 6J.
ACTE. Illustrated in Colour by Gordon
Browne, if. 6</.
*CECILE ; OR, THE WEDDING GOWN. Illus
trated in Colour by D. Murray Smith.
is. 6</.
*THE ADVENTURES OK CAPTAIN PAMPHILK.
Illustrated in Colour by Frank Adams.
is. 6J.
Methuen's Sixpenny Books
Austen (Jane). PRIDE AND PRE
JUDICE.
Bagot (Richard). A ROMAN MYSTERY.
Balfour (Andrew). BY STROKE OF
SWORD.
Baring-Gould (S.). FURZE BLOOM.
CHEAP JACK ZITA.
KITTY ALONE.
URITH.
THE BROOM SQUIRE.
IN THE ROAR OF THE SEA.
NOEMI.
A BOOK OF FAIRY TALES. Illustrated.
LITTLE TU'PENNY.
THE FROBISHERS.
Barr (Robert). JENNIE BAXTER.
JOURNALIST.
IN
THE MIDST OF ALARMS.
THE COUNTESS TEKLA.
THE MUTABLE MANY.
Benson (E. F.). DODO.
Bronte (Charlotte). SHIRLEY.
Brownell (C. L.). THE HEART OF
JAPAN.
Burton (J. Bloundelle). ACROSS THE
SALT SEAS.
Caffyn"(Mrs).,('Iota'). ANNE MAULE-
VERER.
'Capes (Bernard). THE LAKE OF
WINE.
Clifford (Mrs. W. K.). A FLASH OF
SUMMER.
MRS. KEITH'S CRIME.
Connell (F. Norreys). THE NIGGER
KNIGHTS.
Corbett (Julian). A BUSINESS IN-
GREAT WATERS.
Croker (Mrs. B. M.). PEGGY OF THE
BARTONS.
A STATE SECRET.
ANGEL.
JOHANNA.
Dante (Alighieri). THE VISION OF
DANTE (CARY).
Doyle (A. Conan). ROUND THE RED
LAMP.
Duncan (Sara Jeannette). A VOYAGE
OF CONSOLATION
THOSE DELIGHTFUL AMERICANS.
MESSRS. METHUEN'S CATALOGUE
Eliot (George). THE MILL ON THE
FLOSS.
Findlater (Jane H.). THE GREEN
GRAVES OF BALGOWRIE.
Gallon (Tom). RICKERBY'S FOLLY.
GaskelKMrs.). CRANFORD.
MARY BARTON.
NORTH AND SOUTH.
Gerard (Dorothea). HOLY MATRL
MONY.
THE CONQUEST OF LONDON.
MADE OF MONEY.
Qissing (George). THE TOWN TRAVEL-
LER.
THE CROWN OF LIFE.
Ulanville (Ernest). THE INCA'S
TREASURE.
THE KLOOF BRIDE.
Gleig (Charles). HUNTER'S CRUISE.
Urimm (The Brothers). GRIMM'S
FAIRY TALES. Illustrated.
Hope (Anthony). A MAN OF MARK.
A CHANGE OF AIR.
THE CHRONICLES OF COUNT
ANTONIO.
PHROSO.
THE DOLLY DIALOGUES.
Hornung (E. W.). DEAD MEN TELL
NO TALES.
Ingraham (J. H.). THE THRONE OF
DAVID.
Le Queux (W.). THE HUNCHBACK OF
WESTMINSTER.
*Levett-Yeats(S. K.). THE TRAITOR'S
WAY.
Llnton (E. Lynn). THE TRUE HIS
TORY OF JOSHUA DAVIDSON.
Lyall(Edna). DERRICK VAUGHAN.
Malet(Lucas). THE CARISSIMA.
A COUNSEL OF PERFECTION.
Mann (Mrs. M. E.). MRS. PETER
HOWARD.
A LOST ESTATE.
THE CEDAR STAR.
Marchmont (A W.). MISER HOAD
LEY'S SECRET.
A MOMENT'S ERROR.
Marryat (Captain). PETER SIMPLE.
JACOB FAITHFUL.
Marsh (Richard). THE TWICKENHAM
PEERAGE.
THE GODDESS.
THE JOSS.
Mason (A. E. W.). CLEMENTINA.
Mathers (Helen). HONEY.
GRIFF OF GRIFFITHSCOURT.
SAM'S SWEETHEART
Meade (Mrs. L. T.). DRIFT.
Mitford (Bertram). THE SIGN OF THE
SPIDER.
Montresor (F. F.). THE ALIEN.
Moore (Arthur). THE GAY DECEIVERS.
Morrison (Arthur). THE HOLE IN
THE WALL.
Nesblt(E.). THE RED HOUSE.
Morris (W. E.). HIS GRACE.
GILES INGILBY.
THE CREDIT OF THE COUNTY.
LORD LEONARD.
MATTHEW AUSTIN.
CLARISSA FURIOSA.
Oliphant (Mrs.). THE LADY'S WALK.
SIR ROBERT'S FORTUNE.
THE PRODIGALS.
Oppenheim (E. Phillips). MASTER O/
MEN.
Parker (Gilbert). THE POMP OF THi:
LAVILETTES.
WHEN VALMONDCAMETO PONTIAC.
THE TRAIL OF THE SWORD.
Pemberton (Max). THE FOOTSTEPS
OF A THRONE.
I CROWN THEE KING.
Phillpotts (Eden). THE HUMAN BOY
CHILDREN OF THE MIST.
Ridge ( W. Pett). A SON OF THE STATE.
LOST PROPERTY.
GEORGE AND THE GENERAL.
Russell (W. Clark). A MARRIAGE AT
SEA.
ABANDONED.
MY DANISH SWEETHEART.
Sergeant (Adeline). THE MASTER OF
BEECHWOOD.
BARBARA'S MONEY.
THE YELLOW DIAMOND.
Surtees (R. S.). HANDLEY CROSS.
Illustrated.
MR. SPONGE'S SPORTING TOUR.
Illustrated.
ASK MAMMA. Illustrated.
I Valentine (Major E. S.). VELDT AND
LAAGER.
Walford (Mrs. L. B.). MR. SMITH.
THE BABY'S GRANDMOTHER.
Wallace (General Lew). BEN-HUR.
THE FAIR GOD.
Watson (H. B. Marriot). THE ADVEN-
TURERS.
Weekes (A. B.). PRISONERS OF WAR.
Wells (H.G.). THE STOLEN BACILLUS.
*White (Percy). A PASSIONATE
PILGRIM.
BS
2675
HENSON
APOSTOLIC
CHRISTIANITY